UBS Bus less Tour September 17, 2015 NYSE: DVN devonenergy.com - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ubs bus less tour
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

UBS Bus less Tour September 17, 2015 NYSE: DVN devonenergy.com - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

UBS Bus less Tour September 17, 2015 NYSE: DVN devonenergy.com Investor Contacts & Notices Investor Relations Contacts Howard J. Thill, Senior Vice President, Communications & Investor Relations (405) 5523693 /


slide-1
SLIDE 1

NYSE: DVN devonenergy.com

UBS Bus‐less Tour

September 17, 2015

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Investor Contacts & Notices

Investor Relations Contacts Howard J. Thill, Senior Vice President, Communications & Investor Relations (405) 552‐3693 / howard.thill@dvn.com Scott Coody, Director, Investor Relations (405) 552‐4735 / scott.coody@dvn.com Shea Snyder, Director, Investor Communications (405) 552‐4782 / shea.snyder@dvn.com Safe Harbor Some of the information provided in this presentation includes “forward‐looking statements” as defined by the Securities and Exchange

  • Commission. Words such as “forecasts," "projections," "estimates," "plans," "expectations," "targets," and other comparable

terminology often identify forward‐looking statements. Such statements concerning future performance are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties that could cause Devon’s actual results to differ materially from the forward‐looking statements contained herein, including as a result of the items described under "Risk Factors" in our most recent Form 10‐K; and the items described under "Information Regarding Forward‐Looking Estimates" in our Form 8‐K furnished August 4, 2015. Cautionary Note to Investors The United States Securities and Exchange Commission permits oil and gas companies, in their filings with the SEC, to disclose only proved, probable and possible reserves that meet the SEC's definitions for such terms, and price and cost sensitivities for such reserves, and prohibits disclosure of resources that do not constitute such reserves. This presentation may contain certain terms, such as resource potential and exploration target size. These estimates are by their nature more speculative than estimates of proved, probable and possible reserves and accordingly are subject to substantially greater risk of being actually realized. The SEC guidelines strictly prohibit us from including these estimates in filings with the SEC. Investors are urged to consider closely the disclosure in our Form 10‐K, available from us at Devon Energy Corporation, Attn. Investor Relations, 333 West Sheridan, Oklahoma City, OK 73102‐5015. You can also obtain this form from the SEC by calling 1‐800‐SEC‐0330 or from the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Devon Today

A Leading North American E&P

3

  • Premier asset portfolio
  • Platform for sustainable growth
  • Delivering superior execution
  • Advantaged capital structure
  • Disciplined capital allocation
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Premier Asset Portfolio

4

  • Positioned in top‐tier basins

— Leading Delaware Basin operator — Prolific Eagle Ford assets — High‐quality Anadarko Basin position — World‐class heavy oil projects

  • Significant operational momentum

— Delivering top‐tier well productivity — Achieving efficiencies — Improving cost structure

Heavy Oil Rockies Oil Barnett Shale Eagle Ford Delaware Basin Anadarko Basin

Oil Assets Liquids‐Rich Gas Assets

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Delaware Basin

Overview

5

  • Industry leader in basin

— Net risked acres: 585,000 — Q2 net production: 64 MBOED (65% oil) — Delivering top‐tier well results

  • Deep inventory of low‐risk projects

— >5,000 risked locations — Significant upside from downspacing

  • Most active asset in portfolio

— 2015 capital: ≈$1.2 billion — Activity focused in Bone Spring play

Eddy Lea

Delaware Sands Leonard Shale Bone Spring Wolfcamp

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Delaware Basin

Delivering Prolific Production Growth

6

Delaware Basin Production Growth

MBOED

Oil NGL Gas

Q2 2014 Q2 2015

40%

Growth

  • Per‐well productivity continues to increase
  • Q2 net production increased 40% YoY
  • Bone Spring driving growth

46 64

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Q2 Bone Spring Basin Wells

30‐Day IP Rate, BOED

Delaware Basin

Bone Spring Results Continue to Improve

7

900 1,400

Type Well Q2 2015

>50%

Increase

1,500 ‐ 2,000 lbs./ft.

  • Enhanced completion design drives

productivity gains

— ≈3x more sand than historic design — 16 Bone Spring basin wells in Q2 — Avg. 30‐day IP: 1,400 BOED — Results >50% above type curve

  • Significant reduction in well costs

— >30% decline in well costs since Q4 2014 — Substantial improvements in drilling efficiency — Completions sized to maximize returns

523 574 615

Q4 2014 Q1 2015 Q2 2015

18%

Productivity Increase Bone Spring Drilling

Average Feet Drilled Per Day

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Delaware Basin

Significant & Growing Resource Opportunity

8

  • Identified >5,000 risked, undrilled locations
  • Downspacing pilots expected to grow inventory

— Testing 8 wells per section in lower 2nd Bone Spring interval (traditional landing zone) — Appraising stand‐alone commerciality of upper portion of 2nd Bone Spring

  • Wolfcamp provides significant upside potential

Formation Net Risked Acres Risked Wells Per Section Gross Risked Locations Gross Unrisked Locations Delaware Sands 80,000 4 700 Leonard Shale 60,000 5 700 Bone Spring 285,000 4 – 5 3,500 Wolfcamp 140,000 N/A Evaluating Other 20,000 4 >200 Total 585,000 >5,000 >11,000

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Eagle Ford

Overview

9

  • Top‐tier acreage position

— 75,000 net acres focused in DeWitt Co. — Q2 net production: 114 MBOED (≈60% oil)

  • Highest returning asset in portfolio

— Delivering best‐in‐class well results — Condensate exports boost realizations — Low cost asset: LOE $5 per BOE

  • Growing resource opportunity

— ≈400 MMBOE of risked resource — Encouraging Upper Eagle Ford Marl results — Staggered lateral pilots underway

Dewitt Lavaca

Gonzales Karnes

Devon Acreage Oil Condensate & NGLs Dry Gas

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Eagle Ford

Best‐In‐Class Results

10

  • Acreage located in best part of Eagle Ford
  • Consistently delivering world‐class development results
  • 90‐Day IP rates 125% higher than industry average

250 500 750 1,000 Eagle Ford 90‐Day Wellhead IPs

BOED, 20:1

Source: IHS/Devon. Based on wellhead rates for operated wells online for 90 days from July 2014.

1,000

Industry Average: 440 BOED Peers

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Eagle Ford

11

Per‐well productivity up 74%... While achieving drilling efficiencies... Driving well costs down.

Eagle Ford Production

MBOED

Driving prolific production growth...

1,120 1,950 March 2014 Q2 2015

74%

Increase

30‐Day IP Rates

BOED

51 114 March Q2 2015

≈125%

Growth

2014 15.7 23.9 Q1 2014 Q2 2015

≈50%

Efficiency Improvement

DeWitt Drilling

Wells Per Rig Per Year

$9.5 $7.5 Previous Revised D&C Cost

$ Millions

≈20%

Reduction

DeWitt County Productivity Gains Enhance Results

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Anadarko Basin

Cana‐Woodford Development Play

12

  • Best position in Cana‐Woodford play

— 280,000 net risked acres — Identified 3,600 risked locations — Q2 net production: 59 MBOED

  • Record‐setting pad brought online

— 8‐well Haley section: 30‐day IP ≈1,850 BOED — >50% above type curve — Driven by enhanced completion design

  • Significant drilling efficiencies achieved

— Drilling time improved >30% since Q4 — Offsetting larger completion design — Total well costs declined by 15%

Cana‐Woodford Acreage

280,000 Net Acres

Cana‐Woodford Core Woodford Activity

Haley Pad

8 Wells

  • Avg. 30‐Day IP: 1,850 BOED
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Anadarko Basin

Emerging Meramec Opportunity

13

  • Appraisal activity yields high‐rate wells

— Initial 14 wells: 30‐day IP ≈1,500 BOED — Delivering competitive returns — Upside with improving completions

  • Growing resource opportunity

— Net risked acres: 60,000 — Risked inventory: >400 locations — Meramec potential across Cana acreage

  • Accelerating Meramec activity

— Increasing activity up to 6 rigs — Spacing pilots underway — 2015 plans: 40 appraisal wells

Meramec Oil & Liquids Window

60,000 Net Risked Acres

Meramec Activity

Meramec Appraisal

2 Wells (Q2 2015)

  • Avg. 30‐Day IP: 1,500 BOED
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Rockies Oil

Powder River Basin

14

Parkman Focus Area

Campbell Converse Johnson

Devon Acreage Recently Acquired

42,000 net acres

  • Emerging asset with significant potential

— Recently added 42,000 acres — Total net surface acres: 225,000 — Risked locations: ≈800 across Parkman, Turner and Frontier formations

  • Delivering substantial growth rates

— Q2 net production: 27 MBOED — Oil production increased ≈90% YoY

  • Strong Q2 development results

— 8 wells: 30‐day IP ≈1,400 BOED — Driven by 9,600’ extended reach laterals — 2x length of previous design

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Heavy Oil

Overview

15

  • Located in best part of oil sands

— Low geologic risk — Thick and continuous reservoir — Industry leading operating results — Massive risked resource: 1.4 BBO

  • Features of each Jackfish project:

— 300 MMBO gross EUR — Long reserve life >20 years — Flat production profile

  • Delivering top‐tier results

— Per‐well productivity >40% above industry average

650 450

Devon Jackfish Industry Average

Production Per Well

(Bbls/d)

Source: FirstEnergy

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Heavy Oil

Delivering Visible Oil Growth

16

  • Oil production up 27% over past year
  • Driven by world‐class Jackfish complex

— Q2 gross production: 75 MBOD — Production increased 41% YoY — LOE declined by >30% YTD

  • Jackfish 3 ramp‐up ahead of schedule

— Current gross production: 27.5 MBOD — Expect 35 MBOD by end of 2015

  • Q2 margins expanded to $17 per barrel

Heavy Oil Production

MBOD Q2 2014 Q2 2015

Lloydminster Jackfish 1 Jackfish 2 Jackfish 3

77 98

27%

Growth 1.7 11.2 14.6 23.1 27.5 35.0

Q3 2014 Q4 2014 Q1 2015 Q2 2015 Current YE 2015

Jackfish 3 Gross Production Ramp‐Up

MBOD

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Platform For Sustainable Growth

Significant & Growing Resource Opportunity

17

Heavy Oil Rockies Oil Barnett Shale Eagle Ford Anadarko Basin

Oil Assets Liquids‐Rich Gas Assets

Delaware Basin

Asset Risked Opportunity Upside Potential Delaware Basin >5,000 undrilled locations Spacing pilots underway Eagle Ford ≈400 MMBoe of risked resource Upper EF delineation and staggered lateral development of Lower EF Anadarko Basin >4,000 undrilled locations Continued appraisal

  • f Meramec

Heavy Oil 1.4 billion barrels

  • f risked resource

Technology to improve facility performance and increase future recovery rates Barnett Shale 5,000‐plus producing wells Significant horizontal refrac potential Rockies Oil ≈800 undrilled locations Further de‐risking of Parkman oil fairway

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Delivering Superior Execution

  • Maximize base production

— Minimize controllable downtime — Enhance well productivity — Leverage midstream operations — Reduce operating costs

Operating Strategy For Long‐Term Success

  • Optimize capital program

— Disciplined project execution — Perform premier technical work — Focus on development drilling — Reduce capital costs

Capture Full Value Improve Returns

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Delivering Superior Execution

Leveraging Technology To Enhance Performance

19

  • Decision support centers enhance performance

— Minimize downtime — Reduce drilling times — Improve well placement and completion design — Optimize flow rates and NPV per well

  • Benefits beyond well performance

— Enhanced collaboration with technical teams — Faster decision making — Encourages innovation

  • Targeting up to $250 million of value gains annually
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Delivering Superior Execution

A Track Record Of Performance

20 176 270 Q1 2014 Q2 2015 Oil Production

MBOD

Focused investment drives strong oil growth… While shifting to higher margin product… And maintaining a low cost structure.

54%

Growth

Production Mix Q1 2014 40% 20% 40% Q2 2015

Oil NGL Gas

31% 21% 48% $9.61 $9.16 Q1 2014 Q2 2015 Lease Operating Expense

$ Per BOE

563 674 Q1 2014 Q2 2015 Total Production

MBOED

Driving 20% topline growth…

20%

Growth

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Advantaged Capital Structure

  • Excellent financial strength & flexibility

— Strong investment‐grade credit ratings — Cash & credit facility availability: $4.5 billion — Low leverage: $7.6 billion of net debt(1)

  • The EnLink Midstream advantage

— Asset dropdown visibility — Annual distributions: ≈$270 million — Equity ownership valued at ≈$4 billion

(1) Net debt is a Non‐GAAP measure defined as total debt less cash and cash equivalents and debt attributable to the consolidation

  • f EnLink Midstream.

Market Value of EnLink Ownership

September 2015

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Disciplined Capital Allocation

  • Protect the balance sheet

— Match capital investment with cash inflows

  • Prepared to dynamically allocate capital

— Minimal service contracts >12 months — No long‐term project commitments — Leases held by production — Tailor activity to market conditions

Approach To Current Environment

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Disciplined Capital Allocation

23

  • E&P capital reduced by 25% vs. 2014

— Targeting ≈20% cost reductions by year‐end — Efficiency gains achieved across portfolio

  • Improved operating cost expectations

— Targeting savings of ≈$400 million in 2015 — 10% decline vs. original guidance

  • 2015 production outlook on track

— Exceeded oil expectations 4 straight quarters — Delivering strong growth with less capital

Heavy Oil

$5.4 $4.0 2014 2015e

25%

Reduction

E&P Capital

$ Billions

209 270 2014 2015e

≈30%

Growth

2015 Oil Production Guidance

MBOD

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Why Own Devon?

24

  • Premier asset portfolio
  • Platform for sustainable growth
  • Delivering superior execution
  • Advantaged capital structure
  • Disciplined capital allocation
slide-25
SLIDE 25

Thank you.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Appendix

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Barnett Shale

Liquids‐Rich Gas Development

27

Wise Parker Johnson Hood Denton Fort Worth

1,900

Verticals

Barnett Wells

>3,000

Horizontals

  • Significant gas optionality

— Net acres: 620,000 — Best position in play — Q2 net production: 185 MBOED — Liquids 27% of production mix

  • Focused on optimizing base production

— Active vertical refrac program (150 wells) — Up to 15 horizontal refrac tests

  • 2015 outlook

— 2015 capital: ≈$150 million

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Potential Drop Down Asset

Access Pipeline

28

  • Three ≈180 mile pipelines from

Sturgeon Terminal to Devon’s thermal acreage

  • ≈30 miles of dual pipeline from

Sturgeon Terminal to Edmonton

  • Capacity net to Devon:

— Blended bitumen: 170 MBOD

  • Devon ownership: 50%

— ≈$1 B invested to date

Express

To U.S . Rockies

JACKFISH & PIKE

Sturgeon Terminal

EDMONTON HARDISTY

16” Diluent Line

(Edmonton to Jackfish)

Oil Pipelines 24” Diluent Line

(Sturgeon to Jackfish)

42” Blend Line

(Jackfish to Sturgeon)

30” Blend Line

(Sturgeon to Edmonton)

slide-29
SLIDE 29

SCOOP STACK CANA‐ WOODFORD Bridgeport Plant

EnLink

Cana Plant

EnLink

NGPL Proposed Processing Facility

OKLAHOMA TEXAS

Red

Potential Drop Down Asset

NGPL

29

  • 92‐mile gas pipeline from North Texas

to Central Oklahoma

  • Acquisition of NGPL nearing completion

— Regulatory approval received — Expect to close transaction early 2016

  • Strategic opportunity with growing

STACK, SCOOP and Cana‐Woodford

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Delaware Basin

Bone Spring Spacing Pilots

30 Lower 2nd BONE SPRING Upper 3rd BONE SPRING Pilot 1 Planned Pilot Well Existing Producer Pilot 2

660’

Pilot 3 Pilot 4 Pilot 5

660’ 880’ 1,320’ 280’ 660’

  • Results will help optimize future development schemes and ultimately

maximize resource value

  • Pilots are underway with data collection and analysis occurring in the

2nd half of 2015 and into 2016

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Anadarko Basin

Meramec Spacing Pilots

31

  • Results will help determine the optimal future development schemes
  • f both the Meramec and Woodford formations
  • Pilot activity to begin in the 2nd half of 2015

Planned Pilot Well Spacing Pilot Staggered Lateral Pilot MISSISSIPPIAN

1,150’ (5 wells/section) 660’

Lower Upper MERAMEC

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Key Modeling Statistics

0% 15% 30% 45% 60% 75% Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5

Decline Rates

(1st month to 13th month)

Bone Spring Slope (Delaware Basin)

Working interest / royalty: 71% / 21% 30‐day IP rate: 500 BOED EUR: 450 MBOE Oil / NGLs as % of production: 65% / 12%

0% 15% 30% 45% 60% 75% Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5

Decline Rates

(1st month to 13th month)

Bone Spring Basin (Delaware Basin)

Working interest / royalty: 71% / 21% 30‐day IP rate: 900 BOED EUR: 600 MBOE Oil / NGLs as % of production: 65% / 20%

32

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Key Modeling Statistics

0% 15% 30% 45% 60% 75% 90% Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5

Decline Rates

(1st month to 13th month)

Rockies: Powder River Basin (Parkman)

Working interest / royalty: 58% / 18% 30‐day IP rate: 1,300 BOED EUR: 425 MBOE Oil / Gas as % of production: 95% / 5%

0% 15% 30% 45% 60% 75% Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5

Decline Rates

(1st month to 13th month)

Eagle Ford (DeWitt County)

Working interest / royalty: 54% / 22% 30‐day IP rate: 1,650 BOED EUR: 900 MBOE Oil / NGLs as % of production: 60% / 20%

33

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Key Modeling Statistics

0% 15% 30% 45% 60% 75% Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5

Decline Rates

(1st month to 13th month)

Cana‐Woodford Shale

Working interest / royalty: 51% / 21% 30‐day IP rate: 1,200 BOED EUR: 1,700 MBOE Oil / NGLs as % of production: 5% / 40%

34

0% 15% 30% 45% 60% 75% 90% Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5

Decline Rates

(1st month to 13th month)

Meramec

Working interest / royalty: 34% / 18% 30‐day IP rate: 1,500 BOED EUR: 1,400 MBOE Oil / NGLs as % of production: 9% / 42%

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Discussion of Risk Factors

35

Forward‐Looking Statements: Information provided in this presentation includes “forward‐looking statements” as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Forward‐looking statements are often identified by use of the words “forecasts”, “projections”, “estimates”, “plans”, “expectations”, “targets”, “opportunities”, “potential”, “outlook”, and other similar terminology.” Such statements are subject to a variety of risk factors. A discussion of risk factors that could cause Devon’s actual results to differ materially from the forward‐looking statements contained herein are outlined below. The forward‐looking statements provided in this presentation are based on management’s examination of historical operating trends, the information which was used to prepare reserve reports and other data in Devon’s possession or available from third parties. Devon cautions that its future oil, natural gas and NGL production, revenues and expenses are subject to all of the risks and uncertainties normally incident to the exploration for and development, production and sale of oil, gas and NGL. These risks include, but are not limited to, price volatility, inflation or lack of availability of goods and services, environmental risks, drilling risks, political changes, changes in laws or regulations, the uncertainty inherent in estimating future oil and gas production or reserves, and other risks identified in our Form 10‐K and our other filings with the SEC. Specific Assumptions and Risks Related to Price and Production Estimates: A significant and prolonged deterioration in market conditions and the other assumptions on which our estimates are based will impact many aspects of our business and our results. Substantially all of Devon’s revenues are attributable to sales, processing and transportation of three commodities: oil, natural gas and NGL. Prices for oil, natural gas and NGL are determined primarily by prevailing market conditions, which may be impacted by a variety of general and specific factors that are difficult to control or predict. Worldwide and regional economic conditions, weather and other local market conditions influence the supply of and demand for energy commodities. In particular, concerns about the level of global crude‐oil and natural‐gas inventories and the production trends of significant oil producers like OPEC, among other things, have led to a significant drop in prices. In addition to volatility from general market conditions, Devon’s oil, natural gas and NGL prices may vary considerably due to factors specific to Devon, such as pricing differentials among the various regional markets in which our products are sold, the value derivable from the quality of oil Devon produces (i.e., sweet crude versus heavy or sour crude),the Btu content of gas produced, the availability and capacity of transportation facilities we may utilize, and the costs and demand for the various products derived from oil, natural gas and NGL. Estimates for Devon’s future production of oil, natural gas and NGL are based on the assumption that market demand and prices for oil, natural gas and NGL will be at levels that allow for profitable production of these products. As illustrated by recent market trends, there can be no assurance of such stability. Much of Devon’s production in Canada is subject to government royalties that fluctuate with prices, which, therefore, will affect reported production. Estimates for Devon’s future processing and transportation of oil, natural gas and NGL are based on the assumption that market demand and prices for oil, natural gas and NGL will be at levels that allow for profitable processing and transport of these products. As with our production estimates, there can be no assurance of such stability. The production, transportation, processing and marketing of oil, natural gas and NGL are complex processes which are subject to disruption due to transportation and processing availability, mechanical failure, human error, meteorological events including, but not limited to, tornadoes, extreme temperatures, and numerous other factors. Assumptions and Risks Related to Capital Expenditures Estimates: Devon’s capital expenditures budget is based on an expected range of future oil, natural gas and NGL prices as well as the expected costs of the capital additions. Should actual prices received differ materially from Devon’s price expectations for its future production, some projects may be accelerated or deferred and, consequently, may increase or decrease capital expenditures. In addition, if the actual material or labor costs of the budgeted items vary significantly from the anticipated amounts, actual capital expenditures could vary materially from Devon’s estimates. Assumptions and Risks Related to Marketing and Midstream Estimates: Devon cautions that its future marketing and midstream revenues and expenses are subject to all

  • f the risks and uncertainties normally incident to the marketing and midstream business. These risks include, but are not limited to, price volatility, environmental risks,

mechanical failures, regulatory changes, the uncertainty inherent in estimating future processing volumes and pipeline throughput, cost of goods and services and other risks.