what you see is what you get exploiting visibility for 3d
play

What You See Is What You Get Exploiting Visibility for 3D Object - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ID: 8111 What You See Is What You Get Exploiting Visibility for 3D Object Detection Peiyun Hu, Jason Ziglar, David Held, Deva Ramanan Carnegie Mellon University Argo AI 1 What is a good representation for LiDAR data? LiDAR data provides


  1. ID: 8111 What You See Is What You Get Exploiting Visibility for 3D Object Detection Peiyun Hu, Jason Ziglar, David Held, Deva Ramanan Carnegie Mellon University Argo AI 1

  2. What is a good representation for LiDAR data? • LiDAR data provides more than just point measurements • Rays emanating from the sensor to each 3D point must pass through free space • Representing LiDAR data as s fundamentally destroys such freespace information ( x , y , z ) 2

  3. What representations do we have? Deep Voxel Representation Deep Point Representation PointPillars , Lang et al., CVPR’19 PointNet , Qi et al., CVPR’17 This work Occupancy Voxels Visibility Augmented Deep Voxels OctoMap , Hornung et al., Autonomous Robots’13 WYSIWYG , Hu et al., CVPR’20 3

  4. A Simple Approach to Augment Visibility Deep Voxel Representation Voxel Encoder W H × C L Concat H W H × ( C + 1) W L L Visibility-augmented Ray-casting Point Cloud Voxel Grid Deep Voxel Representation W H L Visibility Volume 4

  5. E ffj cient Ray-casting via Voxel Traversal Unknown END Occupied Free START Though animated in 2D, the idea generalizes in 3D. A Fast Voxel Traversal Algorithm for Ray Tracing 3D Visibility Volume John Amanatides, Andrew Woo Eurographics 1987 5

  6. Visibility over Multiple LiDAR Sweeps Single sweep Discrete visibility Multiple sweeps Continuous visibility (one slice) (one slice) OctoMap , Hornung et al., Autonomous Robots’13 6

  7. Visibility-aware LiDAR Synthesis Should be occluded! Occluded! Naive Object Augmentation Visibility-aware Object Augmentation PointPillars , Lang et al., CVPR'19 SECOND , Yan et al., Sensors’18 7

  8. Improve PointPillars by 4.5% in overall mAP PointPillars Ours 80% 79.1% 68.4% NuScenes Benchmark (test set) 65.0% 59.7% 60% 46.6% 40.1% 40% 38.9% 35.0% 34.7% 30.8% 30.5% 30.4% 28.8% 28.2% 27.4% 23.4% 23.0% 20% 18.2% 7.1% 4.1% 1.1% 0.1% 0% car pedes. barri. tra fg . truck bus trail. const. motor. bicyc. mAP More than 10% Almost 20% 8

  9. https://cs.cmu.edu/~peiyunh/wysiwyg 9

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend