VALUE DRIVEN Corporate Presentation March 2017 1 Disclaimer - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

value driven
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

VALUE DRIVEN Corporate Presentation March 2017 1 Disclaimer - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

FINANCIALLY STRONG DISCIPLINED APPROACH VALUE DRIVEN Corporate Presentation March 2017 1 Disclaimer General Advisory The information contained in this presentation does not purport to be all-inclusive or contain all information that readers


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

FINANCIALLY STRONG DISCIPLINED APPROACH VALUE DRIVEN

Corporate Presentation March 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Disclaimer

General Advisory The information contained in this presentation does not purport to be all-inclusive or contain all information that readers may require. You are encouraged to conduct your own analysis and review of Gran Tierra Energy Inc. (“Gran Tierra”, “GTE”, or the “Company”) and of the information contained in this presentation. Without limitation, you should read the entire record of publicly filed documents relating to the Company, consider the advice of their financial, legal, accounting, tax and other professional advisors and such other factors you consider appropriate in investigating and analyzing the Company. You should rely only on the information provided by the Company and is not entitled to rely on parts of that information to the exclusion of others. The Company has not authorized anyone to provide you with additional or different information, and any such information, including statements in media articles about Gran Tierra, should not be relied upon. In this presentation, unless otherwise indicated, all dollar amounts are expressed in U.S. dollars. An investment in the securities of Gran Tierra is speculative and involves a high degree of risk that should be considered by potential purchasers. Gran Tierra’s business is subject to the risks normally encountered in the oil and gas industry and, more specifically, and certain other risks that are associated with Gran Tierra’s current stage of development. An investment in the Company’s securities is suitable only for those purchasers who are willing to risk a loss of some or all of their investment and who can afford to lose some or all of their investment. You should carefully consider the risks described under the heading “Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 and in the Company’s other SEC filings. This presentation contains disclosure respecting contingent and prospective resources. Please see the appendices to this presentation for important advisories relating to our contingent and prospective resources disclosure. Certain financial and operating results included in this presentation, including working capital and production information are based on unaudited estimated results. Forward-Looking Information Advisory This presentation contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and financial outlook and forward looking information within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws (collectively, “forward-looking statements”). Such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about: future projected or target production and the growth of production including the product mix of such production and expectations respecting production growth; our ability to grow in both the near and long term and the funding of our growth

  • pportunities; our possible creation of new core areas; our prospects and leads; anticipated rationalization of our portfolio and strategies for maximizing value for our assets in Peru and Brazil;
  • ur pursuit of opportunities in Mexico; forecasted funds flow from operations; the plans, objectives, expectations and intentions of the company regarding production, exploration and

exploration upside, drilling, permitting, testing and development; Gran Tierra’s 2017 capital program including the changes thereto along with the expected costs and the allocation of the capital program; Gran Tierra’s financial position and the future development of the company’s business. Statements respecting reserves, contingent resources, and prospective resources are forward-looking statements as they involve the implied assessment, based on estimates and assumptions, that the reserves, contingent resources, and prospective resources described exist in the quantities predicted or estimated and can be profitably produced in the future. Estimates of future production may be considered to be future-oriented financial information or a financial outlook for the purposes of applicable Canadian securities laws. Financial outlook and future-oriented financial information contained in this presentation about prospective financial performance, financial position or cash flows are based on assumptions about future events, including economic conditions and proposed courses of action, based on management’s assessment of the relevant information currently available, and to become available in the future. In particular, this presentation contains projected operational information for 2017. These projections contain forward-looking statements and are based on a number of material assumptions and factors set out above. Actual results may differ significantly from the projections presented herein. These projections may also be considered to contain future-oriented financial information or a financial outlook. The actual results of Gran Tierra’s operations for any period will likely vary from the amounts set forth in these projections, and such variations may be material. See above for a discussion of the risks that could cause actual results to vary. The future-oriented financial information and financial outlooks contained in this presentation have been approved by management as of the date of this presentation. Readers are cautioned that any such financial outlook and future-oriented financial information contained herein should not be used for purposes other than those for which it is disclosed herein. The Company and its management believe that the prospective financial information has been prepared on a reasonable basis, reflecting management’s best estimates and judgments, and represent, to the best of management’s knowledge and opinion, the Company’s expected course of action. However, because this information is highly subjective, it should not be relied on as necessarily indicative of future results. The forward-looking statements contained in this presentation are based on certain assumptions made by Gran Tierra based on management’s experience and perception of historical trends, current conditions, anticipated future development and other factors believed to be appropriate. Such statements are subject to a number of assumptions, risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond Gran Tierra’s control, which may cause actual results to differ materially from those implied or expressed by the forward-looking statements. These include the factors discussed or referenced under the heading “Part 1. Item 1A. Risk Factors” in Gran Tierra’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K, under the heading “Part II. Item 1A. Risk Factors” in Gran Tierra’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and in the other reports and filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which such statements are made, and Gran Tierra undertakes no obligation to correct or update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable law. Gran Tierra’s forward-looking statements are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

GRAN TIERRA – KEY INVESTMENT ATTRIBUTES

Transformed Portfolio

  • 4 strategic acquisitions in Colombia in 2016*, established dominant land position in highly

prospective, underexplored Putumayo & new core area in prolific Middle Magdalena

  • 2016: W.I. 1P, 2P, 3P reserves before royalties: increased 51%, 91% & 146%, respectively1

High Quality Assets

  • ~74% of 2P reserves are in 3 large, operated, conventional, onshore Colombian oil assets

(Acordionero, Costayaco & Moqueta) with high netback production & low base declines2

  • Expanded inventory of net undrilled development well locations: 36 (2P) & 54 (3P)

Large Resource Base

  • W.I. mean unrisked prospective Colombia resources of 682 MMBOE3**; plans to drill 30-35

exploration wells over next 3 years, expected to be funded by cash from operating activities

  • Dominant Putumayo position in emerging N-Sand & A Limestone oil play fairways

Control of Operations

  • Operates >90% percent of production
  • Significant control & flexibility on capital allocation & timing

Visible Production Growth

  • Q4/2016 W.I. production increased 34% over Q4/2015 W.I. production
  • 2017 W.I. production forecasted to increase 33% vs. 2016 full year & 16% vs.Q4/2016
  • Visibility to 2018 W.I. production greater than 40,000 boepd based on 2P forecast4

1, 2, 3, 4 ) See endnotes. * 3 completed acquisitions (Petroamerica, PetroGranada, PetroLatina), 1 pending (Ecopetrol bid round);

**EXCLUDES PetroLatina & Ecopetrol acquisitions & new “A” Limestone play

Sustainable business model, expected to be fully funded by forecasted cash from operating activities

    

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

2016 Year-End 2P Gross W.I. Reserves3 (MMBOE) Market Statistics Symbol (NYSE MKT, TSX) GTE Share Price (at close February 24, 2017), NYSE MKT US$ 2.61 Daily Trading, 30-day Ave Volume, NYSE MKT/TSX 2.00 MM / 2.50 MM Basic Shares 399.0 MM1 Market Capitalization (Basic Shares Only) US$ 1,041 MM Enterprise Value (Basic Shares Only) US$ 1,262 MM2 2016 Year End Production, Reserves, RLI* & Net Asset Value (NAV) 10% Before Tax W.I. Production (Q4/2016 Average) 31,031 BOEPD W.I. Proved (1P) Reserves 72.8 MMBOE3 (6.4 year RLI5) W.I. Proved + Probable (2P) Reserves 126.1 MMBOE3 (11.1 year RLI5) W.I. Proved + Probable + Possible (3P) Reserves 199.2 MMBOE3 (17.5 year RLI5) W.I. 1P NAV 10% Before Tax US$ 1,010 MM4 W.I. 2P NAV 10% Before Tax US$ 1,935 MM4 W.I. 3P NAV 10% Before Tax US$ 3,131 MM4

1) At Dec.31, 2016; 2, 3, 4) See endnotes; 5) RLI = Reserve Life Index, see endnotes

COMPANY SNAPSHOT

Highly liquid stock, supported by solid NAV, low decline production & strong cash flow generation

Acordionero 48.2 Costayaco 27.2 Moqueta 18.3 Cumplidor 5.4 Ramiriqui 4.3 Suroriente 4.0 Minor Fields 8.5 Tie 10.2

74%

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

COLOMBIA

Discovered Resources

Appraise & develop newly acquired fields, including the large Acordionero oil field

Grow/maintain existing production in Costayaco & Moqueta through development & appraisal of “A” Limestone, incl. horizontal wells

Continue to optimize development & operating cost structures

Undiscovered Resources

Accelerating N-Sand, “A” Limestone, U/T/Caballos exploration & development in Putumayo Basin

Multi-zone targets reduce risk

W.I. Mean Unrisked Prospective Resources of 682 MMBOE in Colombia 1

New Inventory

Continue evaluation of Ecopetrol joint-venture (JV) & farm-in

  • pportunities

Expand into other basins within Colombia via JV/farm-in & diversify product streams with a focus on value creation

Qualified operating team advantage

CORPORATE STRATEGY

1) See endnotes; 2) Conditional on financing by Maha Energy.

BRAZIL/PERU

Maximize Value of Brazil & Peru

Brazil: $35 million sale2 to Maha Energy announced, expected close on or before Aug.1/2017

Peru: evaluating spin-out proposal where SpinCo would externally raise its own funds & GTE may retain equity interest

MEXICO

Longer Term Growth Strategy

Positioning for Mexico option

Evaluate conventional onshore development, EOR & low risk exploration opportunities

Objective is to grow net asset value per share by 3 – 5 times within 5 years

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

4.47 4.85 5.44 7.84 Dec-15 Dec-16 2P NPV BT 3P NPV BT 23.1 31.0 Q4/2015 Q4/2016 Actual 119 178 501 682 Dec-15 Dec-16 Risked Unrisked 48 73 66 126 81 199 Dec-15 Dec-16 1P Reserves 2P Reserves 3P Reserves

DELIVERING ON OUR FOCUSED STRATEGY

1, 2, 3) See endnotes.

Growth in Colombian reserves/production/exploration potential = shareholder value creation

   

1 2 3 4

Reserves Growth(1) Production Growth Expanded Exploration Potential(2) Net Asset Value Growth(3)

(mmboe, W.I., pre-royalties) (mboe/d, W.I., pre-royalties) (mmboe, mean prospective resources, W.I., pre-royalties)

146% 91% 51%

(US$/share)

8% 51% 44% 34% 36%

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

NET ASSET VALUE

1) See endnotes.

Net Asset Value (NAV)1 Based on McDaniel Dec.31, 2016 Reserve Report, Before Tax (US$MM, US$/share) Gran Tierra shares currently trade at substantial discount to 2P and 3P NAV per share $916 $1,010 $1,935 $3,131 $314 $220.5 $925 $1,196 $2.53 $4.85 $7.85 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500

Proved Developed Proved Undeveloped Net Working Capital & Long Term Debt 1P NAV Probable 2P NAV Possible 3P NAV

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

NETBACK COMPARISON

Top quartile netbacks versus oil weighted peers Operating Netback Peer Comparison1, Sep YTD 2016 (US$/bbl )

20.90 17.52 16.75 16.27 15.76 15.34 15.26 13.58 13.52 13.27 11.52 10.10 9.14 8.89 8.47 8.16 6.68

5 10 15 20 25 RRX GTE VET PXT BNE SPG WCP SPE VII TOG SGY NVA PWT ARX BTE JOY PGF

1) Source: Company Reports. 2016 Q3 YTD actuals as reported; netbacks are a non-GAAP measure; refer to March 1, 2017, press release for additional information.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

2017 CAPITAL BUDGET & PRODUCTION GUIDANCE1

2017 WELL SUMMARY (ALL IN COLOMBIA) Gross Wells Net Wells 2017 PRODUCTION GUIDANCE (BOEPD) Low End High End Development 15-19 13-14 Colombia 32,800 36,500 Exploration 8-11 7-9 Brazil 1,200 1,500 Total 23-30 20-23 Total Company 34,000 38,000 Growth over 2016 Average 25% 40%

2017 CAPITAL BUDGET ($ MILLION)

At US$56.00/bbl Brent2, Gran Tierra expects to fund its capital budget from cash from operating activities3

2017 CAPITAL BUDGET ALLOCATIONS

COLOMBIA Development 57 %

  • Development

100 – 140 MM Exploration 43 %

  • Exploration

85 – 95 MM TOTAL 100 % TOTAL COLOMBIA 185 – 235 MM Brazil 8 MM Drilling & Completions 75 % Peru 6 MM Facilities & Pipeline 20 % Corporate 1 MM 2D & 3D Seismic 5 % TOTAL COMPANY 200 - 250 MM TOTAL 100 %

1, 2, 3) See endnotes

2017 capital budget expected to be fully funded from cash from operating activities with 43% of capital to be invested in Exploration to test ~ 200 MMBOE of unrisked Prospective Resources

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

2017 CASH FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES GUIDANCE1&2

1, 2, 3) See endnotes

Brent ($/bbl) 56.003 2017 Budget W.I. Production Guidance before royalties (BOEPD)2 34,000 – 38,000 Cash from Operating Activities ($million)2 240 – 260 Expenses ($/boe)

  • Transportation and Discount

13.00 – 15.00

  • Royalties

7.00 – 9.00

  • Operating Costs

7.00 – 9.00

  • General and Administrative

2.00 – 3.00

  • Interest and Financing

1.00 – 2.00

  • Taxes

2.00 – 4.00

With projected 2017 Brent oil price of $56/bbl, Gran Tierra expects following ranges of 2017 cash from operating activities and 2017 expenses

2017 forecast: continued delivery of growing low cost & high netback oil production

2017 expected production growth

  • f 25-40% over

2016 average

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Core Assets

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

19 48 96

  • 20

40 60 80 100 120 1P Reserves 2P Reserves 3P Reserves mmboe

MIDDLE MAGDALENA – ACORDIONERO (100% WI)

Field Production (December 31, 2016)

  • Oil: 6,877 bopd (6 wells total)
  • Water: 46 bwpd (0.7% water cut)
  • GOR: 113 scf/stb

1) See endnotes

Reserves & NPV (mmboe; US$MM)1

Delivering material production growth, 2P & 3P reserves upside

NPV10% Before Tax 418 938 1,666 NPV10% After Tax 388 733 1,223 Recovery Factor % 13.4 18.9 27.0

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

ACORDIONERO FIELD OVERVIEW

Lisama A Structure

Main UNC AC-2 E W 60+° dip 35° dip

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

ACORDIONERO 2P DEVELOPMENT PLAN1

Facilities Expansion #1: 15,000 BFPD / 10,000 BOPD

CPF Pad: 3 new producers, 2 new injectors

AC-2 Pad: 4 new producers, 1 new injector

Mochuelo Pad: 1 water source

AC-4 Pad: 4 new producers, 2 new injectors

Facilities Expansion #2: 25,000 BPFD / 15,000 BOPD

South Pad: 5 new producers, 1 new injector

AC-6 Pad: 2 new producers

Central Pad: 2 new producers

CPF Pad

Lisama A Structure

1) See endnotes.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

PUTUMAYO – COSTAYACO OVERVIEW (100% WI)

1) See endnotes.

Legacy field delivering significant free cash flow; optimizing waterflood efficiency

Field Production (Dec.31, 2016)

  • Oil: 14,249 bopd
  • Water: 34,083 bwpd (71% w/c)
  • GOR: 174 scf/stb
  • Water Injection: 37,318 bwipd

Reserves & NPV (mmboe; US$MM)1

Large increase in fluid handling

21 27 33

  • 10

20 30 40 1P Reserves 2P Reserves 3P Reserves mmboe NPV10% Before Tax 334 425 540 NPV10% After Tax 247 305 379 Recovery Factor % 36.3 38.5 40.2

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

COSTAYACO: NEW OIL PLAY, BYPASSED “A” LIMESTONE (100% WI)

 Costayaco-19: 60’ perforated interval/100’ pay; jet pump, 70% drawdown  Costayaco-9: producing ~527 bopd (29.5oAPI), 2% water cut, 200 scf/stb GOR; 50’ perforated interval/70’ net pay; jet pump, 90% pressure drawdown

* See disclaimer on Slide 53, last paragraph

Natural Flow Jet Pump 29.5o API Oil

“A” Limestone: exciting new play concept in Putumayo; testing with 2 Costayaco horizontal wells H1/2017

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

COSTAYACO STRUCTURAL CROSS SECTION

Field wide potential in both the A and M2 Limestones.

