vol 3 2015
play

VOL. 3 2015 VOL. 3 2015 C O N T E N T S I. Corporate & - PDF document

VOL. 3 2015 VOL. 3 2015 C O N T E N T S I. Corporate & Finance VI. Litigation and Arbitration 1. International Transactions 1. International Litigation Gibbons P.C. v. Einem&Partner Attention, Sellers of Goods on Alter Egos


  1. VOL. 3 • 2015

  2. VOL. 3 • 2015 C O N T E N T S I. Corporate & Finance VI. Litigation and Arbitration 1. International Transactions 1. International Litigation Gibbons P.C. v. Einem&Partner Attention, Sellers of Goods on Alter Egos in International Credit: A “Retention of Title” Litigation ....................................... 14 (Eigentumsvorbehalt) is Not V. Real Estate Sufficient Under U.S. Law, 1. Development and Land Use and the U.S. Equivalent GÖRG is Changing .....................................3 Real Estate Project SGK Simon Gluck&Kane LLP Developments: FDA’s Recent Supplemental Everybody wins .............................. 16 Proposed Rule Focuses on 2. Real Estate Transactions Added Sugars ..................................5 Aulinger Rechtsanwälte|Notare Wuersch&Gering LLP Hereditary Building Rights in Using a Delaware Limited Liability Germany – a historical vehicle Company (LLC) to Structure an as a modern solution for International Joint Venture has real estate investments ....................18 Gained Considerable Advantage VI. Tax with the Arrival of the Delaware 1. International Tax Rapid Arbitration Act .........................7 AugustinPartners LLC II. International IP/Trademarks Foreign Corporations Owned Vonnemann Kloiber&Kollegen by U.S. Taxpayers – Form 5471 ..........20 “It´s the little differences” Deloitte Tax LLP – Comparison of CTM and The unfinished U.S. tax reform .........22 German Trademarks in litigation cases ............................. 9 III. Immigration Law 1. Others: Renunciation of U.S. citizenship Hodgson Russ LLP The “Reed Amendment” and Admissibility to the United States: Will I Be Barred From Reentry After Renunciation? ......................... 11

  3. VOL. 3 • 2015 Attention, Sellers of Goods on Credit: A “Retention of Title” (Eigentumsvorbehalt) is Not Sufficient Under U.S. Law, and the U.S. Equivalent is Changing When a company sells goods on credit in Germany, it usually retains title in the goods until payment has been made in full (Eigentumsvorbehalt). But, when a German company sells goods on credit to a buyer in the U.S., it cannot assume that it will be protected in the same manner. Rather, if the German seller ships goods to the buyer in the U.S. Brian DiBenedetto, Esq. Director before full payment has been made, it runs the risk of losing title to the goods if the buyer D +1 (212) 613 2033 becomes insolvent. The law in the U.S. does not recognize a retention of title as a matter bdibenedetto@gibbonslaw.com of course – rather, the seller must take certain affirmative steps to protect itself before shipping its goods to the buyer. The precise requirements of the protection are a matter of state law, and the state of New Jersey recently issued a noteworthy amendment to its law on this issue. The Law in the U.S. In the U.S., sellers of goods on credit can obtain a security interest in the sold goods under Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). A version of Article 9 of the UCC has been adopted in all 50 states and Washington, DC; however, there are some differences among the jurisdictions. A security interest under Article 9 of the UCC requires two things – “attachment” and “perfection.” One method of satisfying a critical Marius C. Scherb element of “attachment” is to have express language in a written contract between the Referendar* seller and the buyer granting the security interest. Perfection of a lien on goods may be Gibbons P.C. accomplished with the filing of a Form UCC-1 financing statement, generally with the One Pennsylvania Plaza, 37th Floor Secretary of State of the state where the buyer entity is incorporated or organized. Filed New York, NY 10119 financing statements are publically available, survive for an initial period of five years, T +1 (212) 613 2000 F +1 (212) 554 9671 and can thereafter be renewed. www.gibbonslaw.com In general, a secured party will conduct a UCC lien search to determine whether there are existing perfected security interests filed against the debtor with regard to the collateral in question. This is important, as, between competing security interests in the same collateral, “first to file” usually governs the priority of the security interests. However, a seller of goods on credit can also obtain a purchase money security interest (PMSI), which provides a higher priority interest over competing creditors in the same collateral, even if the other creditors’ competing security interests were recorded first. Simply put, a PMSI is a super priority security interest in goods in favor of the creditor who has financed the purchase price of the goods. 3

  4. VOL. 3 • 2015 Brian DiBenedetto, Esq. Attention, Sellers of Goods on Credit: A “Retention of Title” Director (Eigentumsvorbehalt) is Not Sufficient Under U.S. Law, and the U.S. D +1 (212) 613 2033 Equivalent is Changing bdibenedetto@gibbonslaw.com Marius C. Scherb The requirements to obtain a PMSI differ depending on whether the security interest is in Referendar* “inventory” or “equipment.” For example, a PMSI in inventory requires, without limitation, Gibbons P.C. notification to the holders of conflicting security interests prior to delivery of the goods. In One Pennsylvania Plaza, 37th Floor contrast, a PMSI in equipment must merely be filed within 20 days after the transfer of New York, NY 10119 T +1 (212) 613 2000 the goods to be perfected, without any such notice requirement. Inventory under Article F +1 (212) 554 9671 9 of the UCC refers to specific goods purchased for resale or further processing, whereas www.gibbonslaw.com any other goods generally are deemed to be equipment. Recent Changes in New Jersey Although Article 9 of the UCC is largely the same throughout the different jurisdictions, a recent change in New Jersey is worth noting. Specifically, New Jersey adopted a change to Article 9 of its UCC to address fraudulent UCC and lien filings being made against judges and court personnel. There are two primary changes that may impact how liens are perfected in New Jersey. The first change arguably requires a secured party or representative to use its proper legal name or a filed (in New Jersey) trade name on the Form UCC-1 (as opposed to an unfiled trade name or DBA). The second change alters the requirements for the indication of the collateral in N.J.S.A. § 12A:9-502(a)(3). Under the new law, the Form UCC-1 must indicate not only the collateral covered by the security interest, but also that “the collateral is within the scope of this chapter.” Conclusion Similar to a retention of title in Germany, a filed security interest or PMSI pursuant to Article 9 of the UCC is an effective means of creditor protection. However, a seller must ensure that it complies with the requirements of Article 9 of the UCC in the relevant U.S. jurisdiction. * Marius Scherb, a Referendar with Gibbons P.C. (while in the process of taking the German Bar Examination) at the time this article was authored. 4

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend