What Actually Happens: An Ethnographic Investigation of Student - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

what actually happens
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

What Actually Happens: An Ethnographic Investigation of Student - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

What Actually Happens: An Ethnographic Investigation of Student Library Use Kimberly Mullins, LIU Post, New York Natasha Tomlin, LIU Post, New York Eamon Tewell, LIU Brooklyn, New York Research Team LIST OF PARTICIPANTS - BROOKLYN Katherine


slide-1
SLIDE 1

What Actually Happens:

An Ethnographic Investigation

  • f Student Library Use

Kimberly Mullins, LIU Post, New York Natasha Tomlin, LIU Post, New York Eamon Tewell, LIU Brooklyn, New York

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Research Team

LIST OF PARTICIPANTS - BROOKLYN Katherine Boss Valeda Dent Charles Guarria Rachel King Paula Patiño Susan Thomas Ingrid Wang Gloria Willson LIST OF PARTICIPANTS - POST Mary Kate Boyd-Byrnes Kathleen Burlingame Thomas Dillman Mellissa Hinton Kimberly Mullins Eduardo Rivera Derek Stadler Natalia Tomlin ETHNOGRAPHIC CODING TEAM MEMBERS Valeda Dent Edward Keane Kimberly Mullins Paula Patiño Bhavya Teja Kolla Eamon Tewell Natasha Tomlin

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Background

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Our University

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Our Study’s Timeline

Summer 2012 IRB approval received Fall 2012 Survey distributed Spring 2013 Observations conducted Spring 2013 Interviews conducted Spring 2014 Coding process started Spring 2016 Coding process completed

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Ethnographic Research

  • The study of a culture to improve one’s understanding of it
  • Investigates few cases in thorough detail
  • Qualitative methods, rooted in anthropology:

participant observation, in-depth interviews, etc.

  • Time intensive!
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Why?

  • Examine our local culture of student research habits
  • Provide need-based services
  • Make ethnography a consistent and ongoing practice
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Previous Major Studies

  • University of Rochester “Studying Students” Project

http://www.alastore.ala.org/detail.aspx?ID=2322

  • Rutgers Ethnographic Research Project

http://www.libraries.rutgers.edu/rul/staff/groups/ethnography/reports. shtml

  • University of Illinois ERIAL Project

http://www.erialproject.org

  • CUNY Undergraduate Scholarly Habits Ethnography Project

https://ushep.commons.gc.cuny.edu

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Our Study: Mixed Methods Research

SURVEYS OBSERVATIONS INTERVIEWS

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Data Collection

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Survey Overview

  • Fifty-one questions on technology

integration, library use, and research and study habits

  • Administered Fall 2012
  • 1100+ responses
  • Used survey data to create interview

questions

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Sample Survey Questions

“Have you had any library instruction while at Long island University?” “During the last academic year, how often was the Libraries' website a basic part of your research process?” “Which of these resources do you use most often?” “Would you use text messaging to get an answer to a reference

  • r research question from the LIU Libraries?”
slide-13
SLIDE 13

LIU Post Survey Team

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Survey Kick-Off Party

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Survey Demographics

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Observation Overview

  • 32 hours of unobtrusive observations in the Post and

Brooklyn Libraries

  • Recorded field notes
  • Recorded interpretations
  • Used observational data to create interview questions
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Observation Recording Sheet

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Interview Overview

  • Recruited interviewee during the survey stage
  • Conducted 30 one-hour semi-structured interviews
  • Included “show me” questions
  • Videotaped and professionally transcribed audio
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Interview Questions

“When you get an assignment for a class, what is the very first thing you do?” “Do you seek help from library personnel?” “When you study in the library, do you prefer to be around

  • ther students, or have more of your own personal space?”
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Interview Demographics

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Data Analysis

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Survey Analysis

1. Library staff and graduate student entered data into SPSS 2. Quantitatively analysed closed-ended questions using proprietary survey software 3. Performed content analysis for open-ended questions

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Survey Analysis

  • 4. Graphically depicted major themes to

identify “areas of focus”

  • 5. Themes further analyzed
slide-24
SLIDE 24

Survey Analysis

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Observation and Interview Codebook

1. Started with observations and sample interview word counts 2. Added codes identified through coding process (6 iterations) 3. Resulted in 459 codes at question, unit, and thematic levels

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Observation Coding

1. Combined into one document and analyzed for frequency counts 2. Read field notes and coded the text 3. Library staff and graduate student entered data into SPSS 4. Statistical analysis performed

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Interview Coding

1. Transcripts coded individually, by pairs and as a team (4 coders) 2. Paired teams and entire team reconciled coding to ensure inter-coder reliability 3. Library staff and graduate student entered data into SPSS 4. Statistical analysis performed

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Findings

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Survey Findings

  • 75% of students received some type of instruction on how

to utilize the Library and its resources

  • 60% of students use the Libraries’ website between 1 and 4

times per week

  • Students use Google and the Libraries’ databases equally

to complete their work

  • Majority of students were not taking advantage of

University iPad program

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Observation Findings

  • Coming and going; leaving personal items
  • “Cocooning”
  • Multitasking supported by technology
  • Seated in groups but working individually
  • Headphones for music or to signal need for uninterruption
slide-31
SLIDE 31

Interview Findings

  • Students go to peers and instructors first for research

questions; embarrassed to approach librarians

  • Creation of study materials using flash card apps or

compiling materials in iBooks app

  • Need for more comfortable spaces and extended library

hours

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Library & Non-Library Resources

Interview Findings

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Interview Findings

Use of Library Resources

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Interview Findings

Use of Library Space

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Triangulation

slide-36
SLIDE 36

SURVEY INTERVIEW

Library Instruction

slide-37
SLIDE 37

INTERVIEW SURVEY

Print vs. eBooks

slide-38
SLIDE 38

INTERVIEW SURVEY

Librarian Contact

slide-39
SLIDE 39

INTERVIEW SURVEY

Non-Library Resources

slide-40
SLIDE 40
  • Librarians are the third point of reference
  • Students DO evaluate sources
  • Students prefer shelf browsing
  • Signage is important

Important “Triangulation” Tidbits

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Changes Made

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Instruction

  • At one campus, basic library instruction and an

information literacy exam were integrated within the first semester curriculum

  • At another campus, librarians performed syllabus

analysis for various Departments to identify library instruction opportunities

  • Librarians became involved in Learning Communities to

communicate directly with students early in their academic careers

slide-43
SLIDE 43
  • Extended hours
  • Website redesign
  • Skype by appointment

Reference Services

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Space Modifications

  • Both libraries underwent renovations that include

additional group study areas and natural light

  • A “lounge environment”

and group tables were added

  • “Genius Bar” workspace

was implemented

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Post Library Renovations

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Brooklyn Library Renovations (Before)

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Brooklyn Library Renovations (After)

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Questions?

Kimberly.Mullins@liu.edu Natalia.Tomlin@liu.edu Eamon.Tewell@liu.edu @EamonTewell