toward a more accurate estimate of global stratospheric
play

Toward a more accurate estimate of global stratospheric aerosol - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Toward a more accurate estimate of global stratospheric aerosol surface area density. Is it important? T. Deshler, J. L. Mercer, M. Kovilakam, J. M. Rosen Univ. of Wyoming, Laramie, WY D. J. Hofmann, S. Solomon, J. F. Lamarque, P. J. Young NOAA


  1. Toward a more accurate estimate of global stratospheric aerosol surface area density. Is it important? T. Deshler, J. L. Mercer, M. Kovilakam, J. M. Rosen Univ. of Wyoming, Laramie, WY D. J. Hofmann, S. Solomon, J. F. Lamarque, P. J. Young NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO • History of stratospheric aerosol • Present climatology – SAGE II+ and times of concern – 1971 - 1984 – Post Pinatubo – low aerosol loading • Why we care • Comparison with in situ measurements and fixing the climatology – Comparisons over Laramie – Broadcasting • Using the new climatology – results from Chem-CAM (3D) – 1970s – NOx, ClOx, Ozone

  2. -2 10 o S, 46 o W), o N, 156 o W) São José dos Campos (23 Mauna Loa (20 -1 ) -3 10 Integrated Backscatter (sr -4 10 Latitude o < 30 Four -5 10 o > 30 -2 10 Lidar o N, 76 o W), o N, 11 o E) Hampton (37 Garmisch (47 -3 Records 10 -4 10 -5 10 o N, 105 o W) 20-25 km Laramie, Wyoming, (41 -2 ) 6 10 5 km Aerosol column (cm In Situ 5 10 Record 4 10 Two N(r > 0.15 μ m) 15-20 km altidudes 6 N(r > 0.25 μ m)) 10 5 10 Latitude o < 30 4 10 o > 30 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 SAGE Years SAGE II Satellite Record Deshler, T. (2008), A Review of Global Stratospheric Aerosol: Measurements, Importance, Life Cycle, and Local Stratospheric Aerosol, Atmos. Res., 90 , 223-232 .

  3. Current Surface area density used in Atmospheric models Periods of concern

  4. Why we care N 2 O 5 + H 2 O (aer) � 2HNO 3 • Results of this conversion – Less N 2 O 5 for: N 2 O 5 + h ν � NO 2 + NO 3 – Less NO 2 for: • NO 2 + ClO + M � ClONO 2 • NO 2 + OH + M � HNO 3 – More ClO for • HO 2 + ClO � HOCl + 0 2 , HOCl + hv � OH + Cl • Cl + 0 3 � ClO + 0 2 – More OH for: • OH + 0 3 � H0 2 + O 2 • HO 2 + 0 3 � OH + 0 2 + 0 2 • Net result – Less ozone from reactions with ClO and OH – More ozone from reduction in loss from NOx

  5. Revising the climatology using In Situ Aerosol Profiles University of Wyoming – with particular thanks to Jim Rosen and Dave Hofmann • http://www-das.uwyo.edu/~deshler/ – US_Laramie_41N_105W (1971 - 2009) – AU_Mildura_34S_142W (1972 - 1980) – NZ_Lauder_45S_170E (1991 - 2001) – Ant_McMurdo_78S_167E (1989 - 2008) – SE_Kiruna_68N_21E (1991 - 2004) – Miscellaneous • Brazil, Niamey, France

  6. Aerosol concentration for particles > 0.01, 0.15, 0.25 µm Oct 1971 Oct 1974 Fuego

  7. Aerosol concentration for particles > 0.01, 0.15, 0.25, … 2.0/10.0 µm Mar 1991 July 1991 Pinatubo

  8. Fixing the climatology – Comparisons over Laramie – Resultant ratios – Broadcasting • Comparison with far flung measurements – Mildura Australia (1972-1980) – Lauder New Zealand (1991-2001) • Led to determining rate of latitudinal spread and weighting functions for dispersal from eruptions

  9. Fuego

  10. Low aerosol load Extinction measurements Can’t see the small particles Controlling surface area

  11. 1988 – 1991 Pre Pinatubo Aerosol load high enough for extinction meas. to Peak of Pinatubo obtain good estimates of surface area SAGE blinded Post Pinatubo low aerosol load Decay of Pinatubo aerosol in good range for extinction measurements

  12. Comparison of revised climatology with measurements

  13. Comparison of revised climatology with measurements

  14. Periods of concern Period investigated With CAM - chem

  15. 4500 Effective Equivalent Stratospheric Chlorine (pptv) Compliments of Paul Newman and the Goddard automailer 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 1960 1980 2000 2020 2040 2060 2080 2100 Years

  16. Results CAM – chem NOx run through 1970s New / Old Climatology

  17. Results CAM – chem NOx Profiles 40 N run through 1970s New / Old Climatology Revised Climatology Fuego

  18. Results CAM – chem NOx profiles 40 S run through 1970s New / Old Climatology Revised Climatology Fuego

  19. Results CAM – chem run through 1970s

  20. Results CAM – chem ClO run through 1970s New / Old Climatology

  21. Results CAM – chem ClO 40 N run through 1970s New / Old Climatology Revised Climatology Fuego

  22. Results CAM – chem ClO 40 S run through 1970s New / Old Climatology Revised Climatology Fuego

  23. Results CAM – chem Ozone run through 1970s New / Old Climatology

  24. Ozone 40 N Results CAM – chem New / Old run through 1970s Climatology 40 S is similar Revised Climatology Fuego

  25. Total ozone global average Results CAM – chem New / Old run through 1970s Climatology Revised Climatology Fuego

  26. Summary • Present aerosol surface area density climatology has some deficiencies, < 1970, 1981-1984, > 2000 • A new climatology corrected with in situ measurements is available along with the in situ measurements used to develop it. See: http://www-das.uwyo.edu/~deshler/ • First results with the new climatology show differences in NOx, ClOx and OH leading to ± 0.5% for global average ozone in the 1970s when stratoshperic chlorine was 1500 – 2000 ppt. • Future work – Fix blanks at pressures > 100 hPa in El Chichon period – Smooth climatology at pressures < 20 hPa, where signal is very weak – Use the new climatology in model runs, 1980-1985, and 1991-2010 • There are many people and agencies to thank for these results – Funding over the last 40 years – NSF, NSF, NSF, NASA, NRL, ... – The pioneers Jim Rosen and Dave Hofmann, and their (and my) engineers, technicians, scientists and students necessary to complete the measurements. – Susan Solomon for the invitation to a sabbatical and providing the means to get introduced to the world of atmospheric models, and to Jean Francois Lamarque and Paul Young for guiding me into the details

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend