Wh What ats Happeni Happening: ng: Reflecting on Data for the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

wh what at s happeni happening ng reflecting on data for
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Wh What ats Happeni Happening: ng: Reflecting on Data for the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Wh What ats Happeni Happening: ng: Reflecting on Data for the Educational Master Plan PRESENTER: RAJINDER S. SAMRA Director of Research, Planning, and Institutional Effectiveness MAY 6, 2020 Town Meeting Agenda Purpose of the Educational


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Wh What at’s Happeni Happening: ng: Reflecting on Data for the Educational Master Plan

PRESENTER: RAJINDER S. SAMRA

Director of Research, Planning, and Institutional Effectiveness

MAY 6, 2020

Town Meeting

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Agenda

  • Purpose of the Educational Master Plan (EMP)
  • LPC Mission Statement
  • Four Educational Master Plan Goals
  • External Environment (outside the college)
  • e.g., Alameda County population trends
  • Internal Environment (inside the college)
  • e.g., Trends in student demographics
  • Breakout Group Discussions – 30 minutes
  • Pick a recorder and reporter (Google Doc – link will be given)
  • Discuss what the data may mean in the context of the 4 EMP Goals
  • Group Report Out (one minute per group)
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Primary Purpose of LPC’s Educational Master Plan Advance our College’s Mission

slide-4
SLIDE 4

LPC Mission Statement

Las Positas College provides an inclusive, learning-centered, equity- focused environment that offers educational opportunities and support for completion of students’ transfer, degree, and career-technical goals while promoting lifelong learning.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Four EMP Goals

  • Educational Excellence – about quality academic programs and support services.
  • Community Collaboration – about collaborating with community partners to

provide educational opportunities.

  • Supportive Organizational Resources – about fiscal stability, appropriate staffing

levels, meeting technology needs, and addressing facilities.

  • Organizational Effectiveness – about improving organizational processes, safety

and wellness, and professional development.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

EMP Goal Questions During Breakout Session (Google Doc)

Given the data:

  • How do we ensure Educational Excellence?
  • How can we strengthen Community Collaboration?
  • What Supportive Organizational Resources should be developed?
  • How can we improve Organizational Effectiveness?
  • What questions do you still have?
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Ex External rnal En Envir vironm nmen ent

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Impact of COVID‐19 on Students

slide-9
SLIDE 9

65% 38% 36% 38% 41% 32% 43% 44% 44% 45% 3% 19% 21% 18% 14%

Your professor(s)/ instructor(s) Counseling Department staff Financial Aid staff Admissions & Records staff Other college personnel

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

How effective have the following college personnel communicated with you about the changes as a result of the Coronavirus (COVID‐19)?

Very effective Somewhat effective Not at all effective

Responses = 1,987 Responses = 1,296 Responses = 1,065 Responses = 1,330 Responses = 1,155

slide-10
SLIDE 10

14% 23% 24% 24% 10% 5%

Very easy Easy Neither easy nor difficult Difficult Very difficult Does not apply

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%

Overall, how has your transition been from face-to-face to remote online learning?

slide-11
SLIDE 11

59% 58% 52% 12%

Loss of work/uncertainty of work Staying on track to complete my educational goal (e.g., certificate, degree, transfer, or other goal) Anxiety, depression, or

  • ther mental health

need Loss of financial aid 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

Are you experiencing or likely to experience in the near future any of the following issues? (Check all that apply)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Impact of COVID‐19 on Students

The most successful colleges will be the ones that best adapt to this new environment.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Alameda County Jobs Growth by Industry

Industry Group Alameda County Jobs 2019 2029 Growth

All Industries 891,596 975,217 83,621 Government 121,091 124,449 3,358 Health Care and Social Assistance 115,997 141,091 25,094 Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 90,183 99,713 9,529 Manufacturing 85,701 91,917 6,215 Leisure and Hospitality 83,838 97,626 13,788 Retail Trade 74,462 75,871 1,409 Construction 59,417 69,923 10,506 Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services 48,739 51,324 2,585 Other Services, except Public Administration 40,506 42,565 2,059 Wholesale Trade 37,350 32,651 (4,699) Transportation and Warehousing, and Utilities 36,713 41,304 4,591 Educational Services 24,294 27,433 3,138 Information 21,916 27,594 5,678

SOURCE: Economic Modeling Specialists, Intl. (EMSI 2020.2)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Student‐Centered Funding Formula (SCFF)

SCFF Components Percent Full‐Time Equivalent Students (FTES) 70% Supplemental Allocation ‐ Promise Grants (68% ‐ CLPCCD) ‐ Pell Grants (28% ‐ CLPCCD) ‐ AB 540 (3% ‐ CLPCCD) 20% Student Success Allocation

(additional $ for Promise and Pell Grants)

10% Total 100%

slide-15
SLIDE 15

169,545 533,051 377,399 517,175 69,479 17,752 158,310 609,287 395,033 500,196 75,732 18,081 African‐American Asian Latino White Multi‐Ethnic Other

Alameda County Population by Race‐Ethnicity 2019 Versus 2029 Projections

2019 2029

slide-16
SLIDE 16

24% 6% 19% 31% CSU/UC CA Prviate Out‐of‐State CA Community College

College‐Going Rates of 2017‐18 High School Grads (N) From Livermore, Pleasanton, & Dublin (Combined)

80% 20% Combined ‐ Livermore, Pleasanton, Dublin N = 2,839

Did Not Attend ‐> College Attended College or University ‐>

slide-17
SLIDE 17

31% 41% 21% 47% 30% 36%

Overall African American Asian Latino White Multi‐Ethnic N = 2,839

Community College Going Rates

Of 2017‐18 High School Grads (N) in Livermore, Pleasanton, & Dublin (Combined) By Race‐Ethnicity

N = 63 N = 784 N = 481 N = 1,341 N = 159 Community College Going Rates

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Of Those Who Applied to LPC, How Many Enrolled at LPC Versus a Different Community College in 2017‐18?

45% 39% 47% 48% 46% 17% 24% 18% 18% 14%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Overall African American Asian Latino White

Enrolled at LPC Enrolled at Different Community College Applicants: (N = 20,970) (N = 1,350) (N = 4,465) (N = 5,434) (N = 7,570)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Internal rnal En Envir vironm nmen ent

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Trends ends in in Studen Student Char Charact acteris ristics ics

slide-21
SLIDE 21

9,440 8,839 8,825 8,940 9,009 9,208 9,326 9,372 9,314 9,065

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Student Headcount (unduplicated) Fall Semesters: 2010 to 2019

slide-22
SLIDE 22

2,945 2,680 2,373 1,755 1,301 Pleasanton : 1,446 1,046 1,417 Tracy : 1,449 884 749 985 476 421 472 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Top Five Cities of Residence of Students Fall Semesters: 2010 to 2019

Livermore Pleasanton Tracy Dublin San Ramon

slide-23
SLIDE 23

4% 12% 4% 24% 47% 5% 4% 4% 18% 5% 30% 33% 7% 4%

African Am. Asian Filipino Latino White Multi‐Ethnic Unk./ Other

Race‐Ethnicity Fall 2011 vs. Fall 2019

Fall 2011 Fall 2019

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Male, 47% Female, 51% Other/Unknown, 2%

Students by Gender Fall 2019

slide-25
SLIDE 25

48% 47% 46% 50% 61% 73% 67% 50% 51% 53% 49% 37% 25% 30%

19 or Younger 20‐21 22‐24 25‐29 30‐39 40‐49 50 or Older

Gender of Students by Age Fall 2019

Female Male

N = 3,126 N = 1,766 N = 1,280 N = 1,003 N = 913 N = 573 N = 400

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Educational Goal of Students Fall 2019

Transfer (with/with Associate Degree) , 64% Associate Degree Only, 6% Cert./Job Training, 12% Personal Dev., 4% Improve Eng/Math Skills, 3% Undecided, 10% Other/ Unk., 1%

slide-27
SLIDE 27

79% 67% 52% 37% 23% 17% 3% 7% 11% 10% 10% 11% 4% 11% 20% 26% 29% 27% 2% 3% 5% 8% 10% 20% 1% 1% 2% 7% 15% 14% 10% 10% 10% 11% 12% 11%

21 or Younger 22‐24 25‐29 30‐39 40‐49 50 or Older

Educational Goals by Age Fall 2019

Transfer (with/without AA/AS) AA/AS Degree Only Certificate/Job Training Personal Development Improve Eng/Math Basic Skills Undecided

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Trends ends in in Studen Student Success Success

slide-29
SLIDE 29

539 533 499 508 498 539 551 555 494 470 5 23 58 146 246 320 346

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900

2009‐10 2010‐11 2011‐12 2012‐13 2013‐14 2014‐15 2015‐16 2016‐17 2017‐18 2018‐19

Associate Degrees Awarded by Type 2009‐10 ‐ 2018‐19

Associate Degrees (AA/AS) Associate Degree for Transfer (AA‐T/AS‐T)

513 521 597 697 801 814 816

slide-30
SLIDE 30

175 167 151 195 135 180 162 145 171 193

50 100 150 200 250

2009‐10 2010‐11 2011‐12 2012‐13 2013‐14 2014‐15 2015‐16 2016‐17 2017‐18 2018‐19

Certificates Awarded 2009‐10 to 2018‐19

slide-31
SLIDE 31

317 497 123 200 60 22 88 71

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000

2009‐10 2010‐11 2011‐12 2012‐13 2013‐14 2014‐15 2015‐16 2016‐17 2017‐18 2018‐19

LPC Transfers by Destination 2009‐10 to 2018‐19

CSU UC In‐State‐Private (ISP) Out‐of‐State (OOS)

588 723 735 666 721 788 779 788 886 790

slide-32
SLIDE 32

66% 67% 69% 73%

2016 2017 2018 2019

Increase in Students Finding Work Closely or Very Closely Related to Their Field of Study

Source: Career & Technical Education Employment Outcomes Survey, 2019

slide-33
SLIDE 33

+$3.00 +$5.00 +$8.00

Not Close Close Very Close

Wages Increased the Most for Students Who Found a Job that Was Closely or Very Closely Related to Their Field of Study

Hourly Wage Change (median)

Source: Career & Technical Education Employment Outcomes Survey, 2019

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Br Break eakout ut Gr Group

  • up Discussion

Discussion (30 (30 mi minut nutes) es)

  • Pick a recorder and reporter – you will receive a google doc
  • Discuss what the data may mean in the context of the 4 EMP

Goals

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Gr Group

  • up Re

Report Out Out