Welcome to T EX! Now what?
⇒ Who? What? Where? When? Why? How? ⇒ T EX for the World ⇒ Document Processing vs. Word Processing ⇒ T EX Front Ends on Mac OS X ⇒ About the Learning Curve ⇒ L
AT
EX, ConT EXt, Eplain or DIY? ⇒ L
AT
Welcome to T EX! Now what? Who? What? Where? When? Why? How? T EX - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome to T EX! Now what? Who? What? Where? When? Why? How? T EX for the World Document Processing vs. Word Processing T EX Front Ends on Mac OS X About the Learning Curve L A T EX, ConT EXt, Eplain or DIY? L A T
AT
AT
TeX Primitives Plain E-Plain LaTeX TeX Engine TeX Macro Formats TeXShop iTeXMac TeX Front Ends (Mac OS X) Others ConTeXt
Arabic, Armenian, Bangla and Asamese, Basque, Bengali, Burmese, Casyl, Cherokee, Chinese, English, Japanese, Korean, Coptic, Croatian, Czech and Slovene, Cyrillic, Devanagari, Dutch, English, Epi-Olmec, Ethiopian, French, German, Greek, Gurmukhi, Hebrew, Hungarian, Icelandic, Indian, Inuktitut, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Latin, Malayalam, Manju, Mongolian, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Russian, Sanskrit, Sinhala, Slovene, Somali, Spanish, Swedish, Tamil, Telugu, Tibetan, Turkish, Ukrainian, Vietnamese. . .
Word Processor +’s and -’s
One of the best advantages of word processors is being able to see the results as you enter text and pictures. For example, it is easy to insert images and wrap text around
attributes as bold, italic, font and size. On the downside, word processors gen erally do a below average job of typog raphy, that is controlling the overall ap pearance of how words and images appear
netuning line breaks, justied type, word spacing, hyphen ation, line spacing and so on. While word processors are great for many uses, for the most part, printed materials created today with word processors are of lower typographic quality than those published in the 19th and the 20th centuries using precomputer typesetting methods. Also making changes to a large word processor document format can be very dicult and time consuming, even if you use the socalled style sheets. TeX and its ospring such as eplain, LaTeX and ConTeXt can consistently produce highquality typographic output.
TeX Program
Word Processor +’s and -’s
One of the best advantages of word processors is being able to see the results as you enter text and pictures. For example, it is easy to insert images and wrap text around them. You can also change as you type such text at- tributes as bold, italic, font and size. On the downside, word proces- sors generally do a below aver- age job of typography, that is controlling the overall appear- ance of how words and images appear on a page. They have few, or difficult to use, functions for fine-tuning line breaks, justified type, word spacing, hyphenation, line spacing and so on. While word processors are great for many uses, for the most part, printed materials created today with word processors are of lower typographic quality than those published in the 19th and the 20th centuries using pre-computer type- setting methods. Also making changes to a large word processor document format can be very difficult and time consuming, even if you use the so-called style sheets. T EX and its offspring such as eplain, L A T EX and ConT EXt can consistently produce high-quality typographicalA
A
A
AT
AT
A
A
AT
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
AT
A
A
A
AT
A
A