University, AgBio Subcommittee on Higher Research, and MSU - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

university agbio subcommittee on higher
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

University, AgBio Subcommittee on Higher Research, and MSU - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Michigan State House Appropriations University, AgBio Subcommittee on Higher Research, and MSU Education and Community Extension Colleges February 21, 2019 Serving Michigan First Serving Michigan First In-State Enrollment MSU welcomes


slide-1
SLIDE 1

House Appropriations Subcommittee on Higher Education and Community Colleges Michigan State University, AgBio Research, and MSU Extension February 21, 2019

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Serving Michigan First

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Serving Michigan First

3

In-State Enrollment

MSU welcomes students from all 83 Michigan counties 30,521 undergraduates are Michigan residents, the highest number in at least 10 years 77.1% of all undergraduates are Michigan residents

In-State Employment

65% of all graduates obtain employment in Michigan within 6 months of graduation

Economic Impact

MSUs economic impact exceeds $5B annually

MSU Product Center MSUs business development center created 1,995 jobs and has also assisted in creating or expanding 634 businesses and increased sales by $402M

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Serving Michigan First

4

MSU AgBioResearch & MSU Extension

MSU AgBioResearch Focus on key research areas in:

  • Resilient and profitable

agriculture and natural resource systems

  • Natural resources

stewardship and ecosystem health

  • Secure food, fiber, and

energy systems

  • Food safety
  • Nutrition and health

MSU Extension Areas of focus include:

  • Developing youth and

communities

  • Ensuring safe and secure

food

  • Ensuring strong

communities

  • Keeping businesses strong
  • Keeping people healthy
  • Making the most of

Michigan’s natural assets

  • Supporting food and

agriculture

MSU AgBioResearch & MSU Extension

MSU AgBioResearch and MSU Extension contribute to Michigan’s economy with significant research, educational programs and a community presence to boost economic development and growth related to agriculture and natural resources, community vitality, entrepreneurship, and career preparation.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Serving Michigan First

5

Students from Middle Class Families

Approximately two thirds MSU students from families who are at or below the Pew Center definition of “Middle Class”

Student Loans at Graduation Half of graduating seniors graduate with no debt Families making less than $20,000 MSU enrolls more students from families making less than $20,000 than 5 years ago

200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 2017 5 Year Average

Family Income for Financial Aid Filers

Note: Families reporting $200,000 or more in annual income truncated for purposes of this analysis

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Serving Michigan First | Undergraduate Enrollment by Institution

6

MSU resident undergraduates MSU enrolls more resident undergraduate students than its state peers, with approximately 11,000 more resident undergraduate FYES than its nearest peer U of M non-resident enrollment U of M’s non-resident undergraduate population approximates 45 percent, 25 percentage points more than MSU. If MSU mimicked U of M’s non- resident population, MSU would

  • perate with over $100M in

additional revenue annually

10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 Lake Superior State University University of Michigan Flint Michigan Tech. University University of Michigan Dearborn Northern Michigan University Saginaw Valley State University Ferris State University Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University Oakland University Western Michigan University Central Michigan University Grand Valley State University University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan State University

Resident Undergraduates Non-Resident Undergraduates

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Academic Competitiveness

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Academic Competitiveness

8

National Rankings

MSU has 9 programs ranked #1 nationwide and a total of 32 graduate and undergraduate

programs/schools ranked in the top 25 nationwide.

2019 unless otherwise noted *Indicates graduate program **Indicates both graduate & undergraduate programs As of 1/21/19

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Academic Competitiveness

9

Global rankings

10 Programs Ranked in the top 25 globally* Agricultural Sciences Agriculture and Forestry Communication Communication & Media Studies Education Environmental Science & Engineering Hospitality & Leisure Management Plant & Animal Science Veterinary Science 90th U.S. News and World Report 2019 Best Global Universities 93rd Times Higher Education (London) Word University Rankings, 2019

*Includes rankings from: Academic Ranking of World Universities (Shanghai) 2018 Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) World University Rankings (London), 2018 Times Higher Education World University Rankings (London), 2019 U.S. News and World Report Best Global Universities, 2019 As of 1/21/19

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Enrollment Overview

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Enrollment Overview | Enrollment Overview

There were 8,442 students in the fall 2018 entering class The fall 2018 entering class is the most racially/ethnically diverse class ever. 8.6% of the entering class are in the Honors College, the highest percentage in at least 10 years.

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Enrollment Overview | Undergraduate Overview

10.2% are in the Honors College 23.8%

  • f domestic undergraduates

are students of color

$

$16,227 2017-18 Average In-State Net Price (includes room and board) 90.7% are full-time students Undergraduate Enrollment 78.3 percent of all students, or 39,423, are undergraduates. 77.4 percent are Michigan residents Of undergraduate students…

50,351 students were enrolled for fall semester 2018. 23.5 percent are students of color, the most racially/ethnically diverse student population to date.

Percent of High School Graduates Total resident undergraduate students, routinely admitting over 5% of the state’s graduating high school seniors

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Enrollment Overview

Students Receiving Pell

Percentage of Students Receiving Pell Over Time The percentage of students receiving a Pell Grant has remained between 22 and 23 percent over the last five years (2013-2017) 2017-18 8,539 students (22% of all undergraduates) received a Pell

  • Grant. This represents or

approximately 2 in every 9 students. Average Pell Grant Amount The average Pell Grant amount was $4,887 with a total of $41.7 million awarded.

13 22% 22% 23% 22% 23% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 17-18 16-17 15-16 14-15 13-14

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Enrollment Overview

First Generation Students

Percentage of Students Who Self-Identify as First Generation The percentage of students receiving a Pell Grant has remained between 22% to 25% percent over the last 5 years.

25% 24% 22% 22% 23% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% Fall 2014 Fall 2015 Fall 2016 Fall 2017 Fall 2018

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Financial Aid

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Financial Aid

Total support for student assistance increased 48.4% between FY08 and FY18, moving from $473.0 million to $701.7 million (not adjusted for inflation). MSU Financial Aid | Overall 10 Year Change

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Financial Aid | Spartan Advantage Program

Spartan Advantage provides full tuition, room and board, and books to students from families with income at or below the federally established poverty

  • guidelines. Current students with a

family size of four and family income of $25,750 could qualify for the program.

MSU Spartan Advantage Program

Since inception, the Spartan Advantage program has facilitated close to $500M in aid for over 22,000 students from Federal, State, and Institutional sources

5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 $0 $50,000,000 $100,000,000 $150,000,000 $200,000,000 $250,000,000 $300,000,000 $350,000,000 $400,000,000 $450,000,000 $500,000,000

Number of students Amount spent 17

Total Impact of the Spartan Advantage Program Over Time

slide-18
SLIDE 18

State Support for Higher Education

slide-19
SLIDE 19

State Support for Higher Education

Per Pupil State Appropriation

$6,648 $6,153 $0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000

MSU’s per student state appropriation declined more than 7 percent between FY08 and FY18 from $6,648 to $6,153.

19

The state of Michigan ranks 40th of 50 states for ten-year change in appropriations

Michigan’s FY19 state appropriation is 5.2% below the FY09 appropriation.

10 Year Percent Change in State Appropriations

Source: Grapevine, Illinois State University

  • 40%
  • 20%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Michigan’s change in state appropriation

  • ver 10 years is 16.7 percentage points

below the median Current per student appropriations remain below the 1992 level

slide-20
SLIDE 20

State Support for Higher Education

Appropriations Recovery

MSU last amongst institutions complying with tuition restraint provision in percentage appropriations change since 2011 MSU funding at the state median would result in an additional $14.2M in funding for student programming and financial aid

20

Appropriations Since 2011

16% 13% 13% 10% 10% 9% 6% 5% 5% 4% 4% 1% 1% 1% 1%

  • 6%
  • 10%
  • 5%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20%

Grand Valley State University Ferris State University University of Michigan-Flint Lake Superior State University Saginaw Valley State University Central Michigan University Northern Michigan University State of Michigan Median University of Michigan-Dearborn Michigan Technological University Oakland University U of M - AA Western Michigan University Eastern Michigan University Michigan State University Wayne State University

Indicates institutions that did not comply with tuition restraint provision in one or more years

slide-21
SLIDE 21

State Support for Higher Education

Per Pupil Appropriation Comparison | University of Michigan and Wayne State MSU currently lags the average appropriations per student of U of M and Wayne State by approximately $1,650 per student – represents approximately $76M in additional resources

$0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000

Michigan State University Wayne State and University of Michigan 21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Student Success

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Student Success

First Semester Probation Rate and Neighborhoods

Neighborhoods A campus-based, wrap around student success network that includes support for academic and personal success Student Success Teams Professionals in each Neighborhood that conduct group-level and individual reviews to identify students for personalized outreach and interventions

9.7% (767) 9.2% (721) 7.9% (626) 7.0% (554) 7.5% (611) 6.7% (567) 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Probation Rate

Entering Cohort

The first fall semester probation rate for first time students declined to 6.7%, the lowest rate on record.

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Student Success

First Year Persistence Rate – Carnegie Peer Group

The percentage of first time, full-time undergraduate students in the fall 2017 entering cohort returning for their first fall semester after their

  • riginal enrollment in fall 2018

increased to 91.9%. MSU Persistence Rate

88 91 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Carnegie Public Median Michigan State University

MSU’s first time, full-time undergraduate student persistence rate consistently outperforms Carnegie peer median. Persistence Rate Comparison to Peers

Fall 2017 Persistence Rate

(most recent year available for all institutions)

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Student Success

Federally Reported 6-Year Graduation Rate – Carnegie Peer Group

The percentage of students entering in 2012 and graduating within 6 years reached a record high of 80%. MSU Graduation Rate

71.5 79 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Carnegie Public Median Michigan State University

MSU’s 6-year graduation rate for students entering in 2011 (most recent year available for all institutions) exceeds Carnegie peer average by over 7 percentage points and the U.S. News and World report predicted rate by 10 percentage points, the highest in the Big Ten Graduation Rate Comparison to Peers

Six Year Graduation Rate

(2011 Entering Cohort)

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Student Success | Outcomes

Graduate Outcomes

(of students graduating in spring or summer 2018)

Of students in the 2012 entering class… 80% graduated from MSU within 6 years, 7% graduated from another institution, 3% transferred to and are still enrolled in another institution, 2% remain enrolled at MSU, and 7% had no further enrollments found. This may indicate, for International students, returning to their home country.

Note: Due to the point in time which data were retrieved, totals may not sum to 100%.

65% 25% 7% 2% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Employed Continuing Education Unplaced or unresolved Starting a business or other

81% knowledge rate

Employment Location Of students reporting an employment location 64%

Were employed in Michigan

79%

Were employed in the Midwest Additionally, of students reporting employment and

  • riginally being from Michigan,

71% were employed in-state

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Student Success | Cohort Default Rate

2.9% 3.5% 3.6% 4.0% 5.7% 5.9% 4.3% 4.6% 3.5% 3.0%

0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 7.0% 8.0% 9.0% 10.0% 17-18 16-17 15-16 14-15 13-14 12-13 11-12 10-11 09-10 08-09

MSU’s student loan cohort default rate continues to decline and is currently 2.9%, the lowest number recorded in the last 10 years. This is also significantly lower than the national average of 10.8% (FY15, most recent year available).

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Research Portfolio

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Research Portfolio

Sponsored Programs

$302,204 $494,280 $540,421 $548,885 $622,814 $642,084 $681,719 $694,917 $751,809 $854,815 $864,327 $921,681 $1,193,413 $1,530,139

$0 $400,000 $800,000 $1,200,000 $1,600,000

University of Nebraska University of Iowa Indiana University University of Maryland Purdue University, University of Illinois Rutgers University Michigan State University Northwestern University Pennsylvania State University Ohio State University University of Minnesota University of Wisconsin University of Michigan

Total sponsored programs approximate $700M annually, an increase of over 50% over ten years. MSU ranks 32nd annually for annual R&D expenditures, and 7th in the Big Ten MSU sponsored programs per tenure system faculty member exceed $300k, an increase of 50% over ten years

Research and Development Total Sponsored Programs Sponsored Programs per tenure system faculty

29

Big Ten 2017 R&D Expenditures

Three Year Rate of Change

Across the Big Ten, MSUs rate of change ranks number 1 over the past 3 years

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Cost Containment and Efficient Operations

slide-31
SLIDE 31

4.53 4.17 4.00 3.86 3.81 3.71 3.32 2.86 2.67 2.63 2.55 2.04 1.87 1.81 1 2 3 4 5

FTE students per FTE employee

Cost Containment and Efficient Operations

The average for the Big Ten is 3.08 FTE students per FTE employee. More Efficient Less Efficient

MSU functions with more FTE students (fall 2017 enrollment) per total FTE staff than the Big Ten average and ranks 5th out of 14 Big Ten schools for the number of students per employee.

Students Per Employee

$44M in savings since 2009 due to conservation and plant efficiency efforts.

Cost Savings & Avoidance

Cost avoidance savings exceed $50M over the last 8 years due to improved purchasing agreements.

31

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Cost Containment and Efficient Operations

32

MSU eliminates defined benefit retirement program, initiates defined contribution, remaining liability funded as opposed to numerous governmental entities grappling with unfunded legacy liabilities MSU eliminates funded post- retirement healthcare for dependents

  • f new

employees

Long term commitment

MSU eliminated funded post- retirement healthcare for new employees

1973 2005 2010