u s v lumber liquidators inc
play

U.S. v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc. Patrick Duggan DOJ Environmental - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

U.S. v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc. Patrick Duggan DOJ Environmental Crimes Section April 6, 2016 tment of Forest Trends TREE Meeting: Prague, Czech Republic 4/20/2016 United States Depar Justice 1 Overview Case summary Case results


  1. U.S. v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc. Patrick Duggan DOJ Environmental Crimes Section April 6, 2016 tment of Forest Trends TREE Meeting: Prague, Czech Republic 4/20/2016 United States Depar Justice 1

  2. Overview • Case summary • Case results • Environmental Compliance Plan • Impact tment of 4/20/2016 United States Depar Justice 2

  3. Natural Resources • DOJ received information from EIA that LL was bringing in timber products: • Illegally harvested in Russian Far East; • Transported to China for manufacturing; • Falsely declared upon import into the U.S. • The Russian Far East is: • Mixed broadleaf forests of Korean pine (CITES-III) and Mongolian oak (CITES-III) • Extremely remote • Known for illegal logging tment of 4/20/2016 United States Depar Justice 3

  4. Natural Resources • The Russian Far East is also home to: • The last 450 wild Siberian tigers (CITES-I), and • The last 47 Amur leopards (CITES-I) • Both cats are dependent on Mongolian oak and Korean pine forests for hunting & prey species (boar, red deer rely on pine nuts & acorns) • Greatest threat to the cats’ survival is illegal logging tment of 4/20/2016 United States Depar Justice 4

  5. Case Initiation • Selling the Case ECS • Impact • Value APHIS FBI • Publicity • Ease ICE-HSI AFMLS • Hand search • International cooperation ICE-TTU USFS USFWS tment of 4/20/2016 United States Depar Justice 5

  6. Case Development • Interviews (covert) • Search Warrant tment of 4/20/2016 United States Depar Justice 6

  7. Evidence: Knowledge LL Lacey Act 2010 Manual tment of 4/20/2016 United States Depar Justice 7

  8. Methods of Illegality • The case involved two common methods of timber crimes: 1) Falsely declaring species and/or harvest country to cover up true product 2) Using a legitimate permit to launder illegally harvested timber tment of 4/20/2016 United States Depar Justice 8

  9. Evidence: False Declarations 34 Purchase Orders declared as Quercus petraea when known species was Quercus mongolica Total Value of $ 3,417,677.28 tment of 4/20/2016 United States Depar Justice 9

  10. tment of 4/20/2016 United States Depar Justice 10

  11. Evidence: Illegal Logging in Russia Number of POs imported under permit 0100/2008 77 Value $7,740,033.84 Total Cu. M Shipped April 2013 to July 2013 Hexin Russian Oak 2,494.80 Maximum Potential POs under Permit 0100/2008 9 Value $904,679.28 Total illegally harvested POs 68 Value $6,835,354.56 tment of 4/20/2016 United States Depar Justice 11

  12. Outcome • One felony violation, four misdemeanor violations • First felony conviction under Lacey Act timber amendments • Largest Lacey Act criminal penalty ever • $7.8 million criminal fine • $1.2 million community service payments • $4.5 million in forfeiture • Detailed factual statement • Environmental Compliance Plan • Annual auditing and reporting to the court • 5 years probation tment of 4/20/2016 United States Depar Justice 12

  13. Plea Conditions • ECP • Community Service • Forfeiture • Lacey Fund tment of 4/20/2016 United States Depar Justice 13

  14. Environmental Compliance Plan • Court-enforced measures to ensure that LL knows what they import and who they are import it from. • LL compliance decision-making process will be centralized, documented and audited. • Keep in mind: tment of 4/20/2016 United States Depar Justice 14

  15. ECP: Oversight tment of 4/20/2016 United States Depar Justice 15

  16. ECP: Risk tment of 4/20/2016 United States Depar Justice 16

  17. ECP: Vendor Validation tment of 4/20/2016 United States Depar Justice 17

  18. ECP: Document Review tment of 4/20/2016 United States Depar Justice 18

  19. Impact • Compliance expectations are heightened • Status quo not acceptable • Knowledge pool • Modes of illegality • Locations of illegality • Complacency • Device • NGO cooperation tment of 4/20/2016 United States Depar Justice 19

  20. Contact Patrick Duggan Patrick.Duggan@usdoj.gov (202) 305-0321 Trial Attorney Dept. of Justice Environmental Crimes Section tment of 4/20/2016 United States Depar Justice 20

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend