WAB Proje ject t co- financed by European Union’s Europ opean Region onal Develop opmen ment t Fund
Pomeran anian ian Agric icultu ltural ral Education ation Center er in Gdansk ul. Trakt Św. Wojciecha 293 www.pod podr. r.pl
Survey of Pomeranian farmers Preparation of an electronic database based on collected questionnaires and interviews with farmers Creation of professional expertise defining the energy potential of the region Implementation of GIS digital maps with the locations of future biogas plants in Pomeranian Region
Training of 1000 Pomeranian farmers (lectures, workshops, conferences and working demonstrations of agricultural biogas plants) Study trip of selected 50 Pomeranian farmers to Trelleborg in Sweden Promotion of the project - development and delivery information leaflets, training materials, gadgets, publication of articles in the press
PAEC organized and supervised surveys of selected 640 farmers in 16 Pomeranian provinces Goal: – evaluation of potential interest in biogas production – energy resource assessment for biogas production at the disposal of farmers
Biomass (energy crops) Manure Organic waste (vegetable, animal waste: from farm, garden, kitchen, food industry)
Biomass Biogas Electric energy Thermal energy (waste) Bioethanol Thermal energy (biomass boilers)
1 MW biogas plant - corn of about 500 ha
According to the Electric Power Development Program which includes Renewable Energy Sources in the Pomeranian Region for 2025 150 biogas plants with an electrical capacity of 0.5 MW are planned to be build The potential for biogas production in the Region is 217 million m³ per year Currently - only 5 agricultural biogas plants work in the Pomeranian Region
Type of animals: cattle, pigs, poultry Theoretical potential: 70 455.4 thous. m ³/ year Technical potential: 44 314.2 thous. m ³/ year Total value of electricity: 283 345MWh
Type of of farms surve veye yed Pomeranian Countie ties malborski, słupski, Cattle farms> 200 units sztumski, nowodworski, tczewski człuchowski, kościerski, Pig farms> 2 000 units bytowski kartuski, wejherowski, Poultry farms tczewski, słupski Na podstawie: Musiał i inni, 2008
Fermy hodowlane Rośliny uprawne Składowiska odpadów Powiat [MWh] [MWh] [MWh] 81 302 bytowski 97 777 20933 91 703,10 chojnicki 63 550 27599 379 331,57 człuchowski 90 448 26 551,10 gdański 53 772 57453 92 860,53 kartuski 89 882 93 361,20 kościerski 60 813 10859 62 322,16 kwidzyński 67 234 31 319,34 lęborski 28 310 24015 malborski 32391,124 63 043 34 742,57 nowodworski 50 167 37 529,21 pucki 32 481 70 928,75 słupski 119 974 54258 124 780,30 starogardzki 85 536 37574 70 257,47 sztumski 71 071 28653 94 937,37 tczewski 59 832 56 644,87 wejherowski 62 163 182600 1 380 962 RAZEM 1 096 053 443 944 W oparciu o dane z: Programu rozwoju elektroenergetyki (UMWP, 2009), Planu gospodarki odpadami dla województwa pomorskiego i Musiał i inni, 2008
The greatest potential for substrate usage for biogas production, reported by farmers in Pomeranian districts: Wejherowo - about 22 million m³ / year, the dominant substrate: crops 1. Malbork - about 19 million m³ / year, the dominant substrate: manure 2. 3. Slupsk - about 17 million m³ / year, the dominant substrate: crops 4. Gdansk - about 11 million m³ / year, the dominant substrate: manure 5. Tczew - about 10 million m³ / year, the dominant substrate: manure
Possible ble locat ation ions for agric icultu ltura ral l bioga gas plants (indic dicated ted in yellow) ow) based on agri-foo ood d waste
Total potential of biogas production (expressed in GWh) depending on the type of substrates █ - municipa pal waste █ - energy y crops ps █ - manure
areas - part of the Natura 2000 network nature reserves areas of national parks and their surroundings terrain parks (landscape parks) as part of Natura 2000 floodplains, and areas of flood built-up areas Natural obstacles: forests, lakes, rivers Locations too distant to the substrate (transportation costs make the plant unfeasible)
Miejscowość Ilość biogazu (m3 ) Lp. Moc biogazowni (MW el ) Będomin 1 11 581 574,93 3,040 2 Nowy Barkoczyn 216 738,55 0,057 Grabówko 3 57 81,00 0,015 4 Wysin 52 167,46 0,014 5 Sztofrowa Huta 39 290,03 0,010 Raduń 6 21 630,54 0,006 7 Lubieszynek 18 718,49 0,005 Skrzydłówko 8 18 499,20 0,005 9 Orle 18 499,20 0,005 10 Mniszek 16 522,70 0,004 11 Cisewie 16 382,53 0,004 12 Lubieszyn 11 430,13 0,003 13 Bąk 9 689,34 0,003 14 Górki 9 078,90 0,002 15 Liniewskie Góry 6 384,80 0,002 16 Zamość 5 802,39 0,002 17 Gostomie 5 553,24 0,002 18 Skoczkowo 5 248,02 0,001
1. Pomeranian Region has a significant and unused potential for biogas production 2. Biogas substrates are highly dispersed 3. PAEC analysis of manure shows that in total dispersed sources have much more potential than large farms 4. It is advisable to build small agricultural biogas plants in the region
5. Biogas plant locations should steer clear of flooded and protected natural areas (hence reduce investment risk) 6. Pomeranian farmers should establish plantations of wetlands on agricultural wasteland and use the limnic plants as an addition to the biogas substrates 7. Substrates located farther than 30 km from the biogas plant are unprofitable due to transportation costs
8. Construction of agricultural biogas plants will have a big impact on the growth of production of electricity and heat from renewable sources in Pomeranian Region 9. Biogas production will contribute to the diversification of the agricultural income 10. In the future agricultural biogas plants will be treated as priority investments 11. Development of biogas production depends on the effectiveness of promotional and educational campaigns and financial conditions
1. Reduc uctio tion n of enviro ironm nment ntal l poll llut ution ion • Respo pons nsible ble management ent of organic nic waste te and animal manur ure • Reduct duction n of eutr troph phicat cation n which ch impro roves es the e region's n's touris rist attra ractions ctions 2. Econo nomic ic bene nefits its Convent ention ional l energ ergy y saving ing Inde depen pendenc ence e from exter terna nal l supply pply
WAB Project co- financed by European Union’s European Regional Development Fund
Recommend
More recommend
