University of Colorado A Line Tonight Presentation (35 min) - - PDF document
7/25/2016 38th & Blake Station Area Height Amendments: Public Meeting #5 July 13 th , 2016 www.denvergov.org/38Blake Image: RTD NDCC North Denver Cornerstone Collaborative 38 th & Blake Station Area 1 st Stop along the Corridor of
Image: RTD
www.denvergov.org/38Blake
July 13th, 2016
1st Stop along the Corridor of Opportunity to DIA, as envisioned by Mayor Hancock
1. February 10th Kickoff: Collected ideas and feedback 2. March 16th: Explored alternatives 3. April 26th: Refined a Preferred Alternative 4. May 24th: Presentation of Public Review Draft
Jul 22nd: Comments Due Aug 3rd: Planning Board Info Item Aug 17th: Planning Board Hearing Sept 19th: City Council Hearing
1. Regulatory approach to encourage design quality, such as through a design overlay to implement appropriate design requirements. 1. Regulatory approach to encourage integration of affordable housing and mixed income development within the 38th and Blake Station Area.
Tonight’s Focus Next Meeting
V e r y C r i t i c a l C r i t i c a l S
e w h a t C r i t i c a l N
C r i t i c a l
76% 1% 4% 19%
(Input from Public Meeting #2)
vibrancy and walkability of a TOD area?
public realm, including streets or river promenade? (Select up to 4) A. Street Facing Entrances B. Porches / Stoops C. More Windows / Visibility (High Transparency) D. Taller Ground Level Height E. Building Close to the Street (Build-To Requirement) F. Artwork Integrated into Architecture G. Awnings and Lighting H. Pedestrian-Scaled Signage
A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. 18% 11% 14% 4% 15% 17% 9% 11%
the quality and character of taller buildings? (Select up to 3) A. Upper Story Setbacks Above 5 Stories B. Active Uses Fronting the Primary Street (e.g. No Parking Garages) C. Screened Parking Garages (with cladding, art, etc.) D. Incentives to Incorporate Art E. Limited Building Envelop (Mass Reduction) for Light and Views F. Other
A. B. C. D. E. F.
26% 27% 2% 13% 20% 13%
ie nte d gr
s
e se r ve sunlight, vie ws, and ar c hite c tur al var ie ty
r e at the r ive r as a spe c ial plac e / e dge
in special and unique cases, to provide a vehicle to supplement underlying Zone District standards with adjusted standards or allowances.
character in specific areas (e.g. Curtis Park accessory structures)
uses)
Sloan’s Lake height transition)
Adopted Design Overlay for South Sloan’s Lake
Draft outline of RiNo’s proposed design overlay
Doe s this me e t the obje c tive s?
How about this this?
Doe s this me e t the obje c tive s? PEOPLE‐ORIENTED GROUND FLOORS
How c ould we ge t some thing mor e like this? PEOPLE‐ORIENTED GROUND FLOORS
How c ould we ge t some thing mor e like this? PEOPLE‐ORIENTED GROUND FLOORS
R e quir e T alle r Ce ilings on the F ir st F loor R e quir e Mor e T r anspar e nc y
PEOPLE‐ORIENTED GROUND FLOORS
PEOPLE‐ORIENTED GROUND FLOORS
R e side ntial Se tbac k Gr
F loor E ntr ie s
PRESERVE SUNLIGHT, VIEWS AND ARCHITECTURAL VARIETY
How c ould we ge t some thing mor e like this? PRESERVE SUNLIGHT, VIEWS AND ARCHITECTURAL VARIETY
Mass R e duc tion
Or this?
Mass R e duc tion
MITIGATE IMPACTS OF PARKING
How c ould we ge t some thing mor e like this? MITIGATE IMPACTS OF PARKING
L imit above gr
par king ne ar tr ansit Sc r e e n Visible Par king
Doe s this me e t the obje c tive s? TREAT THE RIVER AS A SPECIAL PLACE
R ive r ?
TREAT THE RIVER AS A SPECIAL PLACE
R ive r
To Tonight’s Ac Activity: vity: 1.
20 Mi Minute nute Ta Table Dis Discus ussion sion
To Tonight’s Ac Activit tivity: 2.
Share yo your individua dividual vi view ews
To Tonight’s Ac Activit tivity: 3.
Review Re Results / Lar Large Gr Group
Discu scussion ssion