effectiveness
play

effectiveness Prepared by: David Pryce & Reshma Kolambkar - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Diabetes Inpatient Surveillance Dashboard: Evaluation of effectiveness Prepared by: David Pryce & Reshma Kolambkar Business Analytics Services WSLHD Health Data Analytics October 2019 Aim Evaluation of effectiveness of dashboard


  1. Diabetes Inpatient Surveillance Dashboard: Evaluation of effectiveness Prepared by: David Pryce & Reshma Kolambkar Business Analytics Services WSLHD Health Data Analytics October 2019

  2. Aim • Evaluation of effectiveness of dashboard • Evaluation of impact on clinical activities

  3. Introduction  Western Sydney has a high  Generating and maintaining prevalence of Diabetes. an updated list of these individuals was challenging.  Testing Diabetes is not a routine in all hospitals in WSLHD.  Mid-2016 - HbA1c Screening tests at Blacktown and Mt. Druitt ED commenced.  Revealed alarming rate – 17% Diabetes (HbA1c > 6.5 ) – 30% Pre-diabetes (HbA1c 5.7 - 6.4)

  4. Background  Diabetes Inpatient Surveillance Dashboard developed  Improve identification of diabetes patients across Hospital  Provide Pop Health view if HbA1c Testing (>100k)  Enable improved management of inpatients by Diabetes Team via MOC

  5. Data Source

  6. Dashboard as a tool

  7. Evaluation Method

  8. Quantitative evaluation  Currently – Length of Stay (LOS) – Reduce in the LOS by ~2days – CMI – No signification improvement Clinical Indicators – 6 Months Before Comparison Indicator 6 months After (Average length of stay in days ) (05/05/2018 – 04/11/2018) (05/11/2018 – 04/05/2019) Primary Diagnoses is diabetes - Including 0.51 ↓ Gestational Diabetes 3.93 3.42 Primary Diagnoses is diabetes - Excluding 0.48 ↓ Gestational Diabetes 3.93 3.45 Identified diabetes in any diagnoses - 0.99 ↓ Including Gestational Diabetes 5.36 4.37 Identified diabetes in any diagnoses - 1.95 ↓ excluding Gestational Diabetes 7.19 5.24  In future, planning to consider HAC for diabetes complication

  9. Qualitative evaluation

  10. Qualitative evaluation

  11. Evaluation Results  Improved identification diabetes patients  Improved clinical management of hyperglycaemia and hypoglycaemia  Improved identification of undiagnosed diabetes in pregnancy.  Reduce inpatient length of stay  Dashboard helped identifying data quality issues  User feedback - easy review of all diabetes patients across the whole hospital

  12. Discussion  Better outcomes via reduced LOS  Need to analyse the Model of Care – to determine Improved evaluation metrics  Usefulness of the dashboard as a tool by end users  Staff are using the dashboard for MOC Operational and research purposes  Some better evaluation metrics could be TAT, Complications, eGFR, measures of Liver/Kidney conditions

  13. Conclusion • The evaluation carried out showed a decrease in the Average length of stay • Feedback from clinician that dashboard helped to quickly identify patient and provide better care • Triangulation of data from different sources can provide a comprehensive view of diabetes patient journey in hospital. • Dashboard enables complex data set to be easily accessed by clinicians on one platform.

  14. Thank You to the Project Team  Project Sponsor – Dr Tien-Ming Hng, Head of Endocrinology Department, Blacktown Mt Druitt Hospitals  BAS Team – Ching Luo (Senior Analyst Developer), Reshma Kolambkar (Senior Business Data Analyst)  BAS Manger – David Pryce

  15. Feedback/Questions?

  16. Thank You !!!

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend