SLIDE 35 CA house prices Bork/Møller Motivation Research question Takeaway Overview Model Empirical results: Overview
IRF Historical decomposition
Conclusion
4) IRF: regional housing demand shock
12 24 36
0.05
12 24 36
0.05
12 24 36
0.05
12 24 36
0.1
12 24 36
0.1
12 24 36
0.5 1 1.5
12 24 36
0.5 1
12 24 36
0.5 1 1.5
Empl NP in Riv/SB/Ont
12 24 36
1 2 3
Empl NP in Stockton
12 24 36
0.5 1 1.5
Building Permits CA total
12 24 36
0.1 0.2
New permits SF/O/F
12 24 36
0.05 0.1
Housing starts : 1-U for LA/LB/SanA
12 24 36
0.1 0.2
Housing starts : 1-U for Riv/SB/O
12 24 36
0.1 0.2
New permits Sacr/A/A/R,
12 24 36
0.05 0.1 0.15
CPI: All, CA
12 24 36
0.5 1
CPI-U: All items, SF/O/SJ
12 24 36
0.5 1
CPI-U: All items, LA/R/O
12 24 36
0.5 1
CPI-U: Non-dbles, LA/R/O
12 24 36
0.2 0.4
CPI-U: All items, San Diego
12 24 36
0.5 1 1.5
LosAngelesLongBeachGlendaleCA
12 24 36 2 4 6
SanFranciscoRedwoodCitySouthSanFranciscoCA
12 24 36
1 2 3
LosAngelesLongBeachGlendaleCA
12 24 36 2 4 6
FresnoCA
12 24 36 2 4 6
ReddingCA
12 24 36 2 4 6
MS72172Sign4ACCandRSR RHD CS 2RHD r10 p2
Remark: Here the dotted line is the single model closest to the median; cf. Fry and Pagan (2011).
A favourable regional housing demand shock ⇒,
(un)employment improves.