WAB Proje ject t co- financed by European Unions Europ opean - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

WAB Proje ject t co-financed by European Union’s Europ

• pean Region
• nal Develop
• pmen

ment t Fund

Pomeran anian ian Agric icultu ltural ral Education ation Center er in Gdansk

• ul. Trakt Św. Wojciecha 293

www.pod podr. r.pl



Survey of Pomeranian farmers



Preparation of an electronic database based on collected questionnaires and interviews with farmers



Creation of professional expertise defining the energy potential of the region



Implementation of GIS digital maps with the locations of future biogas plants in Pomeranian Region

 Training of 1000 Pomeranian farmers

(lectures, workshops, conferences and working demonstrations of agricultural biogas plants)

 Study trip of selected 50 Pomeranian farmers to

Trelleborg in Sweden

 Promotion of the project - development and delivery

information leaflets, training materials, gadgets, publication of articles in the press

 PAEC organized and supervised

surveys of selected 640 farmers in 16 Pomeranian provinces

 Goal:

– evaluation of potential interest in biogas production – energy resource assessment for biogas production at the disposal of farmers

 Biomass (energy crops)  Manure  Organic waste (vegetable, animal

waste: from farm, garden, kitchen, food industry)

Biomass Biogas Electric energy Thermal energy (waste) Bioethanol Thermal energy (biomass boilers)

1 MW biogas plant - corn of about 500 ha

According to the Electric Power Development Program which includes Renewable Energy Sources in the Pomeranian Region for 2025 150 biogas plants with an electrical capacity of 0.5 MW are planned to be build

 The potential for biogas production in

the Region is 217 million m³ per year Currently - only 5 agricultural biogas plants work in the Pomeranian Region

 Type of animals: cattle, pigs, poultry  Theoretical potential: 70 455.4 thous. m³/ year  Technical potential: 44 314.2 thous. m³/ year  Total value of electricity: 283 345MWh



Na podstawie: Musiał i inni, 2008

Type of

• f farms surve

veye yed Pomeranian Countie ties Cattle farms> 200 units malborski, słupski, sztumski, nowodworski, tczewski Pig farms> 2 000 units człuchowski, kościerski, bytowski Poultry farms kartuski, wejherowski, tczewski, słupski



W oparciu o dane z: Programu rozwoju elektroenergetyki (UMWP, 2009), Planu gospodarki odpadami dla województwa pomorskiego i Musiał i inni, 2008

Powiat Fermy hodowlane [MWh] Rośliny uprawne [MWh] Składowiska odpadów [MWh] bytowski 81 302 97 777 20933 chojnicki 91 703,10 63 550 27599 człuchowski 379 331,57 90 448 gdański 26 551,10 53 772 57453 kartuski 92 860,53 89 882 kościerski 93 361,20 60 813 10859 kwidzyński 62 322,16 67 234 lęborski 31 319,34 28 310 24015 malborski 32391,124 63 043 nowodworski 34 742,57 50 167 pucki 37 529,21 32 481 słupski 70 928,75 119 974 54258 starogardzki 124 780,30 85 536 37574 sztumski 70 257,47 71 071 28653 tczewski 94 937,37 59 832 wejherowski 56 644,87 62 163 182600 RAZEM 1 380 962 1 096 053 443 944

The greatest potential for substrate usage for biogas production, reported by farmers in Pomeranian districts: 1. Wejherowo - about 22 million m³ / year, the dominant substrate: crops 2. Malbork - about 19 ​million m³ / year, the dominant substrate: manure

• 3. Slupsk - about 17 million m³ / year, the dominant substrate: crops
• 4. Gdansk - about 11 million m³ / year, the dominant substrate: manure
• 5. Tczew - about 10 million m³ / year, the dominant substrate: manure

 Possible

ble locat ation ions for agric icultu ltura ral l bioga gas plants (indic dicated ted in yellow)

• w) based on agri-foo
• od

d waste

 Total potential of biogas production (expressed in

GWh) depending on the type of substrates



█ - municipa pal waste █ - energy y crops ps █ - manure

 areas - part of the Natura 2000 network  nature reserves  areas of national parks and their surroundings  terrain parks (landscape parks) as part of Natura

2000

 floodplains, and areas of flood  built-up areas  Natural obstacles: forests, lakes, rivers  Locations too distant to the substrate (transportation

costs make the plant unfeasible)

Lp. Miejscowość Ilość biogazu (m3) Moc biogazowni (MWel) 1 Będomin 11 581 574,93 3,040 2 Nowy Barkoczyn 216 738,55 0,057 3 Grabówko 57 81,00 0,015 4 Wysin 52 167,46 0,014 5 Sztofrowa Huta 39 290,03 0,010 6 Raduń 21 630,54 0,006 7 Lubieszynek 18 718,49 0,005 8 Skrzydłówko 18 499,20 0,005 9 Orle 18 499,20 0,005 10 Mniszek 16 522,70 0,004 11 Cisewie 16 382,53 0,004 12 Lubieszyn 11 430,13 0,003 13 Bąk 9 689,34 0,003 14 Górki 9 078,90 0,002 15 Liniewskie Góry 6 384,80 0,002 16 Zamość 5 802,39 0,002 17 Gostomie 5 553,24 0,002 18 Skoczkowo 5 248,02 0,001

• 1. Pomeranian Region has a significant and unused potential for

biogas production

• 2. Biogas substrates are highly dispersed
• 3. PAEC analysis of manure shows that in total dispersed

sources have much more potential than large farms

• 4. It is advisable to build small agricultural biogas plants in the

region

• 5. Biogas plant locations should steer clear of flooded and

protected natural areas (hence reduce investment risk)

• 6. Pomeranian farmers should establish plantations of wetlands
• n agricultural wasteland and use the limnic plants as an

addition to the biogas substrates

• 7. Substrates located farther than 30 km from the biogas plant are

unprofitable due to transportation costs

• 8. Construction of agricultural biogas plants will have a big

impact on the growth of production of electricity and heat from renewable sources in Pomeranian Region

• 9. Biogas production will contribute to the diversification of the

agricultural income

• 10. In the future agricultural biogas plants will be treated as

priority investments

• 11. Development of biogas production depends on the

effectiveness of promotional and educational campaigns and financial conditions

• 1. Reduc

uctio tion n of enviro ironm nment ntal l poll llut ution ion

• Respo

pons nsible ble management ent of organic nic waste te and animal manur ure

• Reduct

duction n of eutr troph phicat cation n which ch impro roves es the e region's n's touris rist attra ractions ctions

• 2. Econo

nomic ic bene nefits its

 Convent

ention ional l energ ergy y saving ing

 Inde

depen pendenc ence e from exter terna nal l supply pply

WAB Project co-financed by European Union’s European Regional Development Fund