virtual ESC protection Design and implementation of new tool chain - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
virtual ESC protection Design and implementation of new tool chain - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Design and implementation of new tool chain for virtual ESC protection Design and implementation of new tool chain for virtual ESC protection 01 Elektronische Fahrwerksysteme | EFS-34 chassis simulation 02 Tool chain requirement 03 Tool
Design and implementation of new tool chain for virtual ESC protection
Elektronische Fahrwerksysteme | EFS-34 chassis simulation
01
Tool chain requirement
02
Tool migration project
03
Results and expertise
04
EFS-34 chassis simulation | Christoph Kossira, Dr. Paul Spannaus 2
Elektronische Fahrwerksysteme EFS-34 chassis simulation
01
EFS-34 chassis simulation | Christoph Kossira, Dr. Paul Spannaus 3
Company at a glance
EFS-34 chassis simulation | Christoph Kossira, Dr. Paul Spannaus
Founded 2009 Location Ingolstadt/Wolfsburg Interest GIGATRONIK Group (51%) Audi Electronics Venture (49%) Employees 315 (April 2016) Company management Wilhelm Schmitt, Audi AG
- Dr. Edwin Tscheschlok,
GIGATRONIK Group
Fields of activity
System integration Divisional Director - Markus Brummer System software development Divisional Director - Stefan Sollmann Interdisciplinary functions Divisional Director - Raimund Hofmayer IN/VE – Innovation management and pre-development Divisional Director - Stefan Sollmann
Company
4
Audi Electronics Venture GmbH cooperation network
e.solutions
Das Joint Venture von Elektrobit und AudiProf. Gustafsson AEV cooperation platform
To increase the speed of automotive electronics innovations and developments, AEV enters into collaboration with technology companies.
EFS-34 chassis simulation | Christoph Kossira, Dr. Paul Spannaus 5
EFS-34 chassis simulation
EFS-34 chassis simulation | Christoph Kossira, Dr. Paul Spannaus
Real test drive Multibody systems Real-time capable vehicle dynamics Virtual test drive Environment simulation
6
Tool chain requirement
02
EFS-34 chassis simulation | Christoph Kossira, Dr. Paul Spannaus 7
MLBevo crosslinking 1 MLBevo crosslinking 2 MLB 3
Scope [%]
50 100 150 200 250 300
Required test scopes in virtual test drive
EFS-34 chassis simulation | Christoph Kossira, Dr. Paul Spannaus
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Topics transfer EFS
- 2. Supplier
FlexRay B channel crosslinking of control units Assistance systems pACC crosslinking of chassis control unit Collective functions Movement manager
Today
8
Scope [%]
50 100 150 200 250 300
Personnel and resources planning
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Starting point Topics transfer EFS
Planning from 2011
Employees [%]
100 200 300
Personnel development
EFS-34 chassis simulation | Christoph Kossira, Dr. Paul Spannaus 9
ESC test field structure and standardisation
Standardisation of ESC cubes Universal simulator Structuring
- f test area
Occupational Health and Safety Combination of dry/wet ESC cubes Connection to Audi IT Universal vehicle dynamics models variant reduction Implementation
- f night run
EFS-34 chassis simulation | Christoph Kossira, Dr. Paul Spannaus 10
Scope [%]
50 100 150 200 250 300
Personnel and resources planning
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Starting point Topics transfer EFS
Planning from 2011
Employees [%]
100 200 300 Option 1 planning without change to tool chain Option 2 planning with tool chain change
Personnel development
Adaptation required
EFS-34 chassis simulation | Christoph Kossira, Dr. Paul Spannaus 11
Tool chain requirements
Connection to Group standards (e.g. EXAM) Potential for certification Flexible & intuitive
- peration
State of the art & standardised interfaces Professional tool environment
EFS-34 chassis simulation | Christoph Kossira, Dr. Paul Spannaus 12
Tool chain for business process outsourcing
Model management Project management Test- development Test- evaluation Test- execution
Internally developed Matlab environment for ESC simulation
- No standardised interfaces
- veDYNA as vehicle dynamics model
- Error-prone, low stability
30% night run abort rate
- Over 400 functionally dependent scripts
Time-consuming training and maintenance Certification not possible
- No connection to ODIS & EXAM
Tool chain requirements not met
HAP HIL workstation
Test automation
Simulation tool
EFS-34 chassis simulation | Christoph Kossira, Dr. Paul Spannaus 13
Test task Results management
Interface Control unit
Test automation
Target tool chain
Simulation tool
EXAM (Test control)
Framework
Vehicle dynamics model Manoeuvre development Manoeuvre control Model management
Requirements- based
Doors Interface simulator/ hardware ControlDesk Versioning Sub version MM6 Datalyzer ODIS
During development
Report creation Database result Test evaluation
EFS-34 chassis simulation | Christoph Kossira, Dr. Paul Spannaus 14
Catalogue specifications comparison
Simulationstool
Requirement Provider 1 Provider 2 Provider 3 Standard components models Own models integration dSPACE hardware platform Signal manipulation Measurement simulation Adaptive driver Animation Manoeuvre creation (graphical) Roads definition (graphical) Process automation FMI/FMU
EFS-34 chassis simulation | Christoph Kossira, Dr. Paul Spannaus 15
Evaluation to prototypical implementation
Criterion Provider 1 Provider 2 Provider 3 Test creation effort (test catalogue #2) 100 % 50 % 25 % Test execution duration #2 100 % n.r. 15 % Test migration effort 100 % n.r. 35 % Development phase testing
- n.r.
+
- Tech. Support
- +
+ Familiarisation time
- +
Operability, usability
- +
Model changes effort
- n.r.
+ Debugging
- n.r.
- EFS-34 chassis simulation | Christoph Kossira, Dr. Paul Spannaus
16
n.r. = not rateable
Financial expenditure for simulation tool migration
Provider 1 Provider 2 Provider 3 Licences 2 1 3 Migration expenditure 3 1 1
Ranking: 1 = best in comparison, descending order
EFS-34 chassis simulation | Christoph Kossira, Dr. Paul Spannaus 17
Internal migration costs 1 2 2 Maintenance per year 3 1 2
Total costs 2 1 3
Scope [%]
50 100 150 200 250 300
Personnel and resources planning
EFS-34 chassis simulation | Christoph Kossira, Dr. Paul Spannaus 18
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Starting point Topics transfer EFS
Planning from 2011
Employees [%]
100 200 300
Cost benefits
Option 1 no change Option 2 planning with tool chain change
Personnel development
Adaptation required
Migration start
Tool migration project
03
EFS-34 chassis simulation | Christoph Kossira, Dr. Paul Spannaus 19
Test case migration for test catalogue #2 example
EFS-34 chassis simulation | Christoph Kossira, Dr. Paul Spannaus 20
6.1 20.1 3.2 17.2 2.3 16.3 30.3 13.4 27.4 Migrated Evaluations Before = after Total
100% Test cases [%]
EFS-34 chassis simulation tool migration status (27/04/2016)
EFS-34 chassis simulation | Christoph Kossira, Dr. Paul Spannaus 21
#01 #02 #03 #04 #05 #06 #07 #08 #09 #10 #11 #12 #13 #14 #15
6.1 20.1 3.2 17.2 2.3 16.3 30.3 13.4 27.4 6.1 20.1 3.2 17.2 2.3 16.3 30.3 13.4 27.4 6.1 20.1 3.2 17.2 2.3 16.3 30.3 13.4 27.4 6.1 20.1 3.2 17.2 2.3 16.3 30.3 13.4 27.4 6.1 20.1 3.2 17.2 2.3 16.3 30.3 13.4 27.4 6.1 20.1 3.2 17.2 2.3 16.3 30.3 13.4 27.4 6.1 20.1 3.2 17.2 2.3 16.3 30.3 13.4 27.4 6.1 20.1 3.2 17.2 2.3 16.3 30.3 13.4 27.4 6.1 20.1 3.2 17.2 2.3 16.3 30.3 13.4 27.4 6.1 20.1 3.2 17.2 2.3 16.3 30.3 13.4 27.4 6.1 20.1 3.2 17.2 2.3 16.3 30.3 13.4 27.4 6.1 20.1 3.2 17.2 2.3 16.3 30.3 13.4 27.4 6.1 20.1 3.2 17.2 2.3 16.3 30.3 13.4 27.4 6.1 20.1 3.2 17.2 2.3 16.3 30.3 13.4 27.4 6.1 20.1 3.2 17.2 2.3 16.3 30.3 13.4 27.4
100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Number of vehicle variants
Platform # Drivetrain Transmission Body Axles Steering Wheel sys Brake Engine Transmission Sensors Restbus A1 Conventional Four-wheel drive Automatic A2 conv. Four-wheel drive Manual gearbox B2 conv. Front Manual gearbox B3 PHEV Four-wheel drive Automatic B4 conv. Four-wheel drive Automatic D1 EV Four-wheel drive E1 conv. Four-wheel drive Automatic E2 PHEV M1a Four-wheel drive Automatic E3 conv. Four-wheel drive Automatic F1 MHEV Four-wheel drive Automatic J1 PHEV Four-wheel drive Automatic J2 conv. Four-wheel drive Automatic J3 MHEV Four-wheel drive Automatic J4 conv. Four-wheel drive Automatic J5 MHEV Four-wheel drive Automatic J6 conv. Four-wheel drive Automatic
EFS-34 chassis simulation | Christoph Kossira, Dr. Paul Spannaus 22
Results and expertise
04
EFS-34 chassis simulation | Christoph Kossira, Dr. Paul Spannaus 23
0 % 50 % 100 %
2016
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 CW 100 % 0 % 50 %
available resources
ESC simulators utilisation
EFS-34 chassis simulation | Christoph Kossira, Dr. Paul Spannaus
Productive test bench operation Total Resource coverage [%]
Migration: 30 % reduction in active simulators
2015
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 CW
Documented downtime not including setup time
effective utilisation approx. 40 % effective utilisation approx. 75 % average utilisation
24
Figures, data, facts about ESC testing tool migration
EFS-34 chassis simulation | Christoph Kossira, Dr. Paul Spannaus
Starting point As of 06/2016 Degree of automation low EXAM -> test control Test cases migrated 100 % 98.4 % Test bench operating time for catalogue #2 | #4 | #5 Veh.1 -- 71.9 23:28 h | 22:12 h | 15:59 h Veh.1 -- 75.5 12:04 h | 10:17 h | 08:23 h Processing time #2 | #4 | #5 40 h | 35 h | 40 h 40 h | 25 h | open Test creation duration with evaluation 100 % 50 %
25
Today Scope [%]
50 100 150 200 250 300
Personnel and resources planning
EFS-34 chassis simulation | Christoph Kossira, Dr. Paul Spannaus 26
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Starting point Topics transfer EFS
Planning from 2011
Employees [%]
100 200 300 Option 2 planning with tool chain change
Personnel development
Central tool chain successes in ESC testing
Automation
- Coding (vehicle installation state)
- Writing of data records (vehicle parameters – tyre data)
- Setting of adjustment channels (field data acquisition)
=> full coverage possible over weekend
- Next step: Sequences of multiple successive catalogues
- Objective: Time to full protection of an entire baseline
EFS-34 chassis simulation | Christoph Kossira, Dr. Paul Spannaus 27
Migration difficulties and challenges
- Evaluation adjustment: phase-based to manoeuvre-based evaluation
- Common manoeuvre description understanding
- Creation of shared team knowledge
- Continuous test operation (5 test executions during migration)
- New software and interface adaptation during operation: Decision as to
whether required adjustment with fixed deadlines should be implemented in new or old tool chain
- Spirit of transformation and active risk management
EFS-34 chassis simulation | Christoph Kossira, Dr. Paul Spannaus 28
Success factors
- Test automation responsibility by experienced employees
- Stringent migration specifications and mandatory use of new standards
- Migration speed tracking
- Adaptive support for decreasing migration speed
- Free radicals: targeted direct/indirect support and kappa shifts
- Tried and tested training programme: Tool chain immediately mandatory for all testers
- Professional support for all participating software manufacturers (purchasing tools)
- Great use of teams
EFS-34 chassis simulation | Christoph Kossira, Dr. Paul Spannaus 29
Thank you!
EFS-34 chassis simulation | Christoph Kossira, Dr. Paul Spannaus 30