Transforming Forest Health in Idaho & Montana Tom Schultz, VP - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

transforming forest health in idaho amp montana
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Transforming Forest Health in Idaho & Montana Tom Schultz, VP - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transforming Forest Health in Idaho & Montana Tom Schultz, VP Government Affairs Our Mission To enhance the lives and livelihoods of our employees, customers, partners and the communities in which we operate by providing the earths


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Transforming Forest Health in Idaho & Montana

Tom Schultz, VP Government Affairs

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Our Mission

“To enhance the lives and livelihoods of our employees, customers, partners and the communities in which we operate by providing the earth’s best renewable building products.”

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

A Glimpse at IFG’s Impact in 2018

  • 1050 team members with an additional 2,000+

contractors assisting business.

  • Wages across the company were $70 million
  • Over $2 million paid in taxes within Idaho,

Montana, and Washington states

  • 143,553 truck loads delivered to IFG facilities.

That equates to trucks lined up end to end from Coeur d’Alene to Pittsburgh, PA!

  • IFG supports charitable organizations that provide

educational and arts and cultural opportunities and youth activities in Idaho and Montana, enhancing the communities where our employees live and raise families.

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Overview

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Overview

We’re going to discuss:

  • Health and mortality in Idaho and Montana’s

forests

  • Why forest health matters
  • How we can restore our forests and how long it

will take to make an impact

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Overview

Today’s Inland Northwest forests are not the same forests that existed before European settlement. Their ecology has been altered by:

  • Fire suppression
  • Historically unsustainable harvest methods, without replanting
  • Introduction of White Pine Blister Rust and other invasive species
  • Climate change and drought
  • These impacts have created more densely populated forests with dominant

tree species that are less tolerant of fire and disease and are competing for limited resources.

  • This has set the stage for an abundance of weak, malnourished trees that

are susceptible to insect, disease, and catastrophic wildfire.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Overview

7

  • 2,000,000

4,000,000 6,000,000 8,000,000 10,000,000 12,000,000 14,000,000 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 Volume of Timber Harvested (MBF) Acres burned

U.S. Volume Harvested vs. U.S. Acres Burned in Wildfires 1980-2017

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Fire

  • 3 million acres

burned in Idaho & Montana

  • 85 people died
  • Current stand

conditions are now similar to the conditions prior to 1910

8

1910 Fire:

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Overview

9

Mortality Fire Overstocked/Weakened Stands

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Insects and Disease

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Insects & Disease

11

NIDRM

  • 28% of Idaho’s treed acres are at risk – ranked 1st nationally for

percentage of acres at risk.

  • 21% of Montana’s treed acres are at risk – ranked 3rd nationally

for its percentage of acres at risk. Beaverhead-Deerlodge Forest

slide-12
SLIDE 12

493,809 4,857,385 998,833 206,624 1,081,556 223,811

Idaho

State Lands USFS-Non Wilderness Wilderness Areas BLM Private Other Ownerships

Treed Acres at Risk of >25% Basal Area Loss 2013-2027

12

258,191 4,955,281 974,152 180,406 877,950 409,578

Montana

Total: 7,862,018 Total: 7,655,558

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Insects & Disease

13

“The warming climate has allowed beetles to hang on, reproduce faster—multiple broods in a year—and access trees at higher elevations that used to be resistant because of the cold,’ says Carl Seielstad, a fire expert at the University of Montana in Missoula.”

Washington Post, January 29, 2019

Beetle Gallery Root Rot

Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2019/national/gone-in-a-generation/ forest-climate-change.html?utm_term=.3f4e862dafc6#forest. Published January 29, 2019.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Fire

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Fire

According to the US Forest Service, almost 70% of federal forests need some sort of fuels restoration treatment, which may include:

  • Harvest
  • Thinning
  • Prescribed fire
  • Replanting

15

Clearwater Complex, near Kamiah, 2015

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Fire

16

MONTANA IDAHO 200000 400000 600000 800000 1000000 1200000 1400000 1600000 1800000 2000000 Beaverhead-Deerlodge Bitterroot Kootenai Lolo Flathead Idaho Panhandle Boise Nez Perce-Clearwater Payette

Burned Acres on National Forests 1980-2018

Total Non-Wilderness, Non-Roadless Acres Total Burned Non-Wilderness, Non-Roadless Acres 1980-2018

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Forest Health

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Forest Health

One decade ago, mortality in the Intermountain Forest started to exceed growth. What defines mortality? Trees that DIED from natural causes:

  • Fire
  • Drought
  • Insects and Disease
  • Age

Tree mortality is measured as trees that died from natural causes within 5 years of the measurement date.

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Forest Health

19

500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 1952 1962 1976 1986 1991 1996 2006 2011 2016

Intermountain Region All Ownerships Softwoods, Growth, Removal, and Mortality (MCuFt)

Net Growth Removal Mortality

Created from FIA data

Intermountain Region refers to Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Forest Health

20

  • 500,000

500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 1952 1962 1976 1986 1991 1996 2006 2011 2016

Intermountain Region National Forests Softwoods, Growth, Removal and Mortality (Mcuft)

Net Growth Removal Mortality

Intermountain Region refers to Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Forest Health: Federal Forests

Over the next 15 years, National Forests are at greatest risk of loss: 50% of treed acres are at risk and growth rates are declining.

Some forests are in critical situations:

  • The Beaverhead-Deerlodge is set up for a catastrophic wildfire:
  • Mortality is far exceeding growth
  • Fires have only touched 3.6% of the non-wilderness, non roadless acres
  • Harvest has been around 26 MMBF
  • The Payette keeps burning:
  • Only about 13% of the forest is non-wilderness, non-roadless acres
  • About an eighth of the acres have already burned
  • Mortality has surpassed growth
  • The Panhandle is succumbing to disease:
  • There is a 50% risk of 25% basal area loss from insect and disease
  • Only 2.3% of the non-wilderness, non-roadless base has burned since 1980
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Percent Change in Forest Growth, Removal, and Mortality 1991-2016

22

Year Net growth Removals Mortality 1991 728,705 333,015 189,614 1996 793,597 247,041 274,016 2006 597,709 245,735 374,967 2011 417,388 257,803 612,835 2016 441,238 230,262 616,491 Percent Change

  • 39%
  • 31%

225% Year Net growth Removals Mortality 1991 607,168 258,529 182,289 1996 560,727 170,735 272,818 2006 469,731 197,889 386,900 2011 254,712 90,411 558,466 2016 54,778 102,171 662,369 Percent Change

  • 91%
  • 60%

263%

Idaho Montana

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Forest Health

Mortality is reducing the growth of the existing timber resource in Idaho and Montana over the last ten years.

23

Idaho Montana

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2019/national/gone-in-a-generation/ forest-climate-change.html?utm_term=.3f4e862dafc6#forest. Published January 29, 2019.

“Montana is one of six states in the West where trees have been emitting carbon in the past decade or so, according to an analysis by David Cleaves, former climate change adviser to the chief of the U.S. Forest Service.” “The other states are Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, Utah and Wyoming. Four of these states’ forests have flipped in recent years to become carbon emitters— with Montana showing the biggest changes of all.” “Between 2000 and 2015, 14 million acres were damaged by beetles and other pests or diseases, more than half of the state’s total forested area.”

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

0.00% 0.50% 1.00% 1.50% 2.00% 2.50% 3.00% 3.50% 4.00% 4.50% 5.00% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Idaho, Net Growth as % of BF Volume by Ownership USFS BLM State Private

  • 1.00%
  • 0.50%

0.00% 0.50% 1.00% 1.50% 2.00% 2.50% 3.00% 3.50% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Montana Net Growth as % of BF Volume by Ownership USFS BLM State Private

Created from FIA data

The negative percentages mean that mortality is exceeding growth.

Forest Health

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

  • 3%
  • 2%
  • 1%

0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% Montana, Net Growth as % of BF Volume by National Forest

Private Lands Beaverhead Bitterroot Flathead Kootenai Lolo

Forest Health

  • 3%
  • 2%
  • 1%

0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% Idaho, Net Growth as % of BF Volume by National Forest

Private Lands Panhandle Clearwater Nez Perce Boise Payette

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Forest Health

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

Forest Health Summary

Why do we care about Mortality?

  • Reduced timber supply
  • Depleted carbon sequestration capacity
  • Increased risk of catastrophic fire, smoke, and

carbon emissions

  • Degraded water quality, reduced water supply,

and increased erosion

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Transformation

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Collaboration

Diverse stakeholder groups (tribes, industry, conservation, recreation, local government) using science to build consensus and take on forest projects that support economic, restoration, and conservation goals on priority landscapes.

30

Idaho has 10 forest collaboratives that participate in the Idaho Forest Restoration Partnership Montana has 14 forest collaboratives, that participate in the Montana Forest Collaboration Network.

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

Collaboration: Case Study

Clearwater Basin Collaborative

  • Supported the development of science to guide forest restoration that

recognizes current forest conditions are significantly departed from natural ranges of variation. The science enabled consensus amongst the CBC.

  • With the support of the CBC, the forest has more than tripled it’s annual

timber sold volume since 2008, from about 35 MMBF to 120 MMBF a year.

  • The CBC was awarded the USDA’s “Abraham Lincoln” award in 2015 for

“thoughtful and deliberative problem solving that resulted in accelerated restoration and ecological, social and economic benefits for the citizens of north-central Idaho”.

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

Collaboration: Case Study

  • 2.00
  • 1.50
  • 1.00
  • 0.50

0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Net Growth as % of BF Volume on Timberland, by National Forest (Idaho)

Clearwater Idaho Panhandle Nez Perce Boise Payette

Since the formation of the CBC, growth rates on the Clearwater National Forest have increased the most of any forest studied (+.77%) and mortality on the Nez Perce has slowed.

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Good Neighbor Authority

33

  • GNA enables the Forest Service to partner

with the states to increase the pace and scale of forest and watershed restoration activities on federal forests.

  • Designed to be self-funding over time,

through timber sale revenue which will lead to increased restoration and management in the forest.

  • Allows knowledge sharing between state

and federal agencies.

GNA Snapshot

Idaho Montana

Projects with Timber Removal Completed or In-Progress 2016-2023 14 17 Projects without Timber Removal Completed or In-Progress 2016-2023 29 N/A Estimated Acres Treated by 2023 13,568 10,934 Estimated Harvest Volume by 2023 (MBF) 113,058 68,599

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Good Neighbor Authority

34

Note: Map current as of 2-25-19. Project status changes frequently.

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Shared Stewardship

“Shared stewardship simply means we share decision space with states, partners and tribes. Together we choose the right tools, the right places and the appropriate scale to invest our resources. We jointly set priorities that incorporate each other’s knowledge, skills and personnel.” – Vicki Christiansen Chief, US Forest Service

35

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Shared Stewardship

36

In action, means:

  • A sense of interdependence

and shared responsibility

  • Outcomes based investment

strategies

  • Working across
  • wnerships/boundaries
  • Recognition of a need to

increase treatment areas (active management)

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Active Management

slide-38
SLIDE 38

38

Active Management

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000

Total Idaho & Montana National Forest Sold Volume (MMBF) vs. Allowable Sale Quantity (ASQ) 1990-2023

Volume Sold (MMBF), Idaho and Montana ASQ Idaho and Montana

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Idaho National Forest Suitable Acres Managed 2010-2018

39

*Total Suitable Acres: 4,202,010 *Fuels Treatment: mechanical removal (non-commercial harvest), prescribed fire, and naturally occurring wildfire deemed beneficial to the landscape.

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Wildfire Acres Deemed Beneficial 16,870 69,140 23,206 155,528 36,905 76,032 146,768 172,739 141,612 Commercial Harvest Acres 3,887 6,244 10,536 8,813 9,542 7,090 6,036 9,489 16,580 Mechanical Fuels Treatment Acres 26,855 17,737 11,636 17,855 12,778 13,702 13,754 17,041 22,198 RX Fire Acres Treated 26,522 30,393 31,179 16,785 29,236 23,475 26,597 13,017 25,701

  • 50,000

100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000

Acres Treated

*

On average,

1.2%

  • f Idaho’s

suitable acres are treated each year

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Idaho National Forest Region Comparison Acres Managed 2010-2018

13% 9% 7% 71% Total Acres Managed between 2010-2018 ID Region 1 Total Acres: 461,802

RX Fire Acres Treated Mechanical Fuels Treatment Acres Commercial Harvest Acres Wildfire Acres Deemed Beneficial

40

20% 14% 5% 61% Total Acres Managed between 2010-2018 ID Region 4 Total Acres: 831,676

RX Fire Acres Treated Mechanical Fuels Treatment Acres Commercial Harvest Acres Wildfire Acres Deemed Beneficial

Total Idaho acres managed (region 1 & 4): 1,293,478

slide-41
SLIDE 41

On average,

0.5%

  • f Montana’s

suitable acres are treated each year

Montana National Forest Suitable Acres Managed 2010-2018

41

* Total Suitable Acres: 5,539,703 * Fuels Treatment: mechanical removal (non-commercial harvest), prescribed fire, and naturally occurring wildfire deemed beneficial to the landscape.

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Wildfire Acres Deemed Beneficial 8,283 29,151 25,522 55,918 45,078 147,591 46,932 142,246 50,993 Commercial Harvest Acres 12,884 9,845 9,997 12,436 10,684 8,014 7,980 6,094 10,132 Mechanical Fuels Treatment Acres 25,312 14,709 11,851 12,237 15,865 12,137 13,148 13,642 16,126 RX Fire Acres Treated 15,689 30,520 19,914 15,222 16,520 18,620 13,373 12,894 21,892

  • 20,000

40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 140,000 160,000 180,000 200,000

Acres Treated

*

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Montana National Forest Region Comparison Acres Managed 2010-2018

18% 14% 9% 59% Total Acres Managed between 2010-2018 Total Acres: 939,451

RX Fire Acres Treated Mechanical Fuels Treatment Acres Commercial Harvest Acres Wildfire Acres Deemed Beneficial

42

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Summary

slide-44
SLIDE 44

44

Desired Results

To increase the pace and scale of treatment on national forests, Idaho will need to commit resources to increasing activity as outlined in the Shared Stewardship agreement signed in December 2018.

Status Quo

Treating the forests at our current pace, it will take ~121 years to treat Idaho’s 6.1 million acres at risk.

MOU 1.0

Treating the forests by

  • nly doubling the

current pace of commercial harvest, it will take ~103 years to treat Idaho’s 6.1 million acres at risk.

MOU 2.0

Treating the forests at double the current pace (commercial harvest & hazardous fuels treatments), it will take ~60 years to treat Idaho’s 6.1 million acres at risk.

slide-45
SLIDE 45

45

Desired Results

In Montana, a similar commitment could reduce the time needed to treat at-risk acres in half.

Treating the forests at our current pace, it will take ~114 years to treat Montana’s 4.9 million acres at risk. Treating the forests by only doubling the current pace of commercial harvest, it will take ~93 years to treat Montana’s 4.9 million acres at risk. Treating the forests at double the current pace (commercial harvest & hazardous fuels treatments), it will take ~57 years to treat Montana’s 4.9 million acres at risk.

slide-46
SLIDE 46

46

Desired Results

PURPOSE

  • Increased forest resilience and decreased catastrophic fire risk

PEOPLE

  • Greater collaboration between state and federal governments (cooperative

federalism) and stakeholders PROCESS

  • Continued focus on using new technology to collect data that will drive

forest management decisions

  • Increased sharing of data and science that can help government, private,

and industry land owners better manage their forestland PERFORMANCE

  • A measurable increase in the pace and scale of treatment on public lands
slide-47
SLIDE 47

Where did this data come from?

National Insect and Disease Risk Map (NIDRM) data is a collaborative process led by the Forest Health Monitoring program (FHM) and the USDA Forest Service that can be used to identify the potential impacts of pests and pathogens to forest ecosystems throughout the US for the time frame 2013-2027. Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) data helps determine how much forest exists, where it exists, who owns it and how it is changing. It has been collected since 1930. The total nationwide fire acres were found on the National interagency Fire Center (NIFC) website that houses the National Interagency Coordination Center (NICC) fire data yearly reports. These can be found at https://www.nifc.gov/fireInfo/fireInfo_statistics.html. The data on harvest came from USFS Cut and Sold Reports found at https://www.fs.fed.us/forestmanagement/products/cut-sold/index.shtml.

Thank You

Tom Schultz, VP of Government Affairs | tom.schultz@idfg.com