tools for synthesis of antennas and sensors
play

Tools for Synthesis of Antennas and Sensors Project of Technology - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Tools for Synthesis of Antennas and Sensors Project of Technology Agency of the Czech Republic Miloslav Capek & Project team 1 Department of Electromagnetic Field CTU in Prague, Czech Republic miloslav.capek@fel.cvut.cz Prague, Czech


  1. Tools for Synthesis of Antennas and Sensors Project of Technology Agency of the Czech Republic Miloslav ˇ Capek & Project team 1 Department of Electromagnetic Field CTU in Prague, Czech Republic miloslav.capek@fel.cvut.cz Prague, Czech Republic March 15, 2016 1 Results you will see in this presentation are collective work of the whole project team. ˇ Capek et al. Tools for Synthesis of Antennas and Sensors 1 / 70

  2. Motivation 1 Source Concept 2 What is the source concept? Selected applications of the source concept Characteristic mode decomposition 3 4 About the project Project infrastructure 5 6 AToM architecture AToM – Closer investigation AToM’s – Features Integration into Visual CEM (ESI Group) 7 Conclusions 8 ˇ Capek et al. Tools for Synthesis of Antennas and Sensors 2 / 70

  3. Motivation analysis Feeding Point Antenna characteristics  0 -5 s 11 [ dB] -10 -15 Q max = 7 -20 electric current f 0 Perfect Electric Conductor synthesis Antenna analysis × antenna synthesis. ˇ Capek et al. Tools for Synthesis of Antennas and Sensors 3 / 70

  4. Source Concept What is the source concept? Source Concept What is actually the Source Concept? It can be observed that . . . Perspective ◮ an antenna is topol- ogy and completely represented geometry by a source current, HPC, ◮ all parameters can be Modal de- algorithm compositions efficiency inferred from a source current, ◮ any proper int.-diff. Source Concept operator can be decomposed into modes Heuristic Integral and or can be inverted, or convex variational optimization methods ◮ spatial decomposition of current is possible. Sketch of main fields of the source concept. ˇ Capek et al. Tools for Synthesis of Antennas and Sensors 4 / 70

  5. Source Concept Selected applications of the source concept Source Concept Applications: Characteristic Modes ◮ characteristic modes (CMs) W W decomposition 2 J 1 J 2 X J = λ R J (1) • other useful decompositions Modes J 1 and J 2 are depicted. � J = α m J m (2) m M � J m , E � ◮ CMs are excellent for pattern synthesis � J = J m or feeding network synthesis 3 1 + λ m m =1 2 R. F. Harrington and J. R. Mautz. “Theory of Characteristic Modes for Conducting Bodies”. In: IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 19.5 (1971), pp. 622–628. doi : 10.1109/TAP.1971.1139999 3 R. F. Harrington and J. R. Mautz. “Pattern Synthesis for Loaded N-Port Scatterers”. In: IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 22.2 (1974), pp. 184–190. doi : 10.1109/TAP.1974.1140785 ˇ Capek et al. Tools for Synthesis of Antennas and Sensors 5 / 70

  6. Source Concept Selected applications of the source concept Source Concept Applications: Structural Decomposition ◮ similar to structural decomposition in W A W B mechanical engineering ◮ to decide what part of a radiator stores J ( r A ) J ( r B ) significant portion of energy / radiates well 4 Division of Ω into two parts. ◮ excellent for synthesis of reflect arrays 5 ◮ combination with CM: sub-structure K modes 6 � J = J k k =1 4 M. Capek et al. “The Measurable Q Factor and Observable Energies of Radiating Structures”. In: IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 62.1 (2014), pp. 311–318. doi : 10.1109/TAP.2013.2287519 5 J. Ethier. “Antenna Shape Synthesis Using Characteristic Mode Concepts”. PhD thesis. University of Ottawa, 2012 6 J. L. T. Ethier and D.A. McNamara. “Sub-structure characteristic mode concept for antenna shape synthesis”. In: Electronics Letters 48.9 (2012), pp. 471–472. issn : 0013-5194. doi : 10.1049/el.2012.0392 ˇ Capek et al. Tools for Synthesis of Antennas and Sensors 6 / 70

  7. Source Concept Selected applications of the source concept Source Concept Applications: Optimization W max ◮ both single- and multi-objective W 0 W final optimization can be utilized in order to W max obtain best antenna performance ◮ many objectives can be subjects of convex optimization 7 Optimization of antenna’s shape. • F ( J , J ) has to be positive single-objective optim.: semi-definite 8 { y j } = min { x i } F ( J ) • convex optimization does not result in specific design, only minimizes given multi-objective optim.: convex function { y j } = min { x i } {F j ( J ) } 7 M. Gustafsson and S. Nordebo. “Optimal antenna currents for Q, superdirectivity, and radiation patterns using convex optimization”. In: IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 61.3 (2013), pp. 1109–1118. doi : 10.1109/TAP.2012.2227656 8 S. Boyd and L. Vandenberghe. Convex Optimization . Cambridge University Press, 2004 ˇ Capek et al. Tools for Synthesis of Antennas and Sensors 7 / 70

  8. Source Concept Selected applications of the source concept Source Concept Applications: Advanced Post-processing VG 2A VG 2B ◮ any antenna parameter can be defined by functional containing current(s) VG 1 ◮ recently derived: • radiation efficiency without IBC 9 Feeding network synthesis. • measurable Q Z factor 10 β m,n = ℜ { α m α ∗ n } • energies for sub-wavelength radiators 11 ( ka < 1) where: • no matter if modal / structural / total α m = � J m , E � current is substituted 1 + λ m 9 M. Capek, J. Eichler, and P. Hazdra. “Evaluation of Radiation Efficiency from Characteristic Currents”. In: IET Microw. Antennas Propag. 9.1 (2015), pp. 10–15. doi : 10.1049/iet-map.2013.0473 10 M. Capek et al. “The Measurable Q Factor and Observable Energies of Radiating Structures”. In: IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 62.1 (2014), pp. 311–318. doi : 10.1109/TAP.2013.2287519 11 G. A. E. Vandenbosch. “Reactive Energies, Impedance, and Q Factor of Radiating Structures”. In: IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 58.4 (2010), pp. 1112–1127. doi : 10.1109/TAP.2010.2041166 ˇ Capek et al. Tools for Synthesis of Antennas and Sensors 8 / 70

  9. Source Concept Selected applications of the source concept Source Concept Applications: Fundamental Bounds and Optimal Currents ◮ optimal current can be found 12 A n J n = ξ n B J n (3) ◮ optimal (minimal / maximal) • quality factor Q • D/Q ratio • radiation efficiency η rad • antenna gain G • other parameters. . . ◮ additional constraint of current resonance can be enforced Optimal Q on a spherical shell. 2 X ′ I n = Q n RI n 12 M. Capek and L. Jelinek. “Optimal Composition of Modal Currents For Minimal Quality Factor Q”. . In: (2016). arXiv:1602.04808,L. Jelinek and M. Capek. “Optimal Currents on Arbitrarily Shaped Surfaces”. In: (2016). arXiv:1602.05520 ˇ Capek et al. Tools for Synthesis of Antennas and Sensors 9 / 70

  10. Source Concept Selected applications of the source concept Design of optimal antenna ◮ The source concept was recently utilized for so-called optimal antenna design. Source Concept • see e.g. recent papers by M. Cismasu and M. Gustafsson 13 or by J. Ethier and D. McNamara 14 Design of Op- AToM timal Antenna ◮ To this purpose, it is beneficial to have a fast prototyping environment with partially open-source code. Antenna Synthesis 13 M. Cismasu and M. Gustafsson. “Antenna Bandwidth Optimization With Single Freuquency Simulation”. In: IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 62.3 (2014), pp. 1304–1311 14 J. L. T. Ethier and D. A. McNamara. “Antenna Shape Synthesis without Prior Specification of the Feedpoint Locations”. In: IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 62.10 (2014), pp. 4919–4934. doi : 0.1109/TAP.2014.2344107 ˇ Capek et al. Tools for Synthesis of Antennas and Sensors 10 / 70

  11. Source Concept Selected applications of the source concept Design of optimal antenna ◮ The source concept was recently utilized for so-called optimal antenna design. Source Concept • see e.g. recent papers by M. Cismasu and M. Gustafsson 13 or by J. Ethier and D. McNamara 14 Design of Op- AToM timal Antenna ◮ To this purpose, it is beneficial to have a fast prototyping environment with partially open-source code. Antenna Synthesis The optimal antenna design leads at least to a partial antenna synthesis! 13 M. Cismasu and M. Gustafsson. “Antenna Bandwidth Optimization With Single Freuquency Simulation”. In: IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 62.3 (2014), pp. 1304–1311 14 J. L. T. Ethier and D. A. McNamara. “Antenna Shape Synthesis without Prior Specification of the Feedpoint Locations”. In: IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 62.10 (2014), pp. 4919–4934. doi : 0.1109/TAP.2014.2344107 ˇ Capek et al. Tools for Synthesis of Antennas and Sensors 10 / 70

  12. Characteristic mode decomposition Characteristic mode decomposition 1 Motivation 2 Source Concept What is the source concept? Selected applications of the source concept 3 Characteristic mode decomposition 4 About the project 5 Project infrastructure 6 AToM architecture AToM – Closer investigation AToM’s – Features 7 Integration into Visual CEM (ESI Group) 8 Conclusions ˇ Capek et al. Tools for Synthesis of Antennas and Sensors 11 / 70

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend