What says the dodo bird? Patrick Corrigan Illinois Institute of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

what says the dodo bird
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

What says the dodo bird? Patrick Corrigan Illinois Institute of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

What says the dodo bird? Patrick Corrigan Illinois Institute of Technology STOP Stigma is Bad Public stigma Self-stigma Not all ways to address stigma work! Unintended consequences Direction for change 5 6 Funded by


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Patrick Corrigan Illinois Institute of Technology

What says the dodo bird?

slide-2
SLIDE 2
slide-3
SLIDE 3
slide-4
SLIDE 4

STOP

slide-5
SLIDE 5

 Stigma is Bad

  • Public stigma
  • Self-stigma

 Not all ways to address stigma work!

  • Unintended consequences

 Direction for change

5
slide-6
SLIDE 6 6
slide-7
SLIDE 7  Funded by the U.S. NIMH since 2001  Collection of more than 20 research and

consumer groups from across US

 WWW.NCSE1.ORG  corrigan@iit.edu
slide-8
SLIDE 8

UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES

Everybody has won and all must have prizes!

slide-9
SLIDE 9 Psychoanalysis Cognitive Therapy
slide-10
SLIDE 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11

BEAT RACISM

slide-12
SLIDE 12

DON’T ASK DON’T TELL

BEAT HOMOPHOBIA

slide-13
SLIDE 13

“THE POOR!” “THE WEAK!”

“THE LEAST IMPORTANT!”

slide-14
SLIDE 14

“THE POOR!” “THE WEAK!” “THE LEAST IMPORTANT!” “Whatsoever you do to the least of my brethren, that you do unto me!” John

BESTOW

EMPOWER

slide-15
SLIDE 15 15 15 N=213

Stigmatizing Attitudes and

Behavioral Intentions Education: Responsibility Contact: Dangerousness Education: Dangerousness Contact: Responsibility Control Attitudes and Intentions @ post and 1 wk f-up

  • 2.5
  • 2
  • 1.5
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 1.5 control ed:danger ed:respon ct:danger ct:respon pre post 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 Pos Neg 6.8 7.3 7.8 8.3 8.8 9.3 9.8 10.3 10.8 control ed:danger ed:respon ct:danger ct:respon pre f-up 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 low mod high stigma change 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 low mod high stigma change
slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18 18
slide-19
SLIDE 19
slide-20
SLIDE 20 20

In the movies

slide-21
SLIDE 21 21
slide-22
SLIDE 22 22
slide-23
SLIDE 23 23

In the newspapers

slide-24
SLIDE 24 24
slide-25
SLIDE 25
slide-26
SLIDE 26 26

In advertising

slide-27
SLIDE 27 27
slide-28
SLIDE 28
slide-29
SLIDE 29
slide-30
SLIDE 30 30
slide-31
SLIDE 31 31
slide-32
SLIDE 32

Trenton State Hospital has fire.

slide-33
SLIDE 33 33

Ro Roaste asted d Nu Nuts ts

slide-34
SLIDE 34

DANGER

Phelan, Link et al

34 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 1956 1996 danger
slide-35
SLIDE 35  DANGER

Phelan, Link et al

35 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 1956 1996 danger
slide-36
SLIDE 36  DANGER

Phelan, Link et al

36 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 1956 1996 danger
slide-37
SLIDE 37  DANGER

Phelan, Link et al

37 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 1956 1996 2006 danger
slide-38
SLIDE 38
slide-39
SLIDE 39 39

Public stigma Self- stigma Label avoidance Structural stigma

stereotype

prejudice

discrimination S t r u c t u r e s

  • --types

types--

slide-40
SLIDE 40 40  STEREOTYPES
  • All Irish Americans are drunks and

beat their wives.

 PREJUDICE
  • That’s right. They’re drunks and I

loathe them.

 DISCRIMINATION
  • So, don’t: hire, rent, or befriend them
slide-41
SLIDE 41 41  STEREOTYPES
  • People with MI are: weak,

dangerous….

 PREJUDICE
  • They are bad because: scary,

shameful.

 DISCRIMINATION
  • So, don’t: hire, serve, or rent to them
slide-42
SLIDE 42 42

Public stigma Self- stigma Label avoidance Structural stigma

stereotype

prejudice

discrimination S t r u c t u r e s

  • --types

types--

slide-43
SLIDE 43  Lost employment  Subpar housing  Worse health care  Worse educational opportunities  Diminished legislative support  Alienated faith communities  Coercive treatment
slide-44
SLIDE 44 PTCA: percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty Druss et al., 2000
slide-45
SLIDE 45 45

Public stigma Self- stigma Label avoidance Structural stigma

stereotype

prejudice

discrimination S t r u c t u r e s

  • --types

types--

slide-46
SLIDE 46  Decreased self-esteem
  • I am not worthy
 Decreased self-efficacy
  • I am not able
 Why try?!
  • I am not worthy of a good job
  • I am not able to live alone
slide-47
SLIDE 47 47

Public stigma Self- stigma Label avoidance Structural stigma

stereotype

prejudice

discrimination S t r u c t u r e s

  • --types

types--

slide-48
SLIDE 48 48 seekers non-seekers

45%

Label Avoidance

Epidemiological Catchment Area, National Co-morbidity Survey, NCSII
slide-49
SLIDE 49 49 users non-users

22%

Corrigan, P.W. (2004). How stigma interferes with mental health care. American Psychologist, 59, 614-625 Canadian Community Health Survey

Label Avoidance

slide-50
SLIDE 50

No treatment

  • Do not seek care
  • Do not stay in treatment
  • Do not fully participate
50
slide-51
SLIDE 51 51

Protest

Education Contact

Media- based In vivo

v e h i c l e

  • --processes

processes--

slide-52
SLIDE 52  EDUCATION:
  • contrasting myths (people are to blame)
  • with facts (serious mental illness biological)
 CONTACT
  • Meeting people and their stories of recovery
slide-53
SLIDE 53

EASY STUFF:

Just change the words! Just cure the disease!

slide-54
SLIDE 54  Leprosy to Hansen’s Disease  Dementia to Alzheimer’s  Mental Retardation to Intellectual Disability  Mania to Bipolar Illness
slide-55
SLIDE 55  Japan: Seishin-Bunretsu-Byo to togo shitco sho  Korea: Jeongshin-bunyeol to Johyun-byung  Hong Kong: Jing Shen Fen Lie to Si Jue Shi Tiao  Singapore, China “mind split disease” “integration disorder” “attunement disorder” “mind splitted disorder” “dysfunction of thought and perception” “splitting of the mind” Sartorius et al., 2014
slide-56
SLIDE 56  The Data
  • Japan: mixed findings (Takashi et al., 2009, 2011)
  • Relationship between name recognition and

recovery (Sato in preparation, 2014)

  • Hansen’s Disease (Oliveria et al., 2003; Van Brakel et al., in press)
 Perpetuates the difference  Prejudice and discrimination more than words.
  • MODERN RACISM
slide-57
SLIDE 57

It Looks easy: NIMH and other funders decrease support Advocacy groups: No longer a problem

slide-58
SLIDE 58

KNOWLEDGE IS GOLD: Educate stigma away!

slide-59
SLIDE 59

75% US school districts 43 countries

RESEARCH Uncertain effects No effects RTI (1994) Cal Dept Ed (1995) U Maryland (1998) Worse effects APA (1999) Indiana U (1992)
slide-60
SLIDE 60 60

Protest

Education Contact

Media- based In vivo

v e h i c l e

  • --processes

processes--

slide-61
SLIDE 61 61

Protest

Education Contact

Media- based In vivo

v e h i c l e

  • --processes

processes--

  • EDUCATION
slide-62
SLIDE 62
slide-63
SLIDE 63

RECOVERY

slide-64
SLIDE 64

RECOVERY

HIRE THEM? RENT TO THEM? EQUAL HEALTH CARE?
slide-65
SLIDE 65  Sixteen representative samples of nation-

defined populations

 230 to 6000 Ss  Response rates: 65-85% Schomerus, Schwann, Holzinger, Corrigan, Grabe, Carta, & Angermeyer, 2011
slide-66
SLIDE 66

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 Sz Dep

Schomerus, Schwann, Holzinger, Corrigan, Grabe, Carta, & Angermeyer, 2011

Inherited/Genetic

META-ANALYSIS FINDINGS: CAUSE
slide-67
SLIDE 67

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 Sz Dep

Schomerus, Schwann, Holzinger, Corrigan, Grabe, Carta, & Angermeyer, 2011

Brain Disease

META-ANALYSIS FINDINGS: CAUSE
slide-68
SLIDE 68

10 20 30 40 50 60 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 Sz Dep

Schomerus, Schwann, Holzinger, Corrigan, Grabe, Carta, & Angermeyer, 2011

Co-worker

META-ANALYSIS FINDINGS: ACCEPTANCE
slide-69
SLIDE 69

10 20 30 40 50 60 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 Sz Dep

Schomerus, Schwann, Holzinger, Corrigan, Grabe, Carta, & Angermeyer, 2011

Neighbor

META-ANALYSIS FINDINGS: ACCEPTANCE
slide-70
SLIDE 70 70

Protest

Education Contact

Media- based In vivo

v e h i c l e

  • --processes

processes--

  • PROTEST
slide-71
SLIDE 71

PROTEST:

The Pros and CONs!

slide-72
SLIDE 72 72

Protest

  • Review stigmatizing images
  • Shame on you for thinking

that way

slide-73
SLIDE 73 73
slide-74
SLIDE 74 74

Beware the rebound effect

the white bear

slide-75
SLIDE 75

NAMI - stigmabusters

slide-76
SLIDE 76 The JASONUT The CRAZY FACE The SUICIDE SQUEEZE

Located in Campbell and San Jose California

slide-77
SLIDE 77 Join the national on-line food fight. Help turn lemon donuts into lemonade.

Join the national on-line food fight. Help turn lemon donuts into lemonade.

slide-78
SLIDE 78

I'm an advocate of equal rights and a more tolerant world toward all people of different races, religion, gender, and sexual orientation; but that is it. Any thing else is just moronic.

Stan Rezaee, Aug, 2009
slide-79
SLIDE 79

FRANCHISE

OPPORTUNITIES

slide-80
SLIDE 80 80

Protest

Education Contact

Media- based In vivo

v e h i c l e

  • --processes

processes--

  • CONTACT
slide-81
SLIDE 81

CONTACT vs EDUCATION

The Pros and CONs!

slide-82
SLIDE 82

We are focused on encouraging EVER

ERYON YONE TO TO SPE PEAK AK OUT and share their story of being

affected by mental illness. The more everyone shares, the more we can learn from each other and find solutions to overcome our common challenges.

slide-83
SLIDE 83 83

Contact

“Meet Bob Lundin”

slide-84
SLIDE 84 84

Bob’s story

  • My name is ______ and I h

I have ve a severe mental

illness called schizo-affective disorder

  • My ch

childhood ldhood was not unusual…

  • Unfortunately, my mental illness was

traumatic.

  • aumatic. It did not go away quickly…
  • Despite these problems, I h

I have ave ac achieved ieved

several accomplishments.

slide-85
SLIDE 85 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
  • verall
attitudes behavior education contact p<.05 p<.05 p<.05 CORRIGAN ET AL., 2012
slide-86
SLIDE 86

WHAT’S THE GOAL

More service seeking! Less discrimination!

slide-87
SLIDE 87  30 to 66% do NOT seek treatment  People with all disorders  All treatments  People don’t go to treatment to avoid STIGMA.  Decrease stigma: increase care seeking

PARITY!

slide-88
SLIDE 88  Stigma undermines employment, housing,

health goals

 Decrease stigma: decrease care seeking –

increase opportunities – promote recovery

slide-89
SLIDE 89  Does the push for care seeking make

discrimination worse?

slide-90
SLIDE 90 PENETRATION: >60% of Australians recognize IMPACT: increase mental health literacy care seeking ??? since 2000
slide-91
SLIDE 91

UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES

  • Brain Disease
  • Difference
  • Broken
slide-92
SLIDE 92 6 6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5 9 9.5 10 10.5 11 beyondblue recovery pre post

SIMILARITY

slide-93
SLIDE 93

TLC 3

slide-94
SLIDE 94

Targeted Local Credible Continuous Contact

94 Corrigan, 2011
slide-95
SLIDE 95
slide-96
SLIDE 96

Landlords Health care professionals Teachers Legislators Employers

slide-97
SLIDE 97
slide-98
SLIDE 98
slide-99
SLIDE 99

x

CHICAGO: the heart and brains of Illinois

ILLINOIS

Does it play in PEORIA?

slide-100
SLIDE 100

City Office Church, synagogue, mosque School

10
slide-101
SLIDE 101 101

Good stigma

change

 credible  continuous

slide-102
SLIDE 102

 Contact with whom?  Example

  • Military (PTSD)
  • Other enlisted members

 Marines from marines  Sailors from sailors

102
slide-103
SLIDE 103

Once is not enough And cannot be carbon

copies

10 3
slide-104
SLIDE 104

Targeted Local Credible Continuous Contact

10 4
slide-105
SLIDE 105

The GRAND PLAN

slide-106
SLIDE 106

Come out everyone

Come out everywhere

slide-107
SLIDE 107

Come out Mad

Come out Proud

slide-108
SLIDE 108 Rod Steiger Mike Wallace Margot Kidder Patty Duke
slide-109
SLIDE 109
slide-110
SLIDE 110

Thurgood Marshall Effect

slide-111
SLIDE 111
slide-112
SLIDE 112
slide-113
SLIDE 113  LGBT agenda
  • Confusing
  • Objectionable
  • Ho

Hone nest, t, Op Open, n, Proud

  • ud
slide-114
SLIDE 114

 Three Lessons

  • Consider the pros and cons of

disclosing

  • There are different ways to disclose
  • Telling your story
slide-115
SLIDE 115
slide-116
SLIDE 116

Clifford Beers - 1909

slide-117
SLIDE 117 117
slide-118
SLIDE 118

National Center on Stigma and Empowerment

www.ncse1.org corrigan@iit.edu

slide-119
SLIDE 119
slide-120
SLIDE 120
slide-121
SLIDE 121
slide-122
SLIDE 122