u niversity of i llinois
play

U NIVERSITY OF I LLINOIS U RBANA -C HAMPAIGN C HICAGO S PRINGFIELD - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

DASHBOARD INDICATORS U NIVERSITY OF I LLINOIS U RBANA -C HAMPAIGN C HICAGO S PRINGFIELD Update Presentation to BOARD OF TRUSTEES December 2, 2011 Dashboards Visual display of key metrics to summarize performance in implementing


  1. DASHBOARD INDICATORS U NIVERSITY OF I LLINOIS U RBANA -C HAMPAIGN  C HICAGO  S PRINGFIELD Update Presentation to BOARD OF TRUSTEES December 2, 2011

  2. Dashboards Visual display of key metrics to summarize performance in implementing strategic priorities and fulfilling mission. 2

  3. Project Timeline • Concept Presentation BOT June 2011 • Update BOT December 2011 • Review and Discussion BOT January 2012 • Update BOT July 2012 3

  4. Three Campus Dashboards 4

  5. Strategic Priorities • Student Access and Enrollment • Student Outcomes • Tuition and Financial Aid Diversity • Faculty and Scholarship • Research Performance • Financial Indicators • Hospital and Clinical Practice 5

  6. Metrics  Student Access and Enrollment Faculty and Scholarship  Fall Term Enrollment by Level Number of Tenure System Faculty   First-Time Freshmen Enrollment % Tenure System Faculty from Underrepresented Groups   % First-Time Freshmen Applicants Admitted National Academy Memberships   % First-Time Freshmen Admissions Yield Student to Faculty Ratios   % Enrolled Students from Underrepresented Groups % Undergraduate Class Sections With Less Than 20 Students   ACT Composite Scores 25 th and 75 th Percentile % Undergraduate Class Sections With More Than 50 Students   ACT English, Math Scores 25 th and 75 th Percentile Faculty Salary Difference from Peer Median   Number of Enrolled First-Time Transfers  Research Performance  % Enrolled Transfers from Underrepresented Groups Science and Engineering R&D Expenditures   Student Outcomes  Total Federal Research Funding  Freshmen to Sophomore One-Year Retention Rates Health and Human Services Funded Research   First-Time Freshmen Four-Year Graduation Rates National Science Foundation Funded Research   % First-Time Freshmen from Underrepresented Groups Four-Year Patents Received   Graduation Rates Licensing Revenues  First-Time Freshmen Six-Year Graduation Rates  New Start-up Companies Formed  % First-Time Freshmen from Underrepresented Groups Six-Year   Financial Indicators Graduation Rates State Appropriations per FTE Enrollment  Number of Degrees Granted in STEM Fields  Instructional Expenses per FTE Enrollment  Number of Health Related Degrees Granted  Gift Income - Total Gifts  Number of Degrees Granted  Annual Giving Rate  % Degrees Granted to Students from Underrepresented Groups  Endowment Assets per FTE Enrollment  Graduate Education   Hospital and Clinical Practice  Tuition and Financial Aid Average Daily Hospital Census  Undergraduate In-State Tuition and Fees  Total Hospital and Health Science System Covered Lives  % Undergraduates Receiving Need or Merit Aid  Patients Rating of Hospital Services  % Undergraduates Receiving Pell Grants  % Undergraduates Awarded Aid Where Need Fully Met  % Need Met for Undergraduates Awarded Need-Based Aid  Average Per-Undergraduate-Borrower Cumulative Principal Borrowed  6 % Full-Time Undergraduates Paying Less than $3,000 Per Semester 

  7. Dashboard Facilitates Peer Comparisons A group of peer institutions selected for each campus based on similarities in mission, profile and reputation. 7

  8. Peer Groups: Urbana-Champaign University of California - Berkeley University of California - Los Angeles University of California - San Diego University of Michigan - Ann Arbor University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill University of Texas - Austin University of Washington University of Wisconsin - Madison University of Virginia 8

  9. Peer Groups: Chicago University of Minnesota - Twin Cities Florida State University University of Missouri - Kansas City Indiana University/Purdue University University of New Mexico - Albuquerque at Indianapolis (IUPUI) University of Pittsburgh* Stony Brook University University of South Florida -Tampa Temple University University of Toledo University at Buffalo Virginia Commonwealth University University of Alabama at Birmingham Wayne State University University of Arizona at Tucson University of California - Irvine University of Cincinnati University of Colorado Denver* University of Louisville * State Related Research Institution 9

  10. Peer Groups: Springfield Auburn University - Montgomery Clark University* College of Charleston Georgia College and State University Iona College* Lake Superior State University Marist College* Northern Michigan University Shippensburg University of Pennsylvania The College at Brockport Trinity University (San Antonio, TX)* Union College (Schenectady, NY)* University of South Dakota University of Wisconsin - Green Bay * Private Institution 10

  11. First-Time Freshmen Four-Year Graduation Rates Fall 2006 – Fall 2010 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 68% 66% Compared to its peer 64% average, the University of UIUC 62% Illinois at Urbana- Peer Average 60% Champaign graduates a 2006 first-time higher percent of students 58% freshmen cohort: 7,172 within four years. 56% 54% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 11

  12. Percent First-Time Freshmen from Underrepresented* Groups Four-Year Graduation Rates Fall 2006 – Fall 2010 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 55% 50% In 2010 the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 45% UIUC graduated a higher percent of Peer Average students from 40% underrepresented groups 2006 within four years compared Underrepresented 35% first-time freshmen to its peer average. cohort: 1,197 30% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 * Includes Black, Hispanic, American Indian, Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander, and multi-racial students. 12

  13. Dashboard Allows Focus on Key Priorities 13

  14. Percent Enrolled Undergraduate Students from Underrepresented* Groups Fall 2006 – Fall 2010 University of Illinois at Chicago 35% 30% The percent of 25% undergraduate students UIC from underrepresented 20% groups at the University of Peer Average Illinois at Chicago is higher 15% than the peer average. 10% 5% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 * Includes Black, Hispanic, American Indian, Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander, and multi-racial students. 14

  15. Total Federal Research Funding* FY 2005 – FY 2009 University of Illinois at Chicago $300 Millions $250 UIC Total federal research funding at the $200 Peer 75th Percentile University of Illinois $150 at Chicago is higher Peer Median than its peer median. $100 Peer 25th Percentile $50 $0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 * As reported to the NSF Survey of Research and Development Expenditures. 15

  16. Dashboard Supports Decision Making 16

  17. State Appropriations per FTE Enrollment FY 2006 – FY 2009 University of Illinois at Springfield $8,000 $7,000 University of Illinois at $6,000 Springfield receives more UIS state support per student $5,000 Peer 75th Percentile than the median amount $4,000 Peer Median for its public university $3,000 peers. Peer 25th Percentile $2,000 $1,000 $0 2006 2007 2008 2009 Note: Does not include any allocation of University Administration expenses. 17

  18. Average Per Undergraduate-Borrower Cumulative Principal Borrowed AY 2008 – AY 2010 (excludes any aid awarded in excess of need as well as any that were awarded to replace EFC: PLUS, unsubsidized and private alternative loans) University of Illinois at Springfield $30,000 $25,000 University of Illinois at $20,000 Springfield students borrow UIS less on average than $15,000 Peer Median students at peer $10,000 institutions. $5,000 $0 2008 2009 2010 Note: Excludes Clark University, College of Charleston, Georgia College and State University, Iona College, Lake Superior State University, Marist College, Union College, Trinity College, and University of South Dakota due to lack of available data. 18

  19. A Comprehensive Picture • Tuition • State Appropriation • Financial Aid/Grants • Actual Payments • Student Borrowing 19

  20. Dashboard Highlights Trends 20

  21. Examples Number of tenure system faculty • Student to faculty ratios • Percent freshmen applicants admitted • Freshman applicant yield • Graduation rates • Degrees granted in STEM disciplines • Instructional expenses per FTE • New start-up companies formed • Average daily hospital census • 21

  22. Next Steps Goal Setting & Review and Discussion Resource Allocation January BOT Unit Level Dashboards 22

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend