Towards bottom-up SHERPA and RIAT+ in Slovenia
Slovenian Environment Agency Marko Rus, Rahela Žabkar, Don Ciglenečki, Luka Matavž and Damijan Bec
Towards bottom-up SHERPA and RIAT+ in Slovenia Slovenian - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Towards bottom-up SHERPA and RIAT+ in Slovenia Slovenian Environment Agency Marko Rus, Rahela abkar, Don Cigleneki, Luka Matav and Damijan Bec LIFE-IP PREPAIR - Po Regions Engaged to Policies of Air Action C3: Establishment of a system
Slovenian Environment Agency Marko Rus, Rahela Žabkar, Don Ciglenečki, Luka Matavž and Damijan Bec
Establishment of a system for integrated assesment of the impact of activities and measures in the Po valley regions and Slovenia.
SHERPA SRR model:
Current resolution: 7 km Resolution in preparation: 4.4 km Planed: 1 km
36% 32% 26% 6%
Celje < 50 ug/m3
49% 29% 17% 5%
Celje > 50 ug/m3
Example: Analysis for 4.11.2010 – 8.2.2011 in Celje station, days with exceedances have much higher contribution of wood burning (Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) receptor model)
Source allocation, Po valley: Source allocation, Slovenia:
Source allocation, Slovenia, for a cell inside Ljubljana: Governance control for the same cell:
CAMS Source-Receptor forecast calculation for the period between 8th and 11th February 2018
Source: Interim Annual Assesment Report for 2018, Copernicus Athmosphere Monitoring Services
Concentration fields ALADIN-SI Meteorology Po Basin emission inventory (PREPAIR) Slovenia emission inventory (PREPAIR) Emissions outside PREPAIR region (TNO/MACC-III)
Chemical boundary conditions (C-IFS)
Land cover, leaf area index Ozone column
𝛦𝐷
𝑘 = 𝑞 𝑄𝑠𝑓𝑑
𝑗 𝑂
𝑏𝑗𝑘
𝑞 𝛦𝐹𝑗 𝑞
𝑏𝑗𝑘
𝑞 = 𝜷𝒌 𝒒 1 + 𝑒𝑗𝑘 −𝝏𝒌
𝒒
Prec = num. of precursors
𝑒𝑗𝑘 = distance between source
cell i and receptor cell j
Using the results from ALADIN-SI/CAMx, the coefficients 𝜷𝒌
𝒒 and 𝝏𝒌 𝒒 connecting
fields in the SHERPA model will be computed. The coefficients 𝜷𝒌
𝒒 and 𝝏𝒌 𝒒will be used
also to run RIAT+.
Yearly average PM10 concetrations 2016:
Yearly average PM10 concetrations in 2016: Difference between the basecase and the caseof 50 % reduction of NOx, SOx, VOC, NH3, PM10:
Yearly average PM10 concetrations in 2016: Difference between the basecase and the caseof 50 % reduction of PM10:
Results in Po Valley (above) are similar, but in Slovenia the ALADIN-SI/CAMx shows much stronger reduction.
Yearly average NO2 concetrations in 2016:
Yearly average NO2 concetrations in 2016: Difference between the basecase and the case of 50 % reduction of NOx, SOx, VOC, NH3, PM10: