Understanding the factors that influence the distribution of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

understanding the factors that influence the distribution
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Understanding the factors that influence the distribution of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Understanding the factors that influence the distribution of antibiotic resistance. PHDL Seminar November 12th 2018 Derek MacFadden MD FRCPC *No Relevant Disclosures/Conflicts of Interest Objectives 1. Review factors related to


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Understanding the factors that influence the distribution of antibiotic resistance.

PHDL Seminar November 12th 2018 Derek MacFadden MD FRCPC
 *No Relevant Disclosures/Conflicts of Interest

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Objectives

  • 1. Review factors related to distribution of antibiotic
  • resistance. 

  • 2. Review the evidence supporting the role of climate
  • n the population level distribution of antibiotic

resistance.


  • 3. Review estimates of burden of antibiotic resistance

and how this is (and might be) measured.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Marston et al. Antimicrobial Resistance. JAMA. 316(11):1193-1204.

Emergence of Antibiotic Resistance

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Projected Burden of Resistance

O’Neill. UK-AMR Review. https://amr-review.org/

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Antibiotic Resistance is OneHealth

http://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/threat-report-2013

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Antibiotic Resistance is Heterogeneous by Region

CPE Endemicity 2010-2015

Albiger et al. Eurosurveillance 2015.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Antibiotic Resistance is Driven By Antimicrobial Use (Selection)

Hicks et al. NEJM 2013.

2010 Outpatient All ages All drugs #RX per 1000

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Epidemiology of Antibiotic Resistance

  • 1. Surveillance - generate a database of

geographically distributed measures of antibiotic resistance 


  • 2. Evaluate factors associated with the

population distribution of antibiotic resistance

www.resistanceopen.com

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Epidemiology of Antibiotic Resistance

  • 1. Surveillance - generate a database of

geographically distributed measures of antibiotic resistance 


  • 2. Evaluate factors associated with the

population distribution of antibiotic resistance

www.resistanceopen.com

slide-10
SLIDE 10

http://www.resistanceopen.org

slide-11
SLIDE 11

http://www.resistanceopen.org

Digital Surveillance

slide-12
SLIDE 12

MacFadden et al. J Infect Dis 2016.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Surveillance Metrics

Current Status:


  • 50 Countries
  • >1700 Indices
  • >10.6 million Isolates
  • 2012-2017

In Progress:


  • Metagenomic Data
  • High Resolution States/

Countries

  • ProMED Collaboration
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Epidemiology of Antibiotic Resistance

  • 1. Surveillance - generate a database of

geographically distributed measures of antibiotic resistance 


  • 2. Evaluate factors associated with the population

distribution of antibiotic resistance

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Epidemiology of Antibiotic Resistance

  • 1. Surveillance - generate a database of

geographically distributed measures of antibiotic resistance 


  • 2. Evaluate factors associated with the

population distribution of antibiotic resistance

slide-16
SLIDE 16

What Factors Impact on Distribution of 
 Antibiotic Resistance?

  • 1. Antibiotic Use
  • 2. Geography?
  • 3. Population Factors?
  • 4. Care setting?
  • 5. Environmental/Climate Factors?

Goossens et al. Outpatient antibiotic use in Europe. Lancet. 2005.

We have a poor understanding of population level determinants of antibiotic resistance.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

What Factors Impact on Distribution of 
 Antibiotic Resistance?

  • 1. Antibiotic Use
  • 2. Geography?
  • 3. Population Factors?
  • 4. Care setting?
  • 5. Environmental/Climate Factors?

Goossens et al. Outpatient antibiotic use in Europe. Lancet. 2005.

We have a poor understanding of population level determinants of antibiotic resistance.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

What About Climate?

  • 1. Temperature is one of the major drivers of


bacterial growth.

  • 2. Seasonality in infection with Gram-negative


and Gram-positive infections = Carriage?

  • 3. Horizontal gene transfer is typically


temperature dependent.

  • 4. Suggestion of latitude gradients, 


typically attributed to antibiotic use.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

What Factors Impact on Distribution of 
 Antibiotic Resistance?

  • Evaluated prevalence of resistance to routinely

tested antibiotics in E. coli, K. pneumoniae, S. aureus across the continental United States.


  • ResistanceOpen, US Census, NOAA Climate,

CDC prescribing.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

What Factors Impact on Distribution of 
 Antibiotic Resistance?

  • Evaluated prevalence of resistance to routinely

tested antibiotics in E. coli, K. pneumoniae, S. aureus across the continental United States.


  • ResistanceOpen, US Census, NOAA Climate,

CDC prescribing.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

What Factors Impact on Distribution of 
 Antibiotic Resistance?

  • Historical Minimum Temperature - parallels use in 


vector-borne diseases - ecologic suitability

  • Population Density
  • Antibiotic Prescribing Rates
  • Reported Laboratory Standard
  • Outpatient/Inpatient Sources

Predictors

slide-22
SLIDE 22

What Factors Impact on Distribution of 
 Antibiotic Resistance?

  • 1.6 million human bacterial pathogens

  • 41 States, 223 facilities

  • 2013-2015

Dataset

slide-23
SLIDE 23

What Factors Impact on Distribution of 
 Antibiotic Resistance?

  • Population level comparison

  • Univariate associations with resistance prevalence

  • Multivariable weighted regression models

Analysis

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Antibiotic Resistance in E. coli

Amoxicillin

MacFadden et al. Antibiotic Resistance Increases with Local Temperature. Nature Climate Change. 2018.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Antibiotic Resistance in E. coli

All tested antibiotics

Resistance

  • Min. Temperature
slide-26
SLIDE 26

Antibiotic Resistance in K. pneumoniae

Septra

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Antibiotic Resistance in K. pneumoniae

All tested antibiotics

Resistance

  • Min. Temperature
slide-28
SLIDE 28

Antibiotic Resistance in S. aureus

Cloxacillin

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Antibiotic Resistance in S. aureus

All tested antibiotics

Resistance

  • Min. Temperature
slide-30
SLIDE 30

Significant Predictors of Resistance

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Significant Predictors of Resistance

Cloxacillin: Adjusted Min Temp effect estimate -> 0.58 (p<0.0001)

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Change Over Time

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Summary

  • Antibiotic prescribing, population density, and

temperature are associated with increased antibiotic resistance for common pathogens.


  • The relationship between temperature and

antibiotic resistance may be increasing over time?

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Limitations

  • Capturing relevant time periods/measures for


antibiotic prescribing


  • Population level data

  • Confounding
slide-35
SLIDE 35

Follow Up

  • How do we validate these findings?

  • Different region

  • Longitudinal data

  • Best possible AMR and AM consumption data
slide-36
SLIDE 36

What Factors Impact on Distribution of 
 Antibiotic Resistance?

  • Evaluated prevalence of resistance to routinely

tested antibiotics in E. coli, K. pneumoniae, S. aureus across Europe.


  • EARS-NET (ECDC), ESAC-NET (ECDC),

MERRA-2.

slide-37
SLIDE 37

What Factors Impact on Distribution of 
 Antibiotic Resistance?

  • 4.5 million human bacterial pathogens

  • 28 Countries across Europe

  • Spanning 2000-2016

Dataset

slide-38
SLIDE 38

What Factors Impact on Distribution of 
 Antibiotic Resistance?

  • Temperature Association (previous study) 

  • Longitudinal Model (country specific intercepts)

  • Evaluate rates of change as explanation for

geographic distribution Analysis

slide-39
SLIDE 39

What Factors Impact on Distribution of 
 Antibiotic Resistance?

  • Annual Minimum Temperature
  • Population Density
  • Antibiotic Consumption Rates
  • Country Specific Intercepts
  • Time

Predictors

slide-40
SLIDE 40

McGough et al. BioRxiv 2018.

slide-41
SLIDE 41
slide-42
SLIDE 42

Escherichia coli

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Escherichia coli

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Klebsiella pneumoniae

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Klebsiella pneumoniae

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Staphylococcus aureus

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Staphylococcus aureus

slide-48
SLIDE 48
slide-49
SLIDE 49
slide-50
SLIDE 50
slide-51
SLIDE 51
slide-52
SLIDE 52

Summary

  • Antibiotic resistance is generally increasing
  • ver time in European countries.

  • Antibiotic prescribing and population density

are associated with antibiotic resistance.


  • Antibiotic resistance is increasing more rapidly

in warmer countries.

slide-53
SLIDE 53

WHY?

http://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/threat-report-2013

slide-54
SLIDE 54

WHY?

  • Season/temperature associated with carriage of

resistant Gram-negatives.

Kaiser et al. Infect Cont Hosp Epi. 2010.

slide-55
SLIDE 55

WHY?

McBride et al. Applied and Env Micro 1977.

slide-56
SLIDE 56

WHY?

  • Temperature associated with rate of horizontal

gene transfer (NDM-1 in Delhi).

Walsh et al. Lancet ID. 2011.

slide-57
SLIDE 57

WHY?

  • Temperature potent driver of growth (environment).

Ratkowsky et al. J Bacteriology. 1982.

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Additional Evidence

Collignon et al. Lancet Planetary Health 2018.

  • 103 countries, 6 major areas (abx usage, governance,

health expenditure, GDP, education, infrastructure, climate)

  • Strong significant positive univariate correlation between

temperature and resistance (E.coli and E.coli/Kleb/Staph).

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Additional Evidence

Collignon et al. Lancet Planetary Health 2018.

  • Significant factors in multivariable model:
  • Governance index
  • GDP/capita
  • Infrastructure index
  • Pitfalls:
  • Indexes were means of standardized variables
  • Variables that were averaged didn’t necessarily move in

parallel directions (e.g. temperature and precipitation)

  • Why wasn’t usage significant? (positive control)
slide-60
SLIDE 60

Additional Evidence

Goldstein et al. In submission.

  • Longitudinal state-level resistance prevalence

data across the United States.

  • NHSN (CAUTI) and IMS Quintiles state-level

antibiotic consumption.

  • Mixed effects multivariable model.
  • Significant positive temperature associations for

common antibiotics for E.coli and Klebsiella spp.

slide-61
SLIDE 61

A warming planet with increasing population density may be further driving increases in AMR.

nasa.gov

slide-62
SLIDE 62

Estimating the Burden of AMR

O’Neill. UK-AMR Review. https://amr-review.org/

slide-63
SLIDE 63

Estimating the Burden of AMR

  • Antimicrobial resistance is not antibiotic resistance.
  • AMR - Viruses, Protozoa, Mycobacteria, Bacteria
slide-64
SLIDE 64

Estimating the Burden of AMR

  • Antimicrobial resistance is not antibiotic resistance.
  • What is the burden of infection/pathogen?
  • Many pathogens, many syndromes
  • Existing surveillance not well equipped for many

community and some nosocomial infections

slide-65
SLIDE 65

Estimating the Burden of AMR

  • Antimicrobial resistance is not antibiotic resistance.
  • What is the burden of infection/pathogen?
  • What is the burden across regions/space?
  • Variability of pathogen, syndromes, and prevalence of

resistance across geography.

slide-66
SLIDE 66

Estimating the Burden of AMR

  • Antimicrobial resistance is not antibiotic resistance.
  • What is the burden of infection/pathogen?
  • What is the burden across regions/space?
  • What is the excess mortality/morbidity/cost?
  • Many studies are underpowered
  • How do you incorporate the ‘future’ costs of resistance
slide-67
SLIDE 67

Estimating the Burden of AMR

  • Antimicrobial resistance is not antibiotic resistance.
  • What is the burden of infection/pathogen?
  • What is the burden across regions/space?
  • What is the excess mortality/morbidity/cost?
  • Contentious.
slide-68
SLIDE 68

Estimating the Burden of AMR

slide-69
SLIDE 69

Estimating the Burden of AMR

Increased mortality

slide-70
SLIDE 70

Estimating the Burden of AMR

Increased mortality

slide-71
SLIDE 71

Estimating the Burden of AMR

Excess Length of Stay (Days)

MRSA VRE GN

slide-72
SLIDE 72

Estimating the Burden of AMR

Abat et al. Clin Infect Dis 2017.

slide-73
SLIDE 73

Estimating the Burden of AMR

Abat et al. Clin Infect Dis 2017.

0 to 10 million deaths annually

  • Age Group
  • Organism
  • Syndrome
slide-74
SLIDE 74

Estimating the Burden of AMR

  • Argued there is NO burden of AMR in their setting.
  • Little empiric data. Mostly ‘mathematical models’.
  • Seek to identify XDR/MDR pathogens causing

death, as opposed to the contribution of resistance to a single or combination of drugs.

  • The right approach is likely somewhere in the

middle, empirical data and models to fill the gaps.

slide-75
SLIDE 75

Estimating the Burden of AMR

slide-76
SLIDE 76

Estimating the Burden of AMR

  • 1. Measure the burden of Sepsis.
  • Assuming sepsis is an intermediate to death.
  • 2. Evaluated distribution of resistant organisms

across human samples.

  • 3. Evaluate relative case-fatality rates in sepsis due to

resistant vs. non-resistant.

slide-77
SLIDE 77

Estimating the Burden of AMR

Challenges

  • ‘Sepsis’ is increasingly unreliable diagnosis using

administrative data. ?sensitive. NOT specific.

  • Not all mortality due to AMR is through ‘sepsis’.
  • The distribution of resistance in clinical samples

doesn’t necessarily relate to the distribution of disease (strain related virulence, non-sterile samples).

slide-78
SLIDE 78

Estimating the Burden of AMR

Another Way?

  • Remove ‘sepsis’ from the equation.
  • Determine marginal mortality associated with drug

resistance.

  • CARI’s (Clinical Antibiotic Resistance Indices) -

proportion of mortality attributable to resistance to a given antibiotic/combination.

  • Context specific. Doesn’t disentangle resistance

versus virulence. Does this matter?

slide-79
SLIDE 79

Estimating the Burden of AMR

CARIs

  • Use an large provincial administrative database

linked with microbiologic outcomes (Ontario).

  • Marginal standardization model for hospitalization

and mortality (30 and 90 days).

  • Can estimate the proportion of outcome that could

be averted by having a susceptible isolate.

  • E.g. a CARI-30DM of 5% will mean that 5% of

deaths were attributable to antibiotic resistance.

slide-80
SLIDE 80

Estimating the Burden of AMR

Considering Particular Antibiotic Classes

  • Doesn’t make sense to use individual classes in a

binary fashion - large numbers of interactions and less clinically meaningful, only certain abx tested.

  • Rather, employ a ‘generalized concentration

addition’ approach, with monotonic increasing index.

  • Base this on 1st line, numbers resistant to 1st line,

then second line, etc. (Difficult-to-treat resistance)

Kadri et al. Clin Infect Dis 2018.

slide-81
SLIDE 81

Objectives Summary

  • 1. Antibiotic use, population density, and climate, appear to

be important predictors of the distribution of antibiotic

  • resistance. Economic and hygiene related factors almost

certainly play a role - but challenging to tease these apart. 


  • 2. Our understanding of the global burden of AMR is poor. It

will take years (?decades) to generate reasonable

  • estimates. Thus challenging to measure progress,
  • forecast. Mostly hand waving for the time being.
slide-82
SLIDE 82

Acknowledgements

  • David Fisman, John Brownstein, Mauricio

Santillana, Sarah McGough, Yuki Ara, Jeff Andre, Warren McIsaac, Kevin Brown, Kevin Schwartz, Nick Daneman, Gary Garber

slide-83
SLIDE 83

Questions?