Erik Severson, Research Associate and Interpretive Soil Scientist, CSES department, Virginia Tech
Erik Severson, Research Associate and Interpretive Soil Scientist, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Erik Severson, Research Associate and Interpretive Soil Scientist, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Erik Severson, Research Associate and Interpretive Soil Scientist, CSES department, Virginia Tech Well Aerobic soil Groundwater Trench Bottom Trench Bottom Trench Bottom Trench Bottom Clayton Site Clayton Site Left Side Lateral 3 Left
Groundwater
Well Aerobic soil
Clayey Horizon Trench Bottom Coarse-Textured
Clayton Site
Left Side – Lateral 3 8/23/1999
Clayey Horizon Trench Bottom Coarse-Textured Clayey Horizon Trench Bottom Coarse-Textured Clayey Horizon Trench Bottom Coarse-Textured
Clayton Site
Left Side – Lateral 3 8/23/1999
Source: Aziz Amoozegar, Lake Wheeler
Introduction
F
Flat Topography + Impermeable Layers = Perched Water Tables
- 1. Document morphology and monitor
saturation in the Appomattox and Bentley Soil Series.
- 2. Calculate % wet season RMFs were
saturated.
- 3. Confirm or deny epiaquic conditions.
- 4. Compare saturation differences of
entirely residual soils versus transported soils.
Location 1: Bentley Soils Location 2: Residual Soil
Appomattox Bentley
Cap and vent hole Annulus Bentonite gravel Restrictive Layer Slotted pipe Solid pipe
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 1/1 1/8 1/15 1/22 1/29 2/5 2/12 2/19 2/26 3/5 3/12 3/19 3/26 4/2 4/9 4/16 4/23 4/30 Date Depth (cm)
Average 30-day 20-day
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 1/1 1/8 1/15 1/22 1/29 2/5 2/12 2/19 2/26 3/5 3/12 3/19 3/26 4/2 4/9 4/16 4/23 4/30 Date Depth (cm)
Iron Concentrations: Chroma 3 depleted ped faces 5% 65%
1) Document Soil Morphology
And
2) Monitor saturation for the Appomattox and Bentley Soils
Ap Bt1 Bt2 2BCt 3CBt 3Ct
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
- 120
- 100
- 80
- 60
- 40
- 20
Oct-11 Mar-12 Aug-12 Jan-13 Jun-13 Nov-13 Apr-14
Precipitation (mm) Depth (cm)
5YR 5/8 (c) 10YR 7/8 (d) 10YR 7/4 (d) N/8 (d) Precipitation
Depleted ped faces n =36
41%
Concentrations n=11
23%
≥3 chroma depletions n=20
41%
≤2 chroma depletions n=12
65%
- 350
- 300
- 250
- 200
- 150
- 100
- 50
Sep-11 Apr-12 Oct-12 May-13 Nov-13 Jun-14
Depth (cm)
1.5M 3M Discontinuity
Perching confirmed at 6 out of 8 sites
Compare hydrology of entirely
residual soils vs. transported soils at same depths (1 m).
- 120
- 100
- 80
- 60
- 40
- 20
Nov-12 Mar-13 Jul-13 Nov-13 Mar-14 Depth (cm)
Residual Transported
Soils
- Avg. Water Table
30-day 20-day
Transported 81 64 91 Residual 95 83
Conclusions Transported soils perch water for extended periods on impermeable layers.
Conclusions Redox Features with chroma ≥3 indicate a fluctuating water table.
Conclusions Residual soils underneath transported soils were not saturated.
Conclusions Entirely residual soils were “drier” than transported soils.
Avoid use of transported soils with
restriction and perched water table
Avoid 1 M below lithologic discontinuity