United States Carbon Sequestration Regional Partnerships - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
united states carbon sequestration regional partnerships
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

United States Carbon Sequestration Regional Partnerships - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Sep 02, 2022 464 likes •657 views

United States Carbon Sequestration Regional Partnerships ClimateChange Copenhagen ClimateChange, Copenhagen March 10 - 12, 2009 Bruce Lani, Sean Plasynski, and Scott Klara United States Department of Energy National Energy Technology United

slide-1
SLIDE 1

United States Carbon Sequestration Regional Partnerships

ClimateChange Copenhagen Bruce Lani, Sean Plasynski, and Scott Klara

United States Department of Energy National Energy Technology

ClimateChange, Copenhagen

March 10 - 12, 2009

United States Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Carbon Sequestration Program Goals

  • Deliver technologies & best practices that validate

Carbon Capture and Safe Storage (CCSS):

– 90% CO2 capture – 99% storage permanence – < 10% increase in COE (pre-combustion capture) < 10% increase in COE (pre combustion capture) – < 35% increase in COE (post- and oxy-combustion)* – +/- 30% storage capacity

*This is current estimate – system studies and analysis being conducted and refined to determine appropriate goals

2

appropriate goals

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Key Challenges to Carbon Capture and Storage

  • Cost of CCS
  • Sufficient Storage Capacity
  • Regulatory Framework

– Permitting – Treatment of CO2 g p y

  • Permanence
  • Best Practices
  • Legal Framework

– Liability – Ownership

  • Best Practices
  • Infrastructure
  • pore space
  • CO2
  • Public Acceptance

p

  • Human Capital Resources

Program helping to address challenges – either specific project, participation in working groups, or through Regional Partnerships

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Sequestration Program Statistics FY2009

lion $)

Strong industry support ~ 39% cost share on projects

120 140 160

Budget (Mil

Federal Investment to Date ~ $481 Million

20 40 60 80 100

DOE

2009 Budget Breakdown

CO2 Use/Reuse (incl FY08 non- CO2) Simulation and Risk

20 1 9 9 7 1 9 9 8 1 9 9 9 2 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 4 2 5 2 6 2 7 2 8 2 9 R e q

Diverse research

Fiscal Year

2)

3% Risk Assessment 4% MVA 9% Geologic Carbon Sequestration

portfolio

~ 80 Active R&D Projects

Capture of CO2 (Pre- Combustion) 12% 4% Regional Partnerships 68%

4

68%

slide-5
SLIDE 5

DOE’s Sequestration Program Structure

I f t t

Core R&D

Global Partnerships/ Infrastructure

Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships & Other Large

Pre- combustion Capture

Collaborations

Monitoring Verification and Accounting

Projects

Simulation CO2 Use/Reuse Geologic Carbon Storage

Demonstration

and Risk Assessment

Commercial Scale Projects

Existing Plants

Post- and Oxy- Combustion Capture

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Regional Partnerships Program Phases

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2003 FISCAL YEAR 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2003 FISCAL YEAR

CHARACTERIZATION PHASE Characterize all RCSP regions for carbon capture CHARACTERIZATION PHASE Characterize all RCSP regions for carbon capture g p and storage opportunities VALIDATION PHASE Validate technologies through g p and storage opportunities VALIDATION PHASE Validate technologies through

Scale of 100 to 10,000 Tons CO2

Validate technologies through field testing at selected geologic and terrestrial site locations DEPLOYMENT PHASE Validate technologies through field testing at selected geologic and terrestrial site locations DEVELOPMENT PHASE

Scale of 1,000,000 Tons CO2

Complete large

  • volume deployment tests of sequestration technologies

that will help enable future commercial

  • scale applications

Complete large-volume development tests of sequestration technologies that will help enable future commercial scale applications

  • 7
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Regional Partnerships Participation

160 organization in Phase I 350+ organizations in Phases II and III

Organizations Number Organizations Number Chemical Companies 5 Land Management/Development Company 2 CO2 Trading Organizations 3 Law Firm 2 Coal Companies 8 Local Agencies 4 Electric Utilities 53 Media/Outreach 6 Engineering and Research Firms 44 National Laboratories 10 Environmental NGOs 11 Oil & Gas Companies 37 Foreign Government Agencies 10 Other State Agencies 51 Forest Products Companies 4 Pipeline Company 2 Governmental Advisory Groups 2 State Geologic Surveys 18 Governmental Advisory Groups 2 State Geologic Surveys 18 Native American Organizations 4 U.S. Federal Agencies 6 Industry Trade Groups 22 University and Academic Institutions 47 Total 351

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Validation Phase (II) Field Tests

Geologic Field Test Sites

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Development Phase (III) Goals

  • Assess

– Injectivity and Capacity j y y – Storage Permanence – Areal Extent of Plume and Leakage Pathways y

  • Develop

– Risk Assessment Strategies – Best Practices for Industry

  • Engage in Public Outreach and

Education

  • Support Regulatory Development

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Development Phase (III) Timeline

2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2008 2008 2010 2010 2012 2012 2014 2014 2016 2016 2018 2018 FISCAL YEAR

Stage 1. Site selection and characterization; Permitting and NEPA compliance; Well completion and Stage 1. Site selection and characterization; Permitting and NEPA compliance; Well completion and

Scale up is required to provide insight into several operational and technical issues that differ from formation to formation

p ; p testing; Infrastructure development Stage 2. CO2 procurement and transportation; p ; p testing; Infrastructure development Stage 2. CO2 procurement and transportation;

formation

CO2 procurement and transportation; Injection operations; Monitoring activities Stage 3. CO2 procurement and transportation; Injection operations; Monitoring activities Stage 3. g Site closure; Post-injection monitoring, Project assessment

RCSP Deployment Phase – 10 years (FY2008-2017)

g Site closure; Post-injection monitoring, Project assessment

RCSP Development Phase– 10 years (FY2008-2018)

11

RCSP Deployment Phase 10 years (FY2008 2017) RCSP Development Phase 10 years (FY2008 2018)

~$500 million DOE - over $200 million cost share

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Development Phase (III) Injection Schedule

5

Partnership Formation Type

Saline 1

Big Sky Big Sky PCOR PCOR MRCSP MRCSP

Saline Saline 1 1 4 2

WESTCARB WESTCARB SWP SWP MGSC MGSC SECARB SECARB

9 Saline/Oil Bearing 4 8 2 3 3 6 7 Oil Bearing Saline 5 6

Injection Schedule

2009 Injection Scheduled Saline Saline 7 8

12

2010 Injection Scheduled 2011 Injection Scheduled Saline 9

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Regional Geologic Assessment Atlas-2

  • New data on storage formations

– Offshore capacity, gulf and east

  • Methodology for Capacity and CO2

Emissions Estimates and Capacity

  • USGS Collaboration
  • Federal Lands CO2 Geologic Storage

2

Potential

  • CO2 Pipeline Infrastructure
  • State CO2 Geologic Storage Potential
  • Data now on 10km X 10km grid

13

Data now on 10km X 10km grid

slide-14
SLIDE 14

CCS Best Practice Manuals

  • Phase II (2008-2009)

– Monitoring Verification and Accounting (Dec 2008) – Site characterization (2009) – Simulation and Risk Assessment (2009) – Well construction and closure (2009) – Regulatory Compliance – Public Education

  • Phase III Updates

p

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

CO2 Injection Regulatory Guidelines

  • EPA taking a lead role

– Guidance released Mar 2007 – Draft rule summer 2008

  • EPA & DOE Working Group

IOGCC F k R l d

  • IOGCC Framework Released

May 2005

  • IOGCC Legal & Regulatory

g g y Framework Released in September 2007

CO2 Storage: A Legal and Regulatory Guide for States Carbon Capture and Storage A Regulatory Framework for States

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Global Partnerships

Selected DOE Participation in International CO2 Storage Projects

Location Period (U.S.) Operations Reservoir Operator /Lead Org. Int’l Recognition N th A i C d 2000 2009 1 8 T CO2/ ilfi ld b t E A h IEA GHG R&D North America, Canada Saskatchewan Weyburn-Midale 2000-2009 1.8 mT CO2/yr commercial 2000

  • ilfield carbonate

EOR Encana, Apache IEA GHG R&D Programme, CSLF North America, Canada, Alberta Zama oilfield 2005-2009 230,000 tons CO2, 80,000 tons H2S demo

  • ilfield

EOR Apache (Reg. Part.) CSLF Zama oilfield North America, Canada, BC Fort Nelson 2009-2015 1.8 mT acid gas/yr (> 1mT CO2/yr) Saline Spectra Energy Europe, North Sea Sleipner 2002-2006 2008-2011 1 mT CO2/yr commercial 1996 marine sandstone Statoil IEA GHG Prog, EC Europe, Germany CO2SINK, Ketzin 2007-2010 60,000-90,000 tonnes CO2 demo 2008 gas field sandstone GeoForsch- ungsZentrum, Potsdam CSLF, European Commission Australia, Victoria 2005-2010 100,000 tonnes CO2 gas field d CO2CRC CSLF Otway Basin demo 2008 sandstone Africa, Algeria In Salah gas 2005-2010 1 mT CO2/yr commercial 2004 gas field sandstone BP, Sonatrach, Statoil CSLF, European Commission Asia, China, 2008-TBD assessment phase CCS Ordos Basin Shenhua Coal

16

Ordos Basin

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Summary

  • CCS has the potential to offset hundreds of years of CO2

emissions in the United States

  • Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships are proving

CCS throughout most of North America CCS throughout most of North America

  • Lessons learned from small and large scale field projects

ill h l i l d l t f CCS t h l i will help commercial deployment of CCS technologies

  • For the status and results of this program visit:

For the status and results of this program, visit: – http://www.fossil.energy.gov – http://www.netl.doe.gov

17