When the catenary degree meets the tame degree in embedding - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

when the catenary degree meets the tame degree in
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

When the catenary degree meets the tame degree in embedding - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

When the catenary degree meets the tame degree in embedding dimension three numerical semigroups Caterina Viola Cortona - September 2014 based on P . A. Garc a-S anchez, C. Viola, When the catenary degree meets the tame degree in


slide-1
SLIDE 1

When the catenary degree meets the tame degree in embedding dimension three numerical semigroups

Caterina Viola Cortona - September 2014

slide-2
SLIDE 2

based on P . A. Garc´ ıa-S´ anchez, C. Viola, When the catenary degree meets the tame degree in embedding dimension three numerical semigroups, to appear in Involve.

  • S. T. Chapman, P

. A. Garc´ ıa-S´ anchez, Z. Tripp, C. Viola,

ω-primality in embedding dimension three numerical

semigroups, preprint.

  • M. Delgado, P

. A. Garc´ ıa-S´ anchez, J. J. Morais, GAP pakage numericalsgps

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Setup

Let S = n1, . . . , np be a p-generated numerical semigroup.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Setup

Let S = n1, . . . , np be a p-generated numerical semigroup. A factorization of s ∈ S is an element x = (x1, . . . , xp) ∈ Np such that x1n1 + · · · + xpnp = s.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Setup

Let S = n1, . . . , np be a p-generated numerical semigroup. A factorization of s ∈ S is an element x = (x1, . . . , xp) ∈ Np such that x1n1 + · · · + xpnp = s. The length of x is |x| = x1 + · · · + xp.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Setup

Let S = n1, . . . , np be a p-generated numerical semigroup. A factorization of s ∈ S is an element x = (x1, . . . , xp) ∈ Np such that x1n1 + · · · + xpnp = s. The length of x is |x| = x1 + · · · + xp. Given another factorization y = (y1, . . . , yp), the distance between x and y is

d(x, y) = max{|x − gcd(x, y)|, |y − gcd(x, y)|},

where gcd(x, y) = (min{x1, y1}, . . . , min{xp, yp}).

slide-7
SLIDE 7

66 ∈ S = 6, 9, 11, c(S) = 4

The factorizations of 66 ∈ 6, 9, 11 are F(66) = {(0, 0, 6), (1, 3, 3), (2, 6, 0), (4, 1, 3), (5, 4, 0), (8, 2, 0), (11, 0, 0)} The distance between (11, 0, 0) and (0, 0, 6) is 11.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

66 ∈ S = 6, 9, 11, c(S) = 4

The factorizations of 66 ∈ 6, 9, 11 are F(66) = {(0, 0, 6), (1, 3, 3), (2, 6, 0), (4, 1, 3), (5, 4, 0), (8, 2, 0), (11, 0, 0)} The distance between (11, 0, 0) and (0, 0, 6) is 11. (11, 0, 0) (11, 0, 0) (0, 0, 6) (0, 0, 6) 11

slide-9
SLIDE 9

66 ∈ S = 6, 9, 11, c(S) = 4

The factorizations of 66 ∈ 6, 9, 11 are F(66) = {(0, 0, 6), (1, 3, 3), (2, 6, 0), (4, 1, 3), (5, 4, 0), (8, 2, 0), (11, 0, 0)} The distance between (11, 0, 0) and (0, 0, 6) is 11. (3, 0, 0) (11, 0, 0) (8, 2, 0) (0, 2, 0)|(8, 2, 0) (0, 0, 6) (0, 0, 6) 3 10

slide-10
SLIDE 10

66 ∈ S = 6, 9, 11, c(S) = 4

The factorizations of 66 ∈ 6, 9, 11 are F(66) = {(0, 0, 6), (1, 3, 3), (2, 6, 0), (4, 1, 3), (5, 4, 0), (8, 2, 0), (11, 0, 0)} The distance between (11, 0, 0) and (0, 0, 6) is 11. (3, 0, 0) (11, 0, 0) (8, 2, 0) (0, 2, 0)|(3, 0, 0) (5, 4, 0) (0, 2, 0)|(5, 4, 0) (0, 0, 6) (0, 0, 6) 3 3 9

slide-11
SLIDE 11

66 ∈ S = 6, 9, 11, c(S) = 4

The factorizations of 66 ∈ 6, 9, 11 are F(66) = {(0, 0, 6), (1, 3, 3), (2, 6, 0), (4, 1, 3), (5, 4, 0), (8, 2, 0), (11, 0, 0)} The distance between (11, 0, 0) and (0, 0, 6) is 11.

(3, 0, 0) (11, 0, 0) (8, 2, 0) (0, 2, 0)|(3, 0, 0) (5, 4, 0) (0, 2, 0)|(3, 0, 0) (2, 6, 0) (0, 2, 0)|(2, 6, 0) (0, 0, 6) (0, 0, 6) 3 3 3 8

slide-12
SLIDE 12

66 ∈ S = 6, 9, 11, c(S) = 4

The factorizations of 66 ∈ 6, 9, 11 are F(66) = {(0, 0, 6), (1, 3, 3), (2, 6, 0), (4, 1, 3), (5, 4, 0), (8, 2, 0), (11, 0, 0)} The distance between (11, 0, 0) and (0, 0, 6) is 11.

(3, 0, 0) (11, 0, 0) (8, 2, 0) (0, 2, 0)|(3, 0, 0) (5, 4, 0) (0, 2, 0)|(3, 0, 0) (2, 6, 0) (0, 2, 0)|(1, 3, 0) (1, 3, 3) (0, 0, 3)|(1, 3, 0) (0, 0, 3) (0, 0, 6) 3 3 3 4 4

slide-13
SLIDE 13

The catenary degree

The catenary degree of s ∈ S, c(s), is the minimum nonnegative integer N such that for any two factorizations x and y of s, there exists a sequence of factorizations x1, . . . , xt of s such that x1 = x, xt = y, for all i ∈ {1, . . . , t − 1}, d(xi, xi+1) ≤ N. The catenary degree of S, c(S), is the supremum (maximum) of the catenary degrees of the elements of S.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

The catenary degree of 77 ∈ 10, 11, 23, 35

(0, 7, 0, 0) (1, 4, 1, 0) (2, 1, 2, 0) (2, 2, 0, 1)

3 6 2 3 5 2

slide-15
SLIDE 15

The catenary degree

(0, 7, 0, 0) (1, 4, 1, 0) (2, 1, 2, 0) (2, 2, 0, 1)

3 2 3 5 2

slide-16
SLIDE 16

The catenary degree

(0, 7, 0, 0) (1, 4, 1, 0) (2, 1, 2, 0) (2, 2, 0, 1)

3 2 3 2

slide-17
SLIDE 17

The catenary degree

(0, 7, 0, 0) (1, 4, 1, 0) (2, 1, 2, 0) (2, 2, 0, 1)

2 3 2

slide-18
SLIDE 18

66 ∈ S = 6, 9, 11, t(S) = 7

The factorizations of 66 ∈ 6, 9, 11 are F(66) = {(0, 0, 6), (1, 3, 3), (2, 6, 0), (4, 1, 3), (5, 4, 0), (8, 2, 0), (11, 0, 0)} Besides, 9 divides 66 (11, 0, 0)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

66 ∈ S = 6, 9, 11, t(S) = 7

The factorizations of 66 ∈ 6, 9, 11 are F(66) = {(0, 0, 6), (1, 3, 3), (2, 6, 0), (4, 1, 3), (5, 4, 0), (8, 2, 0), (11, 0, 0)} and 11 also divides 66 (8, 2, 0) (11, 0, 0)

3

slide-20
SLIDE 20

66 ∈ S = 6, 9, 11, t(S) = 7

The factorizations of 66 ∈ 6, 9, 11 are F(66) = {(0, 0, 6), (1, 3, 3), (2, 6, 0), (4, 1, 3), (5, 4, 0), (8, 2, 0), (11, 0, 0)} (8, 2, 0) (11, 0, 0)

3

(4, 1, 3)

7

slide-21
SLIDE 21

The tame degree

The tame degree of S, t(S), is defined as the minimum N such that for any s ∈ S and any factorization x of s, if s − ni ∈ S for some i ∈ {1, . . . , p}, then there exists another factorization y of s such that d(x, y) ≤ N and the ith coordinate of y is nonzero (ni “occurs” in this factorization).

slide-22
SLIDE 22

The catenary degree of S is less than or equal to the tame degree

  • f S.

c(S) ≤ t(S)

slide-23
SLIDE 23

The catenary degree of S is less than or equal to the tame degree

  • f S.

c(S) ≤ t(S) It is known that in some cases both coincide (for instance for monoids with a generic presentation).

slide-24
SLIDE 24

The catenary degree of S is less than or equal to the tame degree

  • f S.

c(S) ≤ t(S) It is known that in some cases both coincide (for instance for monoids with a generic presentation). We want to characterize when the equality holds if the embedding dimension of S is three.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Embedding dimension three numerical semigroups

Let S = n1 < n2 < n3 be a numerical semigroup with embedding dimension 3. Define ci = min{k ∈ N \ {0} | kni ∈ nj, nk, {i, j, k} = {1, 2, 3}}. Then, for all {i, j, k} = {1, 2, 3}, there exist some rij, rik ∈ N such that cini = rijnj + riknk.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Embedding dimension three numerical semigroups

We know that Betti(S) = {c1n1, c2n2, c3n3}. Hence 1 ≤ # Betti(S) ≤ 3.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Embedding dimension three numerical semigroups

We know that Betti(S) = {c1n1, c2n2, c3n3}. Hence 1 ≤ # Betti(S) ≤ 3. Herzog proved that S is symmetric if and only if rij = 0 for some i, j ∈ {1, 2, 3}, or equivalently, # Betti(S) ∈ {1, 2}.

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Embedding dimension three numerical semigroups

We know that Betti(S) = {c1n1, c2n2, c3n3}. Hence 1 ≤ # Betti(S) ≤ 3. Herzog proved that S is symmetric if and only if rij = 0 for some i, j ∈ {1, 2, 3}, or equivalently, # Betti(S) ∈ {1, 2}. Therefore, S is nonsymmetric if and only if # Betti(S) = 3.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

The nonsymmetric case

Let S be a numerical semigroup minimally generated by {n1, n2, n3} with n1 < n2 < n3.

slide-30
SLIDE 30

The nonsymmetric case

Let S be a numerical semigroup minimally generated by {n1, n2, n3} with n1 < n2 < n3.

  • V. Blanco, P

. A. Garc´ ıa-S´ anchez, A. Geroldinger proved that c(S) = t(S) for S a nonsymmetric embedding dimension three numerical semigroup.

slide-31
SLIDE 31

The nonsymmetric case

Let S be a numerical semigroup minimally generated by {n1, n2, n3} with n1 < n2 < n3.

  • V. Blanco, P

. A. Garc´ ıa-S´ anchez, A. Geroldinger proved that c(S) = t(S) for S a nonsymmetric embedding dimension three numerical semigroup. For this reason we focus henceforth in the case S is symmetric, and thus # Betti(S) ∈ {1, 2}.

slide-32
SLIDE 32

When S has two Betti elements

When S has two Betti elements, we distinguish the three subcases: c1n1 = c2n2 c3n3; c1n1 = c3n3 c2n2; c1n1 c2n2 = c3n3;

slide-33
SLIDE 33

The case c1n1 = c2n2 c3n3

Proposition

Let S = n1, n2, n3 with n1 < n2 < n3 and c1n1 = c2n2 c3n3. Then c(S) < t(S).

Example

S = 4, 6, 7 c(S) = 3 < t(S) = 5

slide-34
SLIDE 34

The case c1n1 = c3n3 c2n2

Proposition

Let S = n1, n2, n3 with n1 < n2 < n3 and c1n1 = c3n3 c2n2. Then c(S) < t(S).

Example

S = 4, 5, 6 c(S) = 3 < t(S) = 4

slide-35
SLIDE 35

The case c1n1 c2n2 = c3n3

Proposition

Let S = n1, n2, n3 with n1 < n2 < n3 and c1n1 c2n2 = c3n3. If c2n2 ∤ c1n1, then c(S) < t(S).

Example

S = 5, 8, 12 c(S) = 4 < t(S) = 6

slide-36
SLIDE 36

The case c1n1 c2n2 = c3n3

Proposition

Let S = n1, n2, n3 with n1 < n2 < n3 and c1n1 c2n2 = c3n3. If c2n2 ∤ c1n1, then c(S) < t(S).

Example

S = 5, 8, 12 c(S) = 4 < t(S) = 6

Proposition

Let S = n1, n2, n3 with n1 < n2 < n3 and c1n1 c2n2 = c3n3. If c2n2 | c1n1, then c(S) = t(S).

