Uncheck Unchecked ed in in Bos Boston: on: Altered Requi Al - - PDF document

uncheck unchecked ed in in bos boston on altered requi al
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Uncheck Unchecked ed in in Bos Boston: on: Altered Requi Al - - PDF document

11/22/2016 Uncheck Unchecked ed in in Bos Boston: on: Altered Requi Al quirements fo for Lo Low Ri Risk sk Re Research Fanny Ennever, PhD, CIP Manager, Regulatory Policy Development Office of Human Research Affairs Boston Medical Center and


slide-1
SLIDE 1

11/22/2016 1

Uncheck Unchecked ed in in Bos Boston:

  • n:

Al Altered Requi quirements fo for Lo Low Ri Risk sk Re Research

Fanny Ennever, PhD, CIP

Manager, Regulatory Policy Development Office of Human Research Affairs Boston Medical Center and Boston University Medical Campus

MEDICAL CAMPUS

Con Context xt

Boston Medical Center and Boston University Medical Campus IRB

  • Two institutions, one Human Research Protection

Program

  • Unchecked the box in 2011
  • Institutional commitment to seek AAHRPP accreditation
  • Process for revising Policies and Procedures
  • Opportunity to implement flexibility

(aka Equivalent Protections)

2

slide-2
SLIDE 2

11/22/2016 2

Sc Scope

  • pe

Conservative rollout – does not apply if:

  • Money from the federal government
  • Grant
  • Payment for clinical services
  • Oversight by FDA (drugs and devices)
  • A promise to follow the federal rules
  • To OHRP (we did until 2/14/2011)
  • To non‐federal sponsor

3

Eq Equiva valent nt Prot

  • tections

ections #1 #1

Ex Extended nded appr approval al period period fo for mi mini nimal risk risk re research

Three‐year (instead of one‐year) approval – most eligible minimal risk research

  • Minimal risk from beginning
  • Minimal risk because in follow‐up or data analysis only

4

slide-3
SLIDE 3

11/22/2016 3

Eq Equiva valent nt Prot

  • tections

ections #2 #2 New New ex exempt pt cate categories

Exempt research – shorter consent, easier to modify New categories

7. Socio‐behavioral with adults 8. Surveys/interviews with children 9. Existing or future data not collected for research

  • 10. Existing data collected for research

5

Eq Equiva valent nt Prot

  • tections

ections #3 #3 New New expedit pedited cate categories

Expedited review – minimal risk, not reviewed by full board New categories for eligible submissions

  • 10. Blood collection >2x/week, ≤550 ml/8 weeks
  • 11. Minimally invasive tissue collection
  • 12. Radiation ≤0.1 mSv

6

slide-4
SLIDE 4

11/22/2016 4

Eq Equiva valent nt Prot

  • tections

ections #4 #4 Pa Parent perm permission ission

  • Federal regulations require permission of both

parents where a minor increase over minimal risk to child with no direct benefit to child

  • If eligible, IRB can require one parent’s permission

7

Eq Equiva valent nt Prot

  • tections

ections #5 #5 Wh When subjects subjects bec become prison prisoner ers

  • Federal regulations require all interventions on an

enrolled subject stop if s/he becomes incarcerated until IRB approves inclusion

  • If eligible, don’t have to get IRB review

8

slide-5
SLIDE 5

11/22/2016 5

Eq Equiva valent nt Prot

  • tections

ections #6 #6 Fa Father’s perm permissio ission fo for fe fetal re research

  • Federal regulations require father’s permission for

research benefitting only the fetus

  • If eligible, IRB can require only mother’s permission

9

Eq Equiva valent nt Prot

  • tections

ections #7 #7 IRB IRB recordkeeping eeping

  • If eligible, IRB does not have to justify inclusion of

pregnant women in minimal risk research

  • If eligible, IRB does not have to justify allowing

abbreviated consent for screening

10

slide-6
SLIDE 6

11/22/2016 6

Thank you!

11