Urbanization and sustainable development David Satterthwaite, IIED - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Urbanization and sustainable development David Satterthwaite, IIED

How can urbanization be a problem if • All rich nations are highly urbanized; all the poorest nations predominantly rural • All the most successful economies in Africa, Asia and Latin America are urbanizing rapidly • Almost all the least successful economies are not urbanizing or urbanizing slowly

Environment & development advantages of cities: � Cities with lower unit costs – Economies of scale/proximity for providing piped water, sewers, drains, health care, education, emergency services…… � Cheaper to keep down energy use, cut wastes, control pollution, cut greenhouse gas emissions.... � WHY DO MOST GOVERNMENTS SEE URBANIZATION AS A PROBLEM? – The mayor who said “The best urban policy – keep people in rural areas”

Urbanization and sustainable development � Meeting people’s needs – Economic, environmental, social, cultural, health and political needs......... � Without compromising ability of future generations to meet their needs – limit generation of environmental costs – sustainable use of finite resources (soils, freshwater...) – limit greenhouse gas emissions

Three global milestones for economic change � In 2008, more than half the world’s population living in urban areas � Two less well-known milestones – 1980, more than half the world’s economically active population working in industry & services – not agriculture (today 65%) – 1940, more than half the world’s GDP was generated in industry and services, not agriculture (today 97%) � Urbanization follows economic success – People moving in response to where new investment and jobs concentrate

Low- and middle-income nations 100 90 80 70 60 Percentage % GDP from industry and services 50 % labour force in 40 industry and services 30 Level of urbanization 20 10 0 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 Sub-Saharan Africa India 1 00 1 00 90 90 80 80 70 70 60 60 50 50 40 40 30 30 20 20 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 950 1 955 1 960 1 965 1 970 1 975 1 980 1 985 1 990 1 995 2000 2005 1 950 1 955 1 960 1 965 1 970 1 975 1 980 1 985 1 990 1 995 2000 2005

Percentage China Percentage 100 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Egypt 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 0 0 1950 1950 1955 1955 1960 1960 1965 1965 1970 1970 1975 1975 1980 1980 1985 1985 1990 1990 1995 1995 2000 2000 2005 2005 Percentage Pakistan 100 Percentage Mexico 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 0 100 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 0 1950 1950 1955 1955 1960 1960 1965 1965 1970 1970 1975 1975 1980 1980 1985 1985 1990 1990 1995 1995 2000 2000 2005 2005

Cities generating high proportion of GDP City % national % GDP generated population living by that city in that city New York 6.2 9 Mexico City 18.1 41 Sao Paulo 9.8 28 Shanghai 1.1 6 Mumbai 1.7 16 Cape Town 6.5 11.2 Johannesburg 7.7 18.1

Distribution of the world's 'million-cities', 2000 The world’s other 207 nations and territories The worlds five largest economies (USA, China, Japan, India, Germany) The fourth five largest economies (Australia, Turkey, South Africa, Argentina, Netherlands) The third five largest economies (Mexico, The second five largest Canada, Rep Korea, economies (France, Spain, Indonesia) UK, Italy, Brazil and Russia)

Urbanization also supports economic growth � Economic logic to where urbanization is taking place and large cities develop – Private investment goes to cities that provide economies of scale and agglomeration – A few exceptions (political change, war/civil strife, disasters) � Well-functioning cities essential for economic competitiveness – Economies of scale/agglomeration for businesses, economics of scale and proximity for almost all forms of infrastructure and services � In successful economies, urbanization decentralizes – Especially if there are competent, capable local governments outside the largest cities

Urbanization and health � Concentrate people, industries, vehicles and their wastes – without good government, very poor health – Cholera, typhoid, diarrhoeal diseases, ARI...... – Much of the population in slums/squatter settlements – One child in five dying – Urban life poor, nasty, brutish and short (Thomas Hobbes) � Use potential advantages of this concentration for providing infrastructure & services and good governance – a huge health benefit � The more urbanized a nation, the higher the life expectancy – All the most urbanized nations with high life expectancies – But good city government needed to deliver this

Urbanization & health: Life expectancy:women 90 84.1 79 78 76.2 80 74.2 70 60.9 60 53.7 50 50 50 44.6 41 40 30 25 20 10 0 s a a k o a a e y ? o e o i r n l k s w r s y r u n u k g k a e a e k u g a b a g e i h m h o T t P m n n l i n D s T A c a o o n a u o l j C n i B o D i j a K L u a t S . B r N c o i r P f A y n a m , r o o P

Governance and health penalties � Good city governance can deliver 10-30 years more life expectancy than bad city governance? – Good city governance cutting under five mortality rates from over 100 to under 20? � Good health statistics for a city depends on reducing the health penalty of having a low income – In badly governed cities, huge health differentials between high-income and low- income areas

Urbanization and social development � Cities driving innovations in participation and democracy (social innovations in Latin America mostly driven by city governments?) � Cities helping partnerships between local governments & citizen groups • 20 nations with national federations of slum/shack dwellers who offer governments partnerships: in India, South Africa, Namibia, Kenya, Malawi, the Philippines.. • Work of the Orangi Pilot Project-Research and Training Institute in Pakistan on sanitation, drainage..... • Partnerships between local governments and low- income groups in Thailand, supported by CODI • The many Latin American cities with mayors who work with the low-income population, not against them

Urbanization and global warming � Cities unfairly blamed for global warming – Cities said to produce 75-80% of all greenhouse gas emissions - but no scientific evidence for this • Misses large contributions of agriculture and deforestation and of industries & high-income people outside cities � Well planned/governed cities can cut link between high quality of life & high greenhouse gas emissions • People choosing to walk, bicycle, use public transport • Much city housing can be very space & energy efficient • Much of what makes a city enjoyable does not mean high greenhouse gas emissions – centres of culture, theatre, music, dance, fun....

What we need for the future � Imagination to see potential of cities for sustainable development and act on this � City governments with the bravery to engage with their low-income populations – Civil servants and politicians who see the dynamism and capacity of low-income groups and migrants and their potential as partners � City governments that build into development plans the need to adapt to climate change & keep down greenhouse gas emissions � African, Asian and Latin American cities to show Europe and the USA how to develop very healthy cities without high ecological costs

Urbanization & health: water and sanitation Best performing cities for in- Many cities in North Africa, house water supplies Mexico, Brazil, South Africa Worst performing cities for Most sub-Saharan African in-house water supplies cities, Colombo, Bangalore... Best performing cities for Several Brazilian & Mexican sanitation cities, many Asian cities, some North African cities Worst performing cities for Most sub-Saharan African sanitation cities, Dhaka, Bangalore

Singapore Hong Kong, China 100 Kuwait Belgium Venezuela Uruguay Israel UK Argentina Australia Lebanon Chile New Zealand Denmark Sweden Jordan Saudi Arabia Brazil 80 Korea, Rep Canada Gabon UAE USA Netherlands France Spain Russian Fed Mexico Norway Czech Rep Germany Peru Switzerland Colombia Estonia Italy Lithuania Armenia Austria Japan Turkey Hungary Urbanization level in 2000 (%) Malaysia Bolivia Ecuador Poland Finland 60 Ireland Costa Rica Greece Congo South Slovakia Africa Croatia Portugal Georgia Botswana Slovenia Syrian AR Belize Egypt Nigeria Guatemala Bosnia & Mauritius Herzegovena 40 Indonesia China Namibia Pakistan Guinea Thailand India Guyana Vietnam Swaziland Bangladesh 20 Lao, PDR Cambodia Sri Lanka Uganda Trinidad and Tobago Burundi 0 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 GDP per capita in 2000 (US$ PPP)

Good governance using potential of cities � Economies of scale and proximity for health producing or enhancing infrastructure – Water – Sanitation – Drainage – Health care and emergency services – Schools and pre-school provision