1 Wils Wils lsdorf lsdorf dorf Hall dorf Hall Hall Hall Wils - - PDF document

▶
1
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

1 Wils Wils lsdorf lsdorf dorf Hall dorf Hall Hall Hall Wils - - PDF document

Dec 17, 2023 281 likes •349 views

Wils Wils lsdorf lsdorf dorf Hall dorf Hall Hall Hall Wilsd Wilsdorf Wilsdorf Wilsd rf Hall rf Hall Hall Hall --- Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building --- Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology

slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

Wilsd Wilsdorf rf Hall Hall Wilsd Wilsdorf rf Hall Hall

Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building University of Virginia University of Virginia Leaha Martynuska Leaha Martynuska Construction Management Option Construction Management Option Senior Thesis 2005 Senior Thesis 2005 The Pennsylvania State University The Pennsylvania State University Department of Architectural Engineering Department of Architectural Engineering Wils lsdorf dorf Hall Hall Wils lsdorf dorf Hall Hall

  • -- Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building

Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building

University of Virginia University of Virginia Leaha Martynuska Leaha Martynuska

Construction Management Option Construction Management Option Senior Thesis 2005 Senior Thesis 2005

Agenda Agenda

  • Questions

Questions

  • Project

Project Overview Overview

  • CM In

CM In-

  • House

House Building Building Commissioning Commissioning

  • Virtual MEP

Virtual MEP Coordination Coordination Underpinning Underpinning

Constructability Constructability

Review Review

Agenda

Project Overview Depth Analysis: CM In-House Building Commissioning Breadth Analysis: Virtual MEP Coordination Breadth Analysis: Underpinning Constructability Review

Wils lsdorf dorf Hall Hall Wils lsdorf dorf Hall Hall

  • -- Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building

Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building

University of Virginia University of Virginia Leaha Martynuska Leaha Martynuska

Construction Management Option Construction Management Option Senior Thesis 2005 Senior Thesis 2005

Agenda Agenda

  • Questions

Questions

  • Project

Project Overview Overview

  • CM In

CM In-

  • House

House Building Building Commissioning Commissioning

  • Virtual MEP

Virtual MEP Coordination Coordination Underpinning Underpinning

Constructability Constructability

Review Review

Project Overview

Location: University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA Building Occupant: UVA School of Engineering and

Applied Science

Building Function:

  • -- Nanotechnology Laboratories
  • -- Faculty Offices
  • -- Conference Rooms
  • -- Computer Labs and work-study areas

Size: 80,000 gsf Cost: $28,000,000

$350.00 / s.f.

Wils lsdorf dorf Hall Hall Wils lsdorf dorf Hall Hall

  • -- Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building

Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building

University of Virginia University of Virginia Leaha Martynuska Leaha Martynuska

Construction Management Option Construction Management Option Senior Thesis 2005 Senior Thesis 2005

Agenda Agenda

  • Questions

Questions

  • Project

Project Overview Overview

  • CM In

CM In-

  • House

House Building Building Commissioning Commissioning

  • Virtual MEP

Virtual MEP Coordination Coordination Underpinning Underpinning

Constructability Constructability

Review Review

Project Overview

Project Delivery Method: Owner’s Agent Building Features:

  • -- Physically Joins Existing Material Science &

Chemistry Buildings

  • -- two floor atrium, café, and courtyard

Dates of Construction:

  • -- Start Date: June 2003
  • -- Anticipated Completion: March 2006
  • -- Underpinning Failure Delay: 2 months
  • -- Current anticipated completion: May 2006

Wils lsdorf dorf Hall Hall Wils lsdorf dorf Hall Hall

  • -- Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building

Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building

University of Virginia University of Virginia Leaha Martynuska Leaha Martynuska

Construction Management Option Construction Management Option Senior Thesis 2005 Senior Thesis 2005

