WSLHD A Clinical Services Redesign Project Carrie Marr Executive - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

wslhd
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

WSLHD A Clinical Services Redesign Project Carrie Marr Executive - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Medication Reconciliation WSLHD A Clinical Services Redesign Project Carrie Marr Executive Director Organisational Effectiveness, WSLHD August 2015 eMEDs Executive Sponsor Margaret Macarthur Director of Pharmacy BMDH & Pharmacy


slide-1
SLIDE 1

August 2015

Medication Reconciliation WSLHD

A Clinical Services Redesign Project

Carrie Marr

Executive Director Organisational Effectiveness, WSLHD eMEDs Executive Sponsor

Margaret Macarthur

Director of Pharmacy BMDH & Pharmacy Directorate,WSLHD

Annie Chong

eMEDs Pharmacist,WSLHD

slide-2
SLIDE 2

 4 teaching hospitals

– Westmead – Blacktown Mount Druitt (2 campuses) – Auburn – Cumberland

 7 Community Health Centres  > 876,500 local residents  > 9000 employees  2000 beds  Strategic Challenges:

– Population growth 2% per annum until 2021 (NSW average 1.2%) and 40% increase in people aged 65+ – 45% local residents speak a language

  • ther than English at home (NSW

average 24%) – >50% adult population is overweight

  • r obese

– Diabetes rates higher than NSW average

Improving access to information through technology is a key component of the strategy to enable clinicians to respond to the increase in demand for services.

Western Sydney LHD

slide-3
SLIDE 3

 Blacktown Hospital rolled out online clinical documentation in 2014;  Why?

– to provide secure, real time access to medical records for all staff at all locations; – new Clinical Services building designed without paper records storage; – preparing the ground for EMM.

We are “Paper-Lite”

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Clinical Services Redesign Framework

Project Approach

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • 1. Planning: Scope

4

  • During the EMM program planning exercise a number of options were considered

for how the District could implement solutions which would deliver benefits that are commensurate with the original EMM business case and represent best value for money.

  • Agreed scope of WSLHD EMM Program

Project Auburn Blacktown Cumberland Mount Druitt Westmead Antimicrobial stewardship     Pharmacy foundation projects      Medications reconciliation      Full electronic medications management 

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • 1. Planning: Governance structure

5

  • Setting up our governance structure
slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • 1. Planning: Schedule and Reporting

6

  • Setting up our schedule
slide-8
SLIDE 8

WSLHD & Paper-Lite Project Approach Planning Scope & Governance Diagnostic & Solution Implementation Sustainability Results & Summary

Speaker change

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Stakeholder mapping & Communication

8

Communication

Primary Care Providers Targeted

  • ne-to-one

clinician engagement Safe use of Medicines Committee District Drug Committee Clinical Leadership Forums Safety & Quality in Health Care Councils Medical Staff Councils Patients (Focus Groups) Departmental & Specialty meetings

Stakeholder Engagement

Meetings & Workshops One-to-one engagement Emails Corridor conversations

slide-10
SLIDE 10

8 25 3 3 39 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

Medical Nursing Pharmacy Other Total

Objective: identify the key challenges in taking a BPMH and ensuring the accuracy of patient’s medications across the patient journey.

  • Informal interviews were conducted over a 2

week period with 39 Blacktown Hospital staff across medical, nursing, and pharmacy staff.

  • Interview questions covered the end to end

patient journey, with particular emphasis on the admission and discharge process and the roles and responsibilities of clinical staff in medication management.

Staff Interviewed

Review best practice literature and findings from the CEC Blacktown medication audit Informal interviews with medical, nursing, and pharmacy staff to identify key issues Workshop to validate findings and receive feedback Interviews with GPs, community pharmacies and patient focus groups Solution Design Phase

  • Further issues identified through:

1. Interviews with GPs and Community Pharmacists 2. Patient focus group

  • 2. Diagnostic: Approach at Blacktown Hospital
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Impact Influence

Low High Low High

  • 1. ED Admission
  • 2. Inpatient
  • 3. Discharge

1

Roles and Responsibilities Systematic Process Admitting Team Rework

2 3

Transfer of Medication

4

Pharmacy Cover

5

Discharge Documentation

6

Day of discharge delays

7

Patient Education

8

  • 9. Performance Monitoring and Management

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

  • During a workshop on 16th January 2015

Blacktown clinical staff ranked the key 9 findings based on: 1. Impact – the impact of the problem on the recording of accurate medications information. 2. Influence – the ability of clinicians and the

  • rganisation to influence improvements in

each of the problem areas.

  • 2. Diagnostic: Key Findings Overview & Ranking Key
slide-12
SLIDE 12

34 38 32 3

107

20 40 60 80 100

Medical Nursing Pharmacy Other Total

The problems identified and prioritised during the diagnostic were used to structure the solution design phase.

  • A kick of workshop was held on the 27th of

February and was attended by 30 clinicians.

  • Working Groups were mobilised to develop

solutions to each of the problems. Clinicians were divided into 2 project work streams to focus on their area of expertise: 1. ED / Admission 2. Discharge

  • The groups have met 14 times over an eight week

period for one hour and actions were completed in between meetings.

Staff Working Group Attendance

11

December January February March April

Planning

Diagnostic Solution Design Implementation

Work Stream Meetings Interviews

  • 3. Solution Design approach at Blacktown Hospital
slide-13
SLIDE 13

12

Pre-arrival Emergency Department Inpatient Discharge

The solutions generated in the Working Groups are designed to improve the accuracy and handover of medication information between all clinicians involved in a patient’s management. This includes the communication of information between community and hospital based clinicians.

Medication Information Flow

  • 1. Pre-Arrival
  • 3. Medication

Handling

  • 2. Roles and

Responsibilities

  • 4. Discharge

Summary

  • 5. Medication List
  • 6. Patient Education

Solutions

GP Lists D/S Patient Initial Medication History Best Possible Medication History Discharge Summary Patient Friendly Medication List INBOUND INFORMATION OUTBOUND INFORMATION

  • 3. Solution Design: Local Solutions
slide-14
SLIDE 14
  • 3. Solution Design: An Example

13

My MEDS TAKE CONTROL OF YOUR MEDICATIONS

Medication name & strength How much to take When to take Reason (if known) 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15.

Why should I use it?

Have an up to date medications

record on you at all times that you can easily share with your care team, including during emergencies.

Scan

the barcode

  • n

your medication to upload details to the app.

Record

  • ther

vital health information, e.g. allergies.

Set alarms to remind you to take

your medication.

MedicineList+ is an app that helps you manage medications for yourself and the people you care for. Is there a smarter way to take control of my medications?

YES!

Download for free at

www.medicinelistplus.com.au

My MEDS

Show this list to your Doctor

  • r Pharmacist

My name is My Contact Information is Emergency Contact Name Phone

Fold Here

slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • 4. Implementation: Education & Communication
  • Weekly Working & Progress Group meetings
  • Email updates
  • Weekly Newsletters
  • Training sessions for all health clinicians
  • Announcement though Broadcast & Grand Rounds
  • Medication Reconciliation Launch morning tea
  • Champions modelling “bright blue” T-shirts for the week of the launch for

ground support

slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • 5. Sustainability

15

A key theme of the project was medications being everyone’s business, so all health clinicians involved with patient’s medication management will be accountable

  • Changes monitored at:
  • Admission (BPMH, Medication Reconciliation)
  • Discharge (Completion statistics, quality of discharges)
  • Changes monitored via:
  • Snapshot audits
  • Pharmacy interventions, medication lists provision
  • Surveys
  • Data from i.Pharmacy and Cerner
  • Hospital committee will continue to monitor progress regularly
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Result & Dashboards

16

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Summary: Enablers & Barriers of the project

17

Barriers Enablers

Introducing a paper tool when already Paper-Lite Interim solution Not everyone was aware Engaged staff early Certain critics of change Recognition of champions Extra workload beliefs Tailoring training material More accountability Engagement by own profession Lower uptake to start Clinical Lead Misunderstanding eMEDs team role progression Dedicated support by eMEDs team to facilitate Implementing at other sites My MEDS leaflet tool

