1 1
Visualising the Dynamics of a Plasma-Based Electron Accelerator - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Visualising the Dynamics of a Plasma-Based Electron Accelerator - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Visualising the Dynamics of a Plasma-Based Electron Accelerator Malte C. Kaluza Institute of Optics and Quantum Electronics, FSU Jena, Germany Helmholtz-Institute Jena 1 1 Thanks to All Collaborators! A. Svert, M. B. Schwab, M. Leier, M.
2 2 2
Thanks to All Collaborators!
Visualising Plasma-Based Acceleration
- A. Sävert, M. B. Schwab, M. Leier, M. Reuter, M. Schnell,
- A. Kawshik, D. Ullmann, O. Jäckel, F. Ronneberger,
- B. Beleites, C. Spielmann, G. G. Paulus, M. Zepf
Institute of Optics and Quantum Electronics, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Helmholtz-Institute Jena
- A. Buck, K. Schmid, C.M.S. Sears, J. M. Mikhailowa,
- F. Krausz, L. Veisz
Max-Planck-Institute of Quantum Optics, Garching
- S. P. D. Mangles, K. Poder, J. Cole, Z. Najmudin
Imperial College London, UK
- E. Siminos, S. Skupin
Max-Planck-Institute of the Physics of Complex Systems, Dresden
3 3 3
Visualising Plasma-Based Acceleration
Motivation and Outline
- Compact laser-driven plasma-electron accelerators:
- plasma formed and modulated by high-intensity laser pulse
- electrons accelerated by fields of laser-generated plasma wave
(„wakefield“)
- electron pulse parameters determined by details of interaction
- generation and evolution of this wakefield?
- acceleration dynamics?
- High relevance for future beam-driven plasma-electron accelerators:
- research programs started or planned e.g. at SLAC and DESY
- first experimental results
- Pump-probe geometry well suited for investigation:
- accelerator driven by main pulse (“pump pulse”),
- can be characterized (“probed“) using synchronized probe pulse
- Generate synchronized electro-magnetic probe pulses:
- investigate details of interaction with high temporal and spatial
resolution
4 4 4
High-energy particle accelerators
- for protons,
- heavy ions,
- electrons – linacs,
- electrons – synchrotrons
are well established. However, they are large because of limited acceleration field strength to avoid break-through
- r ionization.
Conventional Particle Accelerators
CERN GSI SLAC/LCLS Diamond
Visualising Plasma-Based Acceleration
DESY
5 5 5
High-energy particle accelerators
- for protons,
- heavy ions,
- electrons – linacs,
- electrons – synchrotrons
are well established. However, they are large because of limited acceleration field strength to avoid break-through
- r ionization.
Conventional Particle Accelerators
CERN GSI SLAC/LCLS Diamond
Visualising Plasma-Based Acceleration
JETI
⇒ use plasma as the medium, high-intensity laser
- r electron pulse as the driver!
6 6 6
What are „High Intensities“?
Visualising Plasma-Based Acceleration
Laser intensity IL ≥ 1019 W/cm2 Intensity of sun @ earth ≈ 103 W/m2 Earth’s cross section ≈ 1014 m2 Total power of the sun reaching the earth ≈ 1017 W
7 7 7
What are „High Intensities“?
Visualising Plasma-Based Acceleration
Laser intensity IL ≥ 1019 W/cm2 Intensity of sun @ earth ≈ 103 W/m2 Earth’s cross section ≈ 1014 m2 Total power of the sun reaching the earth ≈ 1017 W to (1 mm)2: IL = 1019 W/cm2 to (1 cm)2: IL = 1017 W/cm2 to (0.1 mm)2: IL = 1021 W/cm2
?
Focussingthis power
8 8 8
What are „High Intensities“?
JETI @ FSU Jena and LWS 20 @ MPQ Garching
Multi-TW OPCPA Laser pulse duration: 8.5 fs pulse energy: 65 mJ focus diameter: <3 µm
- max. intensity:
>1×1020 W/cm2 10...30-TW Ti:Sapphire Laser pulse duration: 85 ... 35 fs pulse energy: 750 mJ focus diameter: <3 µm
- max. intensity: >1×1020 W/cm2
Visualising Plasma-Based Acceleration
9 9 9
Plasma Wakefield Acceleration
Visualising Plasma-Based Acceleration
Image courtesy of A.G.R. Thomas
- Plasma wave excited by Fpond of high-intensity laser pulse
≡ modulation of ne against ion background (vph,plasma = vgr,laser) ⇒ longitudinal E-fields (~ 0.1…1 TV/m)
- injection of electrons into the wave
(e.g. by wave breaking or externally)
Principle of the acceleration process
- W. Leemans et al., PRL (2014)
- A. Pukhov et al., APB (2002)
⇒ quasi-monoenergetic, ultra-short electron pulse
10 10 10
Plasma Wakefield Acceleration
Visualising Plasma-Based Acceleration
Image courtesy of A.G.R. Thomas
- injection of electrons into the wave
(e.g. by wave breaking or externally)
Principle of the acceleration process
- M. Litos et al., Nature (2014)
⇒ relativsiticelectron current ⇔ azimuthal B-fields ⇒ quasi-monoenergetic, ultra-short electron pulse
- Plasma wave excited by Fpond of high-intensity laser pulse
≡ modulation of ne against ion background (vph,plasma = vgr,laser) ⇒ longitudinal E-fields (~ 0.1…1 TV/m)
11 11 11
Electromagnetic Probe Pulses
Visualising Plasma-Based Acceleration
Probe-pulse generation
- Generation ofsynchronized optical probe pulses:
- split off part of
the main pulse
- guide it towards
interaction along different path
- adjust temporal
delay ⇒ perfect synchronization ⇒ probe pulse duration similar to main pulse ⇒ record movie from subsequent shots at different delays (requires good shot-to-shotstability!)
12 12 12
Electromagnetic Probe Pulses
⇒ rotation of probe polarization: ⇒ measure φrot to get signature of B-fields, measure ne to get amplitude!
- Transverse probing of B-fields in underdense plasma with linearly-polarized
probe pulse: if ⇒ B-field induced difference of η for circularly-polarized probe components
- J. A. Stamper et al., PRL (1975)
Measuring B-fields: the Faraday effect
Visualising Plasma-Based Acceleration
13 13 13
Probing Laser-Driven Wakefields
Visualising Plasma-Based Acceleration
Experimental setup I
JETI parameters: Elaser = 800 mJ, τlaser = 85 fs, f/6 OAP, Ilaser ≈ 3x1018 W/cm2 probe pulse: τprobe ≈ 100 fs @ 1ω
14 14 14
Probing Laser-Driven Wakefields
Visualising Plasma-Based Acceleration
Two polarograms from two (almost) crossed polarizers: Deduce rotation angle φrot from pixel-by-pixel division of polarogram intensities:
polarogram 2 polarogram 1 560 µm 340 µm
Polarimetry results
15 15 15
polarogram 2 polarogram 1 560 µm
Probing Laser-Driven Wakefields
Visualising Plasma-Based Acceleration
experimental Faraday feature simulated feature Experimental evidence for B-fields from MeV electrons and bubble!
MCK et al., PRL 105, 115002 (2010)
Polarimetry results
16 16 16
Probing Laser-Driven Wakefields
Visualising Plasma-Based Acceleration
JETI parameters: Elaser = 800 mJ, τlaser = 85 fs, f/6 OAP, Ilaser ≈ 3x1018 W/cm2 probe pulse: τprobe ≈ 100 fs @ 1ω LWS-20 parameters: Elaser = 80 mJ, τlaser = 8.5 fs, f/6 OAP, Ilaser ≈ 6x1018 W/cm2 probe pulse: τprobe = 8.5 fs @ 1ω
Experimental setup II
17 17 17
Probing Laser-Driven Wakefields
Visualising Plasma-Based Acceleration
polarogram 2 polarogram 1
Electron bunch length: Δz = 4 µm τFWHM= (6±2) fs, τRMS= (2.5±0.9) fs
- A. Buck et al., Nature Physics 7, 543 (2011)
Polarimetry results
18 18 18
Probing Laser-Driven Wakefields
Visualising Plasma-Based Acceleration
- Polarimetry:
visualize e-bunch via associated B-fields
- change delay between
pump and probe ⇒ movie of e-bunch formation
- observe e-bunch formation on-line!
- A. Buck et al., Nature Physics 7, 543 (2011)
Polarimetry results
19 19 19
Probing Laser-Driven Wakefields
Visualising Plasma-Based Acceleration
- Shadowgraphy:
visualize plasma wave
- change electron density ⇒
change plasma wavelength
- A. Buck et al., Nature Physics 7, 543 (2011)
Shadowgraphy results
20 20 20
Probing Laser-Driven Wakefields
Visualising Plasma-Based Acceleration
- Experiments with 30-TW JETI-laser system
- Similar resolution, but with 35-fs driver laser:
- frequency-broadening of probe pulse
(in gas-filled hollow fiber) ⇒ shorter τprobe ⇒ sub-main pulse temporal resolution, 1.1 µm spatial resolution with optimized imaging system
τprobe = (5.9±0.4) fs
- M. Schwab et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 191118 (2013)
Experimental setup III
21 21 21
Probing Laser-Driven Wakefields
Visualising Plasma-Based Acceleration
- Few-cycle probe pulses
100 µm 10 µm 100 µm 10 µm LWS 20 JETI
Few-Cycle Microscopy
- M. Schwab et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 191118 (2013)
22 22 22
Probing Laser-Driven Wakefields
Visualising Plasma-Based Acceleration
Probing of plasma wakefield acceleration process
critical power for self injection: for our parameters: ne> 1.5x1019cm-3
S.P.D. Mangles et al., PRSTAB 15, 011302 (2012)
Measuringthe length of the 2nd plasma wave period (at fixed position in the plasma) and the electron charge:
- A. Sävert et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 055002 (2015)
23 23 23
Probing Laser-Driven Wakefields
Visualising Plasma-Based Acceleration
Results from Few-Cycle Microscopy
injection transverse focussing acceleration
- A. Sävert et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 055002 (2015)
Plasma wave evolution above injection threshold: ne=1.6x1019cm-3
24 24 24
Probing Laser-Driven Wakefields
Visualising Plasma-Based Acceleration
Results from Few-Cycle Microscopy
Bubble expansion starts before injection. No beam-loadingbut amplificationofpump pulse: λp for ne=1.6x1019 cm-3 „well behaved“ beam-loadingdominated single-bubble regime multiple-bubble regime wavebreaking radiation
- A. Sävert et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 055002 (2015)
Measuringlength of 1st plasma wave period (at ne=1.6x1019 cm-3) at different positions: After injection: strongly non-linear evolution
25 25 25
Probing Laser-Driven Wakefields
Visualising Plasma-Based Acceleration
Comparison with numerical simulations
electron density & pump pulse intensity computed shadowgrams experimental shadowgrams 3D PIC simulation (EPOCH), 150x70x70 µm3 sliding box, 2700x525x525 cells
- E. Siminos et al., submitted (2015)
26 26 26
Probing Laser-Driven Wakefields
Visualising Plasma-Based Acceleration
Comparison with numerical simulations
- A. Sävert et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 055002 (2015)
Bubble expansion starts before injection. No beam-loadingbut amplificationofpump pulse.
27 27 27
Probing Beam-Driven Wakefields
Visualising Plasma-Based Acceleration
- consequences for probing?
- Energy gain:
Probing of plasma waves at lower background densities
- when reducingne
- W. Lu et al.,
PRSTAB 10, 061301 (2007)
- plasma wave length λpl increases
28 28 28
Probing Beam-Driven Wakefields
Visualising Plasma-Based Acceleration
Probing of plasma waves at lower background densities
ne = 1.7×1019 cm-3, 𝜇plasma = 9 µm 1 ne = 4.8×1018 cm-3, 𝜇plasma = 17 µm 2 probing image, simulated for λprobe = 750 nm plasma wave, simulated with 3D-PIC probing image, simulated for λprobe = 1.4 µm 4 3 5
- E. Siminos et al., submitted (2016)
- Sensitivity/contrast depends on 𝜇probe/𝜇plasma (~1/12 optimal)
⇒ increase 𝜇probe to mid-IR (8...10 µm for ne ≤ 1017/cm3)
- Space and time scales of plasma wave increase similarly
⇒ few-cycle probe pulse in mid-IR gives similar relative resolution!
29 29 29
Probing Beam-Driven Wakefields
Visualising Plasma-Based Acceleration mid-IR: 2 µm ≤ λpr≤ 10 µm near-IR: λpr @ 800 nm
spectral broadening + compression shift λpr (+ amplification in an OPA) + spectral broadening + compression
- synchr. few-cycle, near-IR probe
- synchr. few-cycle, mid-IR probe
works @ ne = 0.5...1×1019cm-3 works @ ne = 3×1016...1×1018cm-3
- M. Schwab et al., APL 103, 191118 (2013)
Probing of plasma waves at lower background densities
30 30 30
Probing Beam-Driven Wakefields
Visualising Plasma-Based Acceleration
- when reducing ne
⇒ use synchronizedfew-cycle mid-IR pulses, adapt diagnosticcomponents (lenses, cameras, polarizers,...)
Probing of plasma waves at lower background densities
⇒ probe electrons‘ B-fields in plasma using Faraday-effect: ⇒ High-resolution diagnostic for visualization of wake field and for synchronization of e-bunch and driver for external injection
- A. Buck et al., Nature Phys. 7, 543 (2011)
- Energy gain:
- W. Lu et al.,
PRSTAB 10, 061301 (2007)
- plasma wave length λpl increases
- consequences for probing?
31 31 31
Conclusions
Visualising Plasma-Based Acceleration
- Probingdiagnostics reveal detailed insight
into plasma-based electron accelerators
- Few-cycle optical pulses can be used to
deduce densityand acceleratingfield distributions in the plasma
- Study non-linear evolutionofplasma wave
⇒ quantitative information about acceleration details
- Use of these diagnostics might help to
- vercome current issues of plasma