Tough Budget Times in California: How Did We 1107 9th Street, 1107 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

tough budget times in california how did we
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Tough Budget Times in California: How Did We 1107 9th Street, 1107 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Tough Budget Times in California: How Did We 1107 9th Street, 1107 9th Street, Suite 310 Suite 310 Sacramento, Sacramento, Get Here? California 95814 California 95814 (916) 444-0500 (916) 444-0500 www.cbp.org www.cbp.org A


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1107 9th Street, Suite 310 Sacramento, California 95814 (916) 444-0500 www.cbp.org cbp@cbp.org 1107 9th Street, Suite 310 Sacramento, California 95814 (916) 444-0500 www.cbp.org cbp@cbp.org

Tough Budget Times in California: How Did We Get Here?

A PRESENTATION BY SCOTT GRAVES, SENIOR POLICY ANALYST September 2011

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Budgets Express Values and Priorities. State Budget Choices Affect All Californians.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Why Are Budgets Important?

 Budgets:

– Express our values and priorities as a society. – Provide the framework and funding for public programs and services.

 State budget choices affect:

– The quality of our schools and highways; – The cost of a college education; – Children’s access to health care; – Seniors’ ability to live safely in their own homes; – And more.

 In other words, the state budget affects all Californians.

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

$49.0 $43.2 $6.1 $5.4 $0 $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 $60 2007-08 2011-12 Enacted Proposition 98 Funding (Dollars in Billions)

Support for K-12 Schools and Community Colleges Will Be $6.6 Billion Lower in 2011-12 Than in 2007-08

K-12 Education* California Community Colleges

* Includes funding for the state preschool program. Note: Subtotals may not sum to totals due to rounding. Source: Legislative Analyst's Office

$55.2 $48.6

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

$2,545 $2,686 $10,302 $611 $1,290 $4,335 $0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000 Systemwide Fees for Undergraduates Who Are California Residents (2010-11 Dollars)

Inflation-Adjusted UC and CSU Fees Have More Than Tripled Since 1990-91

UC CSU

Source: California Postsecondary Education Commission

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

85.2% 72.7% 68.9% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% SSI/SSP Monthly Grant for Individuals Who Are Elderly or Have Disabilities as a Percentage of Inflation-Adjusted June 1990 Grant

SSI/SSP Grants for Low-Income Seniors and People With Disabilities Have Lost Nearly One-Third of Their Purchasing Power Since 1990 Due to State Budget Cuts

Source: CBP analysis of Department of Finance and Department of Social Services data

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

1488.4% 381.4% 333.5% 279.0% 261.4% 177.6% 0% 200% 400% 600% 800% 1000% 1200% 1400% 1600% Corrections and Rehabilitation Spending K-12 Education Spending Total Spending Health and Human Services Spending Higher Education Spending Other Spending Percent Change in General Fund Expenditures, 1980-81 to 2010-11 Estimated

Corrections Spending Has Grown at More Than Four Times the Rate of General Fund Spending as a Whole Since 1980-81

Source: Department of Finance

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

35.3% 33.2% 15.2% 2.9% 13.5% 39.2% 29.0% 12.7% 10.5% 8.6% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% K-12 Education Health and Human Services Higher Education Corrections and Rehabilitation Other Percentage of General Fund Expenditures

Spending on Corrections Has More Than Tripled as a Share of Total General Fund Spending Since 1980-81

1980-81 2010-11 Estimated

Source: Department of Finance

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

California Budget Basics

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

State General Fund 41.2% Federal Funds 37.9% State Special Funds 16.4% Bond Funds 4.5%

The State General Fund Accounts for More Than 40 Cents Out of Every Dollar Spent Through California's Budget

Source: Department of Finance

Enacted 2011-12 Expenditures = $208.7 Billion

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

K-12 Education 39.9% Higher Education 11.9% Health and Human Services 26.8% Corrections and Rehabilitation 11.4% Other 9.9%

K-12 Education Accounts for the Largest Share of State General Fund Spending in 2011-12