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Carrie Marr – WSLHD Executive Director Organisational Effectiveness carrie.marr@health.nsw.gov.au Annie Chong – WSLHD eMEDs Pharmacist annie.chong@health.nsw.gov.au

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Appendix – CSR Project Approach Summary

Activities

  • Mobilise and define project team

and roles

  • Establish LHD governance for

initiative

  • Project plan:

− Establish project objectives and KPIs − Request and receipt of data − Status and risk reporting

  • Change management:

− Stakeholder mapping − Communication plan − Plan patient engagement strategies − Capability training for Planning and Diagnostics

  • High level ‘as-is’ process mapping
  • Data analysis to inform:

− Workflow characteristics − Performance (incidents; compliance; quality) − Activity / volume − Target segmentation / risk stratification − Manual data collection (where required)

  • Interviews:

− Pharmacists − Doctors (Consultants; Registrars; Residents − Patient stories − Nursing

  • Capability training for Solutions

Design

  • Validation workshop
  • Existing good practice from

ACSQHC; CEC; exemplar sites; existing LHD projects to provide input into design workshops

  • Collaborative solutions design

workshops: − Strengths based development: defining the vision, outlining the path, building the components − Develop standard ‘principles’ for medication reconciliation across WSLHD − Identify areas for local adaption of these principles in processes at each hospital (e.g. who performs a task dependent on staffing) − Outline process changes (‘to-be’ process − Outline behaviour changes (who are we expecting to act and do differently)

  • Capability training for

Implementation

  • Construct:

− Components of solution developed: process, tools, education and communication materials, reporting, policy/procedure − Confirm KPI definition, baseline, targets, collection and reporting plan − Pilot implementation work plan finalised (cohort/speciality/ward etc.)

  • Education and training:

− Change teams and champions identified and resources allocated − Training on process, roles, accountabilities and reporting conducted

  • ‘Go-live’ Pilot:

− Operationalise medication reconciliation process − Begin KPI monitoring and reporting − Real time feedback and revision

  • Capability training for

Implementation management

  • Continued implementation at each

site:

  • Regular tracking and reporting
  • Celebrate outcomes, address non-

compliance, communicate benefits to staff and patients

  • Ongoing feedback on process and

corrective responses

  • Automated reporting developed

(reporting across LHD to promote competition to be considered)

  • Medication reconciliation process

incorporated into formal structures: policy, procedures, Position Descriptions

  • Implementation checks conducted

using the NHS sustainability framework Benefits

  • Clarity of project team roles and

responsibilities

  • Defined accountabilities through

project governance

  • Timely access to data
  • The right messages from the start

about who will be impacted, what the approach is and what the aims are

  • Clarity of purpose and intent for

engaging with patients and staff

  • Baseline performance established
  • Evidence based case for change

(qualitative and quantitative data)

  • Establish potential benefits of

medication reconciliation for local site

  • Patient stories to emphasise case

for change

  • Engagement and awareness of

impact of medication reconciliation processes

  • Leading practice solutions identified

and innovation explored

  • Collaborative design workshops

promote ownership of improvements (potential to involve patients as best practice)

  • Solutions developed to promote

LHD standardisation through principles, with flexibility to achieve local implementation

  • Determine benefits, risks, costs and

performance measures for solutions

  • Local working groups and change

champions to lead, own and direct the change

  • Structured implementation plans,

feedback mechanisms, messaging and reporting

  • Sustain change and benefits
  • f medication reconciliation

process

  • Preparation for EMM

implementation

Outputs

  • Project Plan
  • Communications Plan
  • Capability Plan
  • Case for change report
  • Solutions Design Briefs
  • Detailed design components
  • Education and training materials
  • Policy and procedures
  • Pilot conducted
  • Finalised implementation plan
  • Sustained implementation success

Phase 1: Planning Phase 2: Diagnostics Phase 3: Solutions Design Phase 4: Implementation Phase 5: Sustain

1 2 3 4 5