Long term stabilization of Sb in MSWI bottom ash Bram Verbinnen Jo - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

long term stabilization of sb in mswi bottom ash
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Long term stabilization of Sb in MSWI bottom ash Bram Verbinnen Jo - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Long term stabilization of Sb in MSWI bottom ash Bram Verbinnen Jo Van Caneghem, Pieter Billen, Carlo Vandecasteele KU Leuven, Belgium Cyprus 2016 conference, 23/06/2016 MSWI Bottom Ash 2 MSWI Bottom Ash Each application: specific


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Long term stabilization of Sb in MSWI bottom ash

Bram Verbinnen

Jo Van Caneghem, Pieter Billen, Carlo Vandecasteele

KU Leuven, Belgium Cyprus 2016 conference, 23/06/2016

slide-2
SLIDE 2

MSWI Bottom Ash

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

MSWI Bottom Ash

  • Each application: specific chemical barrier
  • Most barriers can be overcome!
  • Some problems remain, or more strict legislation
  • Netherlands: Green Deal
  • By 2017: 50% of BA in applications without protective measures
  • By 2020: No more use in applications with protective measures
  • Enhanced recovery of NF metals
  • Most problematic: leaching of Sb

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Sb leaching

4

  • Sb leaching known to be governed by:
  • Formation of calcium antimonates (romeites)1
  • Adsorption to iron (hydr)oxides
  • Formation of iron antimonate (tripuhyite, FeSbO4)2
  • (Incorporation in ettringite)
  • All pH dependent!

1: Cornelis et al..: Antimony leaching from MSWI bottom ash: Modelling of the effect of pH and carbonation. Waste Management 32, 278-286 (2012) 2: Okkenhaug et al..: Treatment of air pollution control residues with iron rich waste sulfuric acid: Does it work for antimony (Sb)? Journal of Hazardous Materials 248, 159-166 (2013)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Reduce Sb leaching

  • Based on these mechanisms: addition of
  • Fe- and Ca- salts
  • Industrial waste streams containing Fe- and Ca-salts
  • Experimental
  • Short term leaching behavior
  • Lab batch tests
  • Middle-long term leaching behavior
  • Outdoor field tests
  • Long term leaching behavior
  • Lab carbonation tests

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Short term leaching behavior

  • pH dependent leaching behavior
  • Addition of:

Fe- and Ca-containing compounds Fe- and Ca-containing industrial residues (10%)

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Short term leaching behavior

7

  • Additives:
  • Ca-compounds
  • CaO, CaCl2: formation and precipitation of romeites
  • CaCO3: less soluble, no precipitation
  • Fe-compounds
  • Formation of tripuhyite
  • Industrial residues
  • Formation of Ca-antimonates (A2, A3: soluble Ca-compounds)
  • No adsorption on iron oxides (A1: no soluble Ca-compounds,

iron oxides)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Middle-long term leaching behavior

  • Outdoor field tests
  • Sb concentrations initially decreased
  • Lower than untreated BA & regulatory limit value
  • Increase slightly over time as pH decreases
  • Romeites become more soluble at lower pH values

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Long term leaching behavior

  • Carbonation
  • BA: decreasing
  • Fe2(SO4)3: initially lower, increasing

0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1 1,2 1,4 1,6 1,8 4,0 6,0 8,0 10,0 12,0 14,0

Sb Leaching concentration (mgkgDM

  • 1)

Leachate pH pH sweep BA 2.5% Fe2(SO4)3 Dutch limit value

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Long term leaching behavior

  • Carbonation
  • A2: initially lower, increasing, below limit value
  • A3: initially lower, increasing, around limit value

0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1 1,2 1,4 1,6 1,8 4,0 6,0 8,0 10,0 12,0 14,0

Sb Leaching concentration (mgkgDM

  • 1)

Leachate pH pH sweep BA 10% A2 10% A3 Dutch limit value

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Long term leaching behavior

11

  • Sb leaching from treated BA increasing after carbonation
  • Romeites more soluble at lower pH1
  • Sb leaching from untreated BA decreases after carbonation
  • Can not be explained by 4 mechanisms

1: Cornelis et al..: Antimony leaching from MSWI bottom ash: Modelling of the effect of pH and carbonation. Waste Management 32, 278-286 (2012)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Additional tests

  • Explain Sb leaching from untreated BA after carbonation
  • Leaching behavior similar to Cu leaching
  • Sb leaching also influenced by organic acids?
  • Sb known to form complexes with organic acids3
  • Heat treatment (400°C, 30 min)
  • Addition of activated carbon

12

pH

4 6 8 10 12 14

Cu leached (mg/kg)

1 10 pH dependent leaching After carbonation

pH

4 6 8 10 12 14

Sb leached (mg/kg)

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 pH dependent leaching After carbonation

Sb Cu

3: Steely et al.: An investigation of inorganic antimony species and antimony associated with soil humic acid molar mass fractions in contaminated soils. Environmental Pollution 148, 590-598 (2007)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Leaching behavior after heat treatment and AC addition

  • Behavior similar to Cu
  • AC addition: adsorption of complexes on AC
  • Heat treatment: decarboxylation of organic acids
  • Carbonation: adsorption of organo-metallic complexes4?

pH

4 6 8 10 12 14

Cu leached (mg/kg)

0.01 0.1 1 10 pH dependent leaching After carbonation Activated carbon Heating pH 4 6 8 10 12 14 Sb leached (mg/kg) 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2

pH dependent Carbonation Activated carbon Heating

Additional tests

13

Sb Cu

4: Arickx et al..: Effect of carbonation on the leaching of organic carbon and of copper from MSWI bottom ash. Waste Management 30, 1296-1302 (2010)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Conclusions

  • Sb leaching from MSWI BA can be reduced by addition of

chemical compounds and Ca- and Fe-containing industrial residues

  • Effect of addition endures in middle-long and long term

leaching experiments

  • More insight is gained in mechanisms governing Sb

leaching from MSWI BA:

  • Plausible that organic matter plays a role
  • Influence needs to be further investigated

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Thank you!

Bram.verbinnen@kuleuven.be