LMC 2001- present Professor Karen Scrivener, FREng 1980-1984 PhD - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

lmc 2001 present
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

LMC 2001- present Professor Karen Scrivener, FREng 1980-1984 PhD - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

LMC 2001- present Professor Karen Scrivener, FREng 1980-1984 PhD Imperial College Development of Microstructure during the Hydration of Portland Cement 10 hr 24 hr 5 hr Backscattered Electron Imaging What is relevance? 1995-2001 LCR,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

LMC 2001- present

Professor Karen Scrivener, FREng

slide-2
SLIDE 2

5 hr 10 hr 24 hr

Development of Microstructure during the Hydration of Portland Cement

1980-1984 PhD Imperial College

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Backscattered Electron Imaging

slide-4
SLIDE 4

What is relevance?

slide-5
SLIDE 5

1995-2001 LCR, Lafarge: Head of Calcium Aluminate Research

Academia to Industry UK to France

slide-6
SLIDE 6

March 2001: Laboratory of Construction Materials EPFL

slide-7
SLIDE 7

How to be relevant in Academia?

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Creation of NANOCEM

  • May 2002: first meeting, 6 partners, Paris
  • Unsuccessful bid for EU network of excellence
  • March 2003: Decision to form independent consortium
  • May 2004: signature of consortium agreement

n Continuing activity - indefinite duration

slide-9
SLIDE 9

An Industrial Academic Partnership for Fundamental Research

  • n Cementitious Materials
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Partner research projects

€s

For Core research programme

slide-11
SLIDE 11

ACADEMIA INDUSTRY

Long term advance

  • f knowledge

Integration of knowledge into new products and processes

Areas where lack of understanding or quantitative measurement blocks progress Interpretation of knowledge and clarification of possible progress areas

Industrial - academic dialog

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Industrial partners

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Academic partners

slide-14
SLIDE 14

What does this mean for LMC?

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Personnel of LMC: ~10 PhD students; 4 postdocs 1 senior researcher; 4 technical staff, visitors

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Microstructural Modelling Quantitative Microstructural Characterisation

Our approach

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Research areas

Hydration Durability

Transport properties ASR Sulfate attack

Specialist binders “Green” cement and concrete

carbonation

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Composition, Mixing, Time, Temperature, RH, etc

Microstructure lies at the heart link between composition and performance

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Microstructural analysis methods

XRD Electron Microscopy - SEM/TEM Proton NMR MIP, TGA, etc

19

10 20 30 40 50 60 100 200 300 Intensity 2q(°)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Microstructural analysis methods

n Sample preparation n Calorimetry n Chemical shrinkage n XRD n Electron Microscopy

  • SEM/TEM

n Proton NMR n MIP, TGA, etc

Written mostly by the students doing the experiments

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Schweizerische Eidgenossenschaft Confédération suisse Confederazione Svizzera Confederaziun svizra Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation SDC

5th

th Do

Doctoral school LC3

Characterisation methods of blended cements 23rd – 26th April 2019 EPFL, Lausanne Switzerland

www.LC3.ch

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

MOOC launched September 2017

n

Includes lectures and practical demonstrations:

n

All available on U tube

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Nowadays global warming is biggest challenge facing us

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

n 830 Billion Tons carbon dioxide!

  • This is the CO2-budget remaining to be emitted if we want to keep

global warming at a maximum of 2 Degrees Celsius temperature increase.

n Emissions in 2017: 36.79 billion tonnes n At this rate we will exceed this amount in 23 years – 2041! n Even if we cut emissions by 50% tomorrow

it will be exceeded in 46 years

n We do not have 100 years to wait for Nanotechnology to deliver! n WE NEED TO ACT NOW

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Cement Based Materials: cannot be replaced by alternatives

2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000 Cementitious Wood Ceramic Iron Lime Asphalt Glass Aluminium Copper Materials production (Mt/year)

Cementitious materials make up ~50%

  • f everything we produce.

In the light of this, CO2 emissions of 5-10% very good

slide-26
SLIDE 26

What is available on earth?

Na2O K2O Fe2O3 MgO CaO SiO2 Al2O3 Too soluble Too low mobility in alkaline solutions The most useful

Mg K rest Na Ca Fe Al Si O

Slag cement blend

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Al2O3 CaO Portland Cement Calcium aluminate / calcium sulfo aluminate BUT, what sources of minerals are there which contain Al2O3 >> SiO2 ? Bauxite – localised, under increasing demand for Aluminium production, EXPENSIVE Even if all current bauxite production diverted would still only replace 10-15% of current demand. SiO2

Hydraulic minerals in system CaO-SiO2-Al2O3

Less CaO > less CO2

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Portland based cements will continue to dominate

Blended cements are the most realistic option to reduce CO2 and extend resources

slide-29
SLIDE 29

2000 4000 6000

Calcined Clay Filler Portland cement Fly ash Slag Natural Pozzolan Vegetable ashes waste glass silica fume

Mt/yr Used Available

limestone

Availability of SCMs

Classic SCMs – fly ash and slag are

  • nly around 15% of current cement

production, will drop to < 10% in near future

slide-30
SLIDE 30

LC3

LC3 is a family of cements, the figure refers to the clinker content

  • 50% less clinker
  • 30% less CO2
  • Similar strength
  • Better chloride resistance
  • ASR resistant

20 40 60 80 100 PC PPC30 LC3-50 LC3-65 Mass proportion (%)

Gypsum Limestone Calcined clay Clinker 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

PC LC3-50

Compressive strength (MPa) 1 day 7 days 28 days 90 days

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Huge amounts of suitable clays presently stockpiled as waste

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Trial productions in Cuba and India

Housing materials produced in factories by unskilled workers with no special training at 1:1 replacement

7 t

  • n

n e s C O 2 s a v e d

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Global cement production Billion tons/year Clinker factor, global average % Global SCM volume Billion tones/year Global CO2 reduction Million tones/year 2006 2.6 79 0.5 2050 (CSI study) 4.4 73 1.2 200 2050 (with LCC) 4.4 60 1.8 600

Global potential of LC3 ∆ = 400 million tonnes per yr > whole of CO2 emissions

  • f France

Potential impact of LC3 technology

IEA: International Energy Agency study for CSI: Cement Sustainability Initiative

  • f WBCSD: World Business

Council for Sustainable Development

slide-34
SLIDE 34

But LMC is much more than LC3

slide-35
SLIDE 35

40 PhD Theses

n

Lucie Baillon

n

Severine Lamberet

n

Mohsen Ben Haha

n

Xinyu Zhang

n

Prakash Mathur

n

Julien Kigelman

n

Thomas Schmidt*

n

Shashank Bishnoi

n

Mercedes Costoya

n

Ines Jaoudi

n

Rodrigo Fernandez

n

Christophe Gosslin

n

Cyrille Dunant

n

Vanessa Kocaba

35 n

Patrick Juilland

n

Ruzena Chamrova

n

Aude Chabrelie

n

Carolina Prieto

n

Alexandra Quennoz

n

Belay Dinesa*

n

Wolfgang Kunther*

n

Aditya Kumar

n

Olga Chowaniec

n

Theodore Chappex

n

Hui Chen

n

Quang Huy Do

n

Alain Giorla

n

Mathieu Antoni

n

Amelie Bazzoni

n

Mo Zalzale

n

John Rossen*

n

Arnaud Muller

n

Julien Bizzozeo

n

Emelie l’Hopital*

n

Elise Berodier

n

Luis Baquerizo

n

Berta Mota Gasso

n

Pawel Durdzinski

n

Zhangli Hu

n

Francois Avet

n

Frank Bullerjahn * with Barbara Lothenbach

slide-36
SLIDE 36

MXG 2nd floor Take stairs up one floor

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Coming soon…… “the book”

More than 100 journal publications More than 20 nationalities

37

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Many Thanks

Especially to Lab staff: Philippe Simonin; Lionel Sofia Secretarial staff: Maude Schneider; Anne Sandra Hofer and their predecessors Nanocem organizer: Marie Alix Dalang

38

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Funders

n EPFL n Swiss National Science Foundation n Nanocem n European Union n Federal Office for Dam Surveillance n Kerneos Aluminate Technologies n Holcim n Heidelberg n SCG n GCC n Grace n Cemsuisse

39