TOWN HALL MEETING
A meeting to discuss the status of the A meeting to discuss the status of the Kansas City Metropolitan School District and next steps
Missouri Department
- f Elementary and Secondary Education
TOWN HALL MEETING A meeting to discuss the status of the A meeting - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
TOWN HALL MEETING A meeting to discuss the status of the A meeting to discuss the status of the Kansas City Metropolitan School District and next steps Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Fourth Cycle Classification
2
3
A district must meet at least one MAP standard to be provisionally accredited
4
yvutsronmlihfedcaYUTSRPONMLKIFEDCA
5
On-site Review – (Part 1) April 2-4, 1991
AAA On-site Review – (Part 2) March 9-11, 1993 Concerns: Instructional climate Student achievement Graduation rate Teacher/administrator certification
Provisionally Accredited Provisionally Accredited
yvutsronmlihfedcaYUTSRPONMLKIFEDCA
6
On-site Technical Assistance Review – December 9-11, 1997 Concerns: Student Performance, Comprehensive School Improvement Plan, Professional Development, Instability in leadership On-site Review – January 12-14, 1999 Concerns: Course offerings and teacher certification Governance and Administration f 11 P f St d d M t 0 of 11 Performance Standards Met
Unaccredited – effective May 1, 2000 Re-Review – January 22-23 , 2002 Continued Concern: Teacher certification, governance and administration noted as making progress continued areas of concern 4 of 11 Performance Standards Met
Classification: Provisionally Accredited Provisionally Accredited
7
On-site Review – January 12-16, 2004 y , Concerns: Student achievement in grades 3-5, 6-8, 9-11, ACT, dropout rate and graduation rate and special education; Teacher Certification; LMC; state and federal IDEA Teacher Certification; LMC; state and federal IDEA compliance; safety regulations
Provisionally Accredited
3rd CYCLE DISTRICT SUMMARY OF ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT (APR) District Name: Kansas City 33 County District Code: 048078
8
Third Cycle MSIP Standards
2001 (00-01) APR 64 performance points
(provisional)
2002 (01-02) APR 64 performance points
(provisional)
2003 (02-03) APR 111 overall/64 performance points
(provisional)
2004 (03-04) APR 55 performance points
(provisional)
2005 (04-05) APR 64 performance points
(provisional)
3rd Cycle ( K-12) Overall Minimum from Performance Accredited >106 >66 Provisionally Accredited >83 >46 (9 pts must be earned in one of the MAP grade spans or reading levels) Unaccredited <83 <46 (or no points earned in MAP grade spans
9
Scheduled Classification Year: 2008-2009
10
Standard Concern 3-5 Math
Student Achievement - not high and not showing sufficient improvement Student Achievement - not high and not showing sufficient improvement
3-5 CA
Student Achievement - not high and not showing sufficient improvement
6-8 Math 6-8 CA
Student Achievement - not high and not showing sufficient improvement
9-11 Math
Student Achievement - not high and not showing sufficient improvement
9 11 CA
Student Achievement not high and not showing sufficient improvement
9-11 CA
Student Achievement - not high and not showing sufficient improvement
ACT
Percent scoring above national average - not high and not showing sufficient improvement
Status of percent of students taking courses is average, below average, or declining
CTE Courses
Status of percent of students taking courses is average, below average, or declining
Percent enrolled in postsecondary education - not high and not showing sufficient improvement
Status is average, below average, or declining g g g
Subgroup
District’s AYP subgroup achievement - not high and not showing sufficient improvement
Data
Corrections needed for CTE completers and attendance
11
88 Teach her f focus groups
Di t i t R t St d d
12
1) 1) Stability of District Level Leadership
2) Role of the Local Board of Education 3) 3) Curriculum K 12
4) Academic Rigor 5) S f
6) Professional Development 7) Federal Programs Compliance 8) Program Evaluation
(Review Date: April 28-May 1, 5-6, 2008)
et
et
et
et
et
et
4th CYCLE DISTRICT SUMMARY OF ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT (APR)
District Name: Kansas City 33 County District Code: 048078 MSIP Standard/Indicator
2006 Met/Not Met 2007 Met/Not Met 2008 Met/Not Met 2009 Met/Not Met 2010 Met/Not Met 2011 Met/Not Met
MSIP Standard/Indicator
et/ et/ et/ et/ et/ et/ 9.1*1 MAP Grades 3-5 Math
Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met
9.1*2 MAP Grades 3-5 CA
Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met
9 1*3 MAP Grades 6 8 Mathematics
Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met
9.1 3 MAP Grades 6-8 Mathematics
Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met
9.1*4 MAP Grades 6-8 CA
Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met
9.1*5 MAP Grades 9-11 Mathematics
Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met
9 1*6 MAP Grades 9-11 CA
Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met
9.1 6 MAP Grades 9 11 CA
Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met
Bonus MAP Achievement
N/A Met Met Met Met Not Met
Subject Area/EOC Bonus
Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met
9 3 ACT
Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met
9.3 ACT
Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met
9.4*1 Advanced Courses
Met Met Met Met Met Met
9.4*2 Career Education Courses
Met Met Met Met Met Met
9.4*3 College Placement
Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met
9.4 3 College Placement
Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met
9.4*4 Career Education Placement
Not Met Met Met Met Met Met
9.5 Graduation Rate
Not Met Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met
9 6 Attendance Rate
Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met
9.6 Attendance Rate
Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met
9.7 Subgroup Achievement
Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met
Total Standards Met
3 5 4 4 4 3
14
15
16
What should be the role of this Team and what What should be the role of this Team and what
What are the desirable characteristics of the
Do you have any other suggestions?
17