Example

S = 12, 14, 21 c(S) = t(S) = 7

slide-37
SLIDE 37

When S has a single Betti element

Proposition

Let S = n1, n2, n3 with n1 < n2 < n3 and c1n1 = c2n2 = c3n3. Then c(S) = t(S).

Example

S = 6, 10, 15 c(S) = t(S) = 5

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Main result

Theorem

Let S be an embedding dimension three numerical semigroup minimally generated by {n1, n2, n3}. For every {i, j, k} = {1, 2, 3}, define ci = min{k ∈ N \ {0} | kni ∈ nj, nk}. Then c(S) = t(S) if and only if either # Betti(S) 2,

  • r c1n1 c2n2 = c3n3 and c2n2 divides c1n1.
slide-39
SLIDE 39

ω-primality, the definition

The ω-primality function assigns to each element n ∈ S the value

ω(n) = m if m is the smallest positive integer with the property that

whenever p

i=1 aini − n ∈ S for |a| > m, there exists

b = (b1, . . . , bp) ∈ Np with b ≤ a (with the usual partial ordering on

Np) such that p

i=1 bini − n ∈ S and |b| ≤ m.

slide-40
SLIDE 40

ω-primality, the definition

The ω-primality function assigns to each element n ∈ S the value

ω(n) = m if m is the smallest positive integer with the property that

whenever p

i=1 aini − n ∈ S for |a| > m, there exists

b = (b1, . . . , bp) ∈ Np with b ≤ a (with the usual partial ordering on

Np) such that p

i=1 bini − n ∈ S and |b| ≤ m.

We set

ω(S) = sup{ω(S, ni) | i ∈ {1, . . . , p}}.

slide-41
SLIDE 41

ω-primality

By definition, an element b ∈ S is a prime element if and only if

ω(S, b) = 1, and S is factorial if and only if ω(S) = 1.

Numerical semigroups other than N have no prime elements.

slide-42
SLIDE 42

ω-primality

By definition, an element b ∈ S is a prime element if and only if

ω(S, b) = 1, and S is factorial if and only if ω(S) = 1.

Numerical semigroups other than N have no prime elements. c(S) ≤ ω(S) ≤ t(S) We are interested in comparing the ω-primality with the catenary degree in embedding dimension three numerical semigroups.

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Comparing the ω-primality with the catenary degree

Theorem

Let S = n1, n2, n3 with n1 < n2 < n3 be a numerical semigroup with embedding dimension three. (a) If # Betti(S) = 3, then c(S) = ω(S) = t(S). (b) If c1n1 = c2n2 c3n3, then c(S) < ω(S). (c) If c1n1 = c3n3 c2n2, then c(S) < ω(S). (d) If c1n1 c2n2 = c3n3 and c2n2 | c1n1, then c(S) = ω(S) = t(S). (e) If c1n1 = c2n2 = c3n3, then c(S) = ω(S) = t(S).

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Comparing ω-primality with the catenary degree

In the case c1n1 c2n2 = c3n3 and c2n2 ∤ c1n1, with some examples we show that we cannot say more than we state in the theorem above.

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Comparing ω-primality with the catenary degree

In the case c1n1 c2n2 = c3n3 and c2n2 ∤ c1n1, with some examples we show that we cannot say more than we state in the theorem above.

Example

S = 19, 350, 490 in which c1n1 c2n2 = c3n3 and c2n2 ∤ c1n1. We have c(S) = ω(S) = 70.

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Comparing ω-primality with the catenary degree

In the case c1n1 c2n2 = c3n3 and c2n2 ∤ c1n1, with some examples we show that we cannot say more than we state in the theorem above.

Example

S = 19, 350, 490 in which c1n1 c2n2 = c3n3 and c2n2 ∤ c1n1. We have c(S) = ω(S) = 70. S = 62, 63, 147 in which c1n1 c2n2 = c3n3 and c2n2 ∤ c1n1. We have c(S) = 21 < ω(S) = 23.

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Questions

When ω(S) = t(S) in embedding dimension three numerical semigroup with two Betti elements?

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Questions

When ω(S) = t(S) in embedding dimension three numerical semigroup with two Betti elements? When c(S) = t(S) for embedding dimension four numerical semigroup?

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Thank you