Agenda Agenda

  • Questions

Questions

  • Project

Project Overview Overview

  • CM In

CM In-

  • House

House Building Building Commissioning Commissioning

  • Virtual MEP

Virtual MEP Coordination Coordination Underpinning Underpinning

Constructability Constructability

Review Review

Construction Features:

  • -- Five total levels, three above grade
  • -- 300ft permanent retaining wall
  • -- Extensive vibration control in sub-basement
  • -- 5 individually ducted fume hoods
  • -- Structural Steel Frame with cast in place concrete slabs
  • -- Brick and architectural pre-cast concrete facade

Project Team:

  • -- Construction Manager: Barton Malow
  • -- Architect: VMDO Architects, P.C.
  • -- Owner: University of Virginia
  • -- Mechanical/Electrical Engr.: BR+A Consulting Engrs
  • -- Structural Engineer: Fox and Associates

Project Overview Wils lsdorf dorf Hall Hall Wils lsdorf dorf Hall Hall

  • -- Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building

Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building

University of Virginia University of Virginia Leaha Martynuska Leaha Martynuska

Construction Management Option Construction Management Option Senior Thesis 2005 Senior Thesis 2005

Agenda Agenda

  • Questions

Questions

  • Project

Project Overview Overview

  • CM In

CM In-

  • House

House Building Building Commissioning Commissioning

  • Virtual MEP

Virtual MEP Coordination Coordination Underpinning Underpinning

Constructability Constructability

Review Review

Site Plan

Chemistry Addition Albert Small Bldg Mat Sci Chemistry Building Chem E MECH ENG Mechanical Engineering Bldg ` N Key
  • ------ Construction Fence
  • - - Building Footprint
New Pedestrian Route Primary Road Access Seconda ry Road Access Temporary Transforme rs Site Trailers Site Storag e Pump Truck Dumpste r Dumpst er Chemistry Addition Albert Small Bldg Mat Sci Chemistry Building Chem E MECH ENG Mechanical Engineering Bldg ` N ` N Key
  • ------ Construction Fence
  • - - Building Footprint
New Pedestrian Route Primary Road Access Seconda ry Road Access Temporary Transforme rs Site Trailers Site Storag e Pump Truck Dumpste r Dumpste r Dumpst er Dumpst er
  • -- Underpinning Required
  • -- Relocation of Chilled Water Lines
  • -- Traffic redirection
slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Wils lsdorf dorf Hall Hall Wils lsdorf dorf Hall Hall

  • -- Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building

Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building

University of Virginia University of Virginia Leaha Martynuska Leaha Martynuska

Construction Management Option Construction Management Option Senior Thesis 2005 Senior Thesis 2005

Agenda Agenda

  • Questions

Questions

  • Project

Project Overview Overview

  • CM In

CM In-

  • House

House Building Building Commissioning Commissioning

  • Virtual MEP

Virtual MEP Coordination Coordination Underpinning Underpinning

Constructability Constructability

Review Review

CM In-House Building Commissioning

Proposal: A CM is qualified to perform in-house building

commissioning vs. hiring a 3rd party commissioning agent

Methods:

  • -- Research Case Studies
  • -- Interview Industry Professionals

Results:

  • -- Benefits of CM In-House Building Commissioning
  • -- CM In-House commissioning department set-up guidelines
  • -- CM In-House Commissioning Plan

Wils lsdorf dorf Hall Hall Wils lsdorf dorf Hall Hall

  • -- Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building

Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building

University of Virginia University of Virginia Leaha Martynuska Leaha Martynuska

Construction Management Option Construction Management Option Senior Thesis 2005 Senior Thesis 2005

Agenda Agenda

  • Questions

Questions

  • Project

Project Overview Overview

  • CM In

CM In-

  • House

House Building Building Commissioning Commissioning

  • Virtual MEP

Virtual MEP Coordination Coordination Underpinning Underpinning

Constructability Constructability

Review Review

Commissioning

Less than 1.0% - 1.5% of Electrical System Cost Electrical Systems Commissioning Less than 1.5% - 2.5% of Mechanical System Cost HVAC and Automated Controls System Commissioning Less than 0.5% - 1.5% of Total Construction Cost Building Commissioning (HVAC, Controls, Electrical) Cost Commissioning

“The basic purpose of building commissioning is to provide documented confirmation that building systems function in compliance with criteria set forth in the Project Documents to satisfy the Owner’s operational needs”

Average Commissioning Costs:

Commissioning Ensures a Building is:

  • -- Designed
  • -- Tested
  • -- Installed
  • -- Started

Wils lsdorf dorf Hall Hall Wils lsdorf dorf Hall Hall

  • -- Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building

Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building

University of Virginia University of Virginia Leaha Martynuska Leaha Martynuska

Construction Management Option Construction Management Option Senior Thesis 2005 Senior Thesis 2005

Agenda Agenda

  • Questions

Questions

  • Project

Project Overview Overview

  • CM In

CM In-

  • House

House Building Building Commissioning Commissioning

  • Virtual MEP

Virtual MEP Coordination Coordination Underpinning Underpinning

Constructability Constructability

Review Review

Commissioning

All systems must be commissioned because all are integrated and a deficiency in one may result in the performance or failure of another.

Commissioning Benefits:

  • Reduced energy use
  • Improved indoor air quality
  • Improved occupant comfort
  • Improved environmental conditions
  • Improved system and equipment function
  • Improved building operation and maintenance
  • Improved building productivity
  • Smoother building turnover
  • Better start-up documentation
  • Better operator training and Owner knowledge of their systems

Wils lsdorf dorf Hall Hall Wils lsdorf dorf Hall Hall

  • -- Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building

Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building

University of Virginia University of Virginia Leaha Martynuska Leaha Martynuska

Construction Management Option Construction Management Option Senior Thesis 2005 Senior Thesis 2005

Agenda Agenda

  • Questions

Questions

  • Project

Project Overview Overview

  • CM In

CM In-

  • House

House Building Building Commissioning Commissioning

  • Virtual MEP

Virtual MEP Coordination Coordination Underpinning Underpinning

Constructability Constructability

Review Review

Why Owners Commission

81% 80% 53% 41% 37% 25% Ensuring System Performance Potential Energy Savings Improve Client Satisfaction Utility Funding Research Improve Comfort

Wils lsdorf dorf Hall Hall Wils lsdorf dorf Hall Hall

  • -- Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building

Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building

University of Virginia University of Virginia Leaha Martynuska Leaha Martynuska

Construction Management Option Construction Management Option Senior Thesis 2005 Senior Thesis 2005

Agenda Agenda

  • Questions

Questions

  • Project

Project Overview Overview

  • CM In

CM In-

  • House

House Building Building Commissioning Commissioning

  • Virtual MEP

Virtual MEP Coordination Coordination Underpinning Underpinning

Constructability Constructability

Review Review

Benefits of In-House Building Commissioning

  • Understand the construction schedule
  • Risk involved ensures an excellent building

turnover

  • Provide services on all building systems, not just

controls

  • Qualified to gain LEED points
  • Extensive background on all building systems

Wils lsdorf dorf Hall Hall Wils lsdorf dorf Hall Hall

  • -- Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building

Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building

University of Virginia University of Virginia Leaha Martynuska Leaha Martynuska

Construction Management Option Construction Management Option Senior Thesis 2005 Senior Thesis 2005

Agenda Agenda

  • Questions

Questions

  • Project

Project Overview Overview

  • CM In

CM In-

  • House

House Building Building Commissioning Commissioning

  • Virtual MEP

Virtual MEP Coordination Coordination Underpinning Underpinning

Constructability Constructability

Review Review

In-House Commissioning Department set-up guidelines

  • Must remain a separate entity
  • Commissioning practices must be understood and

practiced properly

  • Members of the department must be certified

commissioning agents

  • Department must consist of staff specializing in

each building system

  • Organized plan must be followed
slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Wils lsdorf dorf Hall Hall Wils lsdorf dorf Hall Hall

  • -- Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building

Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building

University of Virginia University of Virginia Leaha Martynuska Leaha Martynuska

Construction Management Option Construction Management Option Senior Thesis 2005 Senior Thesis 2005

Agenda Agenda

  • Questions

Questions

  • Project

Project Overview Overview

  • CM In

CM In-

  • House

House Building Building Commissioning Commissioning

  • Virtual MEP

Virtual MEP Coordination Coordination Underpinning Underpinning

Constructability Constructability

Review Review

CM In-House Commissioning Plan

Task 1: Planning Phase

  • -- Develop Project Objectives
  • -- Choose Team
  • -- Develop Commissioning Schedule

Task 2: Submittal Review

  • -- Review system submittals

Task 3: Construction Inspections/Start-ups

  • -- Develop pre-functional tests and checklists
  • -- Inspections, site visits
  • -- Review and attend system start-ups and tests

Task 4: Functional Performance Tests

  • -- Coordinate FPT and test plans
  • -- Witness FPT
  • -- Document FPT Results

Task 5: O & M Manuals and Training Review

Wils lsdorf dorf Hall Hall Wils lsdorf dorf Hall Hall

  • -- Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building

Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building

University of Virginia University of Virginia Leaha Martynuska Leaha Martynuska

Construction Management Option Construction Management Option Senior Thesis 2005 Senior Thesis 2005

Agenda Agenda

  • Questions

Questions

  • Project

Project Overview Overview

  • CM In

CM In-

  • House

House Building Building Commissioning Commissioning

  • Virtual MEP

Virtual MEP Coordination Coordination Underpinning Underpinning

Constructability Constructability

Review Review

Virtual MEP Coordination

Methods:

  • -- Research Case Studies
  • -- Interview Industry Professionals

Results:

  • -- Advantages of 3D MEP Coordination
  • -- 3D MEP Coordination Process
  • -- 3D MEP Model Checklist
  • -- 3D Model Cost and Schedule Analysis
  • -- Problems with 3D MEP Coordination

Proposal: 3D models are more effective when

coordinating MEP systems than traditional coordination methods.

Wils lsdorf dorf Hall Hall Wils lsdorf dorf Hall Hall

  • -- Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building

Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building

University of Virginia University of Virginia Leaha Martynuska Leaha Martynuska

Construction Management Option Construction Management Option Senior Thesis 2005 Senior Thesis 2005

Agenda Agenda

  • Questions

Questions

  • Project

Project Overview Overview

  • CM In

CM In-

  • House

House Building Building Commissioning Commissioning

  • Virtual MEP

Virtual MEP Coordination Coordination Underpinning Underpinning

Constructability Constructability

Review Review

3D MEP Coordination

Provides in One Drawing:

  • -- Material Lists
  • -- Fabrication Drawings
  • -- Assembly Drawings
  • -- Construction/Scheduling Coordination

Wils lsdorf dorf Hall Hall Wils lsdorf dorf Hall Hall

  • -- Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building

Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building

University of Virginia University of Virginia Leaha Martynuska Leaha Martynuska

Construction Management Option Construction Management Option Senior Thesis 2005 Senior Thesis 2005

Agenda Agenda

  • Questions

Questions

  • Project

Project Overview Overview

  • CM In

CM In-

  • House

House Building Building Commissioning Commissioning

  • Virtual MEP

Virtual MEP Coordination Coordination Underpinning Underpinning

Constructability Constructability

Review Review

Advantages of 3D MEP Coordination

  • Problems can be solved in the early phases of design

And construction

  • Multiple coordination plans can be viewed before

selecting the most efficient

  • Navigation through the model is possible allowing errors to

be found

  • Plans can be tested before construction
  • Different views of the model can be seen

Wils lsdorf dorf Hall Hall Wils lsdorf dorf Hall Hall

  • -- Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building

Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building

University of Virginia University of Virginia Leaha Martynuska Leaha Martynuska

Construction Management Option Construction Management Option Senior Thesis 2005 Senior Thesis 2005

Agenda Agenda

  • Questions

Questions

  • Project

Project Overview Overview

  • CM In

CM In-

  • House

House Building Building Commissioning Commissioning

  • Virtual MEP

Virtual MEP Coordination Coordination Underpinning Underpinning

Constructability Constructability

Review Review

3D MEP Coordination Process

HVAC Subcontractor creates background for all
  • ther MEP Contractors
Mechanical Subcontractor adds HVAC system Plumbing Contractor adds plumbing system Sprinkler Contractor adds sprinkler mains/branches Electrical Subcontractor adds main electrical feeds Finished drawings are reviewed by all contractors involved, the architect and the project manager` Conflicts are identified & documented by all parties Solution is developed & documented by all parties Coordination Meeting

Wils lsdorf dorf Hall Hall Wils lsdorf dorf Hall Hall

  • -- Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building

Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building

University of Virginia University of Virginia Leaha Martynuska Leaha Martynuska

Construction Management Option Construction Management Option Senior Thesis 2005 Senior Thesis 2005

Agenda Agenda

  • Questions

Questions

  • Project

Project Overview Overview

  • CM In

CM In-

  • House

House Building Building Commissioning Commissioning

  • Virtual MEP

Virtual MEP Coordination Coordination Underpinning Underpinning

Constructability Constructability

Review Review

3D MEP Model Checklist

Level of Detail: The level of detail needs to be determined because items can be modeled in varying levels of detail. For example a piece of mechanical equipment could be modeled as a 3D box or to show all access point, switches, etc.

When to complete 3D model: The sequence and timing of

the model needs to be coordinated with the construction process, from design to turnover.

Project Staff: Each person needs to understand the goals,

the level of 3D modeling required, and the amount of information sharing needed. Design Background: The coordinate system, file name, layers, etc.. must be set up early in the design process.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Wils lsdorf dorf Hall Hall Wils lsdorf dorf Hall Hall

  • -- Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building

Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building

University of Virginia University of Virginia Leaha Martynuska Leaha Martynuska

Construction Management Option Construction Management Option Senior Thesis 2005 Senior Thesis 2005

Agenda Agenda

  • Questions

Questions

  • Project

Project Overview Overview

  • CM In

CM In-

  • House

House Building Building Commissioning Commissioning

  • Virtual MEP

Virtual MEP Coordination Coordination Underpinning Underpinning

Constructability Constructability

Review Review

3D Model Cost and Schedule Analysis

$20,000 ($30,000) $50,000 Design – Build MEP Coordination (3 projects) $60,000 ($90,000) $150,000 Full Preconstruction Coordination (4 projects) $80,000 ($120,000) $200,000 Limited Preconstruction Coordination (4 projects) $154,000 ($231,000) $385,000 Plan and Spec – Hardly any
  • Precon. Coord. (3 projects)
MEP Conflict Costs after 3D Coordination 3D Coord. Cost Savings (60% Prevented) Average Added Cost due to MEP Coordination Conflicts in the Field

Schedule:

  • -- Total Hours Saved: 38
  • -- Saves more than time, saves stress & conflict

Cost:

Wils lsdorf dorf Hall Hall Wils lsdorf dorf Hall Hall

  • -- Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building

Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building

University of Virginia University of Virginia Leaha Martynuska Leaha Martynuska

Construction Management Option Construction Management Option Senior Thesis 2005 Senior Thesis 2005

Agenda Agenda

  • Questions

Questions

  • Project

Project Overview Overview

  • CM In

CM In-

  • House

House Building Building Commissioning Commissioning

  • Virtual MEP

Virtual MEP Coordination Coordination Underpinning Underpinning

Constructability Constructability

Review Review

Problems with 3D MEP Coordination

New to the Industry

Not all contractors have the capability or

knowledge of using 3D Cad

Trades not using 3D CAD may not know how

to read drawings on a computer

Wils lsdorf dorf Hall Hall Wils lsdorf dorf Hall Hall

  • -- Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building

Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building

University of Virginia University of Virginia Leaha Martynuska Leaha Martynuska

Construction Management Option Construction Management Option Senior Thesis 2005 Senior Thesis 2005

Agenda Agenda

  • Questions

Questions

  • Project

Project Overview Overview

  • CM In

CM In-

  • House

House Building Building Commissioning Commissioning

  • Virtual MEP

Virtual MEP Coordination Coordination Underpinning Underpinning

Constructability Constructability

Review Review

Underpinning Constructability Review

Methods:

  • -- Interview Industry Professionals

Results:

  • -- Constructability review
  • -- CM role in underpinning process

Proposal: Review constructability of underpinning

system and determine factors leading to failure

Wils lsdorf dorf Hall Hall Wils lsdorf dorf Hall Hall

  • -- Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building

Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building

University of Virginia University of Virginia Leaha Martynuska Leaha Martynuska

Construction Management Option Construction Management Option Senior Thesis 2005 Senior Thesis 2005

Agenda Agenda

  • Questions

Questions

  • Project

Project Overview Overview

  • CM In

CM In-

  • House

House Building Building Commissioning Commissioning

  • Virtual MEP

Virtual MEP Coordination Coordination Underpinning Underpinning

Constructability Constructability

Review Review

Underpinning Constructability Review

  • Underpinning Tests
  • -- Concrete Strength - Passed
  • -- Tieback Tests - Passed
  • -- Additional Tiebacks were installed to reinforce the

system - Passed

  • Legal Battle
  • -- Inadequate Designs
  • -- Intersection of soil planes

Wils lsdorf dorf Hall Hall Wils lsdorf dorf Hall Hall

  • -- Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building

Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building

University of Virginia University of Virginia Leaha Martynuska Leaha Martynuska

Construction Management Option Construction Management Option Senior Thesis 2005 Senior Thesis 2005

Agenda Agenda

  • Questions

Questions

  • Project

Project Overview Overview

  • CM In

CM In-

  • House

House Building Building Commissioning Commissioning

  • Virtual MEP

Virtual MEP Coordination Coordination Underpinning Underpinning

Constructability Constructability

Review Review

CM Role in Underpinning Installation

  • Safety
  • Know consequences of actions (have a plan)
  • Check installation

Factors Affecting Underpinning

  • Size and depth of excavation
  • Soil conditions
  • Ground Water
  • Surface drainage conditions
  • Weather and moisture conditions

Wils lsdorf dorf Hall Hall Wils lsdorf dorf Hall Hall

  • -- Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building

Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building

University of Virginia University of Virginia Leaha Martynuska Leaha Martynuska

Construction Management Option Construction Management Option Senior Thesis 2005 Senior Thesis 2005

Agenda Agenda

  • Questions

Questions

  • Project

Project Overview Overview

  • CM In

CM In-

  • House

House Building Building Commissioning Commissioning

  • Virtual MEP

Virtual MEP Coordination Coordination Underpinning Underpinning

Constructability Constructability

Review Review

Acknowledgements

  • The Penn State AE faculty and staff
  • Barton Malow Company
  • University of Virginia
  • The Foreman Group
  • My family and friends
slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Wils lsdorf dorf Hall Hall Wils lsdorf dorf Hall Hall

  • -- Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building

Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building

University of Virginia University of Virginia Leaha Martynuska Leaha Martynuska

Construction Management Option Construction Management Option Senior Thesis 2005 Senior Thesis 2005

Agenda Agenda

  • Questions

Questions

  • Project

Project Overview Overview

  • CM In

CM In-

  • House

House Building Building Commissioning Commissioning

  • Virtual MEP

Virtual MEP Coordination Coordination Underpinning Underpinning

Constructability Constructability

Review Review

Questions

?