Company presentation
Tryg Forsikring A/S
Tier 2 subordinated bond issue
October 2015
Arranged by:
Tryg Forsikring A/S Tier 2 subordinated bond issue Company - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Arranged by: Tryg Forsikring A/S Tier 2 subordinated bond issue Company presentation October 2015 Important information Disclaimer Certain statements in todays presentations are based on the beliefs of our management as well as
Company presentation
October 2015
Arranged by:
2
Certain statements in today’s presentations are based on the beliefs of our management as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to the management. Forward-looking statements (other than statements of historical fact) regarding our future results of operations, financial condition, cash flows, business strategy, plans and future objectives can generally be identified by terminology such as “targets”, “believes”, “expects”, “aims”, “intends”, “plans”, “seeks”, “will”, “may”, ”anticipates”, “continues” or similar expressions. A number of different factors may cause the actual performance to deviate significantly from the forward-looking statements in the presentations including but not limited to general economic developments, changes in the competitive environment, developments in the financial markets, extraordinary events such as natural disasters or terrorist attacks, changes in legislation or case law and reinsurance. We urge you to read our financial reports available on tryg.com for a discussion of some of the factors that could affect our future performance and the industry in which we operate. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialise or should any underlying assumptions prove to be incorrect, our actual financial condition or results of operations could materially differ from that presented as anticipated, believed, estimated or expected. We are not under any duty to update any of the forward-looking statements
by law.
3
Solid and stable earnings and profitability Leading Scandinavian non-life insurance player Strong capitalization – “A-” rating from S&P Low risk balance sheet with stable return on investment Strong customer relationships with high customer retention Attractive market fundamentals
Stable inflow of cash Favorable combined ratio development
Note(*): 2015 year-to-date || Note(**): Moderna Försäkringar is included from 2 April 2009
Return on Equity (%) DKKbn
5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 5 10 15 20 25 30 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15*
Equity Return on Equity 75% 80% 85% 90% 95% 100% 105% 110% '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15* Denmark Norway Sweden**
4
18th century
Denmark, Norway and Sweden
individuals but are also active towards the commercial and corporate sector
and health & accident are Tryg’s main product lines
rooted in Denmark, has a 60% stake in the company
a members’ bonus scheme
recognition with significant local goodwill due to TryghedsGruppen
31% 24% 14% 11% 20% Motor Private property Commercial property Health & Accident Other 56% 23% 21% Private Commercial Corporate Customer Satisfaction Brand Strength Attractive Products Distribution Network Employee Satisfaction 47% 41% 12% Denmark Norway Sweden
Tryg’s operating fundamentals 2014 premiums split by COUNTRY 2014 premiums split by BUSINESS MIX 2014 premiums split by PRODUCT LINE
5
Market share DENMARK
Norway Sweden Denmark
Market position: Market share: Employees: Premiums earned: Technical result: Combined ratio: #1 18.0% 1,903 DKK 9,361m DKK 1,510m 81.2 TOP3 13.5% 1,131 DKK 7,337m DKK 1,478m 84.8 TOP5 3.0% 391 DKK 1,975m DKK 44m 89.0 #1 TOP3 TOP5
Market share NORWAY Market share SWEDEN
18% 18% 12% 10% 6% 6% 31% Tryg Topdanmark Codan Alm Brand. Gjensidige If Other
EUR 6.9bn
25% 22% 14% 10% 29% Gjensidige If Tryg Sparebank1 Other
EUR 6.4bn
Tryg figures
30% 18% 17% 16% 3% 2% 16% Länds- forsikringar If Folksam Trygg-Hansa (Codan) Moderna (Tryg) Gjensidige Other
EUR 7.7bn
1. Solid macroeconomic environment 2. High degree of customer loyalty and acceptance for product bundling 3. Consolidated and mature markets 4. Structurally high operational and underwriting efficiency among key players in the industry 5. Established and rational key players 6. Considerable barriers to entry Market combined ratio development Key market characteristics
Source: Forsikringogpension (DK), FNO (NO), Svenskforsakring (SE)
80% 85% 90% 95% 100% '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 Norway Denmark Sweden
6
Tryg will consecutively deliver long term profitable growth resulting in attractive shareholder value creation
Leading in efficiency Leading Scandinavian insurer with strong track record
Financial targets 2017
Customer targets 2017
Dividend policy
Low risk and high returns
Customer care worth recommending
Next level pricing
7
Note(*): *IFRS from 2004 - previous years are Danish GAAP || Note(general): data before 2009 is not corrected for the sale of Marine Hull business, and Finland before 2008
Selected financial results Combined ratio
500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Investment result Technical result Pre-tax profit 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '04* '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15E '16E '17E
Premium hikes Premium hikes Smaller adjustments Efficiency program Customer and efficiency focus
Established premium portfolio with high retention rate
Attractive underlying underwriting profitability Conservative asset allocation with favorable return Stable pre-tax profit and lucrative return
Hands-on management and lean organization - well suited to efficiently cope with change
8
Annual cost savings 2012-17E Overview of efficiency program 2015-17E Development in FTEs New initiatives towards 2017
4,077 3,914 3,703 3,599 3,425 2011 2012 2013 2014 Q3 2015 Claims reduction Expense reduction DKK 750m DKK 250m DKK 500m 150 73 225 375 175 388 395 45 2012 2013 2014 2015 Q1-Q3 2015 2016 2017 Achieved Target Q3 H1
OLD program NEW program
procurement volume
118
9
Standard deviation of Return on Investment 2011-13
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% DLG Aviva Allianz Talanx Tryg Mapfrre RSA Zürich Gjensidige Sampo Vienna Generali Topdanmark PZU AXA
the insurance result
requirement in Solvency II
MAX and MIN deviation in quarterly return 2007-15YTD Portfolio Q3 2015 (DKK 39.7bn) Key comments
68.6% Bonds/deposits 4.2% Equities 5.8% HY 2.2% EM 1.0%
5.1% Bonds/deposits 13.0%
Free 10.6bn 27% Match 29.0bn 73%
0.0% 2.5% 5.0% Topdk If Gjensidige Alm.Br. Tryg Min Max Average
10
Increasing capital buffer Key comments Stable underlying capitalization
at the end of Q3 2015
percentage points from approx. 30% in the start of 2012
individual capital buffer of ~50%
buffer was ~26% in Q3-15
Internal model expected to be approved by 31 December 2015 Inclusion of notional deferred tax and expected future surplus Eligibility of Norwegian Natural Perils Pool
10% 30% 50% 70% 90% Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 2012 2013 2014 2015 Individual solvecy buffer Standard formula buffer Individual solvency buffer 51% 48% 49% 50% 7% 2% 9% 5% 3% 10% 30% 50% 70% 90% Q4 2014 Q1 2015 Q2 2015 Q3 2015 Underlying buffer Retained cash dividend Underlying share buy-back
11
Source: Standard & Poor’s Rating Services (21.07.2015) || Note(*) for more details see appendix
Key comments Rating and underlying rationale Rating
Financial Strength Rating
rate increases and efficiency initiatives
the competitive strengths underlying the business risk profile, S&P view a negative rating action as remote
Rationale
Counterparty Credit Rating
Junior Subordinated
Subordinated
Business risk profile
STRONG
Financial risk profile
MODERATELY STRONG
Outlook
STABLE
12
Note(*): excluding one-off effects || Note(**): private (DK & NO)
Financial targets Customer targets Shareholder remuneration target ROE development 2005-15YTD-2017
5% 15% 25% 35% 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015YTD 2015E 2016E 2017E
Return on Equity (ROE) after tax 2015: = 20% 2017: ≥ 21% Combined ratio 2015: ≤ 90 2017: ≤ 87 Expense ratio* 2015: < 15 2017: ≤ 14 Net Promoter Score (NPS) 2017: + 100 Retention rate 2017: + 1pp Customers ≥ 3 products** 2017: + 5pp Payout ratio 60% – 90% Aiming for a nominal stable increasing dividend
Share buy-back May occur as extraordinary events
13
Source: Tryg, Pareto Securities, Danske Bank Markets
Issuer:
Tryg Forsikring A/S
Instrument:
Solvency 2 Compliant Subordinated bond issue (Tier 2 Capital)
S&P Ratings:
A- (Issuer Rating) / BBB (Expected Instrument Rating)
Volume:
NOK [Benchmark]
Maturity:
[] 2045
Issuer’s Call option:
Ordinary calls on [] [2025], and any interest payment date thereafter. Conditional calls on either a Capital Disqualification Event, or a Rating Agency Event; or a Taxation Event
Coupon rate:
3 months NIBOR + [Margin]
Margin:
[]% p.a. until [] 2025 and thereafter []% p.a. + 1.00% p.a.
Deferral of Interest Payments:
At the Issuer’s option, subject to 6 months dividend pusher. Mandatory in the event of breach of Solvency requirements. Arrears of Interest will be cumulative
Loss Absorption:
Applicable until 1 January 2016
Listing:
An application will be made for the Bonds to be listed on [Oslo Børs]
Bond Trustee:
Nordic Trustee ASA
Governing law / Denominations:
Danish law / NOK 1,000,000
Arranger:
Danske Bank & Pareto Securities
14
Dedicated Nordic non-life insurance company, with proven operations and favourable outlook, diversified across both countries and products Operates in mature markets, with high entry barriers and customer retention rates, dominated by established key players focusing on lowering cost Profitability has been high and improving in recent years due to efficiency programmes and benign market for raising premiums Aiming to achieve a combined ratio of ≤ 87 and expense ratio of ≤ 14 from 2017 and onwards ROE after tax has been 18.1% on average the last six years and Tryg aims to achieve ≥ 21.0% within 2017 Only one quarterly pre-tax loss since 2006 due to heavy winter. Re-insurance protects Tryg from large claims and single events Low risk through strong capitalization, conservative investment policy and stable profitability resulting in a solid “A-” rating from Standard & Poor’s
16
Norway Denmark Sweden
Source: Tryg, Pareto Securities, Danske Bank Markets
Corporate
63% 24% 13% Own sales Affinity Nordea 56% 4% 26% 14% Own sales External partners Online & others Atlantica / Bilsport MC 45% 15% 32% 8% Own sales Car dealers Affinity Nordea 43% 57% Own sales Brokers
17
Note(*): DKK 15.3m excluding one-offs || Note(**): based on 13 standalone estimates
DKKm 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E 2016E 2017E Gross premium income 19,948 20,314 19,504 18,652 18,028 18,014 18,284 Technical result 1,572 2,492 2,496 3,032 2,623 2,748 2,887 Investment income, net 61 585 588 360 116 248 249 Pre-tax profit 1,603 3,017 2,993 3,302 2,644 2,930 3,070 Net income 1,140 2,208 2,369 2,557 2,044 2,260 2,367 Combined ratio 93.2 88.2 87.7 84.2 85.9 85.0 84.4 Expense ratio 16.6 16.4 15.6 14.6 * 15.2 14.5 14.2 Total insurance provision 34,220 34,355 32,939 31,692 n.a. n.a. n.a. Shareholders’ equity 9,007 10,979 11,107 11,119 n.a. n.a. n.a. Earnings per share 3.8 7.3 7.9 8.7 7.2 8.1 8.7 Dividend per share 1.3 5.2 5.4 5.8 6.1 6.4 6.8 Share buy back
1,000 1,000 1,060 785 556 CONSENSUS **
18
Note(*): from Ipreo’s Big Dough database || Note(**): large shareholders = more than 10,000 shares (~0.017%)
Geographical distribution of free float (40%) year-end 2014 TOP10 shareholders* Shareholder overview year-end 2014**
TryghedsGruppen
60.00 %
Tryg A/S
52% 14% 14% 6% 14% Denmark UK US Nordics Other
Danske Capital Norges Bank Investment Management Industriens Pensionsforsikring BlackRock Fund Advisors ATP Investment Management The Vanguard Group Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken Sampension Administrationsselskab
1.89 % 1.65 % 1.22 % 0.97 % 0.85 % 0.83 % 0.70 % 0.63 % 0.62 %
TOTAL TOP10
69.35%
60% 14% 9% 17% TryghedsGruppen Large international shareholders Large Danish shareholders Small shareholders
19
Source: Standard & Poor’s Rating Services (21.07.2015)
Base-case scenario assumptions and methodology Rating and underlying rationale
moderately strong capital adequacy
utilizing premium rate increases & efficiency initiatives
views a negative rating action as remote over next 2 years
Rating Rationale Business risk profile: STRONG Financial risk profile: MODERATELY STRONG Outlook: STABLE
Junior Subordinated Subordinated Counterparty Credit Rating Financial Strength Rating
BBB A– (stable) BBB A– (stable)
Macroeconomic assumptions
Company-specific assumptions
to 1% and then slightly increase in 2016-17 by 0%-2% p.a.
most likely refinance its maturing subordinated debt in 2015, and potentially add subordinated debt in 2016-2017
Key Metrics
2012 2013 2014 2015E 2016E Gro ss premiums written (D KKm) 20,1 28 1 9,820 1 8,672 ~1 8,500 ~1 8,500 N et inco me (D KKm) 2,1 80 2,373 2,547 >2,300 >2,300 R eturn o n equity (%) 21 .9 21 .6 23.1 >20 >20 P / C net co mbined ratio (%) 87.5 87.0 83.3 <90 <90 N et investment yield (%) 2.6 2.3 2.1 ~1 .9 ~1 .9 S&P capital adequacy M oderately strong M oderately strong M oderately strong M oderately strong M oderately strong F ixed-charge co verage 26.7 23.6 30.8 >30 >25 F inancial leverage (%) 23.0 23.4 22.0 <30 <35
20
Norway Sweden Denmark
#1 TOP3 TOP5 Tryg exposure Source: Economic Outlook, Nordea Markets
Denmark Norway Sweden % 2015E 2016E GDP Growth 1.5 2.0 Inflation 0.6 1.5 Unemployment 4.7 4.3 Current account balance in % of GDP 6.3 5.6 Budget balance in % of GDP
Public debt in % of GDP 39.1 41.0 % 2015E 2016E GDP Growth 1.2 1.3 Inflation 2.1 2.2 Unemployment 4.4 4.8 Current account balance in % of GDP 5.7 5.9 Budget balance in % of GDP 6.1 6.3 Public debt in % of GDP 0.0 0.0 % 2015E 2016E GDP Growth 2.8 2.8 Inflation 0.0 1.1 Unemployment 7.6 7.3 Current account balance in % of GDP 7.0 7.5 Budget balance in % of GDP
Public debt in % of GDP 43.8 43.1
Tryg Forsikring A/S | Klausdalsbrovej 601 | 2750 Ballerup | Denmark | Tel: +4570112020
Arranged by: