Welcome! Michael McCarty Executive Director Glenview Park District - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
welcome
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Welcome! Michael McCarty Executive Director Glenview Park District - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Oct 25, 2023 454 likes •1.2k views

Welcome! Michael McCarty Executive Director Glenview Park District Citizen Task Force Tonights Objectives Review in detail the bond proposal (and new option) Review financing plan and tax impact analysis Decide on proposal

slide-1
SLIDE 1

Welcome!

Michael McCarty Executive Director Glenview Park District

Citizen Task Force

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Tonight’s Objectives

  • Review in detail the bond proposal (and new option)
  • Review financing plan and tax impact analysis
  • Decide on proposal to test district-wide
  • Clarify next steps

Citizen Task Force

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Highest Priority Capital Facility Needs

Citizen Task Force

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Sleepy Hollow Park

  • Protect Key Park Assets
  • Fieldhouse
  • Playground

Glenview Community Ice Center

  • Replace
  • Renovate/Expand
  • Alternative Option

The Grove

  • Improve Safety & Security
  • Education/Programmatic Function
  • Entrance, Paths and Parking

Open Space

  • Purchase & Development Funding

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Glenview Community Ice Center

  • What is the Problem?
  • Very old facility
  • No Prime Time Ice available
  • No ability to expand or provide new programming
  • No ability to generate additional revenue
  • Poor quality facility
  • Continued growth and demand for more programming use
  • What is the Urgency?
  • Cost keep going up
  • The equipment and facility continue to age and becomes more costly to operate
  • Compliance and Accessibility Issues
  • We can’t expand program opportunities
  • Need to leverage the low interest rates and build or replace at today's costs

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Glenview Community Ice Center

  • What Options did we look at?
  • Fix what we have….didn’t fix core problems
  • Just add on a full sheet of ice…costly and didn’t fix core problems
  • What was our Approach to a Solution?
  • Comprehensive evaluation of current and future market for ice-

related sports

  • Determine the right size facility to meet our mission
  • Find a way for Glenview residents to play and practice in Glenview
  • Raise the quality of the facility and bring up to today's standards
  • Make sure that the facility generates revenue and covers costs
  • Determine the best place to re-build or build

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Tom Poulos Williams Architects Andy Dogan Williams Architects Brandon Dowling Johnson Consulting Dave Olson WB Olson, Inc.

Glenview Community Ice Center

 Option 1: Replace  Option 2: Renovate/Expand

Citizen Task Force

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Glenview Community Ice Center

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Feasibility Study/ Business Plan Summary

  • Steady population & very strong median household

income in Glenview

  • Significant local demand for prime time ice
  • Opportunities for expanded programming & events
  • Greater revenue opportunities with 2 main rinks
  • Park District mission achieved with studio rink

programming

  • Demand for local tournaments is strong
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Economic Impact Summary

Meals & Incidentals

Average Daily Spend Per Overnight Visitor

$120 $145 $25  Total Visitors = 194,812  Total Room Nights = 6,973  Total Economic Impact = $5.6 million  One-Time Construction Impact = $18.3 million Lodging

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Glenview Ice Center Annual Attendance 180,865 188,172 191,935 195,774 199,690 203,683 207,757 211,912 216,151 220,474 Hockey Tournaments 5,600 5,826 5,943 6,062 6,183 6,307 6,433 6,561 6,693 6,826 Special Events 8,347 8,684 8,858 9,035 9,216 9,400 9,588 9,780 9,975 10,175 Total Attendence 194,812 202,682 206,736 210,871 215,088 219,390 223,778 228,253 232,818 237,475 Total Room Nights 6,973 7,255 7,400 7,548 7,699 7,853 8,010 8,170 8,334 8,501 Operations 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.7 4.8 4.9 5.0 Tournament/Special Events 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 Total Annual Economic Impact (in Millions) $5.6 $5.8 $6.0 $6.2 $6.4 $6.6 $6.8 $7.0 $7.2 $7.5

Source: Johnson Consulting

Community Ice Center Total Attendance - First 10 years of Operation

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Feasibility Study Process & Findings

  • Comprehensive Market Analysis To Establish Need
  • Develop Facility Requirements / Program
  • Analysis of Potential Sites
  • Concept Design Alternatives
  • Capital Cost Estimates
  • Ten Year Pro Forma Development

(Revenues & Expenses)

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Concept Alternatives

Concept A 2.5 sheet new facility on existing site Concept B Renovation of existing main rink + addition of 1.5 new sheets of ice and associated support spaces

Both concepts phase construction in order to allow the main rink to

  • perate as long as possible during construction.

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Program Summary

PROGRAM COMPONENT / SPACE TYPE

PROPOSED AREA (GSF)

ICE 54,550 ATHLETICS / TRAINING 8,700 COMMUNITY PROGRAMS / MULTI-PURPOSE SPACES 2,200 SERVICES AND VENDORS 2,000 FACILITY ADMINISTRATION 2,400 LOCKER AND CHANGING ROOMS 5,000 COMMON SPACES 10,500 UTILITY SPACES 3,550 INDOOR PLAY 1,600

TOTAL PROGRAM GROSS AREA - SF 90,500 13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

NEW FACILITY (74,740 SF FOOTPRINT) 278 TOTAL PARKING STALLS

Site Plan – Concept A

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Site Plan Detail at Entrance – Concept A

NEW FACILITY (74,740 SF FOOTPRINT)

278 TOTAL PARKING STALLS DROP-OFF LANE

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Lower Level Floor Plan – Concept A

CHAMPIONSHIP RINK RECREATION RINK STUDIO RINK LOBBY

CHECK-IN

CHILDREN’S ADVENTURE PLAY

TOILETS

ADMIN PARTY ROOM

SKATE RENTAL CONCESSIONS

PRO SHOP

ICE MECHANICALS

ICE SUPPORT

  • 10 TEAM ROOMS
  • 4 CHANGING ROOMS
  • SHOWERS/TOILETS
  • COACHES ROOM
  • OFFICIALS ROOM
  • HOCKEY STAFF
  • FIGURE SKATING/

SPECIAL EVENTS STAFF

CAFÉ AREA

ICE SUPPORT

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Upper Level Floor Plan – Concept A

TOILETS MECHANICAL

DRY LAND FITNESS AND TRAINING

PARTNER/ AFFILIATE MEETING SPACE

SPECTATOR VIEWING TRACK (9 LAPS = 1 MILE)

UPPER LOBBY

OPEN TO ADVENTURE PLAY BELOW

MULTI- PURPOSE

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Capital Cost Estimate – Concept A

Base Project $ 32,608,184 Elevated Running Track $ 1,604,221 Children’s Adventure Play $ 718,173 Total Project Cost $ 34,930,578

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

NEW FACILITY (74,740 SF FOOTPRINT) 278 TOTAL PARKING STALLS

(76,040 SF TOTAL FOOTPRINT – NEW + EXISTING) EXISTING MAIN RINK FOOTPRINT 236 TOTAL PARKING STALLS NEW BUILDING ADDITION

Site Plan – Concept B

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Site Plan Detail at Entrance – Concept B

(76,040 SF TOTAL FOOTPRINT – NEW + EXISTING) EXISTING MAIN RINK FOOTPRINT

236 TOTAL PARKING STALLS EMPLOYEE PARKING

NEW BUILDING ADDITION

DROP-OFF LANE

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Lower Level Floor Plan – Concept B

CHAMPIONSHIP RINK RECREATIONAL RINK STUDIO RINK LOBBY

CHECK-IN

CHILDREN’S ADVENTURE PLAY

TOILETS

ADMIN PARTY ROOM

SKATE RENTAL CONCESSIONS

MULTI- PURPOSE PRO SHOP

  • 10 TEAM ROOMS
  • 4 CHANGING

ROOMS

  • SHOWERS/TOILETS
  • COACHES ROOM
  • OFFICIALS ROOM
  • HOCKEY STAFF
  • FIGURE SKATING/

SPECIAL EVENTS STAFF

ICE MECHANICALS

CAFÉ AREA

ICE SUPPORT 21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Upper Level Floor Plan – Concept B

TOILETS

MECHANICAL

DRY LAND FITNESS AND TRAINING

PARTNER AFFILIATE MEETING SPACE

SPECTATOR VIEWING TRACK (8 LAPS=1 MILE)

UPPER LOBBY

OPEN TO ADVENTURE PLAY BELOW

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Capital Cost Estimate – Concept B

Base Project $ 29,369,633 Elevated Running Track $ 1,961,284 Children’s Adventure Play $ 795,589 Total Project Cost $ 32,126,506

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Exterior – View Looking Southeast

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Exterior – From Landwehr Road

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Exterior – Main Entrance

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Lobby / Main Entrance

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Lobby / Gathering Space

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Children’s Adventure Play

29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Recreational Rink (Existing)

30

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Concessions / Café

31

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Upper Level Lobby / Gathering Space Upper Level Lobby / Study Area

32

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Dry Land Training

33

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Jogging / Walking Track

34

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Championship Rink

35

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Capital Cost Estimating Principles

  • Size: Square Footage and Volume
  • Systems
  • Elements and Materials
  • Phasing: Existing Rink Stays Open
  • Escalation: 2018 costs

36

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Thank You!

37

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Q&A

38

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Glenview Community Ice Center

 Option 3: Purchase Existing Facility

Citizen Task Force

39

slide-40
SLIDE 40
  • 2 Sheet Facility, Opened in

September of 2016

  • Asking Price $15,000,000
  • Construction Cost $13,000,000
  • Privately Owned and Operated
  • Village of Mount Prospect
  • Mt. Prospect Ice Arena

1501 Feehanville Dr, Mt Prospect

  • River Trails Park District
  • Site 7-8 acres
  • 5 Core User Groups

Chargers, St. Viator, Notre Dame, Mt. Prospect Park District and Stars 40

slide-41
SLIDE 41
  • Mt. Prospect Ice Arena

Pros

  • Legal for Park District to

purchase land and facilities

  • utside of District
  • Asking Price of $15,000,000
  • Facility is 1 year old
  • 2 full sheets vs 1 ½ sheets
  • Infrastructure is in place to

expand

  • No Referendum needed

Cons

  • Located in Village of Mt.

Prospect and in the River Trails Park District

  • Travel time increased
  • Facility is undersized based
  • n our current needs
  • Current District funds do

not meet the asking price

  • Loss of economic impact to

the Village of Glenview

41

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Q&A

42

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Tom Rychlik, P.E., LEED-AP, Senior Engineer Gewalt Hamilton Associates, Inc. Robert Ijams, Director of Park & Recreation Wight & Company Paul Bluestone, Principal Bluestone + Associates

The Grove

 Improve Safety  Entrance, Paths and Parking  Education/Programmatic Function

Citizen Task Force

43

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Citizen Task Force

The Grove – Improve Safety and Entrance, Paths and Parking

Total Project Cost: $649,940

44

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Citizen Task Force

The Grove – Improve Safety and Entrance, Paths and Parking

45

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Citizen Task Force

The Grove – Improve Safety and Entrance, Paths and Parking

46

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Citizen Task Force

The Grove – Improve Safety and Entrance, Paths and Parking

47

slide-48
SLIDE 48

The Grove – Interpretive Center Renovation

Total Estimated Project Cost: $2,000,000

48

Scope of Building Remodeling includes:

 Add sprinkler system  Upgrade alarm system  Upgrade electrical service to building  Renovate restrooms  New filtration system to support exhibits  Second exit stair from upper floor per life safety code  Remodel of office space and gift shop on first floor to create more space for more exhibits  New reception desk/ kiosk connect staff with visitors and better manage gift shop sales  New building wide HVAC including air conditioning of main exhibit hall and 2nd floor south office area  New LED light fixtures

Citizen Task Force

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Citizen Task Force

The Grove Interpretive Center

49

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Citizen Task Force

The Grove Interpretive Center

September 19, 2017

Why make changes to The Grove’s Interpretive Center?  An untold story  Connect the building, the family and the site  Robert Kennicott  a passionate, accomplished and recognized naturalist  observed and collected on The Grove  on staff of Smithsonian; founder of Chicago Academy of Sciences  Robert died at 30 on the banks of the Yukon River in what is now Alaska  A story waiting to be told

50

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Citizen Task Force

 Let Robert be your guide through the building  Convey his passion  Tell stories about the natural world  Respect the personality of the building and its exhibits  Create some interactive experiences  Involve all the senses: magnification, sound, touch, smell  Create “community exhibits”  Create “bi-level exhibits”  Tell good stories in a conversational dialog  Living interpreters  Unique three part building : museum, nature center, science center

The Grove Interpretive Center

How can we improve the experience of the visitors to the Interpretive Center

51

slide-52
SLIDE 52

52

The Grove Interpretive Center

Citizen Task Force

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Q&A

53

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Steve Konters, PLA, ASLA, Principal Hitchcock Design Group Tom Rychlik, P.E. LEED-AP, Senior Engineer Gewalt Hamilton Associates, Inc.

Sleepy Hollow Park

 Protect District Assets from Flooding  Update Existing Amenities

  • 1,320 Square Foot Fieldhouse
  • Playground for 2-5 year olds & 5-12 year olds

Citizen Task Force

54

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Sleepy Hollow Park

Existing

Citizen Task Force

55

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Sleepy Hollow Park

Concept A Total Project Cost: $913,081

Citizen Task Force

56

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Sleepy Hollow Park

Concept B Total Project Cost: $1,569,432

Citizen Task Force

57

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Sleepy Hollow Park

Concept C Total Project Cost: $1,729,598

Citizen Task Force

58

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Q&A

59

slide-60
SLIDE 60

Michael McCarty, Glenview Park District, Executive Director

Open Space

 Purchase & Development Funding  Expand and Protect Green Infrastructure  Protect and Buffer National and State Designated land  Utilize funds for matching grants  Improve or restore properties once acquired  $1,000,000 in funding

Citizen Task Force

60

slide-61
SLIDE 61

Q&A

61

slide-62
SLIDE 62

Katie Skibbe, Deputy Executive Director Glenview Park District Bill Hofherr, Senior Vice President George K. Baum & Company

 Overview of Proposed Funding Sources/Uses  Overview of Preliminary Financing Plan  Tax Impact Analysis

Citizen Task Force

62

slide-63
SLIDE 63

Citizen Task Force

63

Ice Center $35.0 Million The Grove $2.65 Million Sleepy Hollow $1.73 million Open Space $1.0 million Total $40.38 million

Overview of Potential Uses of Funds*

*Conceptual design rounded estimates.

slide-64
SLIDE 64

Citizen Task Force

Overview of Proposed Funding Sources

 Comprehensive approach to funding proposed projects  Seeking direction on potential voter-approved referendum

 $24 million

 Leveraging certain existing revenues to mitigate tax impact

 $10 million Alternate Revenue Source bonds

 Utilizing accumulated fund balances and potential community group pledged donations

 $6.25 million

64

slide-65
SLIDE 65

Citizen Task Force

Potential Voted Bonds

 Exploring $24 million referendum  Keep financing at 20 years  Structure around existing referendum-approved bonds

 Series 2012C matures on December 1, 2023

 Keep tax impact level in initial years then decreases thereafter  Very conservative in interest rate assumptions

65

slide-66
SLIDE 66

Citizen Task Force

Estimated Debt Service Structure - $24 million

 Debt service on referendum bonds would begin in 2019  Increases in EAV in 2023 and 2024 to coincide with TIF expirations, otherwise no growth assumed

 2023 – The Glen TIF ($513,692,729)  2024 – Waukegan/Golf TIF ($16,815,207)

 Final maturity 20 years from issuance

Outstanding Estimated Calendar Series 2012C New Year EAV Debt Service Debt Service 2017 2,879,602,400 $ 1,181,600 $

  • $

2018 2,879,602,400 1,186,100

  • 2019

2,879,602,400 1,210,100 1,052,801 2020 2,879,602,400 1,208,200 1,095,400 2021 2,879,602,400 1,230,900 1,095,400 2022 2,879,602,400 1,222,700 1,095,400 2023 3,393,295,129 1,234,200 1,095,400 2024 3,410,110,336

  • 2,130,400

2025 3,410,110,336

  • 2,129,000

2026 3,410,110,336

  • 2,130,250

2027 3,410,110,336

  • 2,128,750

2028 3,410,110,336

  • 2,129,500

2029 3,410,110,336

  • 2,127,250

2030 3,410,110,336

  • 2,132,000

2031 3,410,110,336

  • 2,128,250

2032 3,410,110,336

  • 2,131,250

2033 3,410,110,336

  • 2,130,500

2034 3,410,110,336

  • 2,131,000

2035 3,410,110,336

  • 2,127,500

2036 3,410,110,336

  • 2,130,000

2037 3,410,110,336

  • 2,128,000

2038 3,410,110,336

  • 2,131,500

2039 3,410,110,336

  • 8,473,800

$ 37,379,551 $

66

slide-67
SLIDE 67

Citizen Task Force

Estimated Tax Impact - $24 million

 Tax increase in 2019, then decreases in 2023 and 2024  Tax impact based

  • n a home’s

market value

 Assessed at 10%  Current Eq. Factor

  • f 2.8032

 Homeowner’s ex.

  • f $7,000

 Per US Census estimates, Glenview median home value is $473,600

Estimated Impact on Impact on Impact on Impact on Impact on Calendar Tax Rate for $300,000 $400,000 $500,000 $600,000 $700,000 Year Debt Service Home Home Home Home Home 2017 0.0411 2018 0.0412 0.08 $ 0.11 $ 0.13 $ 0.16 $ 0.19 $ 2019 0.0786 28.83 39.32 49.80 60.29 70.77 2020 0.0800 1.08 1.47 1.86 2.26 2.65 2021 0.0808 0.62 0.84 1.07 1.29 1.51 2022 0.0806 (0.15) (0.21) (0.27) (0.32) (0.38) 2023 0.0687 (9.17) (12.51) (15.85) (19.18) (22.52) 2024 0.0625 (4.78) (6.52) (8.26) (9.99) (11.73) 2025 0.0625

  • 2026

0.0625

  • 2027

0.0625

  • 2028

0.0625

  • 2029

0.0624 (0.08) (0.11) (0.13) (0.16) (0.19) 2030 0.0626 0.15 0.21 0.27 0.32 0.38 2031 0.0625 (0.08) (0.11) (0.13) (0.16) (0.19) 2032 0.0625

  • 2033

0.0625

  • 2034

0.0625

  • 2035

0.0624 (0.08) (0.11) (0.13) (0.16) (0.19) 2036 0.0625 0.08 0.11 0.13 0.16 0.19 2037 0.0625

  • 2038

0.0626 0.08 0.11 0.13 0.16 0.19 2039

  • (48.26)

(65.81) (83.36) (100.91) (118.45)

67

slide-68
SLIDE 68

Paul Hanley, Senior Vice President George K. Baum & Company

 Questions & answers  Small group discussion  Further discussion (all members)  Straw poll (deciding what to test district-wide)  Next steps (messaging, outreach, survey research)

Citizen Task Force

68

slide-69
SLIDE 69

Q&A

69

slide-70
SLIDE 70

Small Group Discussion

 Rank the three Ice Center options:

  • New ice center to replace old center at current site
  • Renovate/expand existing ice center at current site
  • Purchase privately owned ice center

 If new or renovated ice center on existing site is pursued:

  • Include walk/jog track?
  • Include children's adventure play area?

 Multiple ice center options can be tested in the mail survey and/or phone poll. Do you wish to test multiple options? If so, how many?  Rank Sleepy Hollow Park options:

  • Concept A
  • Concept B
  • Concept C

 Any projects that you do not want included in the proposal?

  • Ice Center
  • The Grove
  • Sleepy Hollow
  • Open Space

 Any projects you wish to modify before sharing and testing district-wide?

70

slide-71
SLIDE 71

Straw poll:

What proposal should be presented and tested district-wide? This is NOT the final recommendation. You’re voting on what to share and test. Super majority vote: Two-thirds (67%) of task force members present

Citizen Task Force

71

slide-72
SLIDE 72

Schedule of key outreach efforts:

 Letter to key influencers Sep 26  Letter to registered voter households Sep 29  Community Information Meeting #1 Oct 7  Community Information Meeting #2 Oct 11  Community Information Meeting #3 Oct 23  Newsletter Oct 6  Mail Survey Oct 16  Phone Poll Oct 28-30  Task Force Meeting #3 Nov 15  Task Force Meeting #4 Nov 28

Citizen Task Force

72

slide-73
SLIDE 73

Thank you!

Citizen Task Force

Robert Patton Board President Glenview Park District 73