WORLD WAR II BUFFET 15 OCTOBER 2020 KEY FACTORS AND ISSUES - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

world war ii buffet
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

WORLD WAR II BUFFET 15 OCTOBER 2020 KEY FACTORS AND ISSUES - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

WORLD WAR II BUFFET 15 OCTOBER 2020 KEY FACTORS AND ISSUES Dr. Joe Fitzharris Professor Emeritus of History The University of St. Thomas OVERVIEW HITLERS DECISION TO RESCUE THE ITALIANS IN THE BALKANS AND DELAY OPERATION


slide-1
SLIDE 1

WORLD WAR II BUFFET

15 OCTOBER 2020 KEY FACTORS AND ISSUES

  • Dr. Joe Fitzharris

Professor Emeritus of History The University of St. Thomas

slide-2
SLIDE 2

OVERVIEW

  • HITLER’S DECISION TO RESCUE THE ITALIANS IN THE

BALKANS AND DELAY OPERATION BARBAROSSA

  • GERMAN DECLARATION OF WAR AGAINST US
  • THE US’S 90 DIVISION GAMBLE
  • MONTGROMERY’S ARNHEM OFFENSIVE
  • HITLER’S DECISION TO CONTINUE THE “FINAL

SOLUTION” AT MAXIMU EFFORT

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Our Questions

  • What happened when and by whom
  • Why did it happen
  • What was/were the expected outcome/s?
  • Were there alternatives?
  • What was/were the actual outcome/s?
slide-4
SLIDE 4

HITLER’S DECISION TO RESCUE THE ITALIANS IN THE BALKANS AND DELAY OPERATION BARBAROSSA

slide-5
SLIDE 5

THE BALKANS CAMPAIGN IMPACTS BARBAROSSA

  • Germany wanted peace to ensure Romanian oil, raw

materials, and foodstuffs flowed up the Danube to Germany

  • Operation SEA LION postponed (Sept 40) when Luftwaffe

failed to win the “Battle of Britain” allowed shift to eastern problem

  • Führer Directive 21 - order for the invasion of the USSR

(Dec 40)

  • Afrika Korps diverted resources (Feb 41- May 43) from

Barbarossa

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Mussolini gave Hitler a “Surprise”

  • October 1940 Italy aded Greece

through Albania

  • Germany needed to protect the

Danube supply line - hence aid Italy in Greece

  • Necessitated arrangements with
  • Yugoslavia. Regent Prince Paul,

who joined the Tripartite Pact, was overthrown in a coup d’état

  • n 26 Mar 41 by Serbian
  • fficers.
  • Hitler saw this as Serbs again

being problematic and chose to crush Yugoslavia at same time

slide-7
SLIDE 7

OPERATION MARITA

  • Italians invaded in October 40
  • Greeks counter-attacked

successfully driving the Italians back to their start line on the Greece-Albania border in March 41

  • 6 April 41 German forces invade

through Bulgaria opening a second front

  • Small British-ANZAC force

hindered advance but was forced to surrender 30 Apr

  • OPERATION MERKUR followed

in May 41

slide-8
SLIDE 8

OPERATION 25

  • 10 days to prepare
  • Operation PUNISHMENT
  • verwhelming air assault
  • n Belgrade 6-10 April
  • Ground attacks began 6

Apr - seizure of bridges

  • ver Danube.
  • 12 days to completion.
  • Guerrilla and partisan

warfare began soon after.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

EXPECTED

  • Remove threats to Danube supply line
  • Protect Balkans resources
  • Secure southern flank (Greece and Crete)
  • Teach verdamnt Serbs a lesson
  • Secure Yugoslavia
  • Delay Barbarossa but “Nie Probleme!”
slide-10
SLIDE 10

UNEXPECTED: IMPACT ON BARBAROSSA

  • Many units involved in 25 and MARITA were to join Barbarossa

before the invasion began or to do so in the second wave.

  • Limited rail connections in the Balkans generally meant slow

movement of troops, and especially mechanized and logistics units.

