The Future of Pacific Cities: Innovative Solutions for Sustainable - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the future of pacific cities
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The Future of Pacific Cities: Innovative Solutions for Sustainable - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Future of Pacific Cities: Innovative Solutions for Sustainable Urbanization in the Pacific 4 July 2018 USP Statham Campus, Suva, Fiji Omar Siddique Economic Affairs Officer, Sustainable Urban Development Section, ESCAP The Future of Asia


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The Future of Pacific Cities:

Innovative Solutions for Sustainable Urbanization in the Pacific

4 July 2018 USP Statham Campus, Suva, Fiji

Omar Siddique Economic Affairs Officer, Sustainable Urban Development Section, ESCAP

The Future of Asia and Pacific Cities 2019:

Urban Opportunities to deliver the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development

slide-2
SLIDE 2
slide-3
SLIDE 3

United Nations ESCAP

  • Regional development arm of the UN
  • 53 member States, 9 associate members,

from Turkey to Tonga

  • Headquartered in Bangkok, 4 subregional
  • ffices – Pacific Office in Suva
  • ESCAP fosters sustainable development in

line with the 2030 Agenda:

-Policy dialogue, regional cooperation, intergovernmental platforms -Results oriented projects, technical assistance, capacity building -Research & analysis, peer learning, knowledge sharing

  • Interdisciplinary expertise from urban to

environmental issues, to energy, science and technology, trade and transport

Incheon Bangkok ESCAP HQ Chiba Beijing Bogor New Delhi ESCAP Headquarters, Regional or sub-regional offices Shanghai Guangzhou Wuhan Mumbai Hyderabad Karachi Vladivostok Osaka Sapporo Anchorage Sydney Melbourne Perth Surabaya Auckland Istanbul Canberra Wellington Port Moresby Nouméa Pago Pago Port-Vila Apia Alofi Avarua Funafuti Majuro Papeete Tarawa Yaren Jakarta Dili Kuala Lumpur Bandar Seri Begawan Hanoi Manila Vientiane Sri Jayewardenepura Kotte Seoul Tokyo Ulaanbaatar Male Colombo Baku Moscow Ashgabat Astana Ankara T'bilisi Bishkek Dushanbe Tashkent Yerevan Suva Nuku'alofa Koror Hagåtña Palikir T h i m p h u K a t h m a n d u P h n
  • m
P e n h Honiara Tehran
  • Kabul
  • I
s l a m a b a d Dhaka P'yongyang Saipan Naypyitaw Bangkok ESCAP HQ Almaty Suva Bogor Beijing Incheon Chiba New Delhi T u a m
  • t
u A r c h i p e l a g
  • S
  • c
i e t y I s . T u b u a i I s . Pitcairn Phoenix Is. Tokelau Is. Gilbert Is. H a w a i i a n I s l a n d s Northern Line Islands Southern Line Islands Marquesas Is. Honshu Kyushu Shikoku Hokkaido Sakhalin Taiwan Luzon Mindanao K u r i l I s . R y u k y u I s . A l e u t i a n I s l a n d s Tasmania South Island North Island S u m a t e r a Java Sulawesi Hong Kong, China Northern Mariana Islands Guam New Caledonia American Samoa C
  • k
I s l a n d s French Polynesia Niue M a c a
  • ,
C h i n a FIJI SAMOA SINGAPORE TUVALU NAURU MARSHALL ISLANDS SOLOMON ISLANDS PAPUA NEW GUINEA A U S T R A L I A NEW ZEALAND VANUATU TONGA K I R I B A T I FEDERATED STATES OF MICRONESIA PHILIPPINES MALAYSIA I N D O N E S I A C H I N A I N D I A K A Z A K H S T A N SRI LANKA VIET NAM BRUNEI DARUSSALAM MYANMAR THAILAND NEPAL TURKEY ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN BHUTAN BANGLADESH MALDIVES TAJIKISTAN KYRGYZSTAN AZERBAIJAN P A K I S T A N A F G H A N I S T A N T U R K M E N I S T A N U Z B E K I S T A N Jammu and Kashmir C A M B O D I A LAO P.D.R. R U S S I A N F E D E R A T I O N MONGOLIA JAPAN
  • REP. OF
KOREA
  • DEM. PEOPLE'S
  • REP. OF KOREA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PALAU A R M E N I A G E O R G I A TIMOR- LESTE Arafura Sea Bay of Bengal Arabian Sea G u l f
  • f
O m a n Black Sea Caspian Sea

N O R T H P A C I F I C O C E A N S O U T H P A C I F I C O C E A N

T asm an Sea C o ral Sea Celebes Sea South China Sea Philippine Sea East China Sea Sea of Okhotsk Ber ing S ea Mediterranean Sea P e r s i a n G u l f R e d S e a 120° 135° 150° 165° 180° 165° 150° 135° 30° 45° 60° 75° 90° 105° 120° 135° 150° 165° 180° 165° 150° 135° 45° 45° 30° 30° 15° 0° 15° 60° 60° 45° 30° 15° 0° 15° 30° 45° 60° Equator

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMISSION FOR ASIA AND THE PACIFIC

1000 2000 3000 km 1000 2000 mi The boundaries and names shown and the designations used
  • n this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance
by the United Nations. Dotted line represents approximately the Line of Control in Jammu and Kashmir agreed upon by India and Pakistan. The final status of Jammu and Kashmir has not yet been agreed upon by the parties. Afghanistan Armenia Australia Azerbaijan Bangladesh Bhutan Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Democratic People's Republic of Korea Federated States of Micronesia Fiji France Georgia India Indonesia Islamic Republic of Iran Japan Kazakhstan Kiribati Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Malaysia Maldives Marshall Islands Mongolia Myanmar Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Zealand Pakistan Palau Papua New Guinea Philippines Republic of Korea Russian Federation Samoa Singapore Solomon Islands Sri Lanka Tajikistan Thailand Timor-Leste Tonga Turkey Turkmenistan Tuvalu United Kingdom United States of America Uzbekistan Vanuatu Viet Nam American Samoa Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands Cook Islands French Polynesia Guam Hong Kong, China Macao, China New Caledonia Niue

Members: Associate members:

Map No. 3974 Rev. 18 UNITED NATIONS August 2014 Department of Field Support Cartographic Section
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Cities and global sustainability agendas

slide-5
SLIDE 5

The 2030 Agenda and cities

Cities well positioned for the implementation

  • f Global Development

Agendas

slide-6
SLIDE 6
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Snapshot of SDG progress in the Pacific, 2017

slide-8
SLIDE 8
slide-9
SLIDE 9

What are the effective means of implementation

  • f the global agendas at the local level to achieve

sustainable urbanization?

slide-10
SLIDE 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11

The State of Asia and Pacific Cities 2019 The Future :

Urban Opportunities to deliver the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development

slide-12
SLIDE 12

To create a ‘possibility space’ to re‐imagine the future

  • f built/natural environments in Asia‐Pacific cities,

with the aim to further support the localization and implementation of global sustainability agendas, and guide the development of prosperous, resilient, and inclusive cities for all

slide-13
SLIDE 13

A moment of opportunity for Pacific cities

  • decisions made now have long‐term impacts, and will determine

the sustainable development trajectories of Pacific cities

  • in particular, most urban infrastructure investments, especially

environmental ones, are capital intensive and long‐term

-e.g. water and sewer mains need to be replaced once in 30 years

  • poor investment choices can create a lock‐in effect and increase

the challenge to establish sustainable development trajectories

slide-14
SLIDE 14
  • will be a major Report on cities in the Asia‐Pacific region
  • will be a policy advocacy Report for national and local

governments and stakeholders in the region

  • will provide a conceptual framework to localize the global

agendas in Asia‐Pacific cities

  • will critically assess and provide knowledge and best practices of

the means of implementation across a range of urban sustainability areas

  • will feed into the 5th Pacific Urban Forum during Q1 2019
  • will be launched at, and inform the thematic areas and structure
  • f, the 7th Asia‐Pacific Urban Forum during Q3 2019
slide-15
SLIDE 15

State of urbanization in the Pacific

Country National Urban Rural Cook Islands 28.4% 30.5% 23.6% Samoa 20.3% 23.3% 17.9% Solomon Islands 22.7% 32.2% 18.8% Tonga 22.3% 23.6% 22.8% Basic Needs Poverty Incidence

  • falling urban security driven by poverty, unemployment, ethnic conflict, and

the transition from traditional to market economies

  • urban poverty levels are increasing, having been exacerbated by the global

economic crisis of 2008‐2010 and cost‐of‐living increases

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Unemployment

  • Pacific SIDS generally have large informal economies

-Papua New Guinea – 84%, Samoa – 68%, Fiji – 60%

  • unemployment rates vary:

-from over 30% (Marshall Islands, Kiribati, and Tuvalu), below 7% (Palau, Tonga, and Vanuatu), or to 1.4% (Papua New Guinea)

  • youth unemployment rates are much higher than for the overall

population

-over 50% in Kiribati, Marshall Islands, Nauru, and Tuvalu

  • over half the population is under 24 years old in most Pacific SIDS
slide-17
SLIDE 17

High negative migration rates

  • annual averages per 1,000 population (2010‐15):

-Fiji: –6.6, Micronesia: –15.7, Tonga: –15.4, Vanuatu: +0.5

  • migration provides remittances, but also causes “brain drain”

Unemployment rates (%) and net international migration rates (%) for Pacific SIDS

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Investment Needs as percentage of GDP

Climate‐adjusted estimates, 2016‐2030

5.9% 7.8% 5.2% 8.8% 5.7% 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 10%

Asia and the Pacific Central Asia East Asia South Asia Southeast Asia The Pacific

  • however, on a per capita basis ODA is already higher in the Pacific than in any other region
  • 10 Pacific SIDS are among the 25 countries where ODA is highest as a proportion of national income

9.1

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Internet users in 2016 (% of population)

Pacific SIDS % Cook Islands 54.0% Fiji 46.5% French Polynesia 68.4% Guam 77.0% Kiribati 13.7% Marshall Islands 29.8% Micronesia (Federated States of) 33.4% Papua New Guinea 9.6% Samoa 29.4% Solomon Islands 11.0% Tonga 40.0% Tuvalu 46.0% Vanuatu 24.0%

  • renewable sources accounted for less

than 10% of total energy use in Pacific SIDS in 2015

  • there is a lack of data to inform policy – as
  • f 2015, only Fiji had data on expenditure
  • n research and development (R&D),

which it calculated at only 0.15% of GDP in 2012

slide-20
SLIDE 20

– Introduction

  • 1. The Future of Urban Governance and Capacities for Resilience
  • 2. The Future of Urban Finance
  • 3. The Future of Smart Urban Data and Technologies
  • 4. The Future of Urban/Territorial Planning

– Conclusion

Selection of themes was influenced by:

  • the ESCAP – UN‐Habitat Regional Partners Forum held in November 2017
  • the Regional Report for Habitat III
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Key questions for all themes:

a) What are current good practices, emerging examples, and new

  • pportunities for cities in the Pacific region which address

current and future challenges in Pacific cities? b) How can innovative solutions be scaled up for cities to drive the achievement of the SDGs by 2030 ‐ recognizing different challenges within cities, across countries, and across subregions in the Pacific?

slide-22
SLIDE 22 Incheon Bangkok ESCAP HQ Chiba Beijing Bogor New Delhi ESCAP Headquarters, Regional or sub-regional offices Shanghai Guangzhou Wuhan Mumbai Hyderabad Karachi Vladivostok Osaka Sapporo Anchorage Sydney Melbourne Perth Surabaya Auckland Istanbul Canberra Wellington Port Moresby Nouméa Pago Pago Port-Vila Apia Alofi Avarua Funafuti Majuro Papeete Tarawa Yaren Jakarta Dili Kuala Lumpur Bandar Seri Begawan Hanoi Manila Vientiane Sri Jayewardenepura Kotte Seoul Tokyo Ulaanbaatar Male Colombo Baku Moscow Ashgabat Astana Ankara T'bilisi Bishkek Dushanbe Tashkent Yerevan Suva Nuku'alofa Koror Hagåtña Palikir T h i m p h u K a t h m a n d u P h n
  • m
P e n h Honiara Tehran
  • Kabul
  • I
s l a m a b a d Dhaka P'yongyang Saipan Naypyitaw Bangkok ESCAP HQ Almaty Suva Bogor Beijing Incheon Chiba New Delhi T u a m
  • t

u A r c h i p e l a g

  • S
  • c
i e t y I s . T u b u a i I s . Pitcairn Phoenix Is. Tokelau Is. Gilbert Is. H a w a i i a n I s l a n d s Northern Line Islands Southern Line Islands Marquesas Is. Honshu Kyushu Shikoku Hokkaido Sakhalin Taiwan Luzon Mindanao K u r i l I s . R y u k y u I s . A l e u t i a n I s l a n d s Tasmania South Island North Island S u m a t e r a Java Sulawesi Hong Kong, China Northern Mariana Islands Guam New Caledonia American Samoa C
  • k
I s l a n d s French Polynesia Niue M a c a
  • ,
C h i n a FIJI SAMOA SINGAPORE TUVALU NAURU MARSHALL ISLANDS SOLOMON ISLANDS

PAPUA NEW GUINEA

A U S T R A L I A

NEW ZEALAND VANUATU TONGA K I R I B A T I FEDERATED STATES OF MICRONESIA PHILIPPINES MALAYSIA

I N D O N E S I A

C H I N A I N D I A K A Z A K H S T A N

SRI LANKA VIET NAM BRUNEI DARUSSALAM MYANMAR THAILAND NEPAL TURKEY ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN BHUTAN BANGLADESH MALDIVES TAJIKISTAN KYRGYZSTAN AZERBAIJAN P A K I S T A N A F G H A N I S T A N T U R K M E N I S T A N U Z B E K I S T A N Jammu and Kashmir C A M B O D I A LAO P.D.R.

R U S S I A N F E D E R A T I O N

MONGOLIA JAPAN

  • REP. OF
KOREA
  • DEM. PEOPLE'S
  • REP. OF KOREA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PALAU

A R M E N I A G E O R G I A TIMOR- LESTE

Arafura Sea Bay of Bengal

Arabian Sea

G u l f
  • f
O m a n Black Sea Caspian Sea

N O R T H P A C I F I C O C E A N S O U T H P A C I F I C O C E A N

T asm an Sea C oral Sea

Celebes Sea

South China Sea Philippine Sea East China Sea Sea of Okhotsk

B er i n g Sea

Mediterranean Sea P e r s i a n G u l f R e d S e a 120° 135° 150° 165° 180° 165° 150° 135° 30° 45° 60° 75° 90° 105° 120° 135° 150° 165° 180° 165° 150° 135° 45° 45° 30° 30° 15° 0° 15° 60° 60° 45° 30° 15° 0° 15° 30° 45° 60° Equator

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMISSION FOR ASIA AND THE PACIFIC

1000 2000 3000 km 1000 2000 mi

The boundaries and names shown and the designations used
  • n this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance
by the United Nations. Dotted line represents approximately the Line of Control in Jammu and Kashmir agreed upon by India and Pakistan. The final status of Jammu and Kashmir has not yet been agreed upon by the parties.

Afghanistan Armenia Australia Azerbaijan Bangladesh Bhutan Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Democratic People's Republic of Korea Federated States of Micronesia Fiji France Georgia India Indonesia Islamic Republic of Iran Japan Kazakhstan Kiribati Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Malaysia Maldives Marshall Islands Mongolia Myanmar Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Zealand Pakistan Palau Papua New Guinea Philippines Republic of Korea Russian Federation Samoa Singapore Solomon Islands Sri Lanka Tajikistan Thailand Timor-Leste Tonga Turkey Turkmenistan Tuvalu United Kingdom United States of America Uzbekistan Vanuatu Viet Nam American Samoa Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands Cook Islands French Polynesia Guam Hong Kong, China Macao, China New Caledonia Niue

Members: Associate members:

Map No. 3974 Rev. 18 UNITED NATIONS August 2014 Department of Field Support Cartographic Section

