Whole School Reform in Support of High School Transformation: An Overview of the Research The Impact of ISA’s Whole School Reform Approach
- n Student Achievement: A Review of the Evidence
Transformation: An Overview of the Research The Impact of ISAs Whole - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Evidence-based Whole School Reform for High Schools: The Truth is Out There Whole School Reform in Support of High School Transformation: An Overview of the Research The Impact of ISAs Whole School Reform Approach on Student Achievement: A
Sources: Fancsali, C. & Bat-Chava, Y. (2010). Findings from the Institute for Student Achievement outcome evaluation final report. New York: Academy for Educational Development. Retrieved from https://www.studentachievement.org/wp-content/uploads/AED_06242010_6-yr-final.pdf Fancsali, C., Snipes, J., Zhang, Y., Stoker, G., Ortiz, L., Orellana, E. (2012). ISA outcome study final report. IMPAQ International LLC. Retrieved from https://www.studentachievement.org/wp-content/uploads/whole_school_reform_in_high_schools.pdf Bloom, H. S., Levy Thompson, S. & Unterman, R. (2010) Transforming the high school experience: How New York City’s small schools are boosting student achievement and graduation rates. New York: MDRC. Retrieved from https://www.mdrc.org/sites/default/files/full_589.pdf
Allensworth, E. (2005). Graduation and dropout trends in Chicago: A look at cohorts of students from 1991 through 2004, Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research. Roderick, M., Nagaoka, J., Coca, V., Moeller, E.; with Roddie, K., Gilliam, J., & Patton, D. (2008). From high school to the future: Potholes on the road to college. Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research. Easton, J.Q., Johnson, E., & Sartain, L. (2017) The predictive power of ninth-grade GPA. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Consortium on School Research.
*Differences are statistically significant at the p =.01 level
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
Percentage of students
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
Percentage of students
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
Percentage of Days Attended
*Difference is statistically significant at the p =.00 level
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
Percentage of students
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 12th Grade 11th Grade 10th Grade
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 12th Grade 11th Grade 10th Grade
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 12th Grade 11th Grade 10th Grade
*Differences are statistically significant at the p <.05 level or less
*Differences are statistically significant at the p = .05 level or less
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Promoted to 11th grade Promoted to 12th grade
*Differences are statistically significant at the p ≤. 001 level
10 20 30 40 50 Credits Attempted Credits Earned Core Subject Credits Failed Number of Credits
Differences are statistically significant at the p = .000
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
Differences are statistically significant at the p = .02 level
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Graduated Dropped out Percentage of Students
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% ISA National National: Black & Latino Percentage of Students
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Enrolled in Four Year College Enrolled in Two-Year College Percentage of Students
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Class of 2007 Class of 2008 Percentage of Students