TOWN HALL MEETING A meeting to discuss the status of the A meeting - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

town hall meeting
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

TOWN HALL MEETING A meeting to discuss the status of the A meeting - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TOWN HALL MEETING A meeting to discuss the status of the A meeting to discuss the status of the Kansas City Metropolitan School District and next steps Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Fourth Cycle Classification


slide-1
SLIDE 1

TOWN HALL MEETING

A meeting to discuss the status of the A meeting to discuss the status of the Kansas City Metropolitan School District and next steps

Missouri Department

  • f Elementary and Secondary Education
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Fourth Cycle Classification Schedule Fourth Cycle Classification Schedule

Previous Cycles Fourth Cycle

2

Previous Cycles Fourth Cycle

Classification Year: Fourth Cycle:

A l P f R t Performance + Resource Annual Performance Report ↓ Determines Review Type ↓ + Process (Review) = ↓ Review (Process + Resource) ↓ Accreditation Regional School Improvement Team ↓ Performance = Accreditation

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Fourth Cycle Accreditation Levels

3

K-12 Districts K-8 Districts Unaccredited 0 5 Mets 0 3 Mets Unaccredited 0-5 Mets 0-3 Mets Provisional 6-8 Mets 4 Mets A dit d 9 14 M t 5 7 M t Accredited 9-14 Mets 5-7 Mets

A district must meet at least one MAP standard to be provisionally accredited

slide-4
SLIDE 4

History of KCMSD Accreditation

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

yvutsronmlihfedcaYUTSRPONMLKIFEDCA

1st Cycle MSIP 1990-1996

5

On-site Review – (Part 1) April 2-4, 1991

  • Classification:

AAA On-site Review – (Part 2) March 9-11, 1993 Concerns: Instructional climate Student achievement Graduation rate Teacher/administrator certification

  • Classification:
  • Classification:

Provisionally Accredited Provisionally Accredited

slide-6
SLIDE 6

yvutsronmlihfedcaYUTSRPONMLKIFEDCA

2nd Cycle MSIP 1996-2001

6

On-site Technical Assistance Review – December 9-11, 1997 Concerns: Student Performance, Comprehensive School Improvement Plan, Professional Development, Instability in leadership On-site Review – January 12-14, 1999 Concerns: Course offerings and teacher certification Governance and Administration f 11 P f St d d M t 0 of 11 Performance Standards Met

  • Classification:

Unaccredited – effective May 1, 2000 Re-Review – January 22-23 , 2002 Continued Concern: Teacher certification, governance and administration noted as making progress continued areas of concern 4 of 11 Performance Standards Met

  • Classification:

Classification: Provisionally Accredited Provisionally Accredited

slide-7
SLIDE 7

3rd Cycle MSIP 2001-2006

7

On-site Review – January 12-16, 2004 y , Concerns: Student achievement in grades 3-5, 6-8, 9-11, ACT, dropout rate and graduation rate and special education; Teacher Certification; LMC; state and federal IDEA Teacher Certification; LMC; state and federal IDEA compliance; safety regulations

  • Classification:

Provisionally Accredited

slide-8
SLIDE 8

3rd CYCLE DISTRICT SUMMARY OF ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT (APR) District Name: Kansas City 33 County District Code: 048078

8

Third Cycle MSIP Standards

 2001 (00-01) APR 64 performance points

(provisional)

 2002 (01-02) APR 64 performance points

(provisional)

 2003 (02-03) APR 111 overall/64 performance points

(provisional)

 2004 (03-04) APR 55 performance points

(provisional)

 2005 (04-05) APR 64 performance points

(provisional)

3rd Cycle ( K-12) Overall Minimum from Performance Accredited >106 >66 Provisionally Accredited >83 >46 (9 pts must be earned in one of the MAP grade spans or reading levels) Unaccredited <83 <46 (or no points earned in MAP grade spans

  • r reading levels)
slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

4th Cycle MSIP 2006-present

Scheduled Classification Year: 2008-2009

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Performance Findings - 2007

10

Standard Concern 3-5 Math

Student Achievement - not high and not showing sufficient improvement Student Achievement - not high and not showing sufficient improvement

3-5 CA

Student Achievement - not high and not showing sufficient improvement

6-8 Math 6-8 CA

Student Achievement - not high and not showing sufficient improvement

9-11 Math

Student Achievement - not high and not showing sufficient improvement

9 11 CA

Student Achievement not high and not showing sufficient improvement

9-11 CA

Student Achievement - not high and not showing sufficient improvement

ACT

Percent scoring above national average - not high and not showing sufficient improvement

  • Adv. Courses

Status of percent of students taking courses is average, below average, or declining

CTE Courses

Status of percent of students taking courses is average, below average, or declining

  • Postsec. Ed.

Percent enrolled in postsecondary education - not high and not showing sufficient improvement

  • Grad. Rate

Status is average, below average, or declining g g g

Subgroup

District’s AYP subgroup achievement - not high and not showing sufficient improvement

Data

Corrections needed for CTE completers and attendance

slide-11
SLIDE 11

On-site Review April 28 – May 1 and May 5-6 2008 April 28 May 1 and May 5 6, 2008

11

  • Team of 235

Team of 235

  • Visited 65 sites
  • C

d Conduct ted d

  • 1,821 classroom observations
  • 187 Individual staff interviews
  • 88 T

88 Teach her f focus groups

  • 91 Student focus groups
  • 1 Parent focus group
  • Reviewed
  • Advance Questionnaire Results

Di t i t R t St d d

  • District Response to Standards
  • District Documentation
slide-12
SLIDE 12

MSIP Review Team Findings

12

1) 1) Stability of District Level Leadership

Stability of District Level Leadership

2) Role of the Local Board of Education 3) 3) Curriculum K 12

Curriculum K-12

4) Academic Rigor 5) S f

d O d l E i Safe and Orderly Environment

6) Professional Development 7) Federal Programs Compliance 8) Program Evaluation

(Review Date: April 28-May 1, 5-6, 2008)

slide-13
SLIDE 13
  • t

et

  • t

et

  • t

et

  • t

et

  • t

et

  • t

et

  • 13

4th CYCLE DISTRICT SUMMARY OF ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT (APR)

District Name: Kansas City 33 County District Code: 048078 MSIP Standard/Indicator

2006 Met/Not Met 2007 Met/Not Met 2008 Met/Not Met 2009 Met/Not Met 2010 Met/Not Met 2011 Met/Not Met

MSIP Standard/Indicator

et/ et/ et/ et/ et/ et/ 9.1*1 MAP Grades 3-5 Math

Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met

9.1*2 MAP Grades 3-5 CA

Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met

9 1*3 MAP Grades 6 8 Mathematics

Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met

9.1 3 MAP Grades 6-8 Mathematics

Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met

9.1*4 MAP Grades 6-8 CA

Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met

9.1*5 MAP Grades 9-11 Mathematics

Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met

9 1*6 MAP Grades 9-11 CA

Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met

9.1 6 MAP Grades 9 11 CA

Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met

Bonus MAP Achievement

N/A Met Met Met Met Not Met

Subject Area/EOC Bonus

Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met

9 3 ACT

Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met

9.3 ACT

Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met

9.4*1 Advanced Courses

Met Met Met Met Met Met

9.4*2 Career Education Courses

Met Met Met Met Met Met

9.4*3 College Placement

Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met

9.4 3 College Placement

Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met

9.4*4 Career Education Placement

Not Met Met Met Met Met Met

9.5 Graduation Rate

Not Met Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met

9 6 Attendance Rate

Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met

9.6 Attendance Rate

Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met

9.7 Subgroup Achievement

Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met

Total Standards Met

3 5 4 4 4 3

slide-14
SLIDE 14

State Law

14

2 Prior to or at the time any school district in this state

  • 2. Prior to or at the time any school district in this state

shall lapse, but after the school district has been classified as unaccredited, the department of elementary and secondary education shall conduct a public hearing at a location in the unaccredited school district The purpose of the hearing shall be to:

  • district. The purpose of the hearing shall be to:

(1) Review any plan by the district to return to accredited status; or status; or (2) Offer any technical assistance that can be provided to the district.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

State Law (cont.) )

15

  • 3. Except as otherwise p

provided in section 162.1100…the state board of education may appoint a special administrative board to supervise h fi i l i i i d h the financial operations, maintain and preserve the financial assets or, if warranted, continue operation

  • f the educational programs within the district or
  • f the educational programs within the district or

what provisions might otherwise be made in the best interest of the education of the children of the district.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

State Monitoring and Assistance Team

16

 What should be the role of this Team and what  What should be the role of this Team and what

responsibilities should they have?

 What are the desirable characteristics of the

people who serve on this Team? people who serve on this Team?

 Do you have any other suggestions?

Do you have any other suggestions?

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Questions?

17