vertical visibility among parallel polygons in three
play

Vertical Visibility among Parallel Polygons in Three Dimensions GD - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Vertical Visibility among Parallel Polygons in Three Dimensions GD 2015 Radoslav Fulek (IST, Austria), Rado s Radoi ci c (CUNY) Visibility clique Visibility clique We consider a finite set S of translates/homothetes of two dimensional


  1. Vertical Visibility among Parallel Polygons in Three Dimensions GD 2015 Radoslav Fulek (IST, Austria), Radoˇ s Radoiˇ ci´ c (CUNY)

  2. Visibility clique

  3. Visibility clique We consider a finite set S of translates/homothetes of two dimensional convex polygons in R 3 .

  4. Visibility clique We consider a finite set S of translates/homothetes of two dimensional convex polygons in R 3 . A pair of polygons P 1 , P 2 ∈ S see each other if there exists a line segment ℓ orthogonal to both of them connecting them such that ℓ is disjoint from other polygons in S .

  5. Visibility clique We consider a finite set S of translates/homothetes of two dimensional convex polygons in R 3 . A pair of polygons P 1 , P 2 ∈ S see each other if there exists a line segment ℓ orthogonal to both of them connecting them such that ℓ is disjoint from other polygons in S . P 2 P 1 P 3

  6. Visibility clique We consider a finite set S of translates/homothetes of two dimensional convex polygons in R 3 . A pair of polygons P 1 , P 2 ∈ S see each other if there exists a line segment ℓ orthogonal to both of them connecting them such that ℓ is disjoint from other polygons in S . P 2 P 1 P 3 P 1 sees P 2 , but P 1 does not see P 3

  7. Visibility clique We consider a finite set S of translates/homothetes of two dimensional convex polygons in R 3 . A pair of polygons P 1 , P 2 ∈ S see each other if there exists a line segment ℓ orthogonal to both of them connecting them such that ℓ is disjoint from other polygons in S . The set S forms a visibility clique if every pair of polygons in S see each other.

  8. Visibility clique We consider a finite set S of translates/homothetes of two dimensional convex polygons in R 3 . A pair of polygons P 1 , P 2 ∈ S see each other if there exists a line segment ℓ orthogonal to both of them connecting them such that ℓ is disjoint from other polygons in S . The set S forms a visibility clique if every pair of polygons in S see each other. P 1 P 2 P 3

  9. Visibility clique We consider a finite set S of translates/homothetes of two dimensional convex polygons in R 3 . A pair of polygons P 1 , P 2 ∈ S see each other if there exists a line segment ℓ orthogonal to both of them connecting them such that ℓ is disjoint from other polygons in S . The set S forms a visibility clique if every pair of polygons in S see each other. P 1 P 2 { P 1 , P 2 , P 3 } forms a visibility clique. P 3

  10. Bounding size of a visibility clique

  11. Bounding size of a visibility clique We are interested in the maximum size f ( k ) of the visibility clique for translates of a regular convex k -gon.

  12. Bounding size of a visibility clique We are interested in the maximum size f ( k ) of the visibility clique for translates of a regular convex k -gon.

  13. Bounding size of a visibility clique We are interested in the maximum size f ( k ) of the visibility clique for translates of a regular convex k -gon.

  14. Bounding size of a visibility clique We are interested in the maximum size f ( k ) of the visibility clique for translates of a regular convex k -gon.

  15. Bounding size of a visibility clique We are interested in the maximum size f ( k ) of the visibility clique for translates of a regular convex k -gon.

  16. Bounding size of a visibility clique We are interested in the maximum size f ( k ) of the visibility clique for translates of a regular convex k -gon.

  17. Bounding size of a visibility clique We are interested in the maximum size f ( k ) of the visibility clique for translates of a regular convex k -gon.

  18. Bounding size of a visibility clique We are interested in the maximum size f ( k ) of the visibility clique for translates of a regular convex k -gon.

  19. Bounding size of a visibility clique We are interested in the maximum size f ( k ) of the visibility clique for translates of a regular convex k -gon. Thus, f (4) ≥ 7 .

  20. Bounding size of a visibility clique We are interested in the maximum size f ( k ) of the visibility clique for translates of a regular convex k -gon. Thus, f (4) ≥ 7 . In fact, f (4) = 7 . Fekete et al. 1995

  21. Bounding size of a visibility clique We are interested in the maximum size f ( k ) of the visibility clique for translates of a regular convex k -gon. Thus, f (4) ≥ 7 . In fact, f (4) = 7 . Fekete et al. 1995 Also, f (3) ≥ 14 . Babilon et al. 1999

  22. Bounding size of a visibility clique We are interested in the maximum size f ( k ) of the visibility clique for translates of a regular convex k -gon. Thus, f (4) ≥ 7 . In fact, f (4) = 7 . Fekete et al. 1995 Also, f (3) ≥ 14 . Babilon et al. 1999 Not hard to see f ( k ) ≥ ⌊ k 2 ⌋ .

  23. Bounding size of a visibility clique We are interested in the maximum size f ( k ) of the visibility clique for translates of a regular convex k -gon. Thus, f (4) ≥ 7 . In fact, f (4) = 7 . Fekete et al. 1995 Also, f (3) ≥ 14 . Babilon et al. 1999 Not hard to see f ( k ) ≥ ⌊ k 2 ⌋ .

  24. Bounding size of a visibility clique We are interested in the maximum size f ( k ) of the visibility clique for translates of a regular convex k -gon. Thus, f (4) ≥ 7 . In fact, f (4) = 7 . Fekete et al. 1995 Also, f (3) ≥ 14 . Babilon et al. 1999 Not hard to see f ( k ) ≥ ⌊ k 2 ⌋ . f ( k ) ≤ 2 2 k Babilon et al. 1999

  25. Bounding size of a visibility clique We are interested in the maximum size f ( k ) of the visibility clique for translates of a regular convex k -gon. Thus, f (4) ≥ 7 . In fact, f (4) = 7 . Fekete et al. 1995 Also, f (3) ≥ 14 . Babilon et al. 1999 Not hard to see f ( k ) ≥ ⌊ k 2 ⌋ . f ( k ) ≤ 2 2 k Babilon et al. 1999

  26. f ( k ) ≤ 2 2 k Babilon et al. 1999

  27. f ( k ) ≤ 2 2 k Babilon et al. 1999 P 1 P 2

  28. f ( k ) ≤ 2 2 k Babilon et al. 1999 p 1 p 2 1 2 P 1 5 3 4 P 2

  29. f ( k ) ≤ 2 2 k Babilon et al. 1999 p 1 Define partial orders < i for p 2 1 1 ≤ i ≤ k . We have P 1 < 1 P 2 . 2 P 1 5 3 4 P 2

  30. f ( k ) ≤ 2 2 k Babilon et al. 1999 p 1 Define partial orders < i for p 2 1 1 1 ≤ i ≤ k . Now, P 1 and P 2 are 2 incomparable by < 1 . P 1 5 3 4 P 2

  31. f ( k ) ≤ 2 2 k Babilon et al. 1999 p 1 Define partial orders < i for p 2 1 1 1 ≤ i ≤ k . Now, P 1 and P 2 are 2 incomparable by < 1 . P 1 5 3 By Dilworth theorem we can pick 4 P 2 a chain or anti-chain of size at � least f ( k ) .

  32. f ( k ) ≤ 2 2 k Babilon et al. 1999 p 1 Define partial orders < i for p 2 1 1 1 ≤ i ≤ k . Now, P 1 and P 2 are 2 incomparable by < 1 . P 1 5 3 By Dilworth theorem we can pick 4 P 2 a chain or anti-chain of size at � least f ( k ) . We have k partial orders, and hence, �� � f ( k ) ≤ 2 . . . � �� � k − times

  33. f ( k ) ≤ 2 2 k Babilon et al. 1999 p 1 Define partial orders < i for p 2 1 1 1 ≤ i ≤ k . Now, P 1 and P 2 are 2 incomparable by < 1 . P 1 5 3 By Dilworth theorem we can pick 4 P 2 a chain or anti-chain of size at � least f ( k ) . We have k partial orders, and hence, �� � f ( k ) ≤ 2 . . . � �� � P 3 k − times P 2 P 1 ( P 1 ∩ P 3 ) ⊂ P 2

  34. Bounding size of a visibility clique

  35. Bounding size of a visibility clique Theorem 1. (F and Radoiˇ ci´ c 15+) For homothetes of convex k -gon we have f ( k ) ≤ 2 2 ( k 2 ) +2 .

  36. Bounding size of a visibility clique Theorem 1. (F and Radoiˇ ci´ c 15+) For homothetes of convex k -gon we have f ( k ) ≤ 2 2 ( k 2 ) +2 . First, we pick 1 4 fraction of homothetes such that no pair of them is contained one in another.

  37. Bounding size of a visibility clique Theorem 1. (F and Radoiˇ ci´ c 15+) For homothetes of convex k -gon we have f ( k ) ≤ 2 2 ( k 2 ) +2 . First, we pick 1 4 fraction of homothetes such that no pair of them is contained one in another. Consider the poset ( P, ⊆ ) and observe that we have no chain of length five . P 3 P 1 P 2

  38. Bounding size of a visibility clique Theorem 1. (F and Radoiˇ ci´ c 15+) For homothetes of convex k -gon we have f ( k ) ≤ 2 2 ( k 2 ) +2 . First, we pick 1 4 fraction of homothetes such that no pair of them is contained one in another. Consider the poset ( P, ⊆ ) and observe that we have no chain of length five . Use Dilworth theorem. P 3 P 1 P 2

  39. Bounding size of a visibility clique Theorem 1. (F and Radoiˇ ci´ c 15+) For homothetes of convex k -gon we have f ( k ) ≤ 2 2 ( k 2 ) +2 . • We order homothetes from left to right according to x -coordinates of centers of gravity. • We color each edge in the visibility clique with a pair consisting of a two element set encoding the vertices supporting the common tangents, and an indicator for � k � its above–below relationship. We use 2 colors. 2 P 1 1 1 2 c ( P 1 P 2 ) = ( { 1 , 4 } , 0) 4 3 4 P 2

  40. Bounding size of a visibility clique Theorem 1. (F and Radoiˇ ci´ c 15+) For homothetes of convex k -gon we have f ( k ) ≤ 2 2 ( k 2 ) +2 . • We order homothetes from left to right according to x -coordinates of centers of gravity. • We color each edge in the visibility clique with a pair consisting of a two element set encoding the vertices supporting the common tangents, and an indicator for � k � its above–below relationship. We use 2 colors. 2 • We apply a Ramsey–type theorem for ordered graphs.

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend