SLIDE 1
Water: An Economic Perspective Water: The Hydrological Cycle - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Water: An Economic Perspective Water: The Hydrological Cycle - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Water: An Economic Perspective Water: The Hydrological Cycle Water: The Hydrological Cycle 2 sources readily available for human exploitation: 1. Surface water Rivers, lakes, reservoirs 2. Groundwater Collects in porous layers of
SLIDE 2
SLIDE 3
Water: The Hydrological Cycle
2 sources readily available for human exploitation:
- 1. Surface water
Rivers, lakes, reservoirs
- 2. Groundwater
Collects in porous layers of underground rock, called “aquifers”
SLIDE 4
Water: The Hydrological Cycle
Note:
- some groundwater is recharged, through percolation of rainwater
and snowmelt
- most groundwater is not recharged, except over geologic time scales
Estimate: 16,000 trillion gallons of U.S. groundwater 400 trillion “recharged” annually, and therefore renewable
SLIDE 5
Water: Withdrawals, 2005
SLIDE 6
Water: Withdrawals, 2005
SLIDE 7
Water: Withdrawals by state, 2005
SLIDE 8
Water: Withdrawals by state, 2005
SLIDE 9
Water: Withdrawals by state, 2005
SLIDE 10
Water: Unsustainable use in Arizona
Example: Tuscon, AZ
- Annual rainfall: 11”
- Surface water? Not so much
- Population explosion
==> aquifer down 100 feet in 10 years! Estimate: aquifer exhausted in 100 years Estimate: pumping rate roughly 5x the natural recharge rate
SLIDE 11
Water: Unsustainable use in California
Surface Water Resource:
- 200m. acre-feet/year rainfall
7 m. acre-feet/year (Colorado & Klamath Rivers) _________ =207 m. a.f./yr Net Surface Water 2/3 evaporation/transpiration 1/3 (i.e. 71 m. a.f.) as annual runoff Groundwater: 850 m. a.f. available 14 m. a.f. withdrawn annually (12.5 m.a.f. annual recharge) _________ =1.5 m.a.f. overdraft
SLIDE 12
Water: Unsustainable use in California
Specific Uses: Eco-system maintenance (necessary in-stream flows): average 36.9 m.a.f./yr Net available: 71 - 36.9 = 34.1 m.a.f./yr 80% dedicated to agriculture 16% for urban 4% for recreation, wildlife, power generation Urban use growing @ 64 k.a.f./yr Populations projections show rapid growth in the driest areas
SLIDE 13
Water: Unsustainable use in California
SLIDE 14
Water: Unsustainable use in California
SLIDE 15
Water: Unsustainable use in California
SLIDE 16
Water: Unsustainable use in California
SLIDE 17
Water: An Economic Perspective
Two kinds of efficiency: 1) Efficient allocation among competing uses (at a moment in time) 2) Efficient allocation across time (dynamic efficiency)
SLIDE 18
Water: An Economic Perspective
(1) Efficient allocation among competing uses:
- requires that MNBi = MNBj all i,j
NOTE: this is similar to the equimarginal condition If MNBi > MNBj ==> i should get more, j should get less (i could compensate j, Pareto improvement) NOTE: in the case of non-storable Surface Water (river water, e.g.), this is the
- nly efficiency criterion
SLIDE 19
Water: An Economic Perspective
BUT: when there is storage (and scarcity), we also have: (2) Dynamic efficiency To maximize the present value of the flow of value from a finite, exhaustible resource: MNBt = MNB(t+1)/(1+i) all t, t+1 which brings us to: Groundwater
SLIDE 20
Water: Groundwater
SLIDE 21
Water: Groundwater
SLIDE 22
Water: Groundwater
SLIDE 23
Water: Groundwater
SLIDE 24
Water: Groundwater
SLIDE 25
Water: Groundwater
SLIDE 26
Water: Groundwater
Exercise: Compare on Google Maps
- 1. Iowa
- 2. SW Nebraska
SLIDE 27
Water: Groundwater
SLIDE 28
Water: The Basic Economic Challenge
1) Static efficiency: equate MNB’s across sectors, at each moment in time
- urban domestic, rural irrigation, industrial/commercial, etc.
2) Dynamic efficiency: equate present value of MNBs, across time
SLIDE 29
Water: The Basic Economic Challenge
Question: How are we doing? Answer: Badly. Market failures all around.
- lack of property rights make trading difficult
- common pool resource problems make “storage” difficult
- institutional details make efficiency pricing difficult