Urban Building Usage Labeling by Geometric and Context Analyses of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

urban building usage labeling by geometric and context
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Urban Building Usage Labeling by Geometric and Context Analyses of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Institute of Cartography and Geoinformatics | Leibniz Universitt Hannover Urban Building Usage Labeling by Geometric and Context Analyses of the Footprint Data Hai Huang, Birgit Kieler and Monika Sester Introduction The Usage (use and


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Institute of Cartography and Geoinformatics | Leibniz Universität Hannover

Hai Huang, Birgit Kieler and Monika Sester

Urban Building Usage Labeling by Geometric and Context Analyses of the Footprint Data

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Building Usage Labeling | ICC Dresden, 29th Aug. 2013 Hai Huang | 2

The Usage (use and occupancy) information of buildings

  • is of great interest for, e.g., navigation, city planning, emergency

management, etc.

  • is not available in a consistent way in the volunteered data
  • is not always available even in the official cadastral maps

Our approach to automatic labeling:

  • Pre-defined category: residential (family house, apartment

building), com m ercial (shopping mall, office building), industrial (factory, warehouse) and public (school, hospital, theater, etc.)

  • High-level local geom etric features and contextual constraints
  • Markov Random Field (MRF) for the modeling of the building

netw ork

Introduction

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Building Usage Labeling | ICC Dresden, 29th Aug. 2013 Hai Huang | 3

Influence of the local geometric features

  • Footprint area
  • (+ ) distinguish e.g., industrial and single-family house
  • (-) hard to separate public and industrial building without

considering the shape

  • Length/ width ratio
  • (+ ) distinguish e.g., bar shape (often industrial, residential)

and square shape (often public and commercial)

  • (-) only works for simple shapes (or using bounding box),

cannot represent complex buildings  Higher level features are required to integrate multiple geometric attributes and provide more precise description to the footprint shape.

Local features

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Building Usage Labeling | ICC Dresden, 29th Aug. 2013 Hai Huang | 4

Effective Width (EW)

  • Definition: the average width of the footprint along the centerline
  • f the footprint

AB

: building area

LB

: actual building length : length of the modified center line (red)

Local features

~

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Building Usage Labeling | ICC Dresden, 29th Aug. 2013 Hai Huang | 5

Effective Width (EW)

  • Meaning: the general living/ movement space inside the building!

despite the building complexity

Local features

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Building Usage Labeling | ICC Dresden, 29th Aug. 2013 Hai Huang | 6

Branching degree (BD)

  • Definition: a score of the number and distribution of the building

segments (the longest: “trunk”; the others: “branches”)

  • Basis: conventional straight skeleton

Local features

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Building Usage Labeling | ICC Dresden, 29th Aug. 2013 Hai Huang | 7

Branching degree (BD)

  • Meaning: a measurement of the building complexity

Local features

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Building Usage Labeling | ICC Dresden, 29th Aug. 2013 Hai Huang | 8

The local energy

  • EW-BD distribution
  • Each building can be represented as a point in this parameter

space.

  • The class centroids are empirically given with generic values.

Local features

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Building Usage Labeling | ICC Dresden, 29th Aug. 2013 Hai Huang | 9

The local energy

  • The probability that this building belongs to one of the classes is

inversely proportional to its (standardized) distance to the centroid of the class.

  • Energy: a quaternary value of the probabilities (sum= 1)

I.e., the probabilities that this building is supposed to be labeled to all the individual classes.

  • E.g.,

implies the building will be more likely labeled as “industrial” considering only the local features.

Local features

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Building Usage Labeling | ICC Dresden, 29th Aug. 2013 Hai Huang | 10

The neighborhood relationship

  • Voronoi cells as basis

Context model

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Building Usage Labeling | ICC Dresden, 29th Aug. 2013 Hai Huang | 11

Markov Random Field (MRF)

  • Vertices: centroids of individual buildings
  • Edges: neighborhood relationship

Context model

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Building Usage Labeling | ICC Dresden, 29th Aug. 2013 Hai Huang | 12

The total energy

  • Unary term
  • Binary term

Context model

N R C I P R 1

  • 1

0.5 C . 1 0.5 I . . 1

  • 1

P . . . 1

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Building Usage Labeling | ICC Dresden, 29th Aug. 2013 Hai Huang | 13

A global optimization

  • The configuration K, which leads to the maximum total energy
  • Four possible labels for each building/ vertices
  • Change of each label leads to a new configuration
  • Urban area 

highly connected network  Computational intractable for direct solution…

Context model

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Building Usage Labeling | ICC Dresden, 29th Aug. 2013 Hai Huang | 14

Stochastic search

Initialization M0 Propose a new state M’ Sample lables for the buildings Calculate the overall energy Accept the new proposal (Metropolis-Hastings criterion) Mn+ 1= M’ Mn+ 1= Mn Y N current Mn

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Building Usage Labeling | ICC Dresden, 29th Aug. 2013 Hai Huang | 15

Dataset 1 (OSM): 94 buildings, Boston, United States

Experiments

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Building Usage Labeling | ICC Dresden, 29th Aug. 2013 Hai Huang | 16

Ground truth

Experiments

Residential Commercial Industrial Public

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Building Usage Labeling | ICC Dresden, 29th Aug. 2013 Hai Huang | 17

Labeling using only local features (Accuracy= 72.3% )

Experiments

Residential Commercial Industrial Public Incorrect classifications

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Building Usage Labeling | ICC Dresden, 29th Aug. 2013 Hai Huang | 18

Final results using both local and contextual information (Accuracy= 97.8% )

Experiments

Residential Commercial Industrial Public Incorrect classifications

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Building Usage Labeling | ICC Dresden, 29th Aug. 2013 Hai Huang | 19

Dataset 2 (cadastral map): 456 buildings, Hannover, Germany (Accuracy= 89.7% )

Experiments

Residential Commercial Industrial Public Labeling result Ground truth Incorrect classifications

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Building Usage Labeling | ICC Dresden, 29th Aug. 2013 Hai Huang | 20

A novel full automatic labeling of building types (use and occupancy)

Solely based on the building footprint data

Four-classes category: residential, commercial, industrial and public

Two new high-level geometric local features: effective width and branching degree

MRF for the modeling of building network, integrating contextual constraints

Conclusion

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Building Usage Labeling | ICC Dresden, 29th Aug. 2013 Hai Huang | 21

A general, rather rough category

… against the wide variety of building types and definitions

Some building types, e.g., educational, high-hazard, can actually NOT be derived solely from footprint data.

Finer contextual knowledge can be integrated. E.g., an identified market square may increase the likelihood that the surrounding buildings are commercial!  New local features as well as contextual knowledge can be easily added in the proposed framework… for a refined or specialized classification.

A general classifier is used all the datasets. In the future work, the local/ specified parameters of the classifier can be learned for individual cities.  A “spectral signature” of the city…

Problems & outlook

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Building Usage Labeling | ICC Dresden, 29th Aug. 2013 Hai Huang | 22

Thank you very much for your attention!