*

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Consultative Meetings

  • Subregional Pacific meeting

4 July 2018, Suva, Fiji

  • Thematic consultation on Smart Cities in Asia and the Pacific

10 July 2018, Singapore

  • Subregional consultation for South and South West Asia

September 2018 TBD, New Delhi, India

  • Expert Group Meeting on Municipal Finance

September/October 2018 TBD, Manila, the Philippines

  • Subregional consultation for North and Central Asia

October TBD, Geneva, Switzerland

  • 6th Asia‐Pacific Forum on Sustainable Development (APFSD)

March 2019 TBD, Bangkok, Thailand

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Pacific subregional meeting on

The Future of Pacific Cities:

Innovative Solutions for Sustainable Urbanization in the Pacific

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Objectives

1. Review the overall issues and assess the sustainability of urban development in the Pacific, and develop recommendations for public, private and civil society organisations for the sustainable management of Pacific cities, towns and settlements 2. Broaden the knowledge base regarding sustainable city planning, financing, data, technologies, resilient local governance and urban management capacities in the Pacific through the elaboration of local good practices and knowledge partnerships 3. Build ownership for the Report and encourage participants to become champions, to take its knowledge and recommendations forward, and to disseminate, and raise awareness within their networks

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Expected outcomes

  • 1. Validation of the overall narrative and structure of the Report from a

Pacific urban perspective

  • 2. A more granular and regionally‐specific understanding of the

challenges and future opportunities of sustainable city development in the Pacific, to generate examples of best practices and case studies that can feed into the Report

  • 3. Confirmation of timeline and possible thematic working group for

the Report on Pacific cities to further elaborate content from the Pacific against the thematic focus areas of the Report

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Today’s Programme

-Country presentations -Group discussions on the solutions for means of implementation Coffee break -Plenary group discussion -Closing Lunch break -Academic‐Practitioner Collaboration for Urban Shelter in the South Pacific (APCUS‐SP)

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Topics for group discussions on the solutions for means of implementation

Group 1: Urban governance and capacities for resilient cities – Facilitator: Renata Netaf Group 2: Urban finance – Facilitator: Kemo Pepena‐Guise Group 3: Data and technologies for smart cities – Facilitator: Mere Naulumatua Group 4: Integrated urban/territorial planning – Facilitator: Fetoloa’I Yandall Alama a) What are current good practices, emerging examples, and new opportunities for cities in the Pacific region which address current and future challenges in (city governance and capacity development for resilient cities OR urban financing OR smart urban data and technologies OR urban and territorial planning) in Pacific cities? b) How can innovative solutions be scaled up for cities to drive the achievement of the SDGs by 2030 ‐ recognizing different challenges within cities, across countries, and across subregions in the Pacific?

slide-29
SLIDE 29

ANNEX

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Cities and the global agendas

New Urban Agenda – transformative commitments for sustainable urban development Addis Ababa Action Agenda – mobilizing domestic sources of finance Paris Agreement – recognized the importance of the engagement of all levels of government and various actors Sendai Framework – unplanned and rapid urbanization as an underlying disaster risk driver

slide-31
SLIDE 31

A moment of opportunity for Pacific cities

  • decisions made now have long‐term impacts, and will determine

the sustainable development trajectories of Pacific cities

  • in particular, most urban infrastructure investments, especially

environmental ones, are capital intensive and long‐term

-e.g. water and sewer mains need to be replaced once in 30 years

  • poor investment choices can create a lock‐in effect and increase

the challenge to establish sustainable development trajectories

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Past trajectories and Future pathways

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Alternative trajectories

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Chapter 1

The Future of Urban Governance and Capacities for Resilience

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Chapter 1

The Future of Urban Governance and Capacities for Resilience

  • in the context of their unique challenges, how can Pacific cities increase their capacities and

make local governance more effective in order to address the multidimensional urban impacts

  • f social, economic, and environmental shocks and stresses, including from natural hazards

and climate change? How can Pacific cities increase the resilience of the most vulnerable segments of society in particular?

  • how can improving both technical (e.g. human resource capacities) and functional (e.g.

stakeholder engagement) institutional capacities increase resilience in Pacific cities?

  • how can local governments engage with the informal sector to strengthen resilience?
  • how can nature‐based solutions or ecosystem‐based urban development approaches and

green infrastructure increase resilience in Pacific cities?

  • where necessary, how can off‐island migration (‘migration with dignity’) be supported and the

economic, social, cultural, and psychological costs associated with climate change‐related migration be minimized, both for the voluntary migration of individuals and for the planned resettlement of entire communities?

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Chapter 2

The Future of Urban Finance

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Chapter 2

The Future of Urban Finance

  • how can Pacific cities expand their access to climate finance? What are their options

(e.g. disaster‐contingent lines of credit, sovereign or regional insurance schemes)?

  • how can Pacific cities finance the additional costs of ‘climate proofing’

infrastructure?

  • what role can community financing play in the Pacific (e.g. savings, innovations like

crowdfunding, blockchain, housing microfinance)?

  • what are the new and innovative solutions to meet the existing finance gap in the

Pacific (e.g. land value capture, PPPs, debt capital) and de‐risk investments (e.g. pooling, credit enhancements, safeguards)?

  • how can Pacific cities finance support for the most vulnerable groups (e.g. youth,

women)?

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Chapter 3

The Future of Smart Urban Data and Technologies

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Chapter 3

The Future of Smart Urban Data and Technologies

  • how can municipal governments reduce the digital divide in the Pacific?
  • what kinds of data is needed, and how can it be collected, to enable

Pacific cities to offer basic services and livelihoods to all their residents and truly leave no one behind? e.g.:

-natural hazard and climate change information -baseline data on settlement types (geospatial data on urban assets and population, length of settlement occupation, governance arrangements, levels of provision of basic infrastructure and services, waste management arrangements, types of basic tenure security)

  • what kinds of innovative technologies can Pacific cities use to strengthen

their connections with global markets and increase their resilience? How can such investments be financed? How can Pacific governments choose the appropriate technological solutions for their unique context?

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Chapter 4

The Future of Urban/Territorial Planning

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Land use and urban villages

  • decisions around planning and investments in infrastructure and basic services do not

currently address the trends in land use in Pacific cities

  • the future of Pacific cities will be increasingly determined by the growth of urban villages,

which are characterized by underserviced squatter and informal settlements

  • urban villages already contain over 1 million residents, and have flourished not only within

and adjoining land owned by customary landowners, but increasingly on state and freehold lands as people seek available and affordable land for housing

  • lands being occupied is that discarded by the formal planning system

-the edges of rivers and estuaries -accretion lands on ocean and lagoon foreshores -mangrove wetlands -tidal lagoons and swamps -peri‐urban “edge” lands -waste disposal sites -residual land parcels within formally planned residential areas

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Urban villages

  • the process is the opposite of the top‐down formal planning systems

-land occupation and building come first, with services, infrastructure, and land tenure security following later, if at all -housing construction is “stop‐start” and reiterative -government imposition and control is minimal or absent

  • urban villages are not just 'settlements’ – they are communities with

social networks, governance structures and a defined way of life – but they have inadequate levels of basic services and infrastructure such as sanitation, water, waste disposal, electricity, roads, and drainage

  • the solution is not “formalizing the informal,” which would continue to

perpetuate current practices and approaches such as eviction, relocation, and even eradication

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Chapter 4

The Future of Urban/Territorial Planning

  • how to plan cities in the context of the mixture of formal planned development

(native and traditional villages) and new urban villages (informal and squatter settlements)?

  • how to reconceptualize approaches to Pacific urbanization? (i.e. it is not about

“formalizing the informal” by standardization and regularization)

  • how can urban planning be used to encourage healthier lifestyles in Pacific cities?
  • what are the entry points in Pacific cities for enhancing cross‐sector integration

and inclusive planning processes to increase inclusiveness, resilience, and prosperity?

  • how can Pacific cities plan land use for circular economy and integrated resource

management of key resource flows (e.g. waste, water, energy)?

slide-44
SLIDE 44

The Pacific context

  • the small size, limited resources, geographic dispersion, and isolation

from markets of Pacific small island developing States (SIDS) disadvantage them economically and increase their development challenges

-in a study ranking the remoteness of 219 countries, where 1 was the most accessible and 219 the most remote, the average rank of Pacific SIDS was 197

  • the impact of natural hazards and climate change threaten the

integrity, food security, water, health, infrastructure, livelihoods, economies, populations and ecosystems of Pacific SIDS

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Urban challenges in the Pacific

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Percentage of Population Residing in Urban Areas, 1990‐2030

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

Melanesia Micronesia Polynesia Pacific average Asia average

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Urban growth rate, 1950‐2050

0.0% 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% 1990‐1995 1995‐2000 2000‐2005 2005‐2010 2010‐2015 2015‐2020 2020‐2025 2025‐2030 2030‐2035 2035‐2040 2040‐2045 2045‐2050

Melanesia Micronesia Polynesia Asia

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Urban population as a percentage of total population

slide-49
SLIDE 49

State of urbanization in the Pacific

  • growing towns and cities fueled by strong rural–urban and circular migration
  • inadequate affordable land with formal services to accommodate urban and

peri‐urban population growth, with escalation of land disputes and conflicts

  • unmet demand for services and infrastructure, including water, sanitation,

and adequate drainage

  • impacts of climate change increasingly affecting towns and cities, with most

Pacific urban centres in low‐lying, hazard‐prone coastal areas

  • limited capacities for urban management and planning, and the actions

required at all levels to enable urban centers to be effective drivers of economic, social, and environmental development

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Economic growth, 2000‐2016

0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Pacific ESCAP Asia‐Pacific aggregate

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Proportional mortality, by cause

non‐communicable diseases account for up to 80% of deaths in Fiji and 74% in Tonga and Tuvalu, compared with the global average of 68%

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Behavioural risks are driving non‐communicable diseases

  • obesity and diabetes

-obesity rates are as high as 54‐58% in Tonga and Samoa, with rates over 25% in most Pacific SIDS, versus the global average of 13% -Cook Islands, Marshall Islands, Nauru, and Palau are among the world’s top 10 diabetes‐prevalent countries

  • tobacco use

-66% of adult men in Kiribati and 40‐55% in Palau, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, and Tonga are regular tobacco users -high consumption of tobacco by youth, especially by young women, with 47% in Cook Islands and 62% in Palau

  • lack of public spaces discourages physical activity, with urban areas not

designed for walkability

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Economic and non‐economic costs of disasters

  • Pacific SIDS are highly exposed to a range of natural hazards of hydro‐

meteorological origin (cyclones, droughts, landslides and floods) and geological origin (volcanic eruptions, earthquakes and tsunamis), with:

-5 of the top 15 countries with the highest weather‐related disasters risk -10 of the top 30 countries with the largest potential economic disaster losses

  • since 1950, extreme events have affected 9.2 million people, with

9,811 deaths and $3.2 billion in damages

  • countries have experienced losses approaching or exceeding their GDP

-Tropical Cyclone Pam in Vanuatu in 2015 – losses of $450 million (64% of GDP) -Tropical Cyclone Heta in Niue in 2004 – losses of over five times the 2003 GDP

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Average annual loss by 2030 (% of GDP)

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Climate change

  • Pacific SIDS only contribute 0.03% of the world’s greenhouse gas

emissions, yet are amongst the most vulnerable to its effects

  • climate change is increasing the risks of weather‐related disasters by

changing the nature and extent of natural hazards, by increasing their frequency, intensity, duration, and spatial extent

  • climate change projections identify increases in extreme hot days and

warm nights, extreme rainfall events, the intensity of tropical cyclones in the South Pacific, as well as sea level rise and ocean acidification

  • climate change causes long‐term degradation to the natural

environment and to critical ecosystems (e.g. coral bleaching)

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Environmental degradation

  • ocean plastic

-at the current rate the oceans will carry more plastic than fish by 2050 -there are 500 times more microplastic particles in the oceans than there are stars in our galaxy

  • environmental degradation is exacerbated by the increasing

population, unplanned urbanization, unsustainable coastal development, the exploitation of natural resources, poor waste management, and pollution

-half the coral reefs are threatened due to overfishing, runoff from land‐based sources, and coastal development -over 2/3 of mangrove forests are threatened by infrastructure development, tourism, sedimentation, and pollution -there is also decreased biodiversity, overexploited fisheries, and pollution of water sources

slide-57
SLIDE 57
slide-58
SLIDE 58