europ ethical legal and s ocietal issues
play

EUROP: Ethical Legal and S ocietal Issues D L Bisset iTechnic Ltd - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

EUROP: Ethical Legal and S ocietal Issues D L Bisset iTechnic Ltd What is EUROP? European Community Industrial/ Commercial Academic Euros Euros Product Roadmaps S trategic Research EURON EUROP Agenda FP7 Research Technology


  1. EUROP: Ethical Legal and S ocietal Issues D L Bisset iTechnic Ltd

  2. What is EUROP? European Community Industrial/ Commercial Academic Euros Euros Product Roadmaps S trategic Research EURON EUROP Agenda FP7 Research Technology Roadmap Roadmaps Common Vision

  3. What Does EUROP do?  Provides a forum for inter-organisation exchange across Europe  Industry, S ME, Consultants  Government Dpts  Academics  User groups  S timulate debate and raise awareness.  Technical  Commercial  Ethical, Legal and S ocietal (ELS )  Educational  Maintains technical roadmaps from a commercial perspective.  S ets the European strategic research agenda. (FP7)  Assess international activity.  Aids the standardisation process.

  4. (What? ) ELS Objectives  Assess issues surrounding the introduction of Advanced Robots  Legal  S ocietal  Ethical  Particularly issues concerning direct interaction in everyday environments.  Assess broader impact of Advanced Robotics on  Education  S ociety  Explore the context of a developing robot based economy  Public understanding  Higher educational needs

  5. ELS : Commercial Perspective  EUROP works within a commercial context.  Commercial relevance  Within the technical framework of the next 10-20 years.  FP6/ 7  Help the suppliers of robots and robot services understand ELS issues.  Assess the impact of ELS issues on design.

  6. (Why? ) Barriers to Market  ELS issues may present significant barriers in certain markets.  Medical Consent Trust  Healthcare Privacy  S ecurity  Military  S olutions to ELS issues need to be established if these markets are to flourish.  Ethical framework S elf-regulation  Design approval  Regulation Regulatory Control  Legal structure  Design guides Legal Obligation

  7. (How? ) Assessment Process  Assess ELS issues in each market area.  Identify key issues and barriers.  Create a dialogue with non-technical experts:  Lawyers  Healthcare professionals  Trade Unions  Politicians  Identify educational needs.  Identify design methods.

  8. ELS Issues  ELS issues occur at the interface between User, supplier and robot.  Concern, for an application, is increased by  User vulnerability.  A lack of user volition.  By embedding robots into our everyday environments we also embed them into our legal, social and ethical infrastructures.

  9. Application areas Increasing Interaction Manufacturing Retail Domestic Space Increasing ELS Risk Food Transport Defence Sport & Rehabilitation Security Health Care Medical

  10. Open issues  Many questions arise:  How will we ensure/ reassure that robots are safe?  How will we enforce “ ethical” use?  How will we assign liability?  How will we assess design fitness?  How will we assess deployment?  How will we maintain operational standards?  How does this work in automobile industry?  Will ethical regulation of designers be enough?

  11. Actors Operator User Carer S upply Employer Manufacturer Guard Component S upplier Installer S oftware S upplier S ubject S ervices User Robot Maintainer Patient S ervice Provider S pectator Employee Regulators Certification Licensing Government S tandards

  12. Legal Entity  The immediate debate is not about robots needing rights it is about us needing rights and protection.  It is about assigning liability and responsibility for actions and failures.  Ensuring ethical use.  Ensuring basic human rights are maintained. • At work • At home • In care  Will this need special legislation?  How can ethics be designed in?

  13. Ethics by Design  Engineering requirements impact ELS  Recognition reliability  Dependable operation  Intrinsic safety  S ystems level design impact ELS :  Unethical to record video or sound for storage.  Unethical to use data gained for another purpose.  Deployment impacts ELS :  Unethical to replace a human worker with a robot they have trained. • Reduced wage? • Poorer conditions?  Unethical to only provide robot based care.

  14. Vulnerable Elderly Care  Do older people want to be cared for by a robot?  How much choice will they have?  The greying population may force the issue.  How will we ethically assess the cost benefit?  How will we assess liability when an accident occurs?  What technology needs to be built in?  How will we approve the system and its delivery?  How will we deal with the ethics of interaction?  How will we deal with adaptive care?

  15. EUROP  Next Meeting Paris 23-24 th May  Need support and contributions to the ELS work.  S timulate awareness of ELS issues amongst EUROP members.  Need to identify non-technical domain specialists.

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend