University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Dashboard Indicators A D - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
university of illinois at urbana champaign
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Dashboard Indicators A D - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Jun 01, 2023 353 likes •876 views

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Dashboard Indicators A D D I T I O N A L U P DAT E S BY: U N I V E R S I T Y O F F I C E F O R P L A N N I N G A N D B U D G E T I N G F E B R UA RY 1 5 , 2 0 1 3 P R E S E N T E D BY: C H A

slide-1
SLIDE 1

A D D I T I O N A L U P DAT E S BY: U N I V E R S I T Y O F F I C E F O R P L A N N I N G A N D B U D G E T I N G F E B R UA RY 1 5 , 2 0 1 3 P R E S E N T E D BY: C H A N C E L L O R P H Y L L I S W I S E M A R C H 7 , 2 0 1 3

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Dashboard Indicators

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Student Access and Enrollment

Page 2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Percent First-Time Freshmen Admissions Yield* Fall 2007 – Fall 2012

Admissions yield at the University

  • f Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

has fallen below the peer median.

* Admissions Yield = Percent of (total enrolled divided by total admits). Fall 2012 peer data not available.

Page 3

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 UIUC Peer 75th Percentile Peer Median Peer 25th Percentile

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Percent Enrolled Undergraduate Students from Underrepresented* Groups Fall 2007 – Fall 2012

The percent of undergraduate students from underrepresented groups at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign is at par or below the peer median.

* Includes Black, Hispanic, American Indian, Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander, and multi-racial students. Fall 2012 peer data not available.

Page 4

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 UIUC Peer 75th Percentile Peer Median Peer 25th Percentile

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Enrolled Undergraduate Students from Underrepresented* Groups Fall 2011

* Includes Black, Hispanic, American Indian, Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander, and multi-racial students.

Page 5

2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 Uva Wisc Mich UW UNC Median UCSD UC-Berk UI UCLA UT

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Percent Enrolled Graduate and Professional Students from Underrepresented* Groups Fall 2007 – Fall 2012

The percent of graduate and professional students from underrepresented groups at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign is lower than the peer median.

Page 6

* Includes Black, Hispanic, American Indian, Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander, and multi-racial students. Fall 2012 peer data not available.

0% 5% 10% 15% 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 UIUC Peer 75th Percentile Peer Median Peer 25th Percentile

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Entering Freshmen ACT Composite Scores 25th and 75th Percentile Fall 2007 – Fall 2012

ACT scores of incoming freshmen at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign are on par with peers.

ACT Score

Note: Fewer students at peer institutions submit ACT scores. Fall 2012 peer data not available.

Page 7

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 UIUC 75th Percentile Peer Average 75th Percentile UIUC 25th Percentile Peer Average 25th Percentile

slide-8
SLIDE 8

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and Peer Institutions First-Time Transfers Enrollment Fall 2007 – Fall 2012

Page 8

Institution 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 858 1,183 1,195 1,168 1,398 1,350 University of California - Berkeley 2,034 2,012 2,199 2,195 2,336 University of California - Los Angeles 3,317 3,219 3,234 3,228 3,116 University of California - San Diego 1,723 1,858 1,931 2,567 2,795 University of Michigan - Ann Arbor 755 759 870 928 874 University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill 793 783 778 922 791 University of Texas - Austin 2,297 2,270 2,457 2,452 2,492 University of Virginia 590 588 641 631 621 University of Washington 1,483 1,492 1,677 1,623 2,001 University of Wisconsin-Madison 1,292 1,238 1,187 1,304 1,326 Note: Fall 2012 peer data not available. Data Source: IPEDS Data Center.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Percent First-Time Transfers from Underrepresented* Groups Fall 2007 – Fall 2012

Page 9

The percent of first-time transfers from underrepresented groups at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign is lower than its peer median.

* Includes Black, Hispanic, American Indian, Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander, and multi-racial students. Fall 2012 peer data not available.

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 UIUC Peer 75th Percentile Peer Median Peer 25th Percentile

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Student Access and Enrollment: Goals

Page 10

  • Increase the diversity of our class
  • Improve yield in high-achieving students
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Action Items

Page 11

Increase scholarship support Recruit more intensively in key high schools Increase preparedness of potential students to enrich and enlarge the applicant pool

1-2 year 3-5 year

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Student Outcomes

Page 12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Freshman to Sophomore One-Year Retention Rates Fall 2007 – Fall 2012

2011 first-time freshmen cohort: 7,249

The freshmen retention rate at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign is high and similar to its peers.

Page 13

Note: Fall 2012 peer data not available.

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 UIUC Peer 75th Percentile Peer Median Peer 25th Percentile

slide-14
SLIDE 14

First-Time Freshmen Four-Year Graduation Rates 2001 – 2006 Cohorts

The four year graduation rate for undergraduates at the University

  • f Illinois at Urbana-Champaign is

similar to the peer median.

2006 first-time freshmen cohort: 7,105 Page 14

Note: Fall 2012 peer data not available.

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 UIUC Peer 75th Percentile Peer Median Peer 25th Percentile

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Percent First-Time Freshmen from Underrepresented* Groups Four-Year Graduation Rates 2001 – 2006 Cohorts

In 2010 the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign graduated a higher percent of students from underrepresented groups within four years compared to its peer median.

2006 Underrepresented first-time freshmen cohort: 1,264 Page 15

* Includes Black, Hispanic, American Indian, Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander, and multi-racial students. Fall 2012 peer data not available.

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 UIUC Peer 75th Percentile Peer Median Peer 25th Percentile

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Percent First-Time Freshmen from Underrepresented* Groups Six-Year Graduation Rates 2001 – 2006 Cohorts

About 73% of the students from underrepresented groups at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign graduate within six years, but that number is lower than the peer median.

2006 Underrepresented first-time freshmen cohort: 1,264 Page 16

* Includes Black, Hispanic, American Indian, Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander, and multi-racial students. Fall 2012 peer data not available.

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 UIUC Peer 75th Percentile Peer Median Peer 25th Percentile

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Number of Degrees Granted – Bachelor’s FY 2007 – FY 2012

University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign grants more undergraduate degrees than its peer median.

Page 17

Note: Only includes bachelor’s degrees, excludes associate degrees and certificates. Degrees awarded from July 1 to June 30 of each fiscal year. Fiscal Year 2012 peer data not available.

1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 UIUC Peer 75th Percentile Peer Median Peer 25th Percentile

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Number of Degrees Granted – Master’s and Doctoral FY 2007 – FY 2012

University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign grants more graduate degrees than its peer median.

Page 18

Note: Only includes master’s and doctoral degrees, excludes certificates. Degrees awarded from July 1 to June 30

  • f each fiscal year. Fiscal Year 2012 peer data not available.

1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 UIUC Peer 75th Percentile Peer Median Peer 25th Percentile

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Number of Bachelor’s Degrees Granted to Students from Underrepresented* Groups FY 2007 – FY 2012

* Includes Black, Hispanic, American Indian, Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander, and multi-racial students.

Page 19

Note: Only includes bachelor’s degrees, excludes associate degrees and certificates. Degrees awarded from July 1 to June 30 of each fiscal year.

856 893 827 966 1,037 1,070 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Number of Master’s and Doctoral Degrees Granted to Students from Underrepresented* Groups FY 2007 – FY 2012

* Includes Black, Hispanic, American Indian, Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander, and multi-racial students.

Page 20

Note: Only includes master’s and doctoral degrees, excludes certificates. Degrees awarded from July 1 to June 30

  • f each fiscal year.

285 226 287 319 349 372 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Student Outcomes: Goals

Page 21

  • Improve retention and graduation rates
  • Reduce the gap in graduation rates for

underrepresented students

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Action Items

Page 22

Provide more mentoring assistance to more at-risk students Strengthen and better coordinate retention programs across the entire student experience

1-2 year 3-5 year

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Tuition and Financial Aid

Page 23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Undergraduate In-State Tuition and Fees Per Academic Year AY 2007 – AY 2012

Undergraduate tuition and fees at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign are higher than its peer median.

Page 24

$0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000 $14,000 $16,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 UIUC Peer 75th Percentile Peer Median Peer 25th Percentile

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Percent Need Met of Full-Time Undergraduates Awarded Any Need-Based Aid AY 2007 – AY 2012

(excludes any aid awarded in excess of need as well as any that were awarded to replace EFC: PLUS, unsubsidized and private alternative loans)

Page 25

University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign students who receive need-based aid have a lower percentage of their financial need met compared to the peer median.

Note: Excludes University of Washington due to lack of available data. Academic Year 2012 peer data not available.

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 UIUC Peer Median

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Average Per Undergraduate-Borrower Cumulative Principal Borrowed AY 2007 – AY 2012

(excludes any aid awarded in excess of need as well as any that were awarded to replace EFC: PLUS, unsubsidized and private alternative loans)

Page 26

Note: Excludes University of Washington and University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill due to lack of available data. Academic Year 2012 peer data not available.

The average debt of the University

  • f Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

students is on par with the peer median.

$0 $5,000 $10,000 $15,000 $20,000 $25,000 $30,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 UIUC Peer Median

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Tuition and Financial Aid: Goals

Page 27

  • Educate the best and brightest students

regardless of their ability to pay

  • Shrink unmet need and reduce student debt
slide-28
SLIDE 28

Action Items

Page 28

Increase philanthropic support for scholarships Increase support for high-need/high-merit students Improve campus coordination of and support for allocation of financial aid awards

1-2 year 3-5 year

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Faculty and Scholarship

Page 29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Number of Tenure System Faculty Selected Fall Terms

University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign has about the same number of tenure system faculty as its peer median.

Page 30

Note: Fall 2012 peer data not available.

500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 2005 2007 2009 2011 2012 UIUC Peer 75th Percentile Peer Median Peer 25th Percentile

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Percent Tenure System Faculty from Underrepresented* Groups Selected Fall Terms

Compared to its peer median, the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign has a higher percent of tenure system faculty from underrepresented groups.

Page 31

* Includes Black, Hispanic, American Indian, Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander, and multi-racial faculty. Fall 2012 peer data not available.

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 2005 2007 2009 2011 2012 UIUC Peer 75th Percentile Peer Median Peer 25th Percentile

slide-32
SLIDE 32

National Academy Memberships FY 2006 – FY 2010

University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign has fewer National Academy memberships than its peer median.

Page 32

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 UIUC Peer Median

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Student to Faculty Ratios Fall 2008 – Fall 2012

University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign has a higher student to faculty ratio than its peer median.

Page 33

5 10 15 20 25 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 UIUC Peer 75th Percentile Peer Median Peer 25th Percentile

Note: Fall 2012 peer data not available.

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Percent Undergraduate Class Sections with Fewer Than 20 Students Fall 2007 – Fall 2012

The percent of classes with less than 20 students at the University

  • f Illinois at Urbana-Champaign is

less than its peer median.

Page 34

Note: Fall 2012 peer data not available.

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 UIUC Peer Median

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Percent Undergraduate Class Sections with More Than 50 Students Fall 2007 – Fall 2012

The percent of classes with more than 50 students at the University

  • f Illinois at Urbana-Champaign is

higher than its peer median.

Page 35

Note: Fall 2012 peer data not available.

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 UIUC Peer Median

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Faculty* Salary - Difference from Peer Median FY 2008 – FY 2012

Average faculty salary at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign is lower than its peer median.

* Includes full-time instructional faculty and excludes clinical faculty.

Page 36

  • 5%
  • 4%
  • 3%
  • 2%
  • 1%

0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Faculty and Scholarship: Goals

Page 37

  • Attract world-class faculty with a broad

spectrum of perspectives and experiences

  • Rebuild the faculty strategically to address

society’s grandest challenges

  • Offer competitive faculty salaries and address

retention challenges

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Action Items

Page 38

Launch aggressive, targeted hiring of senior faculty in key interdisciplinary areas Invest more in diversity hiring efforts Build more campus-college partnerships Enhance capacity with cluster hires

1-2 year 3-5 year

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Research Performance

Page 39

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Total Research and Development Expenditures* FY 2007 – FY 2012

Though increasing in FY 2008 and FY 2009, research and development expenditures at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign are less than the peer median. Urbana-Champaign does not have a medical center but six of its nine peers do have one.

* As reported to the NSF Survey of Research and Development Expenditures. Fiscal Year 2012 peer data not available.

Page 40

Methodology change $0 $200 $400 $600 $800 $1,000 $1,200 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Millions UIUC Peer 75th Percentile Peer Median Peer 25th Percentile

slide-41
SLIDE 41

National Science Foundation Funded Research and Development FY 2007 – FY 2012

* Some institutions reported combined campus data. Fiscal Year 2012 peer data not available.

University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign receives more NSF funding than its peer median and is consistently ranked in the top three among its peers. NSF is the largest source of Federal R&D funding for the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Page 41

$0 $20 $40 $60 $80 $100 $120 $140 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Millions UIUC Peer 75th Percentile Peer Median Peer 25th Percentile

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Research Performance: Goals

Page 42

  • Expand the research enterprise in quality, impact, and

visibility

  • Support, encourage and promote internal connections

among researchers

  • Support and streamline business and compliance

requirements

  • Create opportunities for diverse populations and

perspectives in the research enterprise

  • Improve customer service functions that support faculty

research

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Action Items

Page 43

Develop leadership structure for campus initiatives Create a formal network of research deans Improve support for securing grants Coordinate campus activities in broad interdisciplinary areas Develop a faculty experts database Create a proposal development office for large proposal preparation

1-2 year 3-5 year

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Advancement

Page 44

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Gifts Deferred at Face Value FY 2008 – FY 2012

University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign receives less gift income than its peer median.

Note: UI Advancement Peer Group.

Page 45

$0 $50 $100 $150 $200 $250 $300 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Millions

UIUC Peer Median

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Annual Giving Rate AY 2009 – AY 2011

University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign has a slightly lower percent of alumni donating money than its peer median.

Note: Peer data from US News & World Report, 2013 Edition. Annual giving rate is a two year average.

Page 46

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Peer 25th Percentile UIUC Peer Median Peer 75th Percentile Peer Max Value

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Endowment Assets per FTE Enrollment FY 2007 – FY 2011

University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign has a smaller endowment per student than its peer median.

Note: UI Advancement Peer Group.

Page 47

$0 $5,000 $10,000 $15,000 $20,000 $25,000 $30,000 $35,000 $40,000 $45,000 $50,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 UIUC Peer Median

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Institution Alumni Other Individuals Corporations Foundations Other Total UCLA $53.5 $56.6 $38.7 $220 $12.9 $381.6 Wisconsin $45.9 $38 $28.2 $167.5 $59.5 $339 Washington** $45.4 $40.9 $61.4 $98.8 $64.9 $311.4 Berkeley* $74.9 $29 $56.8 $131.4 $15.3 $307.3 Michigan** $149.2 $52.8 $20.4 $44.5 $15.1 $282.1 North Carolina $68.7 $33.6 $32.8 $89.6 $53.5 $278.2 Texas* $72.3 $26.6 $83.6 $77 $14.2 $273.8 Virginia $70.6 $34.4 $21.8 $77.4 $26.2 $230.4 Illinois* $45.9 $23.7 $35.5 $18.7 $12.7 $136.5 UCSD $2.1 $28.4 $20.2 $51.8 $13.7 $116.2 Median $58.3 $33.4 $33.7 $84.5 $19 $275.1

Dashboard Peer Group

Five year averages (FY 2008-12), dollars in millions (CAE/VSE) Institution without full-scale medical school Separate data for main campus not available * - ** -

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Advancement: Goals

  • Renew our emphasis on principal gift prospective

donors

  • Expand our major gift prospective donor pool
  • Improve processes for managing our relations with

donors

  • Stress annual giving acquisition
  • Enhance our talent management/focus on major gift

work

  • Strengthen ties to research/VFE focus areas

Page 49

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Action Items

Page 50

Ensure major gift officers are focused on major gift work Renew emphasis on principal gift prospective donor ($5M+) program, including corporations and foundations Expand major gift prospective donor pool FACTS database conversion process will enable us to track and manage relationships more effectively Stress annual giving acquisition Enhance talent management – recruitment, training, metrics, accountability

1-2 year 3-5 year

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Questions?