Towards a cashless economy: The case of Argentina Pedro Elosegui - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

towards a cashless economy the case of argentina
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Towards a cashless economy: The case of Argentina Pedro Elosegui - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Towards a cashless economy: The case of Argentina Pedro Elosegui Santiago Pinto Central Bank of Argentina Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond October 29, 2020 The views expressed herein are those of the author and are not necessarily those of


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Towards a cashless economy: The case of Argentina

Pedro Elosegui Central Bank of Argentina Santiago Pinto Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond October 29, 2020

The views expressed herein are those of the author and are not necessarily those of the Central Bank of Argentina, the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, or the Federal Reserve System. 1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Motivation

  • The adoption of alternative means of payments to cash is driven by

both demand and supply factors

  • In developing economies, the size of the informal economy

introduces additional challenges and constraints

  • The present study attempts to examine the determinants of the
  • bserved forms of payments used in Argentina in order to quantify

and understand the effects of moving towards a cashless economy

  • Understand the spatial variation in the use of different payment

systems

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

The model

  • Simple two-sided market: buyers, b ∈ [0, 1], sellers, s ∈ [0, 1]

– Sellers: endowed with one unit of good; don’t derive utility from consuming the good; charge p = 1 – Buyers: utility v > 1 from consumption – Buyers and sellers are randomly matched

  • Two payment systems: cash (universally accepted), credit card

(accepted by some sellers)

– Buyers: cost tb

h per transaction in cash, tb d when they use a credit

card

  • A proportion α of buyers can freely choose among the two options;

(1 − α) are credit constrained (informal market)

  • 0 ≤ mb ≤ α ≤ 1: proportion of buyers that choose credit card only

– Sellers: cost ts

h per in-cash transaction; credit card services entail a

fixed cost F > 0 and a cost ts

d per credit card transaction

  • 0 ≤ ms ≤ 1: proportion of sellers that accept credit card payments
  • Assumptions: tb

d < tb h and ts d < ts h

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

The model

  • Timing:
  • 1. Buyers decide whether to pay for the good with cash or card; sellers

decide whether to accept credit cards as a means of payment

  • 2. Buyers and sellers are randomly matched
  • A transaction takes place, if the payment method chosen by buyers

and sellers coincide

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

The model

  • Buyers

– Decision of unconstrained buyers α ((1 − α) can only use cash) – 0 ≤ ms ≤ mb ≤ α: ub = ms(v − tb

d ) + (1 − mb)(v − tb h )

– 0 ≤ mb ≤ ms ≤ α: ub = mb(v − tb

d ) + (1 − mb)(v − tb h )

– The same expected utility holds when 0 ≤ mb ≤ α ≤ ms. – In sum: ub = Min{ms, mb}(v − tb

d ) + (1 − mb)(v − tb h )

– Best response: mb = ms for all ms, subject to mb ≤ α

  • Sellers

– mb ≥ ms: us

d − us h = 1 − ts d − F − (1−mb) (1−ms)(1 − ts h)

– mb < ms: us

d − us h = mb ms (ts h − ts d) − F

– Best response: ms determined by ∆(ms, mb) ≡ us

d − us h = 0

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Equilibrium

  • An equilibrium is defined as {mb, ms} that satisfies:
  • 1. Buyers choose mb that maximizes the expected utility (i.e., the

number of buyers that accept credit cards is given by mb = ms ≤ α);

  • 2. The number of sellers that accept credit cards is given

∆(ms, mb) = 0, for a given mb.

  • The model is characterized by the presence of multiple equilibria
  • {mb, ms} = {0, 0} is always an equilibrium
  • Other equilibria will arise depending on the relative values of ts

h, ts d,

and F

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Characterization of the equilibrium

mb ms 1 1  E E' M M' ms '

F ≤ (ts

h − ts d)

mb ms 1 1  N N'

F > (ts

h − ts d) 7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Empirical strategy

  • Analyze demographic and economic determinants of means of

payments chosen by households in Argentina

– Impact of informality, income level, education and other demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of households on the demand credit card – Analyze regional variation – Include network effects

  • Data

– National Household Expenditure Survey (ENGHO)

  • National and regional (provincial) information regarding expenditure

and income, as well as socioeconomic characteristics of Argentinean households

  • The 2012 and the (recently published) 2017/18 survey include

information regarding the type of payment instruments used by the households

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Empirical Evidence: Payments methods

2012 2017

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Empirical Evidence: Means of payment by province

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Empirical evidence: Means of payment by income decile

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Empirical Evidence: Credit card and labor informality

2012 2017

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Empirical strategy

  • We run the following baseline regression model

Pi,d = β0 + β1 incomei,d + β2 demographici,j,d +β3 employmentj + β4 networkd + εi,d

Pi,d: credit card use (or % of expenditure paid with credit cards) i: household, j: household head j, d: province

  • Informality: employment of household head j
  • Network: % of population using credit card at province d
  • We run two different regression methods

– Logit model for credit card use – Heckman model for credit card use and expenditure

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Results: 2012

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Results: 2017

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Recent Events: Covid 19

RetailPayments MobileQRPayments

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Conclusions and next steps

  • The Argentine economy faces the important challenge of becoming

a cashless economy

  • Achieving this goal requires changes in several dimensions: low level
  • f bank penetration, informal economy, and pervasive tax evasion
  • Policies that only target either the demand or the supply side will

likely fail to accomplish the goal of moving towards a cashless economy

  • Effective policies should, therefore, consider the constraints that

limit the behavior on both sides of the market

  • Next steps:

– Include informality on the supply side

17