  • Barbarossa was planned for mid-May, delayed to 22 June -

and the Russian winter of 1941-42 came early. As a result, the Germans only saw the spires of the Kremlin.

  • Tied down two or three field armies (10-12 divisions, air assets,

naval units) for the rest of the war pacifying Balkans

slide-11
SLIDE 11

GERMAN DECLARATION OF WAR AGAINST THE US

slide-12
SLIDE 12

GERMANY DECLARES WAR

  • NO treaty obligation to do

so.

  • England stood alone.

Europe was Hitler’s. Barbarossa going well.

  • Vague VERBAL commitment

to assist Japan if …

  • Decision was made by Adolf

Hitler personally.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

ADDRESSING THE REICHSTAG

11 Dec 1941

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Why?

  • Was Hitler (and his henchmen) just nuts?
  • Had avoided war by ignoring US provocations at sea and in

economic war

  • US troops were stationed in Greenland and Iceland and the

USN guarded convoys to Iceland

  • Assumed with victory in Europe, confrontation with US

inevitable

  • Decadent, racially inferior (Blacks, Jews), “mongrel” nation

dominated by pacifistic isolationists

slide-15
SLIDE 15

ALTERNATIVE?

  • Continue to ignore USN violations and maintain “cordial

animosity”

  • Respond with diplomatic notes and propaganda in US

aimed at isolationists and pacifists (overlapping sets)

  • Make FDR seek war without provocation (again the

isolationists and pacifists and German- and Italian- and Irish-Americans and probably Scandinavian-Americans, and most Midwesterners and Plains-states people would

  • bject strenuously
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Outcomes:

  • Expected:
  • More of Same - US army inferior, aircraft too, only Navy
  • f any worry and after Pearl Harbor, the Japanese

would keep us busy

  • Actual:
  • Arsenal of the Allies, an army that learned and got

enormously better, an air force that blanketed the skies, and a navy larger than all the other navies

slide-17
SLIDE 17

OUTCOME: Berlin, May 1945

Definitely NOT a good idea!

slide-18
SLIDE 18

THE US’S 90 DIVISION GAMBLE

slide-19
SLIDE 19

THE US’S 90 DIVISION GAMBLE

  • Purposeful decision to limit US Army to 90 combat division

equivalents (does NOT include Marines or air/sea manpower)

  • Made by Marshall, and Stimson
  • Points system (for morale purposes) to bring men home -

effectively demobilizing them.

  • Draft exempted certain classes of men.
  • Women were not at first considered part of the “manpower”

pool.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

PURPOSES

  • Preserve home front manpower for economic production

(our primary responsibility)

  • 1940 estimates indicated this was about the size army we

could created, deploy, and support in the field.

  • Induction quotas for Selective Service System were set

accordingly, varying as conditions changed, but based on this basic assumption.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

ALTERNATIVE(S)?

  • Given the US role as primary producer of the materiel of

war and food for the Allies

  • Take more men early (fewer exemptions) and keep

them (no points system) and risk morale issues

  • Take fewer men (more exemptions) and have serious

manpower problems either in the logistics tail or in the combat teeth

slide-22
SLIDE 22

OUTCOMES

  • Manpower shortages in Europe - During the Battles of the

Hurtgen Forrest and of the Bulge in particular

  • Expected manpower needs for the Invasion of Japan

(entered the manpower calculations in 1945) exacerbated the problem

  • The “points” for going home - effectively demobilization -

made the problem worse by removing combat experienced troops and experienced medical personnel.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

MONTGOMERY’S ARNHEM OFFENSIVE

slide-24
SLIDE 24

MONTGOMERY’S ARNHEM OFFENSIVE, “MARKET–GARDEN”

  • Allied advanced far faster and further than planners expected,
  • utrunning logistical infrastructure.
  • POL pipelines and the “Red Ball Express” could not deliver

enough gas.

  • Ike had decided on broad front advance (contra Monty -

relieved as Allied GFC) but allocated resources to this gamble

  • US Twelfth Army group advance halted, short of gas (given to

21st Army group)

slide-25
SLIDE 25
slide-26
SLIDE 26
slide-27
SLIDE 27

WHY MARKET–GARDEN?

  • Allied Airborne army seeking use planned COMET
  • MARKET with double airborne forces teamed with

GARDEN ground assault to open North German Plain

  • Provide crossing of Rhine
  • Neutralize Industrial heartland in the Ruhr
  • Estimates of German strength in region greatly

understated, making venture look reasonable

slide-28
SLIDE 28

WHAT HAPPENED

  • Montgomery was audacious -

uncharacteristically, ignored intelligence and topography and Dutch resistance

  • FM Montgomery’s 21st Army Group

launched 1st Allied Airborne Army (MARKET) at bridges across the Rhine at Zon and Eindhoven (101 AB), Grave, Nijmegan and the Mass- Waal Canal (82 AB), and at Arnhem (1 BR AB)

  • Ground forces (GARDEN) to link up

and use the bridgeheads so they could advance on Berlin, encircle the Ruhr, etc.

  • 101st and 82nd AB achieved
  • bjectives quickly - used all intell
slide-29
SLIDE 29

ALTERNATIVES

  • √ Clear Scheldt Estuary

approaches to Antwerp (Port taken by Brits in Sept) - make Port usable - a 15 mi advance!

  • √ Give Patton (US Third Army)

gas and let him race east, perhaps Metz would have fallen quickly

  • √ Give gas to Hodges (US First

Army) to try advancing on the Rhine

3√

slide-30
SLIDE 30

EXPECTED

  • Gain Crossing of the Rhine
  • By-pass Scheldt Estuary, cutting off Germans holding it
  • Shorten the war
  • (Monty in competition with Bradley’s (US First and

Third Armies) and Dever’s (Seventh Army) Army Groups to get the bragging rights to the first crossing (honors go to CCB, 9 AD, FIRST Army at Remagen on 7 March)

slide-31
SLIDE 31

ACTUAL RESULTS

  • Attack failed miserably
  • 1st BR AB and 1st Polish Airborne

Brigade heavy losses

  • No crossing of the Rhine in 1944
  • Weakend Allied build-up in north-

east (21st AG)

  • No end of the war inEurope in

1944

  • Dutch people suffered famine in

winter as Dutch RR workers struck and Germans forbade movement

  • f food - 20+k died
slide-32
SLIDE 32

HITER’S DECISION TO CONTINUE THE “FINAL SOLUTION” AT MAXIMUM EFFORT

slide-33
SLIDE 33

HITLER CONTINUES THE “FINAL SOLUTION” TO THE BITTER END

  • SS/Gestapo/local collaborator police rounding up Jews, etc.
  • Einsatzgruppen on eastern front
  • Guards for transportees, planning staff for movements
  • Railroad personnel and equipment for movement
  • Materiel for camp construction and operation, guards for

camps, etc.

  • Putting down of Warsaw Ghetto Uprising
slide-34
SLIDE 34

Concentration Camps in Greater Germany, 1944

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Major European Rail Lines, 1939

slide-36
SLIDE 36

COMPETITION WITH THE WAR EFFORT

  • Prisoners could be used as workers - Party theorist Alfred

Rosenberg argued to delay implementation and use Jews during war, then kill them

  • Took manpower and resources from the war effort for no

gain to Germany – unless eliminating the untermenschen

was of value

  • Diversion of rail transport. Troop trains were diverted onto

sidings so transports of Jews could get to the camps faster!

  • Army tasked to assist – greater priority than killing Russians!
slide-37
SLIDE 37

WHY?

  • Nazi Aryan Race Theory
  • Based upon American Eugenics thought and Nietzsche’s

notions

  • Goal of a Judenfrei (“Jew–free”) Greater Germany took

precedence over winning the war!

slide-38
SLIDE 38

RESULTS [and Implicit Alternative]

  • Even soldaten accepted Nazi ideology and goals
  • Army spent too much time eliminating Jews instead of

fighting

  • Too many resources went to the Final Solution
  • German war effort less than it could have been
  • Allied victory was difficult enough as was, in an alternative

world where Rosenberg’s advice was followed, Das Reich might still be.