Unionville-Chadds Ford School District CSCI Data Spring 2018 School - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

unionville chadds ford school district
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Unionville-Chadds Ford School District CSCI Data Spring 2018 School - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Unionville-Chadds Ford School District CSCI Data Spring 2018 School Climate: NSCCs Definition School climate refers to the quality and character of school life related to norms and values, social interactions, and organizational


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Unionville-Chadds Ford School District

CSCI Data Spring 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

School Climate: NSCC’s Definition

➢ School climate refers to the quality and character of

school life related to norms and values, social interactions, and organizational structures, as experienced by members of the school community:

❖ Students ❖ Staff ❖ Parents

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Background on the Comprehensive School Climate Inventory (CSCI)

  • Developed in 2002, The Comprehensive School Climate Inventory (CSCI) measures how critical groups

– students, school personnel and parents/ guardians – perceive the school’s climate for learning.

  • The CSCI was evaluated by three independent survey development experts at Columbia & Fordham in 2006

who confirmed the tool was reliable & valid.

  • Three recent studies confirm the CSCI’s strength:

1) A 2010 study of 102 school climate surveys found the CSCI to be one of only three measures to meet American Psychological Association criteria for reliability and validity (Gangi). 2) A 2011 study of 73 middle school measures, recommended ten as being reliable, valid and aligned with SEL research. Of those, the CSCI was the only school climate measure recommended (Social Development Research Group). 3) Clifford, M., M., Condon, R., & Hornung, C. (2012). Measuring School Climate for Gauging Principal Performance: A Review of the Validity and Reliability of Publicly Accessible Measures. American Institute for Research (www.air.org/focus-area/education/index.cfm?fa=viewContent&content_id=1869)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

School Climate Research Findings

  • I. Individual Experience:

A positive school climate affects students’ self-esteem and self-concept

  • II. Risk Prevention and Health Promotion:

Effective risk prevention and health promotion efforts are positively correlated with safe, caring, participatory and responsive school climate settings

  • III. Academic Achievement:

Student academic achievement is strongly correlated to a safe, caring, and responsive school climate setting

  • IV. Teacher Retention:

Positive school climate is associated with greater teacher retention (For a summary of this research as well as a school climate research data base, see: www.schoolclimate.org/climate/research.php and/or Cohen, et. al 2009)

slide-5
SLIDE 5
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Rules & Norms Physical Security Social & Civic Learning Social Support - Peers Connectedness/ Engagement Physical Surroundings

slide-7
SLIDE 7

The School Climate Improvement Model: A five stage process of school climate improvement

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Assessment & Improvement Process

1.

School Climate Assessment/Evaluation

Measurement Process

Interpretation of Results

2.

Action Planning

Drill down to key priorities

Research best practices/ evidence-based programs

3.

Planning for Change

Form a representative team/ establishing ground rules

Leadership Commitment/ Fostering “Buy in”

Establishing a “no fault” framework/ culture of trust

Community Engagement/Outreach

Define action plans

Establish benchmarks and clear timelines

4.

Program/Project Implementation

5.

Re-assessment/Re-evaluation

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Interpreting School Climate Findings

  • School Profile – Strengths & Needs
  • How positive are overall ratings?
  • Which dimensions are at the top/bottom?
  • How do perceptions compare for different population groups-

students, staff, and parents?

➢ Individual & Group Variability

  • How much variability and for whom?
  • Micro-climates – exposure to different environments, different

experiences

  • Individual differences or divergences in perceptions
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Response Rates

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Overall School Profile Example – Pocopson ES

  • Focus on major

differences - .2 or higher – between scores

  • Note high points

and strengths!

  • Look for

consistent findings

  • Are there areas of

disconnect between and within groups?

  • Consider factors

that may inform data: context is key!

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Student Climate Scores by School

  • The general trend of scores is

similar for all schools

  • A lot of strengths in the district

shown by positive scores (a score

  • ver 3.5)
  • Safety Rules and Norms, Respect

for Diversity, Support-Adults, Social Support-Students, School Connectedness Engagement, and Physical Surroundings are strengths at all schools

  • Middle and High School scores are

lower than elementary scores in Support for Learning and Social and Civic Learning.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Faculty Climate Scores by School

  • Many highly rated

dimensions throughout the district, with a lot of scores above 4.0 and near 5.0

  • Very strong scores in

Sense of Physical Security, Support for Learning, Social- Support-Adults and Students, School Connectedness/Engage ment

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Parent Climate Scores by School

  • Parent perceptions are

mostly positive and there are many strengths throughout the district

  • Very strong scores in

the Interpersonal Relationships category

  • Very strong scores in

Safety Rules and Norms and Sense of Physical Security

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Climate Scores by Population

  • There is a lot of

convergence between staff, student, and parent scores and they feel similarly for many dimensions.

  • Staff generally

have slightly higher perceptions than students and parents, but most dimensions are rated positively by all three.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Data Dive: Digging Deeper into Subgroups

➢What does the data tell you? ➢ Micro-climates? ➢ Gaps in perception or areas of convergence? ➢ Relationship between dimensions ➢ Confirmations ➢ Surprises ➢What else do you want to know? ➢ Additional research, data ➢ questions raised

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Student Climate Scores by Grade

  • Perceptions are higher in the ES level,

but mostly positive all-around

  • Many of the dimensions remain

positively rated as grade level increases

  • Biggest drop over time is in Social and

Civic Learning

  • Sense of Social-Emotional Security and

Social Media are rated lower than the

  • ther dimensions throughout grade level
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Student Climate Scores by Race/Ethnicity

  • Racial/ethnic groups exhibit

similar patterns for a majority of the dimensions

  • Most dimensions are rated

positively by different race/ethnic subgroups

  • Black/African American

subgroup had lower scores in some of the dimensions

* Differences in different race/ethnic subgroups rated dimensions can be explored further in the individual school reports.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Staff Climate Scores by Years at School

  • Staff exhibit consistent patterns
  • Leadership and Professional

Relationships, are consistently positive among all staff regardless of their length of tenure

  • Staff of 20+ years report the

most positive perceptions

  • Staff who have been at the

school for 1 year and 2 to 5 years, have slightly higher scores in some dimensions.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Opportunities to Address Within Dimension Rankings

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Item-by-Item Survey Responses Example: Student – Social-Emotional Security

slide-22
SLIDE 22

UCFSD Strengths and Areas for Improvement

Strengths:

Most dimensions were rated positively by students, staff, and parents in all schools.

Safety Rules and Norms was a major area of strength across all schools in the district, regardless of grade level

School Connectedness/Engagement was a top strength for students, staff, and parents.

Physical Surroundings was a strength across all population groups

Interpersonal Relationships: Respect for Diversity, Social Support – Adults, and Social Support – Students was consistently rated very positively across all populations.

Areas for Potential Action:

Sense of Social-Emotional Security and Social Media emerged as an area for potential improvement in select schools.

Social and Civic Learning was rated less positively by students in the middle and high schools.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Research to Action

Connect school climate data with:

  • Other school or district-level data (i.e. suspension data, incident reports,

teacher turnover, etc.)

  • Context Understanding
  • First-hand knowledge and experience
  • Existing school-based goals and initiatives
  • Consider additional areas of research (e.g. Particular unsafe “hot spots”

where incidents occur most frequently)

slide-24
SLIDE 24

What’s Next for UCFSD

  • 1. Unpack the results (district and school levels)
  • 2. Focus on common themes
  • 3. Use other district and school-level data to connect to

school climate data

  • 4. Use multiple strength areas to mitigate areas needing

improvement

  • 5. Prioritize areas for action and begin the work
  • 6. Determine when to conduct future surveys
slide-25
SLIDE 25

Free NSCC Resources

  • BULLYBUST – a national campaign that provides FREE resources to

help students and adults prevent bullying. www.bullybust.org.

  • School Climate Resource Center (SCRC) – interactive, on-demand

learning site for educators: http://scrc.schoolclimate.org

  • National School Climate Standards– adopted by Westbrook District!

www.schoolclimate.org/climate/standards.php

  • School Climate Guide for District Policy Makers and Educational

Leaders – www.schoolclimate.org/climate/process.php

  • School Climate Matters – quarterly e-newsletter with key resources,

expert articles, and educator tips www.schoolclimate.org.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Relevant Readings

Cohen, J, McCabe, E.M, Michelli, N.M & Pickeral, T. (2009). School Climate: Research, Policy, Teacher Education Practice. Teachers College Record, Volume 111: Issue 1: pp. 180-213. Cohen, J., Pickeral, T., & Levine, P. (2010). The Foundation for Democracy: Social, emotional, ethical, cognitive skills and dispositions in K-12 schools. Inter-American Journal of Education for Democracy, Vol. 3. No. 1, pg. 74-97 (http://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/ried/) Gangi,T.A. (2010). School climate and faculty relations: Choosing an effective assessment tool (http://gradworks.umi.com/33/88/3388261.html_ Haggerty, K., Elgin, J., & Woolley (2011). Social-emotional learning and school climate assessment measures for middle school youth. Social Development Research Group, University of Washington and the Raikes Foundation National School Climate Council (2007). The School Climate Challenge: Narrowing the gap between school climate research and school climate policy, practice guidelines and teacher education policy. On www.schoolclimate.org/climate/policy.php Thapa, A., Cohen, J., Guffey, S., & Higgins-D'Alessandro, A. (2013). A review of school climate

  • research. Review of Educational Research, Vol. 83, No. 3, pp. 357-385.
slide-27
SLIDE 27

For additional support from NSCC or questions about the CSCI, contact:

Mylisa Nogra

Mnogra@schoolclimate.org School Support Coordinator

National School Climate Center (NSCC)

223 West 38th Street PO Box 490 New York, NY 10018 (212) 707-8799 ext. 12

Find us online at www.schoolclimate.org for news, resources, updates, and more!

@school_climate @BullyBust /SchoolClimate