Costayaco 19ST Costayaco 9 Costayaco 24 Costayaco 26

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

26 29Hz 28Hz 19 13 18 27i 6i 10i 9 3 15i 5i 14i 23i 7i 17i 21 22 4 8 12 2 16 11 25 20 1 24 GRY-1

  • Oil Kicks: CYC 2,16,19

COSTAYACO: “A” LIMESTONE – POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT

A Limestone Depth Structure Map Possible OWC

  • CYC 19 Recompletion
  • On Stream 19/09/2016
  • CYC 9 Recompletion
  • On Stream 14/10/2016
  • CYC 7 Recompletion
  • On going
  • CYC 28 Pilot Hole
  • Coring the A Limestone
  • CYC 2 Recompletion
  • Feb 2017
  • CYC 28 Hz Drill
  • Kick off Hz ~ 01/02/2017
  • CYC 29 Hz Drill
  • Spud ~ 16/02/2017
  • CYC 30 Hz Drill (Tentative)

1,587 bopd 0.5% W/C

CYC 19

2017 YTD Drawdown 70% 527 bopd 2.1% W/C

CYC 9

2017 YTD Drawdown 90%

19 18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

COSTAYACO: POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT

POTENTIAL ACTIVITIES

2 conversions; producer to injectors (Jan 2017 and April 2017)

Add 2 high pressure injection pumps (April, May 2017)

Install a 2nd test separator

(Feb 2017)

Electrical upgrade / additional gas to power

(Nov 2017)

2 unswept locations targeting T sand and Kc

(2018, 2019)

Unswept Areas

Costayaco Simulation Grid Updated Jan 2017 Kc Sand - Oil Saturation Map T Sand – Oil Saturation Map

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

COSTAYACO: POTENTIAL UPSIDE – N SAND1

McDaniels Evaluation (Dec 2016) Parameter 1P 2P 3P Area (acres) 300 300 300 OOIP (MSTB) 3,320 3,320 3,320 R.F. 12.5% 16.0% 20.0% Reserves (MSTB) 415 531 664 Note: Technical reserves.

N sand thickness map based on seismic attributes. These could be isolated sand bodies between 0.6 and 2 MMSTB each.

C-13

Oil Shows

660 bopd 1.0% W/C CYC 1

2017 YTD

GRY-1

1) See endnotes.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

M2 Limestone

CYC 28 Pilot: Recovered ~ 8 ft of 48 ft cored. M2 ~ 55 ft thick

CYC 28 Core; Oil Shows CYC 26; Fluorescent cut very strong

COSTAYACO: POTENTIAL UPSIDE – A / M2 LIMESTONE1

A Limestone

CYC 28 Core: Fractures flowing oil

Oil Shows Oil Kicks on Drill Oil Producer

A Limestone reserves only defined south end of field, potentially growing bigger by day w/continued low water cuts.

McDaniels Evaluation (Dec 2016) Parameter 1P 2P 3P Area (acres) 520 750 1,225 OOIP (MSTB) 10,395 14,993 24,488 R.F. 12.3% 17.0% 24.0% Reserves (MSTB) 1,281 2,396 5,875 Depth Structure Map Thickness Map

Possible OWC

1) See endnotes.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

1) See endnotes.

PUTUMAYO – MOQUETA OVERVIEW (100% WI)

Legacy field delivering significant free cash flow; large step-up in water injection

Reserves & NPV (mmboe; US$MM)1

Field Production (Dec. 31, 2016)

  • Oil: 6,365 bopd
  • Water: 2,246 bwpd (26.0% w/c)
  • GOR: 494 scf/stb
  • Water Injection: 11,624 bwipd

Large increase in water injection

 Large increase in water injection expected to

repressure reservoirs & maintain plateau production through 2017

 Currently evaluating “A” Limestone potential

13 18 23

  • 5

10 15 20 25 1P Reserves 2P Reserves 3P Reserves mmboe NPV10% Before Tax 198 292 386 NPV10% After Tax 157 217 277 Recovery Factor % 28.2 34.1 40.6

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

MOQUETA STRUCTURAL CROSS SECTION

A A’ A’ A

Consistent A Limestone package evident across the field, ~100ft thick

Moqueta 7 Moqueta 6N ST Moqueta 4 Moqueta 8 Moqueta 11 Moqueta 19ST Moqueta 21

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

MOQUETA POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT

 Increasing fluid handling capacity from

9,000bbl/d to 16,000bbl/d

 Optimizing and executing ongoing stimulation

program

 Increased injection 44% via pump optimization

and well conversion to 13,000 bbl water/day

 Complete well coverage in the field allows us to

  • ptimize the waterflood

 Significant response being noted in select wells,

in particular MQT-12

  • Furthest downdip well in the west and located in a

closed boundary area

 Anticipating the pressure/flood front to

significantly add productivity to wells in 2017

 Currently have a heli-portable rig on standby at

no cost in Moqueta – Artificial lift optimization

Good waterflood response evident - gas oil ratio is decreasing and fluid production is increasing

GOR Decreasing

MQT-10i

MQT-10i Injection

MQT-12

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

A Limestone / M2 Limestone / N Sand Potential

MOQUETA POTENTIAL UPSIDE

Shallow Prospect North Block Prospect

MQT-1 Pad MQT-7 Pad MQT-4 Pad

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

MOQUETA POTENTIAL UPSIDE

MQT-19ST

A M 2

MQT- 1 MQT- 5 MQT-1 MQT-5 MQT-19

Near Term Limestone Opportunities

A Limestone / M2 Limestone

 Significant pay with gas shows identified in multiple

wells

 Strong oil shows through the A and M2 Limestones in

MQT19

 N Sand opportunities have been identified in MQT-18

and ZPT-1

 Areas with good oil shows in the Limestones have

also encountered considerable fracturing as seen by image logs

 Data obtained from Moqueta, potential early asset re:

Limestone opportunities in other areas of Putumayo

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

MARKETING & TRANSPORTATION

1, 2) See endnotes.

Restructured marketing function, improved netbacks by up to $2.50/bbl

Sales netbacks after transportation vary by < $4.00/bbl depending on route

Significant pipeline capacity in Putumayo for current & potential future

  • il production
  • OCP (Ecuador): spare capacity

~280,000 bopd1

  • OTA (Colombia): spare capacity

~25,000 bopd2

Multiple transportation routes to monetize oil

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

Exploration

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

EXPLORATION UPSIDE WITH LARGE RESOURCE BASE

Colombia Prospective Resource (before royalties)1 BOE (MMBOE) MCDANIEL 2015 YEAR END WI Prospective Resources – Unrisked Risked Resources

Basin Prospects / Leads Low P50 Mean High Mean

Putumayo 45P 114.9 306.6 441.4 921.4 134.8 Llanos 9P & 2L 43.4 104.9 136.2 268.3 28.8 Sinu 4 L 10.6 54.5 104.1 263.7 14.6 Total 54P & 6L 168.9 466.0 681.7 1,453.4 178.2

1) See endnotes; P = Prospects; L = Leads

Does not include PetroLatina & Ecopetrol acquisitions, or new “A” Limestone play in Putumayo Basin During 2016: upside exploration potential expanded, 50% increase in W.I. mean risked prospective resources from 119 MMBOE to 178 MMBOE

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

COLOMBIA EXPLORATION PROJECTS - 2017

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

E x e c u t i

  • n

Confianza (Put 7) Prosperidad (El Porton) Siriri (Put 4) Vonu (Put 1) Tonga (Sinu 3) Totumillo (Midas) Cumplidor 3D (Put 7) Tautaco (Lla- 10) Northwest 3D (Put 7) Ayombero (Midas) Comadreja (Put 2) Pomorroso (Put 7) Northwest (Put 7) Caballos (Lla 53)

1 - 2 wells 3 - 4 wells 2 - 3 wells 2 - 3 wells 1 seismic 1 seismic 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q

Spud Executed Spud Planned Seismic Planned

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

E x e c u t i

  • n

Confianza (Put 7) Prosperidad (El Porton) Siriri (Put 4) Vonu (Put 1) Tonga (Sinu 3) Totumillo (Midas) Cumplidor 3D (Put 7) Tautaco (Lla- 10) Northwest 3D (Put 7) Ayombero (Midas) Comadreja (Put 2) Pomorroso (Put 7) Northwest (Put 7) Caballos (Lla 53)

1 - 2 wells 3 - 4 wells 2 - 3 wells 2 - 3 wells 1 seismic 1 seismic 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q

Gran Tierra plans active 2017 Colombia exploration program of up to 12 wells

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

Source: IHS 2017

Dominant land position in N-Sand & A Limestone exploration fairways  Competitive advantages

  • Regional seismic coverage of 2D and 3D
  • Significant multi-zone production
  • Large contiguous land base

 “N” Sand Play

  • Play fairway largely captured
  • Amplitudes identifiable on seismic
  • Statistically high chance of success,

near term tests planned

 Emerging “A” Limestone Play

  • Bypassed pay: Costayaco, Moqueta
  • Regionally extensive carbonate platform
  • A Limestone learnings will be applied to
  • ther limestones such as M2

PUTUMAYO BASIN “N” SAND PLAY FAIRWAY

NBM
slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

 2017 drilling program

will further test seismically defined “N” Sand amplitude play

 Several exploration

wells will be deepened to test “A” Limestone play away from current known production & information at Costayaco

PUTUMAYO BASIN: 2017 EXPLORATION WELLS

GTE 2017 exploration program designed to test several N-Sand & A-Limestone prospects

NBM

slide-33
SLIDE 33

33

Sandstone Reservoir Sealing Shales Limestone Reservoir / Source Limestone & Sandstone Reservoir

PUTUMAYO: UNDEREXPLORED MULTI-ZONE POTENTIAL

ANALOG FIELDS

CUMPLIDOR QUINDE COHEMBI ORITO COSTAYACO COSTAYACO MOQUETÁ GURIYACO

Caballos Fm

Caballos T Sand

Villeta Fm

U Sand A Limestone M2 Limestone N Sand OIL RESERVOIR

The Gran Tierra Putumayo Advantage: Stacked, multi-zone potential, plus dominant land & facilities positions

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

GRAN TIERRA – KEY INVESTMENT ATTRIBUTES

Transformed Portfolio High Quality Assets Large Resource Base Control of Operations Visible Production Growth Sustainable business model, fully funded by forecasted cash from operating activities

    

slide-35
SLIDE 35

35

Appendix

slide-36
SLIDE 36

36

ECOPETROL 2016 BID ROUND – 2 SUCCESSFUL ACQUISITIONS

(1) As reported in Ecopetrol’s Bid Round Summary Flyer – published December 2015; see Gran Tierra press release dated November 28, 2016 for additional information

On Nov.25/2016, submitted 2 successful bids for combined US$30.4 million for Santana & Nancy- Burdine-Maxine Blocks

Gross WI 2016 average production before royalties ~600 bopd & ~300 bopd behind-pipe(1)

Upside: EOR waterflooding, exploration in “N” sands & “A” Limestone plays

~27,400 gross WI acres(1)

Centralized transportation hub in Putumayo; strategic, operated, pipeline infrastructure & gathering facilities:

  • 26,000 bopd of pipeline capacity (1)
  • 25,000 barrels of oil storage (1)
  • O.M.U & O.U.S. pipelines: connect Costayaco,

Moqueta & Guayuyaco fields to Santana Station

Strategic acquisitions strengthen GTE’s competitive advantage in Putumayo Basin

slide-37
SLIDE 37

37

2016 2P RESERVES BREAKDOWN AND RESERVES PROGRESSION1

Reserves by Property (mmboes) Reserves Progression (mmboes)

 Acquisitions almost doubled 2P 2015 reserves  Acordionero, Costayaco and Moqueta represent 74% of the

asset portfolio

 68% of Proved Reserves are Developed  58% of 2P reserves are Proved Reserves  91% of 2P reserves are operated

After 5 years of no reserve growth, GTE grew 2P reserves by 91% and 3P by 146% in 2016

1) See endnotes.

slide-38
SLIDE 38

38

GTE RESERVES SUMMARY – 2P1

Reserves & NPV (mmbbl; US$mm) 2P Production (W.I., mbbl/d) 2P Capex and Cashflows (W.I., US$mm)1,2

 Production increase is primarily from the development of

Acordionero

 No exploration success is assumed in the forecast  Development expenditures over the next 3 years are

forecasted to be $371mm

Production grows over the next 3 years with Free Cash Flow2 of $672mm to fund exploration

NPV10% BT 1,229 2,154 3,351 NPV10% AT 1,032 1,653 2,448 73 126 199

  • 50

100 150 200 250 1P Reserves 2P Reserves 3P Reserves mmboe

1,2) See endnotes.

slide-39
SLIDE 39

39

2P NPV10 Before Tax ($MM) Dec-16 Dec-15 Change Putumayo 889 872 2% Middle Magdalena 999 n/a Llanos 78 47 65% Brazil 188 182 4% Total 2,154 1,100 96% NPV10 Before Tax ($MM) Dec-16 Dec-15 Change 1P 1,230 814 51%

  • per share

$3.08 $2.89 7% 2P 2,155 1,100 96%

  • per share

$5.40 $3.90 38% 3P 3,351 1,374 144%

  • per share

$8.40 $4.87 72% Gross WI (mmboe) Dec-16 Dec-15 Change 1P 72.8 48.4 51%

  • boe per share

0.18 0.17 6% 2P 126.1 66.0 91%

  • boe per share

0.32 0.23 35% 3P 199.2 81.0 146%

  • boe per share

0.50 0.29 74% Reserve Life Index (years) Dec-16 Dec-15 Change 1P 6.4 5.7 12% 2P 11.1 7.8 43% 3P 17.5 9.6 83%

2016 RESERVE HIGHLIGHTS1

1, 2) See endnotes.

 Reserves per share increased by 35% in 2P

and 74% in 3P cases

 2P NPV10 Before Tax increased 96% despite

10% drop in price forecast

 91% operated development portfolio, with

visible production growth for the next 3 years

 Diversified 46% of the 2P value to Middle

Magdalena Valley

 Reserve Life Index2 increased in 2P case from

7.8 to 11.1 years

Completed 3 accretive acquisitions in 2016 with 1 acquisition pending, grew NPV10 Before Tax by 96%

slide-40
SLIDE 40

40

UNDEVELOPED LOCATIONS1

1) See endnotes; *PUD = Proved Undeveloped , PPUD = Proved plus Probable Undeveloped, PPPUD = Proved plus Probable plus Possible Undeveloped

FY2015 vs FY2016 Net number of wells

FY2016 Undeveloped Reserves* per well, Dec 2016 (mmboes) Acordionero and Cumplidor are the major assets with new drilling location adds to the existing portfolio

5 9 9 19 36 54 10 20 30 40 50 60 1P 2P 3P 1P 2P 3P Reserve Report as of Dec 31 2015 Reserve Report as of Dec 31 2016

slide-41
SLIDE 41

41

ACORDIONERO PRODUCTION, CASH FLOW & CAPEX1,2

1P Production (W.I., mbbl/d) 2P Production (W.I., mbbl/d) 3P Production (W.I., mbbl/d) 1P Capex and Cashflows (W.I., US$mm) 2P Capex and Cashflows (W.I., US$mm) 3P Capex and Cashflows (W.I., US$mm)

2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Wells 8

  • Cumul. Wells

8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8

9 8 7 5 5 4 3 3 2 2
  • 2

4 6 8 10 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 mbbl/d (48) (2) (2) (1) 50 98 85 76 68 56 31 25 20 16 (100) (50)

  • 50

100 150 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 US$mm CFFO Capex FCF 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Wells 9 9 3

  • Cumul. Wells

9 18 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21

9 13 16 15 14 12 10 8 7 6
  • 5

10 15 20 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 mbbl/d (71) (59) (16) (1) 34 80 157 177 178 129 105 84 67 53 (100)

  • 100

200 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 US$mm CFFO Capex FCF 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Wells 9 9 11 2

  • Cumul. Wells

9 18 29 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 10 14 20 23 22 22 20 18 16 14

  • 5

10 15 20 25 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 mbbl/d (76) (63) (51) (9) 30 79 149 239 264 226 212 188 165 144 (100)

  • 100

200 300 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 US$mm CFFO Capex FCF

Self-funded development program 2017 onwards generating up to $2.1B cumulative FCF2 for re-deployment

1,2) See endnotes.

slide-42
SLIDE 42

42

COSTAYACO PRODUCTION, CASH FLOW & CAPEX1,2

Reserves & NPV (mmbbl; US$mm) 2P Production (W.I., mbbl/d) 2P Capex and Cashflows (W.I., US$mm)

21 27 33

  • 5

10 15 20 25 30 35 40 1P Reserves 2P Reserves 3P Reserves

mmboe

14 12 9 7 6 5 4 4 3 3

  • 5

10 15 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026

mbbl/d

(13) (8) (0) (0) 71 73 65 57 49 29 23 17 13 9

(50)

  • 50

100 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026

US$mm

CFFO Capex FCF Wells 1 1

  • Cumul. Wells

1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 NPV10% BT 334 425 540 NPV10% AT 247 305 379

Expected strong, reliable cash flow2 with minimal future CAPEX required.

1,2) See endnotes.

slide-43
SLIDE 43

43

MOQUETA PRODUCTION, CASH FLOW & CAPEX1,2

Reserves & NPV (mmbbl; US$mm) 2P Production (W.I., mbbl/d) 2P Capex and Cashflows (W.I., US$mm)

6 6 5 5 4 3 3 3 2 2

  • 2

4 6 8 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 mbbl/d 13 18 23

  • 5

10 15 20 25 1P Reserves 2P Reserves 3P Reserves mmboe

(6) (5) (1) (1) 35 38 43 44 40 26 21 18 15 12

(20)

  • 20

40 60 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 US$mm CFFO Capex FCF NPV10% BT 198 292 386 NPV10% AT 157 217 277 Wells 1 1

  • Cumul. Wells

1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

1,2) See endnotes.

Expected strong, reliable cash flow2 with minimal future CAPEX required.

slide-44
SLIDE 44

44

BRAZIL

 $35 million sale1 to Maha Energy announced,

expected close on or before Aug.1/2017

PERU

 evaluating spin-out proposal where SpinCo would

externally raise its own funds & GTE may retain equity interest

OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS

LEGACY ASSETS IN BRAZIL & PERU MANAGEMENT EVALUATING STRATEGIC OPTIONS FOR BRAZIL & PERU VALUE MAXIMIZATION:

BRAZIL PERU

Colombia

1) Contingent on financing by Maha Energy.

slide-45
SLIDE 45

45

BRAZIL

OPTIMIZING PRODUCTION, NETBACK AND RECOVERY EFFICIENCY

 $35 million sale1 to Maha Energy

announced, expected close on or before Aug.1/2017

 Brazil harvest plan is now in place:

  • Implementing water injection
  • Operating and G&A costs have been

significantly reduced

  • Operation fully funded through Brazil funds flow

 41,606 gross acres, 100% W.I. in 6 blocks  Recôncavo Basin – located in one of the

principal petroleum provinces of Brazil

 2P gross W.I. reserves in the Tiê field:

10.2 MMBOE2

 Crude market trades at international prices  Competitive fiscal regime

GTE BRAZIL OVERVIEW TIÊ FIELD OIL & GAS RESERVES (GROSS W.I.)2

RESERVES CATEGORY

MMBOE (NI 51-101)

Proved

7.7

Probable

2.5

Proved plus Probable

10.2

Possible

4.1

Proved plus Probable plus Possible

14.3

1) Contingent on financing by Maha Energy; 2) Based on the independent report prepared by McDaniel as of December 31, 2016, NI 51-101 & COGEH compliant.

slide-46
SLIDE 46

46

 Bretaña Norte 95-2-1XD

  • 100 foot gross oil column
  • 3,095 bopd natural flow (18.5°API) from horizontal side-track

 Additional exploration potential in Envidia Lobe  Future development area defined and to be retained within the

retention period to facilitate future development scenarios or to provide time for monetization

PERU BLOCK 95

CONTINGENT RESOURCES

BRETAÑA OIL DISCOVERY - Contingent Resources1 GROSS W.I. MMBOE (Unrisked) P50 Best Estimate Contingent Resources (2C) 39.8

1) See endnotes.

slide-47
SLIDE 47

47 1) See endnotes.

PERU EXPLORATION

 Immediately up-dip and along strike from prolific producing

fields

 New 2D seismic acquired, prospects mapped  Well permitting process underway  Pmean prospective resource estimate of 1,605 MMBOE1,

(W.I., unrisked, 5 prospects)

 New 2D seismic acquired, five new prospects and leads identified

  • n Block 107

 On trend with prolific hydrocarbon accumulations

  • Camisea to the southeast
  • Recent oil discovery at Los Angeles-1x on Block 131

 Pmean prospective resource estimate of 313 MMBOE1, (W.I.,

unrisked, 1 prospect)

Blocks 123 & 129 – Marañon Basin Blocks 107 & 133 - Ucayali Basin

slide-48
SLIDE 48

48

Gary Guidry – President & CEO

Professional Engineer (P. Eng.) registered with APEGA with more than 35 years of experience. Before Gran Tierra, was President and CEO of Caracal Energy, Orion Oil & Gas, and Tanganyika Oil.

Ryan Ellson – Chief Financial Officer

Chartered Accountant with over 15 years experience. Prior to Gran Tierra, was Head of Finance at Glencore E&P Canada, and prior thereto was VP Finance at Caracal Energy.

Jim Evans – VP Corporate Services

Over 25 years experience, most recently as Head of Corporate Services at Glencore E&P Canada, and prior thereto with Caracal Energy.

David Hardy – VP Legal & General Counsel

Over 25 years in legal profession; 15 years focused globally on new ventures and international energy projects. Prior to Gran Tierra, held senior legal, regulatory and commercial negotiation positions with Encana.

Alan Johnson – VP Asset Management

Over 20 years experience, most recently as Head of Asset Management, Glencore E&P Canada, and prior thereto with Caracal Energy. Held various senior positions previously with companies operating internationally.

Lawrence West – VP Exploration

Over 35 years experience, most recently as VP Exploration at Caracal Energy, and prior thereto held several management and executive positions focused in Western Canada.

MANAGEMENT TEAM

Adrian Coral – President, Gran Tierra Energy Colombia

Over 20 years experience, most recently as Senior Operations Manager at Gran Tierra Energy Colombia prior to his promotion to President.

Ed Caldwell – VP Health, Safety & Environment & Corporate Social Responsibility

Distinguished 27-year career with ExxonMobil/Imperial Oil; most recently worked with Caracal Energy Inc. in its efforts and achievements in Chad, Africa.

Susan Mawdsley - VP Finance & Corporate Controller

Chartered Accountant with 25 years of experience in oil & gas industry, most recently as Corporate Controller of Gran Tierra Energy.

Glen Mah - VP Business Development

Professional Petroleum Geologist, has worked onshore and offshore projects in various petroleum basins in Americas, Africa, Middle East and Asia. Was Chief Geologist with Tanganyika Oil Company Ltd.

Rodger Trimble - VP Investor Relations

Professional Engineer with 30+ years of experience, most recently as Head of Corporate Planning with Glencore E&P Canada Inc., and prior thereto Director Corporate Planning, Budget & Business Development with Caracal Energy Inc.

SIGNIFICANT EXPERIENCE, PROVEN TRACK RECORD

slide-49
SLIDE 49

49

Gary Guidry – President & CEO

Professional Engineer (P. Eng.) registered with APEGA with 35+ years of experience developing & maximizing assets in international oil & gas industry. Before Gran Tierra, was President & CEO of Caracal Energy, Orion Oil & Gas, & Tanganyika Oil. In 2014, was awarded Oil Council Executive of the Year award for leadership role with Caracal Energy.

Robert Hodgins – Non-Executive Chairman - Independent

Chartered accountant, investor & director with 30+ years of oil & gas industry

  • experience. Former Chairman of Board of Caracal Energy & Chief Financial

Officer of Pengrowth Energy Trust. Currently Director & Chairman of Audit Committee of AltaGas Ltd., MEG Energy Corp., Enerplus Corporation, Kicking Horse Energy Inc., & StonePoint Energy Inc.

Peter Dey – Independent

Corporate lawyer, investment banker & corporate director with 30+ years of

  • experience. Known for corporate governance expertise. Currently Chairman
  • f Paradigm Capital Inc. & Director of Goldcorp, Granite REIT &

Massachusetts Museum of Contemporary Art. Former Director of Caracal Energy.

Evan Hazell – Independent

Experience in global oil & gas industry for 30+ years, initially as petroleum engineer & then as investment banker. Currently Director of Kaisen Energy

  • Corp. Former managing director at HSBC Global Investment Bank & RBC

Capital Markets.

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Ronald W. Royal – Independent

Professional engineer with 35+ years of international upstream experience with Imperial Oil Limited & ExxonMobil. Currently Director of Valeura Energy Inc. & Oando Energy Resources Inc. Former President & General Manager of Esso Exploration & Production Chad Inc. & Director of Caracal Energy.

David Smith – Independent

Chartered Financial Analyst with 20+ years experience in investment banking, research & management. Currently Chairman of Board of Superior Plus Corp. Former Managing Partner of Enterprise Capital Management Inc.

Brooke Wade – Independent

President of Wade Capital Corporation, a private investment company. Currently serves on boards of Novinium, Inc. & IAC Acoustics Limited. Was Co-founder, Chairman & Chief Executive Officer of Acetex Corporation until it sold in 2005. Former Director of Caracal Energy.

SIGNIFICANT EXPERIENCE, PROVEN TRACK RECORD

slide-50
SLIDE 50

50

  • CEO, 3 years
  • CEO, 2 years
  • CEO, 4 years
  • CEO, 2 years
  • SVP and President of AEC International, 5 years
  • President and General Manager - Nigeria, 2 year

SOLID TRACK RECORD OF VALUE CREATION

Experience Performance Under Management’s Leadership

  • B.Sc. in Petroleum Engineering
  • Member of APEGGA

Shareholder Returns

Average shareholder returns of 45%/year & 2P reserves growth of 79% at prior 4 companies led by Mr. Guidry Awarded Oil Council Executive of the Year in 2014

Gary Guidry Leadership Positions Regional Experience Education

Board Membership

2P Reserve Growth (W.I.)

1, 2, 3) See endnotes. 385% (7%) (40%) 80% 200% 320% 440% Tanganyika TSX E&P Index 19 25

  • 5

10 15 20 25 30 Jan 2009 Jan 2010 mmboe 25 90

  • 20

40 60 80 100 Sep 2011 Dec 2013 mmboe 105 851

  • 150

300 450 600 750 900 May 2005 Dec 2007 mmboe 127% 20%

  • 40%

80% 120% 160% Orion TSX E&P Index 101% 8%

  • 20%

40% 60% 80% 100% 120% Caracal FTSE 350 E&P 259% 711% 34%

CAGR: 24% Market cap: $1.8bn Prod: 14,000bbl/d Reserves: 180mmboe Market cap: $2.0bn Prod:25,000bbl/d Reserves: 851mmboe Market cap: $320mm Prod: 5,500boe/d Reserves: 25mmboe CAGR: 73% CAGR: 52% CAGR: 34% CAGR: 53% CAGR: 125% (1) (2) (3)

slide-51
SLIDE 51

51

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

bbl: Barrel BNBOE: Billion Barrels of Oil Equivalent BOE: Barrel of Oil Equivalent BOEPD: Barrel of Oil Equivalent per Day bopd: Barrels of Oil per Day bwpd: Barrels of Water per Day CAGR: Compounded Annual Growth CPF: Central Production Facility DD&A: Depreciation, Depletion & Amortization F&D: Finding & Development Cost GOR: Gas Oil Ratio GTE: Gran Tierra Energy Inc. GTEC: Gran Tierra Energy Colombia Inc. LTIF: Lost Time Injury Frequency LTT: Long-term Test MM: Million MMBBLS: Million Barrels MMBO: Million Barrels of Oil MMBOE: Million Barrels of Oil Equivalent MMcf: Million Cubic Feet MMstb: Million Stock Tank Barrels NAR: Net After Royalty NAV: Net Asset Value PUD: Proved Undeveloped Reserves scf: Standard Cubic Foot stb: Stock Tank Barrel Tcf: Trillion Cubic Feet VRR: Voidage Replacement Ratio w/c: Water Cut W.I.: Working Interest

“contingent resources”: quantities of petroleum estimated, at a given date, to be potentially recoverable from known accumulations using established or developing technology, but which are not currently considered to be commercially recoverable due to one or more

  • contingencies. Contingencies are conditions that must be satisfied for a portion of contingent

resources to be classified as reserves that are: (a) specific to project being evaluated; and (b) expected to be resolved within a reasonable timeframe. Contingencies may include factors such as economic, legal, environmental, political and regulatory matters or a lack of markets. It is also appropriate to classify as contingent resources estimated discovered recoverable quantities associated with a project in early evaluation stage. “gross” means: (a) in relation to Company’s interest in production, reserves, contingent resources or prospective resources, its “company gross” production, reserves, contingent resources or prospective resources, which are Company’s working interest (operating or non-

  • perating) share before deduction of royalties and without including any royalty interests of

Company; (b) in relation to wells, total number of wells in which a company has an interest; and (c) in relation to properties, total area of properties in which Company has an interest. “prospective resources” means quantities of petroleum estimated, as of a given date, to be potentially recoverable from undiscovered accumulations by application of future development

  • projects. Prospective resources have both an associated chance of discovery and a chance of
  • development. Not all exploration projects will result in discoveries. Chance that an exploration

project will result in discovery of petroleum is referred to as “chance of discovery.” Thus, for an undiscovered accumulation, chance of commerciality is product of two risk components — chance of discovery and chance of development. “proved reserves” are those reserves that can be estimated with a high degree of certainty to be recoverable. It is likely that actual remaining quantities recovered will exceed estimated proved reserves; “proved developed reserves” are those proved reserves that are expected to be recovered from existing wells and installed facilities or, if facilities have not been installed, that would involve a low expenditure (e.g., when compared to cost of drilling a well) to put reserves on production. Developed category may be subdivided into producing and non-producing; “proved undeveloped reserves” are those proved reserves expected to be recovered from known accumulations where a significant expenditure (e.g., when compared to cost of drilling a well) is required to render them capable of production. “probable reserves” are those unproved reserves that are less certain to be recovered than proved reserves. It is equally likely that actual remaining quantities recovered will be greater

  • r less than sum of estimated proved plus probable reserves.

“possible reserves” are those additional reserves that are less certain to be recovered than probable reserves. There is a 10% probability that quantities actually recovered will equal or exceed sum of proved plus probable plus possible reserves. “reserves” are estimated remaining quantities of oil and natural gas and related substances anticipated to be recoverable from known accumulations, as of a given date, based on: (a) analysis of drilling, geological, geophysical and engineering data; (b) use of established technology; and (c) specified economic conditions, which are generally accepted as being

  • reasonable. Reserves classified according to degree of certainty associated with estimates.
slide-52
SLIDE 52

52

FUNDS FLOW FROM OPERATIONS

Three Months Ended

Funds Flow From Operations – Non-GAAP Measure (US$ 000s) December 31, 2016 September 30, 2016 Net cash provided by operating activities $6,643 $48,222 Adjustments to reconcile net cash provided by operating activities to funds flow from operations Net change in assets and liabilities from operating activities 29,434 (24,727) Cash settlement of asset retirement obligation 109 32 Funds Flow from Operations $36,186 $23,527

Funds flow from operations, as presented, is net cash provided by operating activities adjusted for net change in assets and liabilities from operating activities and cash settlement of asset retirement

  • bligation. Management uses this financial measure to analyze liquidity and cash flows generated by Gran Tierra's principal business activities prior to the consideration of how changes in assets

and liabilities from operating activities and cash settlement of asset retirement obligation affect those cash flows, and believes that this financial measure is also useful supplemental information for investors to analyze Gran Tierra's liquidity and financial results. This non-GAAP measure does not have a standardized meaning under GAAP. Investors are cautioned that this measure should not be construed as an alternative to net cash provided by operating activities or other measure of liquidity as determined in accordance with GAAP. Gran Tierra's method of calculating this measures may differ from other companies and, accordingly, they may not be comparable to similar measures used by other companies. Each non-GAAP financial measure is presented along with the corresponding GAAP measure so as not to imply that more emphasis should be placed on the non-GAAP measure.

slide-53
SLIDE 53

53 BOE’s may be misleading particularly if used in isolation. A BOE conversion ratio of 6 thousand cubic feet of gas to 1 barrel of oil is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead. In addition, given that the value ratio based on the current price of oil as compared with natural gas is significantly different from the energy equivalent of six to one, utilizing a BOE conversion ratio of 6Mcf:1bbl would be misleading as an indication of value. The estimates of reserves and future net revenue for individual properties may not reflect the same confidence level as estimates of reserves and future net revenue for all properties due to the effects of aggregation. Possible reserves are those additional reserves that are less certain to be recovered than probable reserves. There is a 10% probability that the quantities actually recovered will equal or exceed the sum of proved plus probable plus possible reserves. Unless otherwise specified, in this presentation, all production is reported on a working interest basis (operating and non-operating) before the deduction of royalties payable. Estimates of the Company’s reserves, contingent resources and prospective resources and the net present value of future net revenue attributable to the Company’s reserves, contingent resources and prospective resources are based upon the reports prepared by McDaniel & Associates Consultants (“McDaniel”), GLJ Petroleum Consultants (“GLJ”) & Netherland Sewell & Associates, Inc. (“NSAI””), the Company’s independent qualified reserves evaluators and by a member of management who is a qualified reserves evaluator, as at the effective dates that are specified in this presentation. The estimates of reserves, contingent resources and prospective resources provided in this presentation are estimates only and there is no guarantee that the estimated reserves, contingent resources and prospective resources will be recovered. Actual reserves, contingent resources and prospective resources may be greater than or less than the estimates provided in this in this presentation and the differences may be material. Estimates of net present value of future net revenue attributable to the Company’s reserves, contingent resources and prospective resources do not represent fair market value and there is uncertainty that the net present value of future net revenue will be realized. There is no assurance that the forecast price and cost assumptions applied by McDaniel, GLJ & NSAI in evaluating Gran Tierra’s reserves, contingent resources and prospective resources will be attained and variances could be material. There is no certainty that any portion of the prospective resources will be discovered. If discovered, there is no certainty that it will be commercially viable to produce any portion of the prospective resources. There is also uncertainty that it will be commercially viable to produce any part of the contingent resources. The estimates of reserves and future net revenue for individual properties may not reflect the same confidence level as estimates of reserves and future net revenue for all properties, due to the affect of aggregation. Estimates of contingent resources or prospective resources are by their nature more speculative than estimates of proved reserves and would require substantial capital spending over a significant number of years to implement recovery. Actual locations drilled and quantities that may be ultimately recovered from our properties will differ substantially. In addition, we have made no commitment to drill, and likely will not drill, all of the drilling locations that have been attributable to these quantities. All of Gran Tierra’s prospective resources have been classified as light and medium crude oil and conventional natural gas. Gran Tierra’s contingent resources have been classified as heavy crude oil. The prospective resources estimates that are referred to herein are un-risked as to both chance of discovery and chance of development and the contingent resources estimates that are referred to herein are un-risked as to chance of development (i.e. the level of risk associated with the chance of discovery and chance of development was not assessed by McDaniel, GLJ or the member of management who is a qualified reserves evaluator, as part of the evaluations that were conducted). Risks that could impact the chance of discovery and chance of development include, without limitation: geological uncertainty and uncertainty regarding individual well drainage areas; uncertainty regarding the consistency of productivity that may be achieved from lands with attributed resources; potential delays in development due to product prices, access to capital, availability of markets and/or take-away capacity; and uncertainty regarding potential flow rates from wells and the economics of those wells. Well test results should be considered as preliminary and not necessarily indicative of long-term performance or of ultimate recovery. Well log interpretations indicating oil and gas accumulations are not necessarily indicative of future production or ultimate recovery. If it is indicated that a pressure transient analysis or well-test interpretation has not been carried

  • ut, any data disclosed in that respect should be considered preliminary until such analysis has been completed.

PRESENTATION OF OIL & GAS INFORMATION

slide-54
SLIDE 54

54 The following classification of contingent and prospective resources is used in the presentation:

  • Low Estimate means there is at least a 90 percent probability (P90) that the quantities actually recovered will equal or exceed the low estimate.
  • Best Estimate means there is at least a 50 percent probability (P50) that the quantities actually recovered will equal or exceed the best estimate.
  • High Estimate means there is at least a 10 percent probability (P10) that the quantities actually recovered will equal or exceed the high estimate.

Contingent Resources are based on an updated independent assessment of contingent resources with respect to Gran Tierra's Peruvian exploration and development properties (Bretaña - Block 95) which was completed by Netherland Sewell & Associates, Inc. (the "NSAI Contingent Resources Assessment") with an effective date of September 30, 2016, and prepared in accordance with the Canadian Oil and Gas Evaluation Handbook and the standards established by Canadian National Instrument 51-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Oil and Gas Activities. Please see the press release of Gran Tierra dated November 7, 2016 and filed on SEDAR (www.sedar.com) for a further discussion of these contingent resources. On January 29, 2014, Gran Tierra announced the results of a prospective resource estimate for its four largest prospects in Peru, provided by its independent reserves auditor, GLJ effective October 1, 2013. The resource estimate was prepared in compliance with National Instrument 51-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Oil and Gas Activities and the Canadian Oil and Gas Evaluation Handbook. In the January 29, 2014 press release, and this presentation, risked prospective resources have been risked for chance of discovery but have not been risked for chance of development. If a discovery is made, there is no certainty that it will be developed or, if it is developed, there is no certainty as to the timing of such development. Also, as a non-GAAP measure: The Company's before tax net present values of 2P reserves prepared in accordance with NI 51-101 and COGEH and discounted at 10% ("PV-10") differs from its USGAAP standardized measure because (i) SEC and FASB standards require that the standardized measure reflects reserves and related future net revenue estimated using average prices for the previous 12 months, whereas NI 51-101 reserves and related future net revenue are estimated based on forecast prices and costs and {ii) the standardized measure reflects discounted future income taxes related to the Company's operations. The Company believes that the presentation of PV-10 is useful to investors because it presents (i) relative monetary significance of its oil and natural gas properties regardless of tax structure and (ii) relative size and value of its reserves to other companies. The Company also uses this measure when assessing the potential return on investment related to its oil and natural gas properties. PV-10 and the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows do not purport to present the fair value of the Company's oil and gas reserves. The Company has not provided a reconciliation of PV-10 to the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows because it is impracticable to do so. In general, the significant factors that may change the prospective resources and contingent resources estimates include further delineation drilling, which could change the estimates either positively or negatively, future technology improvements, which would positively affect the estimates, and additional processing capacity that could affect the volumes recoverable

  • r type of production. Additional facility design work, development plans, reservoir studies and delineation drilling is expected to be completed by the Company in accordance with its

long-term resource development plan.

PRESENTATION OF OIL & GAS INFORMATION

slide-55
SLIDE 55

55 Disclosure of Reserve Information and Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors Unless expressly stated otherwise, all estimates of proved, probable and possible reserves and related future net revenue disclosed in this presentation have been prepared in accordance with NI 51-101. Estimates of reserves and future net revenue made in accordance with NI 51-101 will differ from corresponding estimates prepared in accordance with applicable U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules and disclosure requirements of the U.S. Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), and those differences may be material. NI 51-101, for example, requires disclosure of reserves and related future net revenue estimates based on forecast prices and costs, whereas SEC and FASB standards require that reserves and related future net revenue be estimated using average prices for the previous 12 months. In addition, NI 51-101 permits the presentation of reserves estimates

  • n a “company gross” basis, representing Gran Tierra’s working interest share before deduction of royalties, whereas SEC and FASB standards require the presentation of net reserve

estimates after the deduction of royalties and similar payments. There are also differences in the technical reserves estimation standards applicable under NI 51-101 and, pursuant thereto, the COGEH, and those applicable under SEC and FASB requirements. In addition to being a reporting issuer in certain Canadian jurisdictions, Gran Tierra is a registrant with the SEC and subject to domestic issuer reporting requirements under U.S. federal securities law, including with respect to the disclosure of reserves and other oil and gas information in accordance with U.S. federal securities law and applicable SEC rules and regulations (collectively, “SEC requirements”). Disclosure of such information in accordance with SEC requirements is included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K and in

  • ther reports and materials filed with or furnished to the SEC and, as applicable, Canadian securities regulatory authorities. The SEC permits oil and gas companies that are subject to

domestic issuer reporting requirements under U.S. federal securities law, in their filings with the SEC, to disclose only estimated proved, probable and possible reserves that meet the SEC’s definitions of such terms. Gran Tierra has disclosed estimated proved, probable and possible reserves in its filings with the SEC. In addition, Gran Tierra prepares its financial statements in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles, which require that the notes to its annual financial statements include supplementary disclosure in respect of the Company’s oil and gas activities, including estimates of its proved oil and gas reserves and a standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows relating to proved

  • il and gas reserve quantities. This supplementary financial statement disclosure is presented in accordance with FASB requirements, which align with corresponding SEC requirements

concerning reserves estimation and reporting. In this presentation, the Company uses the terms contingent resources and prospective resources. The SEC guidelines strictly prohibit the Company from including contingent or prospective resources in filings with the SEC. Investors are urged to consider closely the disclosures and risk factors in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports

  • n Form 10-Q and in the other reports and filings with the SEC, available from the Company's offices or website. These forms can also be obtained from the SEC via the internet at

www.sec.gov or by calling 1-800-SEC-0330.

PRESENTATION OF OIL & GAS INFORMATION

slide-56
SLIDE 56

56 Slide 3 – Gran Tierra – Key Investment Attributes

  • 1. For % increases in 1P, 2P & 3P reserves, refer to bar chart in slide 6.
  • 2. See pie chart in slide 4.
  • 3. Based on independent evaluation of prospective resources prepared by McDaniel as at September 30, 2015 with respect to Gran Tierra's Colombian properties, independent

evaluation of Petroamerica Oil Corp's ("Petroamerica") prospective resources prepared by McDaniel as at December 31, 2015 ("PTA McDaniel Prospective Resources Report") and further derived from PTA McDaniel Prospective Resources Report by a member of management who is a qualified reserves evaluator in accordance with the Canadian Oil and Gas Evaluation Handbook (“COGEH”) as of same date as PetroGranada Colombia Limited ("PGC") owns the remaining 50% WI in the Putumayo-7 Block, the other 50% WI being owned by Petroamerica and derived from PTA McDaniel Prospective Resources Report by a member of management who is a qualified reserves evaluator in accordance with COGEH as of the same date as PetroLatina owns the remaining 30% WI in the Putumayo-4 Block, the other 70% WI being owned by Gran Tierra.

  • 4. Based on independent reserve report prepared by McDaniel as of December 31, 2016, in accordance with Canadian National Instrument 51-101 - Standards for Oil and Gas Activities

(“NI 51-101”) & COGEH compliant gross WI (“McDaniel NI 51-101 Reserve Report”). Slide 4 – Company Snapshot

  • 2. Enterprise Value ($1,262MM) = Market Capitalization ($1,041 MM) PLUS year-end 2016 working capital deficit ($23.4MM) PLUS long term debt ($197.1MM).
  • 3. See Slide 3, endnote 4.
  • 4. See Slide 3, endnote 4. NAV’s adjusted for year-end 2016 working capital deficit ($23.4MM) and long term debt ($197.1MM). See non-GAAP measures in the appendix for further

information on NI 51-101 net present values before tax discounted at 10%.

  • 5. Reserve life index calculated using Q4/2016 WI average production before royalties of 31,031 boepd

Slide 5 – Corporate Strategy

  • 1. See slide 3, endnote 3.

Slide 6 – Delivering on Our Focused Strategy

  • 1. Based on independent reserve reports prepared by McDaniel as of December 31, 2016 and also the prior year as of December 31, 2015, in accordance with NI 51-101 - Standards for

Oil and Gas Activities (“NI 51-101”) & COGEH compliant gross WI.

  • 2. See Slide 3, endnote 3.
  • 3. See Slide 4, endnote 4; Dec.31/15 shares = 282.0 MM; Dec.31/16 shares = 399.0 MM.

Slide 7 – Net Asset Value

  • 1. See Slide 4, endnote 4; Dec.31/16 shares = 399.0 MM

Slide 9 – 2017 Capital Budget & Production Guidance

  • 1. See Gran Tierra press release dated December 19, 2016 for more details and disclaimers
  • 2. Budgeted 2017 Brent oil price of $56.00/bbl is approximately equal to the average forward month pricing for Brent for 2017 of $56.68/bbl as of December 16, 2016.
  • 3. “Cash from operating activities” refers to the GAAP line item “net cash provided by operating activities”.

Slide 10 – 2017 Cash from Operating Activities Guidance

  • 1. See Slide 9, endnote 1.
  • 2. See Slide 9, endnote 3.
  • 3. Budgeted 2017 Brent oil price of $56.00/bbl is approximately equal to the average forward month pricing for Brent for 2017 of $56.68/bbl as of December 16, 2016.

Slide 12 – Middle Magdalena – Acordionero (100% WI)

  • 1. See Slide 3, endnote 4.

ENDNOTES (ALL $ FIGURES IN US$ UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED)

slide-57
SLIDE 57

57 Slide 14 – Acordionero 2P Development Plan

  • 1. See Slide 3, endnote 4.

Slide 15 – Putumayo – Costayaco Overview (100% WI)

  • 1. See Slide 3, endnote 4.

Slide 20 – Costayaco: Potential Upside – N Sand

  • 1. See Slide 3, endnote 4.

Slide 21 – Costayaco: Potential Upside – A / M2 Limestone

  • 1. See Slide 3, endnote 4.

Slide 22 – Putumayo – Moqueta Overview (100% WI)

  • 1. See Slide 3, endnote 4.

Slide 27 – Marketing & Transportation

  • 1. Source: OCP Ecuador.
  • 2. Source: CENIT Transporte Colombia.

Slide 29 – Exploration Upside with Large Resource Base

  • 1. See slide 3, endnote 3 EXCLUDING PetroLatina Acquisition, Ecopetrol Acquisitions & new “A” Limestone play.

Slide 37 – 2016 2P Reserves Breakdown and Reserves Progression

  • 1. See Slide 3, endnote 4

Slide 38 – GTE Reserves Summary – 2P

  • 1. See Slide 3, endnote 4.
  • 2. CFFO = W.I. cash flow from operations which is oil and gas sales less royalties, high price fees, operating and income tax expenses and asset retirement obligations, a non-GAAP
  • measure. Capex = W.I. capital expenditures. FCF = W.I. free cash flow which is CFFO less Capex, a non-GAAP measure.

Slide 39 – 2016 Reserve Highlights

  • 1. See Slide 6, endnote 1; Dec.31/15 shares = 282.0 MM; Dec.31/16 shares = 399.0 MM.
  • 2. Reserve life indices calculated using WI average production before royalties: Q4/2016 = 31,031 boepd; 2015 = 23,138 boepd

Slide 40 – Undeveloped Locations

  • 1. See Slide 6, endnote 1

Slide 41 – Acordionero Production, Cash Flow & Capex

  • 1. See Slide 3, endnote 4.
  • 2. See Slide 38, endnote 2.

Slide 42 – Costayaco Production, Cash Flow & Capex

  • 1. See Slide 3, endnote 4.
  • 2. See Slide 38, endnote 2.

Slide 43 – Moqueta Production, Cash Flow & Capex

  • 1. See Slide 3, endnote 4.
  • 2. See Slide 38, endnote 2.

ENDNOTES (ALL $ FIGURES IN US$ UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED)

slide-58
SLIDE 58

58 Slide 46 – Peru Block 95

  • 1. Based on Netherland Sewell & Associates, Inc. Contingent Resources Assessment with an effective date of September 30, 2016, and prepared in accordance with the Canadian Oil

and Gas Evaluation Handbook and the standards established by Canadian National Instrument 51-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Oil and Gas Activities. See definition of contingent resources in Glossary of Terms. Refer to Gran Tierra press release dated November 7, 2016 for additional information. Slide 47 – Peru Exploration

  • 1. Based on GLJ prospective resource estimate, effective date of September 30, 2015. See definition of prospective resources in Glossary of Terms.

Slide 50 – Management Track Record

  • 1. Caracal - Performance from 9 Mar 2011 (C$5.00/sh. – Griffiths private placement in March 2011) to 8 Jul 2014 (£5.50/sh. eq. to C$10.07/sh. at time of close). Gary joined Caracal in

July 2011.

  • 2. Orion - Performance from May 2009 (C$0.44/sh. private placement – Sprott offer for Auriga Energy in October 2009) to 8 Jul 2011 (C$1.00/sh. at time of close). Gary joined Auriga

Energy in May 2009.

  • 3. Tanganyika - Performance from 16 May 2005 (C$6.50/sh. at joining) to 23 Dec 2008 (C$31.50/sh. at time of close). Gary joined Tanganyika in May 2005.

ENDNOTES (ALL $ FIGURES IN US$ UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED)

slide-59
SLIDE 59

59

New Address: 900, 520 – 3RD AVENUE SW CALGARY, ALBERTA, CANADA T2P 0R3 Investor Relations 403-265-3221 info@grantierra.com