Source: Department of Finance

Enacted 2011-12 General Fund Expenditures = $85.9 Billion

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Personal Income Tax 57.0% Sales and Use Tax 21.5% Corporation Tax 10.2% Other 8.7% Insurance Tax 2.1% Alcohol Tax 0.4% Cigarette Tax 0.1%

The Personal Income Tax Is Projected To Provide More Than Half of General Fund Revenues in 2011-12

Projected 2011-12 General Fund Revenues and Transfers = $88.5 Billion

Source: Department of Finance

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Californians Lack Basic Knowledge

  • f State Spending and Revenues.
slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

22.0% 3.0% 29.0% 41.0% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% K-12 Education Higher Education Health and Human Services Prisons and Corrections Percentage of Likely California Voters Surveyed in January 2011 Responses to the Question: Which Represents the Largest Amount of Spending in the State Budget?

Only About One-Fifth of Likely Voters in California Know That K-12 Education Makes Up the Largest Share of State Spending

Source: Public Policy Institute of California

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

33.0% 32.0% 18.0% 12.0% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% Personal Income Tax Sales Tax Corporate Tax Motor Vehicle Fees Percentage of Likely California Voters Surveyed in January 2011 Responses to the Question: Which Provides the Most Revenue for the State Budget?

Only One-Third of Likely Voters in California Know That the Personal Income Tax Provides the Most Revenue for the State Budget

Source: Public Policy Institute of California

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

California Has Consistently Faced Multi-Billion Dollar Budget Shortfalls in Recent Years. How Did We Get Here?

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Do We Have a “Spending Problem”? No.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

$103.0 $85.9 $26.7 $34.2 $0 $20 $40 $60 $80 $100 $120 $140 2007-08 2011-12 Enacted Dollars in Billions

Total Annual State Spending Has Declined by Nearly $10 Billion Since 2007-08 Due to Budget Cuts

General Fund Special Funds

Source: Department of Finance

$129.7 $120.1

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

The Great Recession Led to a Steep Decline in State Revenues. Yes, We Have a Revenue Problem.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

$102.5 $82.8 $94.8 $88.5 $50 $60 $70 $80 $90 $100 $110 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11* 2011-12* General Fund Revenues and Transfers (Dollars in Billions)

General Fund Revenues Plunged by Nearly $20 Billion Between 2007-08 and 2008-09

* 2010-11 estimated and 2011-12 enacted. Source: Legislative Analyst's Office

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

8.1% 8.0% 8.2% 6.8% 7.0% 6.0% 6.5% 7.0% 7.5% 8.0% 8.5% 1999-00 2002-03 2005-06 2008-09 2011-12* Total State Revenues and Transfers as a Percentage of California Personal Income

Total State Revenues Have Dropped Significantly as a Share of the California Economy Since 2005-06

* Projected. Source: CBP analysis of Department of Finance and US Bureau of Economic Analysis data

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

In California, Cutting Taxes Is Relatively Easy. It Requires a Simple Majority Vote of the Legislature and the Governor’s Signature.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Years of Tax Cuts Have Undermined California’s Revenue Base. Why? Tax Cuts Don’t “Pay for Themselves.”

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

$0.7 $1.0 $1.3 $1.9 $2.1 $3.8 $5.3 $7.2 $7.6 $7.6 $8.6 $10.0 $10.9 $11.3 $12.1 $8.6 $7.5 $10.2 $13.0 $0 $2 $4 $6 $8 $10 $12 $14 Annual Cost of Tax Reductions Enacted Since 1993 (Dollars in Billions)

Tax Cuts Enacted Since 1993 Will Cost an Estimated $13.0 Billion in 2011-12

* 2009-10 and 2010-11 estimated; 2011-12 projected. Source: Assembly Revenue and Taxation Committee, Board of Equalization, Department of Finance, Franchise Tax Board, and Legislative Analyst's Office

Drop reflects temporary VLF increase and caps on business tax credit use

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

In Contrast, Raising Taxes Is Extremely Difficult in California. It Requires a Two-Thirds Vote of the Legislature and the Governor’s Signature.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

California Is the Only Large State To Require a Supermajority Vote of Its Legislature for Any State Tax Increase

Supermajority vote required to raise a n y st ate taxes. vote. Le g isl a ture m a y pass most tax increases b y a majority vote , but voters must r a tify the increase . Le g isl a ture m a y raise at least some state taxes by a majority .

Source: National Conference of State Legislatures and Wisconsin State Legislature

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

Corporations Doing Business in California Are Paying a Smaller Share of Their Profits in Taxes, Even as Their Profits Have Soared.

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

6.1% 7.4% 9.7% 8.3% 5.3% 6.1% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 1961 1971 1981 1991 2001 2009 Corporate Taxes as a Percentage of Income for Corporations Reporting Net Income

The Share of Corporate Income Paid in Taxes Has Fallen Substantially

Note: 2009 data are preliminary. Source: Franchise Tax Board

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

192.0% 68.6% 16.5% 24.2% 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 225% Total State Net Income of Corporations State Corporate Tax Liability Total Adjusted Gross Income of Personal Income Taxpayers Personal Income Tax Liability Percent Change, 2001 to 2009

Recent Growth in Corporate Profits Has Outpaced Growth in Corporate Tax Payments

Source: Franchise Tax Board

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

Voters Have Passed Many Ballot Measures, Mainly Bonds, That Impose New Spending Obligations Without Providing the Revenues To Pay for Them.

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

3.5% 7.1% 7.8% 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1999-00 2010-11 2011-12 Estimated Debt Service as a Percentage of General Fund Revenues

Debt Service on Bonds Has More Than Doubled as a Share of General Fund Revenues Since 1999-00

Note: Excludes debt service for Economic Recovery Bonds, Enterprise Fund Self-Liquidating Bonds, and General Obligation Commercial Paper. Source: State Treasurer's Office

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

The Economy Has Shifted Toward Services and Internet Sales, Which Has Limited the Growth of Sales Tax Revenues.

slide-33
SLIDE 33

33

$52.8 Billion $26.6 Billion $0 $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 $60 State Sales Tax Revenues (Dollars in Billions)

State Sales Tax Revenues Would Be $26 Billion Higher if Taxable Sales Had Remained at 1966-67 Levels as a Share of the Economy

Revenues at 1966-67 Percentage of Personal Income Actual Sales Tax Revenues

Note: 2009-10 data are estimated. Source: Department of Finance, Legislative Analyst's Office, and US Bureau of Economic Analysis

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

In Addition, California’s Budget Crises Have Occurred in the Context of…

slide-35
SLIDE 35

35

…a Growing, Aging Population…

slide-36
SLIDE 36

36

29.7% 13.5% 26.2% 27.4% 75.4% 29.4% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 0 to 4 5 to 19 20 to 24 25 to 64 65 or Older Total Population Projected Percent Change in Population, 2000 to 2020 Age Group

Californians Age 65 or Older Are Projected To Be the Fastest-Growing Age Group Between 2000 and 2020

Source: Department of Finance

slide-37
SLIDE 37

37

…and Rising Inequality.

slide-38
SLIDE 38

38

Top 1 Percent 35.5% Next 4 Percent 22.1% 90 to 95 Percent 13.6% 80 to 90 Percent 14.7% Fourth Fifth 10.7% Middle Fifth 2.5% Second Fifth 0.8% Bottom Fifth 0.0%

More Than 70 Percent of Total Income Gains Went to the Top 10 Percent of California Taxpayers Between 1987 and 2009

Total Adjusted Gross Income Increased by $219.4 Billion, 1987 to 2009 (2009 Dollars)

Source: Franchise Tax Board

slide-39
SLIDE 39

39

  • 19.5%
  • 17.1%
  • 14.8%
  • 7.3%

21.4% 29.5% 50.2%

  • 30%
  • 20%
  • 10%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Bottom Fifth Second Fifth Middle Fifth Fourth Fifth Top Fifth Top 10 Percent Top 1 Percent Percent Change in Average Adjusted Gross Income, 1987 to 2009 (2009 Dollars) Income Category

The Incomes of the Wealthy Increased Significantly Over the Past Two Decades, While Those of All Other Californians Declined

Source: Franchise Tax Board

slide-40
SLIDE 40

40

$41,203 $35,330 $40,504 $35,098 $32,000 $33,000 $34,000 $35,000 $36,000 $37,000 $38,000 $39,000 $40,000 $41,000 $42,000 Average Adjusted Gross Income (2009 Dollars)

The Average Adjusted Gross Income of Middle-Income Californians Reached a More-Than-Two-Decade Low in 2009

Source: Franchise Tax Board

slide-41
SLIDE 41

41

California’s Families and the State Budget Will Continue To Face Challenges in the Wake of the Great Recession.

slide-42
SLIDE 42

42

July 2007 143,600 July 2011 999,000 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 Number of Jobless Californians Unemployed for At Least 27 Weeks

The Number of Long-Term Jobless Remains Seven Times Higher Than It Was Before the Recession Began

Note: Data reflect 12-month averages ending in the month displayed. Source: Employment Development Department

slide-43
SLIDE 43

43

4.9% 5.4% 6.7% 6.8% 6.2% 5.4% 4.9% 5.3% 7.2% 11.4% 12.4% 11.8% 11.0% 9.5% 8.2% 7.2% 6.5% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Unemployment Rate

California's Annual Jobless Rate Is Projected To Remain At or Above 11 Percent Through 2012

Note: 2011 through 2016 are projected. Source: Legislative Analyst's Office and US Bureau of Labor Statistics

slide-44
SLIDE 44

44

12.9% 12.7% 12.2% 16.3% 12.8% 11.3% 12.3% 15.1% 10% 11% 12% 13% 14% 15% 16% 17% 18% 19% 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Percentage of People With Incomes Below the Federal Poverty Line

California's Poverty Rate Increased Significantly Between 2006 and 2010

The State's 2010 Poverty Rate Was the Highest Since 1997

California US

Source: US Census Bureau

slide-45
SLIDE 45

45

22.0% 16.4% 18.1% 21.0% 23.4% 20.6% 16.3% 17.4% 20.7% 22.0% 15% 17% 19% 21% 23% 25% 27% 29% 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Percentage of Children Under Age 18 in Families With Incomes Below the Federal Poverty Line

California's Child Poverty Rate Increased Significantly Between 2009 and 2010

Nearly One Out of Four California Children Lived in Families With Incomes Below the Poverty Line in 2010

California US

Source: US Census Bureau

slide-46
SLIDE 46

46

$3.3 $2.5 ($6.4) ($5.7) ($5.2)

  • $8
  • $6
  • $4
  • $2

$0 $2 $4 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 General Fund Revenues and Transfers Minus General Fund Expenditures (Dollars in Billions)

Operating Deficits Are Projected To Return Beginning in 2012-13

Note: 2010-11 is estimated; 2011-12 through 2014-15 are projected. Source: Department of Finance

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Conclusion

 Closing California’s state budget gap with a balanced

approach that includes new revenues is essential in order to: – Preserve and strengthen programs that serve low- income families and vulnerable populations; – Boost investment in innovation and a skilled workforce; and – Lay the foundation for broadly shared prosperity in California.

47

slide-48
SLIDE 48

48

Web Resources

 California Budget Project: Budget and policy analyses, email

updates (www.cbp.org), and a blog (californiabudgetbites.org).

 Department of Finance: Access to the Governor’s budget

proposals and related documents (www.dof.ca.gov).

 Legislative Analyst’s Office: Access to analyses on a range of

state budget issues (www.lao.ca.gov).

 State Senate: Provides a free bill-tracking service and the ability

to monitor Senate hearings and floor sessions (www.sen.ca.gov).

 State Assembly: Provides the same services as the Senate’s

website (www.assembly.ca.gov).

 Legislative Counsel: Provides a free bill-tracking service and the

ability to search California Codes (www.leginfo.ca.gov).

 California State Homepage: Gateway to agency information and

data (www.ca.gov).