altered fractionated rt in hnscc w hat is the m agnitude
play

altered fractionated RT in HNSCC : w hat is the m agnitude of the - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

altered fractionated RT in HNSCC : w hat is the m agnitude of the benefit ? Jean Bourhis, MD PhD I nstitute Gustave Roussy & ESTRO Altered fractionation in HNSCC ? Objective = increase the dose - intensity of RT Accelerated RT


  1. altered fractionated RT in HNSCC : w hat is the m agnitude of the benefit ? Jean Bourhis, MD PhD I nstitute Gustave Roussy & ESTRO

  2. Altered fractionation in HNSCC ? Objective = increase the « dose - intensity » of RT Accelerated RT Hyperfractionated RT

  3. Hyperfractionation RT Dose / fraction = reduced (1.1 to 1.3 Gy) Spare normal tissues(from late effects) Total dose higher (80 Gy) Increased « dose - intensity »

  4. Accelerated RT ? Protracting RT Detrimental Accelerated RT Beneficial ??

  5. MARCH Meta-Analysis of Radiotherapy in Carcinomas of Head & neck Purpose : To test whether altered fractionated RT may improve survival as compared to conventional RT

  6. Eligibility criteria (1) Trials properly randomized Performed between 1970 and 1998 Hyperfractionated or accelerated RT R Conventional RT IGR 09.02

  7. 7 weeks Reference 6 weeks Acceleration 5 weeks 4 weeks 3 weeks 2 weeks Total dose 50 Gy 60 Gy 70 Gy 80 Gy

  8. Total dose increased 7 weeks 6 weeks Total the same (+/- 4%) 5 weeks 4 weeks Total dose 3 weeks decreased 2 weeks 50 Gy 60 Gy 70 Gy 80 Gy

  9. 7 weeks same time higher dose 6 weeks Same dose, shorter time 5 weeks 4 weeks lower dose, shorter time 3 weeks 2 weeks 50 Gy 60 Gy 70 Gy 80 Gy

  10. RTOG 90-03 7 wks . Rio Oro 93 RTOG 90-03 EORTC 2279 1 RTOG 90-03 +Toronto ) 6 wks DAHANCA KBN79 CAIR 5 wks RTOG 73-01 27% EORTC 22851 Vancouver 4 wks TROG 91-01 GORTEC 94-02 3 wks 54% Vienna 2 wks CHART 19% 50 Gy 60 Gy 70 Gy 80 Gy

  11. Data collection and checking Extensive checking Updated individual and validation to data collected for all ensure integrity of random ized patients random ization from published and and follow -up and unpublished trials im prove accuracy

  12. Results

  13. Overall survival (all 3 groups) 100 Alt. fractionated RT Conventional RT 80 Survival (% ) 5 7 .4 % 60 5 4 .1 % 3 9 .7 % 40 3 6 .3 % 20 0 ≥ 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Time from randomisation (Years)

  14. Non cancer and cancer death (all 3 groups) Alt. fractionated RT Conventional RT 100 1 0 0 9 1 .7 % 9 0 .5 % 7 8 .9 % 80 7 8 .4 % Non cancer 6 3 .2 % Survival (% ) death 60 6 0 5 0 .5 % 5 9 .1 % Cancer death 4 6 .2 % 40 20 2 0 0 0 ≥ 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Time from randomisation (Years)

  15. Overall survival 100 100 100 100 Acceleration w / o Hyperfractionation 80 80 80 80 total dose reduction Survival (% ) Survival (% ) 60 60 60 60 4 4 .4 % 3 6 .7 % 40 40 40 40 4 2 .4 % 2 8 .5 % 20 20 20 20 0 0 0 0 ≥ 7 ≥ 7 0 0 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 0 0 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 Alt. fractionated RT Time from randomisation (Years) Time from randomisation (Years) Conventional RT 100 100 100 100 100 All 3 groups Acceleration 80 80 80 80 80 with total dose reduction Survival (% ) Survival (% ) 60 60 60 60 60 3 9 .7 % 40 40 40 40 40 3 1 .9 % 3 6 .3 % 3 0 .2 % 20 20 20 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 ≥ 7 ≥ 7 0 0 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 5 6 6 6 Time from randomisation (Years) Time from randomisation (Years)

  16. Overall survival No. Events / No. Entered HR of death HR ( 9 5 % CI ) O-E Variance Alt. fractionated RT Control ( Alt. fractionated RT / Control) ( a) Hyperfractionation EORTC 22791 3 126/ 180 135/ 176 -17.2 64.2 RIO 4 41/ 52 47/ 51 -11.5 20.6 PMH Toronto 5 119/ 172 124/ 164 -13.8 59.6 RTOG 9003 HF 6 184/ 276 201/ 279 -15.9 95.9 Subtotal (a) 470/ 680 507/ 670 -58.4 240.4 0 .7 8 [ 0 .6 9 - 0 .8 9 ] ( b) Accelerated fractionation w / o total dose reduction EORTC 22851 7 171/ 257 164/ 255 -1.3 83.3 RTOG 9003 S 6 205/ 281 201/ 279 1.2 101.5 RTOG 9003 B 6 190/ 277 201/ 279 -9.0 97.6 BCCA 9113 8 30/ 41 23/ 41 4.8 13.1 DAHANCA 9 422/ 755 413/ 730 -5.0 208.6 Oro 9301 10 51/ 65 48/ 63 4.8 24.4 CAI R 11 19/ 51 37/ 49 -16.5 12.6 KBN PO 79 12 42/ 196 41/ 199 1.3 20.7 Subtotal (b) 1130/ 1923 1128/ 1895 -19.9 561.8 0 .9 7 [ 0 .8 9 - 1 .0 5 ] ( c) Accelerated fractionation w ith total dose reduction RTOG 7913 13 91/ 106 87/ 104 -2.9 44.1 CHART 14 359/ 552 227/ 366 5.7 140.2 Vienna 15 62/ 78 66/ 81 -3.1 31.9 TROG 9101 16 96/ 174 109/ 176 -9.4 51.1 GORTEC 9402 17 105/ 137 111/ 131 -10.5 53.4 Subtotal (c) 713/ 1047 600/ 858 -20.2 320.6 0 .9 4 [ 0 .8 4 - 1 .0 5 ] Alt. fractionated RT Total (a ... c) 2313/ 3650 2235/ 3423 -98.5 1122.9 effect w ith p = 0 .0 0 3 0 .9 2 [ 0 .8 6 - 0 .9 7 ] Test for heterogeneity: Test for interaction: 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2 2 = 38.07 p = 0.001 2 = 7.52 p = 0.02 Alt. fractionated RT better | Control better 16

  17. Loco regional control (all 3 groups) 100 Alt. fractionated RT Conventional RT 80 Absolute difference Risk of recurrence (% ) at 5 years: 6 .4 ± 1 .3 % 60 5 2 .9 % 4 6 .5 % 40 20 0 ≥ 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Time from randomisation (Years)

  18. Loco regional control 100 100 100 100 Acceleration w / o Hyperfractionation 80 80 Risk of recurrence (% ) 80 80 Risk of recurrence (% ) total dose reduction 5 7 .9 % 60 60 60 60 4 7 .5 % 4 8 .5 % 40 40 40 40 4 0 .2 % 20 20 20 20 0 0 0 0 ≥ 7 0 0 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 ≥ 7 0 0 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 Time from randomisation (Years) Time from randomisation (Years) Alt. fractionated RT 100 100 100 100 Conventional RT 80 80 80 80 80 Absolute difference Risk of recurrence (% ) Risk of recurrence (% ) at 5 years: 6.4 ± 1.3% 5 9 .8 % 60 60 60 60 60 5 2 .9 % 5 7 .5 % 40 40 4 6 .5 % 40 40 40 Acceleration with 20 20 20 20 20 total dose reduction All the 3 groups together 0 0 0 0 0 ≥ 7 ≥ 7 0 0 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 5 6 6 6 Time from randomisation (Years) Time from randomisation (Years)

  19. Loco regional control No. Events / No. Entered HR of recurrence HR ( 9 5 % CI ) O-E Variance Alt. fractionated RT Control ( Alt. fractionated RT / Control) ( a) Hyperfractionation EORTC 22791 3 78/ 180 99/ 176 -17.0 43.8 RIO 4 18/ 52 16/ 51 -1.4 8.2 PMH Toronto 5 91/ 172 101/ 164 -10.3 47.8 RTOG 9003 HF 6 123/ 276 147/ 279 -16.6 67.3 Subtotal (a) 310/ 680 363/ 670 -45.3 167.1 0 .7 6 [ 0 .6 6 - 0 .8 9 ] ( b) Accelerated fractionation w / o total dose reduction EORTC 22851 7 97/ 257 122/ 255 -16.0 54.6 RTOG 9003 S 6 143/ 281 147/ 279 -6.1 72.4 RTOG 9003 B 6 121/ 277 147/ 279 -16.4 66.9 BCCA 9113 8 25/ 41 21/ 41 2.2 11.5 DAHANCA 9 230/ 755 292/ 730 -37.6 130.4 Oro 9301 10 47/ 65 47/ 63 1.9 23.3 CAI R 11 13/ 51 31/ 49 -13.3 10.0 KBN PO 79 12 36/ 196 49/ 199 -6.1 21.2 Subtotal (b) 712/ 1923 856/ 1895 -91.5 390.3 0 .7 9 [ 0 .7 2 - 0 .8 7 ] ( c) Accelerated fractionation w ith total dose reduction RTOG 7913 13 77/ 106 74/ 104 -0.6 37.6 CHART 14 295/ 552 196/ 366 -1.8 117.4 Vienna 15 49/ 78 57/ 81 -4.6 26.4 TROG 9101 16 87/ 174 94/ 176 -3.3 45.2 GORTEC 9402 17 80/ 137 101/ 131 -17.9 44.6 Subtotal (c) 588/ 1047 522/ 858 -28.2 271.3 0 .9 0 [ 0 .8 0 - 1 .0 2 ] Alt. fractionated RT Total (a ... c) 1610/ 3650 1741/ 3423 -165.0 828.7 0 .8 2 [ 0 .7 7 - 0 .8 8 ] effect w ith p < 0 .0 0 0 1 Test for heterogeneity: Test for interaction: 2 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2 =28.57 p = 0.03 2 = 3.8 p = 0.15 16 Alt. fractionated RT better Control better |

  20. Local control HR of local recurrence Category/ Study No. Events / No. Entered HR ( 9 5 % CI ) Alt. fractionated RT Control Variance ( Alt. fractionated RT / Control) O-E ( a) Hyperfractionation EORTC 22791 3 74/ 180 95/ 176 -16.5 41.9 PMH Toronto 5 77/ 172 94/ 164 -12.8 42.6 RTOG 9003 HF 6 97/ 276 110/ 279 -10.1 51.6 Subtotal (a) 248/ 628 299/ 619 -39.4 136.0 0 .7 5 [ 0 .6 3 - 0 .8 9 ] ( b) Accelerated fractionation w / o total dose reduction EORTC 22851 7 82/ 257 108/ 255 -15.6 47.4 RTOG 9003 S 6 107/ 281 110/ 279 -4.6 54.2 RTOG 9003 B 6 89/ 277 110/ 279 -13.1 49.7 BCCA 9113 8 18/ 41 18/ 41 0.0 9.0 DAHANCA 9 183/ 755 253/ 730 -40.4 108.9 Oro 9301 10 36/ 65 38/ 63 0.4 18.4 CAI R 11 11/ 51 30/ 49 -13.1 9.5 KBN PO 79 12 33/ 196 48/ 199 -7.1 20.2 Subtotal (b) 559/ 1923 715/ 1895 -93.4 317.2 0 .7 4 [ 0 .6 7 - 0 .8 3 ] ( c) Accelerated fractionation w ith total dose reduction CHART 14 251/ 552 183/ 366 -11.2 103.8 Vienna 15 48/ 78 55/ 81 -4.0 25.7 GORTEC 9402 17 74/ 137 95/ 131 -16.8 41.7 Subtotal (c) 373/ 767 333/ 578 -32.0 171.2 0 .8 3 [ 0 .7 1 - 0 .9 6 ] Alt. fractionated RT Total (a ... c) 1180/ 3318 1347/ 3092 -164.8 624.4 0 .7 7 [ 0 .7 1 - 0 .8 3 ] effect w ith p < 0 .0 0 0 1 Test for heterogeneity: Test for interaction: 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2 2 Alt. fractionated RT better 13 = 21.83 p = 0.06 | Control better 2 = 1.4 p = 0.5

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend