topological groupoids and exponentiability
play

Topological Groupoids and Exponentiability Susan Niefield (joint - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Topological Groupoids and Exponentiability Susan Niefield (joint with Dorette Pronk) July 2017 Overview Goal: Study exponentiability in categories of topological groupoid. Starting Point: Consider exponentiability in Gpd ( C ), where C is:


  1. Topological Groupoids and Exponentiability Susan Niefield (joint with Dorette Pronk) July 2017

  2. Overview Goal: Study exponentiability in categories of topological groupoid. Starting Point: Consider exponentiability in Gpd ( C ), where C is: ◮ finitely complete ◮ cartesian closed ◮ locally cartesian closed Application: Adapt to various categories of orbigroupoids.

  3. Exponentiability in C Suppose C is finitely complete. An object Y is called exponentiable � C has a right adjoint, and C is called cartesian if − × Y : C closed if every object is exponentiable. � B is exponentiable in C if it is exponentiable in A morphism Y the slice category C / B , and C is called locally cartesian closed if every morphism is exponentiable. � B is exponentiable and r : Z � B , we follow Note that if q : Y the abuse of notation and write the exponential as r q : Z Y � B .

  4. � � � � � � � � Properties of Exponentiability Composition of exponentiables is exponentiable, and pullback along any morphism preserves exponentiability. ∆ � B × B and Y are exponentiable, then every If the diagonal B q � B is exponentiable, since morphism Y q � B Y Y B ❄ ❄ ⑧⑧⑧⑧⑧⑧⑧ ❄ ❄ ❄ ❄ π 2 � id , q � ❄ Y × B Y × B and � id , q � � Y × B π 2 � B Y Y Y × B Y × B Y × B B q q × id π 1 B B B × B B × B Y Y 1 1 ∆

  5. Exponentiable Spaces A space Y is exponentiable in Top iff O ( Y ) is a continuous lattice (Day/Kelly, 1970) A sober space is exponentiable in Top iff it is locally compact (Hoffmann/Lawson, 1978) A subspace inclusion is exponentiable in Top iff it is locally closed (N, 1978)

  6. Cartesian Closed Coreflective Subcategories of Top Suppose M ⊆ Top . Given a space X , let ˆ X denote the set X with the topology generated by the set of continuous maps � X | M ∈ M} { f : M Say a X is M -generated if X = ˆ X , and let Top M denote the full subcategory of Top consisting of M -generated space. Proposition (N, 1978) If M is a class of exponentiable spaces s.t. M × N ∈ Top M , for all M , N ∈ M , then Top M is cartesian closed. . X × Y is the product and Z Y = � × Y = � Note X ˆ lim � Y Z M M is the exponential in Top M . .

  7. Examples K = compact T 2 spaces; Top K = compactly generated spaces E = exponentiable spaces; Top E = exponentiably generated spaces Note In both cases, one can show locally closed inclusions are � B ˆ exponentiable in Top M . Thus, if ∆: B × B is locally closed, then the slice Top M / B is cartesian closed. .

  8. � � � � � Groupoids in C An object G of Gpd ( C ) is a diagram in C of the form i s � G 0 c � G 1 G 2 G 1 G 1 G 1 G 1 G 0 G 0 e t making G a category in C in which every morphism is invertible, � G 0 is t in where G 2 = G 1 × G 0 G 1 . Unless otherwise stated, G 1 the pullback when G 1 is on the left and s when it is on the right. � H are pairs f i : G i � H i ( i = 0 , 1) compatible Morphisms f : G with the groupoid structure, i.e., homomorphisms . � H are morphisms ϕ : G 0 � H 1 such that 2-Cells f ⇒ g : G � ϕ s , g 1 � � H 2 G 1 G 1 H 2 � f 1 ,ϕ t � � c H 2 H 2 H 1 H 1 c i.e., natural transformations .

  9. � � Exponentiable Objects in Gpd ( C ) Gpd ( C ) is cartesian closed whenever C is, and H G is defined by f 0 ( H G ) 0 � � H G 0 × H G 1 � X 0 0 1 g 0 f 1 � ( H G ) 0 × H G 0 ( H G ) 1 � × ( H G ) 0 � X 1 1 g 1 where ( f 0 , g 0 ) and ( f 1 , g 1 ) make H G the “groupoid of homomorph- � H . isms” G In particular, Gpd ( Top K ) and Gpd ( Top E ) are cartesian closed.

  10. Exponentiable Objects in Gpd ( C ), cont. This construction of H G uses only the fact that G 0 , G 1 , and G 2 are exponentiable and not that C is cartesian closed, and so: Proposition If G 0 , G 1 , and G 2 are exponentiable in C , then G is exponentiable in Gpd ( C ). . Proposition If G is exponentiable in Gpd ( C ), then G 0 is exponent- iable in C . The converse holds if s or t is exponentiable in C . . Note If G is an ´ etale groupoid, then all structure morphisms are exponentiable in Top . We conjecture that, in this case, H G is ´ etale when H is also ´ etale and G 1 / G 0 is compact. .

  11. � Example ∼ = � 1, which is If C also has finite coproducts, we can consider I I : 0 exponentiable in Gpd ( C ). � ¯ ( B I I ) 0 = B 1 , the “object of morphisms β : b b ” ( B I I ) 1 = B 2 × B 1 B 2 via c , the “object of squares” α � b t b s b s b t β s � β t ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ b s b s α � b t b t ¯ α � α � with s ( β s α � β t ) = β s , t ( β s α � β t ) = β t , . . . ¯ ¯ ( B I I ) 2 is the “object of horizontally composable squares” I is an orbigroupoid when B is. Note B I .

  12. � � � Exponentiable Morphisms in Gpd ( C ) q � B is a fibration if G 1 � s , q 1 � � G 0 × B 0 B 1 has a right inverse in C . G q � B is If C is locally cartesian closed, then every fibration G exponentiable in Gpd ( C ) and r q : H G � B is defined by f 0 ( H G ) 0 � � H G 0 × B 0 ( B 0 × B 1 H G 1 1 ) � X 0 0 g 0 f 1 � ( H G ) 0 × B 0 H G 1 ( H G ) 1 � × B 0 ( H G ) 0 � X 1 1 g 1 σ � H b ,” and making ( H G ) 0 “the object of homomorphisms G b ( H G ) 1 “the object of 2-cells between distributers” σ � H b G b G b H b Σ � • • G β � H β σ � G ¯ G ¯ H ¯ H ¯ b b b b ¯ Note Composition is defined using the fibration assumption. .

  13. Exponentiable Morphisms in Gpd ( C ), cont. q � B is a fibration with The construction of H G uses only that G the q i exponentiable, and not that C is locally cartesian closed. � B is a fibration with G i � B i ( i = 0 , 1 , 2) Proposition If G � B is exponentiable in Gpd ( C ). . exponentiable in C , then G ∆ i � B i × B i ( i = 0 , 1) are Corollary Suppose the diagonals B i exponentiable in a cartesian closed category C . Then every � B is exponentiable in Gpd ( C ) . fibration G � B are exponentiable in Note This implies that fibrations G ∆ i � B i ˆ Gpd ( Top M ), for M = K or E , if B i × B i are locally closed. .

  14. � � � Example Revisited s � π 2 � B 2 π 1 � B 1 , and Define B I I t � B by s 0 = s , t 0 = t , s 1 : B 2 × B 1 B 2 α � α � π 1 � B 2 π 2 � B 1 , i.e., s 1 ( β s t 1 : B 2 × B 1 B 2 α � β t ) = α , t 1 ( β s α � β t ) = ¯ α . ¯ ¯ s � Proposition B I I t � B are fibrations in Gpd ( C ). . � ( B I Proof. � s , s 1 � : ( B I I ) 1 I ) 0 × B 0 B 1 is given by α � b t α � α � α � b t b s b s b t b s b s b t b s b s b t b s b s b t β s � β t �→ β s � and so β s � �→ β s � id ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ b s b s α � b t b t b s b s b s b s b t b t ¯ αβ − 1 s is a right inverse. The proof for t is similar. . I × B G s π 1 � B is a fibration, for all G � B . Note Can also show B I .

  15. Example Revisited, cont. I × B G s π 1 � B is exponentiable in Gpd ( C ), if the Proposition B I components are exponentiable in C . . ∆ i � B i × B i ( i = 0 , 1) are Corollary Suppose the diagonals B i exponentiable in a cartesian closed category C . Then s π 1 � B is exponentiable, for all G I × B G � B in Gpd ( C ). . B I s π 1 � B is exponentiable in Gpd ( Top M ), for I × B G Note So, B I ∆ i � B i ˆ M = K or E , if the diagonals B i × B i are locally closed.

  16. � � � � � � � The Pseudo-Slice 2-Category Gpd ( C ) / / B s π 1 � B ) is part of a 2-monad I × B G � B ) �→ ( B I The functor ( G on the 2-category Gpd ( C ) / B induced by the internal groupoid i s � B I × B B I c � B I B I I B I B I B I B I I I I I I B B e t and the 2-Kleisli category is the pseudo-slice Gpd ( C ) / / B whose � B , morphisms are triangles objects are homomorphism q : G � ˆ ϕ, f � � B I f I × B H I × B H � H B I G G H G G ✹ ❂ ϕ � ❂ ✹ � ✡✡✡✡✡ � ✁✁✁✁✁ ❂ ✹ ❂ ✹ q ❂ r ✹ q or ❂ s π 1 B B B B � ( g , ψ ) are 2-cells θ : f � g such that and 2-cells θ : ( f , ϕ ) ϕ � ✂✂ q q ❁ ψ ❁ ❁ rf rf rg rg r θ

  17. Pseudo-Exponentiability in 2-Kleisli Categories An object Y is pseudo-exponentiable in a 2-category K if, for every Z , there is an object Z Y and natural equivalences K ( X × Y , Z ) ≃ K ( X , Z Y ) Theorem (N, 2007) Suppose that K is a 2-category with finite products and T , η, µ is a 2-monad on K such that η T ∼ = T η and � TX × TY is an isomorphism in K , for all X , Y . If T ( X × TY ) TY is 2-exponentiable in K , then T ( TZ TY ) � TZ TY is an equiv- alence and Y is pseudo-exponentiable in the Kleisli 2-category K T . . Remarks 1. |K T | = |K| , K T ( X , Y ) = K ( X , TY ), with composition via µ . 2. One can show that the 2-monad on Gpd ( C ) / B related to B I I satisfies the hypotheses of the theorem.

  18. Pseudo-Exponentiability in Gpd ( C ) / / B � B is pseudo-exponentiable in Gpd ( C ) / Corollary G / B , if the s π 1 � B are exponentiable in C . . I × B G components of B I Corollary Gpd ( C ) / / B is pseudo-cartesian closed, if the diagonals ∆ i � B i × B i are exponentiable in a cartesian closed category C . . B i Note So, Gpd ( Top M ) / / B is pseudo-cartesian closed, for ∆ i � B i ˆ M = K or E , if the diagonals B i × B i are locally closed. . Corollary If C is locally cartesian closed category, then Gpd ( C ) is pseudo-locally cartesian closed. . Note A proof that Gpd ( Sets ) is pseudo-locally cartesian closed appeared in a 2003 paper by Palmgren posted on the arxiv. .

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend