Using SAP2000 Software Package in Earthquake Engineering (Part II: - - PDF document

4/5/2012 1

Using SAP2000 Software Package in Earthquake Engineering (Part II: Pushover)

Same frame but different loading

QD = 4.5 kips/ft QD = 10.5 kips/ft QD = 10.5 kips/ft

Loads on structures:

• Static (e.g. self-weight)
• Dynamic (e.g. earthquake)

Structures’ response: Linear (constant stiffness)

• Linear (constant stiffness)
• Nonlinear (variable stiffness)

→Structural Analysis Approaches:

• Linear static (ELF)

(least accurate; least complex) ( p )

• Linear dynamic (response spectra)
• Nonlinear static (pushover)
• Nonlinear dynamic (time history)

(most accurate; most complex)

4/5/2012 2

Pushover analysis: Applying a force distribution force distribution to the structure in an incremental fashion while monitoring the

• ccurrence of nonlinear behavior

nonlinear behavior and plotting the base shear (Vb) versus control node control node displacement (uN). compromise the simplicity of linear static approaches and accuracy of nonlinear dynamic methods. 1- Nonlinearity sources:

• Geometrical (P-Delta effects)

(consider or not: codes)

• Material

(too many material’s behavior models) (too many material’s behavior models) 2- Nonlinearity modeling:

• Concentrated - Distributed

4/5/2012 3

Plastic hinge properties:

• running section analysis and coming up with M-φ curves

Plastic hinge properties:

• using codes’ tabulated properties

4/5/2012 4

3- Lateral load pattern:

• a single concentrated force at the top

(good for one-story buildings)

• in proportion to the standard code procedure:

in proportion to the product of story masses and

 

/

x x x x x

F w h w h V 



• in proportion to the product of story masses and

predominant mode shape of the elastic model of the structure

 

/

x x x x x

F w w V   



4- Control node:

• For common buildings, the control node could be

selected as roof (top) story node h l i i d h h h

• Pushover analysis is stopped when the structure reaches:

pre-defined displacement

• r

ultimate capacity

5- Gravity loads should be applied prior to the application of lateral loads

4/5/2012 5

6- Check at performance point : The global response of the structure and individual component deformations are compared to limits in li ht f th ifi f l f th t light of the specific performance goals of the system Using SAP2000 for Pushover Analysis

We will use the same frame (elastic beams), just modify dead loads:

4/5/2012 6

1- Run Modal Analysis

( 1 )

1 . 0 0 . 7 5 9           0 . 3 4 5     1 0 0 0    

Select lateral load pattern:

7 5 9 3 4 5

x

F k i p s         

2- Lateral Load Case

4/5/2012 7

3- Modify Dead Load Case 3- Define Push Load Case

1 2

4/5/2012 8

3- Define Push Load Case

1 2

4- Assign Plastic Hinges Select column elements:

4/5/2012 9

4- Assign Plastic Hinges 4- Assign Plastic Hinges Select beam elements:

4/5/2012 10

5- Run

6- Results Output Display displacement:

4/5/2012 11

6- Results Output Display pushover curve: 7- Checking Hinges Status Looking for 0.5 ft roof displacement:

4/5/2012 12

7- Checking Hinges Status At 0.5 ft roof displacement: the performance level

• f the system is Collapse Prevention (CP)