TRANSFORMATION Working together for an efficient, sustainable and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

transformation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

TRANSFORMATION Working together for an efficient, sustainable and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

KENTUCKY PUBLIC HEALTH TRANSFORMATION Working together for an efficient, sustainable and accountable public health system focused on producing better health outcomes for all Kentuckians. Angela T. Dearinger, MD, MPH Tricia Okeson, MPA 1


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Working together for an efficient, sustainable and accountable public health system focused on producing better health outcomes for all Kentuckians.

KENTUCKY PUBLIC HEALTH TRANSFORMATION

Angela T. Dearinger, MD, MPH Tricia Okeson, MPA

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Goals for Public Health Transformation

  • Relieve the fiscal instability of the current system
  • Introduce a simplified and focused PH model with clearly defined

priorities

  • Create accountability at all levels of the system
  • Improve Public Health leadership capacity at all levels
  • Prevent duplication of effort, and reduce waste internally and

externally

  • Support and emphasize data-driven decisions to best promote

community health outcomes

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

SIMPLIFY

3

FOCUS PRIORITIZE

slide-4
SLIDE 4

CHALLENGES

4

Fiscal Instability

  • 41 Local Health Departments representing 4 Districts are at risk for fiscal default in calendar year 2020.
  • Current fiscal analysis shows ~ $40M deficit in 2020.
  • Greatest deficits outside of CORE PH = clinical services.

1

slide-5
SLIDE 5 BALLARD

PURCHASE

CARLISLE GRAVES FULTON HICKMAN

LINCOLN TRAIL

CALLOWAY

PENNYRILE GREEN RIVER NORTH CENTRAL THREE RIVERS NORTHERN KENTUCKY BUFFALO TRACE WEDCO GATEWAY CUMBERLAND VALLEY LAKE CUMBERLAND BARREN RIVER KENTUCKY RIVER

LOCAL HEALTH DEPARTMENTS FY20 KERS Impact

Unrestricted Reserves

Months of Solvency: 0-12 months: 34% 13-24 months: 18%

41 22

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6 https://www.americashealthrankings.org/learn/reports/2018-annual- report/state-summaries-kentucky

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7 https://www.americashealthrankings.org/learn/reports/2018-annual- report/state-summaries-kentucky

slide-8
SLIDE 8

CHALLENGES

Fiscal Instability

  • Up 41 Local Health Departments representing 4 Districts are at risk for fiscal default in calendar year

2020.

  • Current fiscal analysis shows ~ $40M deficit in 2020.
  • Greatest deficits outside of CORE PH = clinical services.

Current Programmatic Services are not Reflective of Community PH Needs

  • Federal funding structure is a significant driver of this result.
  • PH system has not adjusted to post-ACA era PH approaches or programs.
  • Bureaucratic layering needs to be removed from the system to achieve operational efficiency

and effectiveness.

Legislative Issues

  • PH laws are disparate and voluminous  needs consolidation to be more functional.
  • Current statutes and regulations do not allow for proper operational restructuring.

Shared Governance

  • Hybrid structure of Public Health makes change difficult.
  • Greater support, structure, and education for LBOHs.
  • Lack of accountability at ALL levels.

4 3 2 1

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Programmatic Services Don’t Reflect Community Public Health Needs

  • Federal grant cycles and priorities
  • Local health departments must use local $$ to match or supplement

federal funds

  • May lead to duplication of effort/ waste of resources
  • Mismatch with community public health needs/ priorities
  • PH Transformation-Allow communities to:
  • Evaluate community assets
  • Define local health priorities

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

CHALLENGES

Fiscal Instability

  • Up 41 Local Health Departments representing 4 Districts are at risk for fiscal default in calendar year

2020.

  • Current fiscal analysis shows ~ $40M deficit in 2020.
  • Greatest deficits outside of CORE PH = clinical services.

Current Programmatic Services are not Reflective of Community PH Needs

  • Federal funding structure is a significant driver of this result.
  • PH system has not adjusted to post-ACA era PH approaches or programs.
  • Bureaucratic layering needs to be removed from the system to achieve operational efficiency

and effectiveness.

Legislative Issues

  • PH laws are disparate and voluminous  needs consolidation to be more functional.
  • Current statutes and regulations do not allow for proper operational restructuring.

Shared Governance

  • Hybrid structure of Public Health makes change difficult.
  • Greater support, structure, and education for LBOHs.
  • Lack of accountability at ALL levels.

4 3 2 1

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

CORE PUBLIC HEALTH

FOUNDATIONAL PUBLIC HEALTH

Five focus areas with statutory and regulatory defined services:

  • 1. Population Health
  • 2. Enforcement of Regulation
  • 3. Emergency Preparedness &

Response

  • 4. Communicable disease

control

  • 5. Administrative and
  • rganizational infrastructure

Community Health Assessment

WIC HANDS

HARM REDUCTION & SUD

11

  • Available to

every KY citizen.

  • ‘Do or Assure’
  • Community

partners can

  • ffer these on

the LHD’s behalf.

  • Must agree

that these programs are the first priority.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

CORE PUBLIC HEALTH

FOUNDATIONAL PUBLIC HEALTH

Five focus areas with statutory and regulatory defined services:

  • 1. Population Health
  • 2. Enforcement of Regulation
  • 3. Emergency Preparedness &

Response

  • 4. Communicable disease

control

  • 5. Administrative and
  • rganizational infrastructure

Community Health Assessment

WIC HANDS

HARM REDUCTION & SUD

Local Public Health Priorities

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Local Health Assessment Environmental scan

Local PH Priorities

Is someone already meeting this need or could someone meet this need?

YES Support and complement NO

Review “package” and submit plan with needs, justification, funding, monitoring, goals and exit strategy to the PH Advisory Board

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Commissioner of Public Health KHDA President KALBOH President

University Representative rotated

  • n a 2 year cycle

(UK/UL/EKU/WKU)

  • The PH Council will review evidence-based and best practices to develop PH

Service Packages and make them available to every LHD.

  • The Council will also review local priorities with plans as described.
  • The Council may request revision, clarification, approve or deny submitted

plans.

Accountability and Transparency

14

KPHA President

slide-15
SLIDE 15

FIVE COMPONENTS OF LOCAL HEALTH PRIORITY REVIEW

 Data-driven need  Evidence-based solution (program or service)  Adequate funding identified  Performance and quality management plan  Exit strategy

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

May 2018 Jan. 2019 Jan. 2020 Jan. 2021 Jan. 2022 Planning and Preparation Legislative Initiatives Statewide Implementation

TIMELINE

July 1, 2019

slide-18
SLIDE 18

CORE PUBLIC HEALTH

FOUNDATIONAL PUBLIC HEALTH

Five focus areas with statutory and regulatory defined services:

  • 1. Population Health
  • 2. Enforcement of Regulation
  • 3. Emergency Preparedness &

Response

  • 4. Communicable disease

control

  • 5. Administrative and
  • rganizational infrastructure

Community Health Assessment

WIC HANDS

HARM REDUCTION & SUD

Local Public Health Priorities

18