systems
play

Systems David Downing / Kenneth Green WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff / - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Nuclear Power Plant & Systems David Downing / Kenneth Green WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff / Sargent & Lundy TUESDAY, 6 OCTOBER 2015 The Brief To develop whole-of-life cost estimates for the development of nuclear power generation


  1. Nuclear Power Plant & Systems David Downing / Kenneth Green WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff / Sargent & Lundy TUESDAY, 6 OCTOBER 2015

  2. The Brief • To develop whole-of-life cost estimates for the development of nuclear power generation facilities in South Australia • Generation III or later • Commercially available by 2030 • Large-scale or small modular reactors • Infrastructure requirements: road; rail; water supply; electricity transmission • South Australian context • To develop business cases • Cost and revenue streams • Levelised cost of electricity • Required commercial returns • Developmental risk assessment • Requirements for project investment

  3. Evolutionary Generation III Designs • Net capacities 700 – 1,600MWe • General Electric-Hitachi ABWR • KEPCO APR-1400 • AREVA EPR • Enhanced CANDU 6 (EC6)

  4. Advanced Generation III+ Designs • Net capacities 1,100-1,600MWe • Westinghouse AP1000 • General Electric-Hitachi ESBWR • Advanced CANDU (ACR-1000)

  5. Small Modular Reactors • Net capacities - 50-200MWe per reactor • NuScale • SMART • SMR-160 • mPower

  6. The Brief - Modelling • To develop whole-of-life cost estimates for the development of nuclear power generation facilities in South Australia • Generation III or later • Commercially available by 2030 • Large-scale or small modular reactors • Infrastructure requirements: road; rail; water supply; electricity transmission • South Australian context

  7. Economic Modelling • Inputs • Economic assumptions • Capital cost • Operating costs • Technical assumptions • Schedules • Outputs • Levelised cost of electricity, LCOE • Levelised price of electricity, LPOE • Inputs to CGE modelling by others

  8. Economic Assumptions • Macro-economic assumptions • Escalation = 0.95% real (AETA, 2012) • Foreign exchange rates • AU$1.00 = US$0.73 (interim assumption) • Economic assumptions specific to NPP • Weighted average cost of capital, WACC • Assumed NPP business model • Revenue assumptions - wholesale electricity pricing • forecast using EY electricity market model • considers changes to mix of generation technologies • considers international and Australian climate change obligations

  9. Weighted Average Cost of Capital • Basis of estimation WACC Assumptions • Long term capital structure: Experience of recent energy/infrastructure Debt 50% financing in Australia Equity 50% • Review of recent international NPP financing Cost of equity • Not market-tested Risk free rate (Rf) 4.9% • Market risk premium (Rm-Rf) 6.0% Long-term revenue certainty required Asset beta (ß) 0.5 • Governmental support required (e.g.) Alpha factor (  ) 3.0% • Loan guarantees Cost of debt • Tariff guarantees Risk free rate 4.9% Swap margin 0.5% Margin above swap 2.5% • Real pre-tax WACC = 10.47% Other assumptions • Consistent with other nuclear power study real Tax rate 30% pre-tax WACC assumptions Franking credit utilisation 0.0% Inflation rate 2.5% • Imperial College study “Cost estimates for Weighted average cost of capital nuclear power in the UK” - 11% Nominal post-tax 9.27% • AREVA: liberalised markets would require 11% Nominal pre-tax 13.24% Real post-tax 6.60% Real pre-tax 10.47%

  10. Existing NPP Capital Cost Data • Westinghouse PWR AP1000 • Representative PWR design • Two US projects under construction • Vogtle in service June 2019 & June 2020 • VC Summer in service Sept 2019 & June 2020 • Headline cost information is available and reliable • Total project costs are publically reported • Contract and delay costs are reported separately • US construction costs more indicative of Australian costs than those of other projects (China, UAE, Korea)

  11. Existing NPP Capital Cost Data • BWR • Comparisons of historical BWR vs. PWR capital costs show no material differences • PHWR • Historical CANDU experience is higher cost than US LWRs • Reports of proposed Cernavodă EC6 cost > AP1000 • CANDU (EC6 or ACR-1000) costs estimated to be > AP1000

  12. SMR Cost Assumptions • SMR • No commercially available SMRs have yet been built • SMR developers projecting LW SMR technologies ~ US$5,000/kWe • Poorly defined scopes of supply and cost dates • Design and regulatory/licensing processes underway • SMART estimates US$9,000-US$10,000/kWe • UK Small Modular Reactors Feasibility Study, 2014 • Estimates between US$6,400-US$8,900/kWe • Costs need to compete with large-scale reactors • Cost projections are expected to be slightly greater than PWR

  13. Assumptions – NPP Capital Cost • NPP Capital Costs • PWR/BWR – based on Vogtle/Summer costs with adjustments • HWR – higher than PWR/BWR – historical CANDU experience • SMRs – slightly higher to be competitive with PWR/BWR • Sensitivity to lower and higher costs to be studied Large Small Large Small PWR BWR PHWR PHWR SMR SMR AU$m 200 Project Development US$m 150 Regulatory / US$m 67 Licensing US$/kW 5,700 6,300 6,000 6.600 Construction (to be distributed across categories) US$m 6,413 8,978 7,560 4,662 2,160 1,881 Mid-Life Refit US$m 0 1,450 0 (in years 29 & 30)

  14. Infrastructure Requirements • Generic “brownfield” and “greenfield” locations • Brownfield • Location supported by nearby existing infrastructure • Short local connections • Greenfield • No nearby existing infrastructure • 50km connection assets to existing infrastructure • Road, rail, water supply, electricity transmission

  15. Infrastructure – Road & Rail • Road & rail • Independent of capacity of nuclear power plant • Greenfield - 50km spur road/rail to NPP, connections/junctions to existing infrastructure, refurbishment of existing infrastructure • Brownfield - 1-2km spur to NPP, connections/junctions to existing infrastructure, Refurbishment of existing infrastructure • Road • Two-lane highway to SA/national standards • Rail • Single line access and 2km loop to SA/national standards Greenfield Brownfield Roads AU$m 42 4 Rail AU$m 112 6

  16. Infrastructure - Water • Large-scale plant (1,200 MW) • Cooling water • Once-through cooling - 200,000 tonnes/hour (4,800 megalitres/day) • Cooling tower make-up - 8,600 tonnes/hour (206 megalitres/day) • Steam cycle make-up – 60 tonnes/hour (1.4 megalitres/day) • Small modular reactor (300 MW) • Cooling • Once-through cooling - 50,000 tonnes/hour (1,200 megalitres/day) • Cooling tower make-up - 2,150 tonnes/hour (52 megalitres/day) • Steam cycle make-up – 15 tonnes/hour (0.4 megalitres/day) • Low-volume raw water requirements: • Service water • Potable water

  17. Infrastructure - Water • Greenfield • Intake structure and pumping station • 50km pipeline to NPP • Brownfield • 2km spur connection to existing raw water supply infrastructure • All water treatment plant included in cost of NPP Large Small Large Small PWR BWR PHWR PHWR SMR SMR Greenfield AU$m 146 144 Once-through system included in NPP capital cost Brownfield AU$m 10 10

  18. Electricity Transmission • Electranet information • Network 2035 Vision • Transmission Annual Planning Report • AEMO building block costs • 100 Per Cent Renewables Study - Electricity Transmission Cost Assumptions, 2012 • Small Modular Reactors (~300 MW total) • Greenfield – 50km 275kV line & substations • Brownfield – 275kV substation • Large-scale reactors • Greenfield – 50km 500kV line & substations • Brownfield – 500kV substation Large Small Large Small PWR BWR PHWR PHWR SMR SMR Greenfield AU$m 344 344 344 265 92 92 Brownfield AU$m 167 167 167 112 22 22

  19. Electricity Transmission – additional costs • 500kV AC • New 800km backbone including series compensation • Building block costs for 1600MW, 1200MW, 700MW lines & substations • 275kV AC • Building block costs for 400MW lines & substations • 500kV/275kV substations • Building block costs for 1600MW, 1200MW, 700MW substations • HVDC • Building block costs for 1600MW, 1200MW, 700MW, 400MW HVDC links including bipolar lines & converter stations

  20. Operating Costs – Fixed O&M • Fixed O&M as $/MW net/yr • US Nuclear Energy Institute reference data • US¢/kWhe – adjusted to S/MW/yr • Mix of onshore and offshore costs • Insurance as $/MW net/annum • Historically 2.5%-3% of capex per annum • Decommissioning • Funding of decommissioning reserve account as fixed O&M cost Large Small Large Small PWR BWR PHWR PHWR SMR SMR US$m/yr 29 41 31 19 9 7 Fixed O&M AU$m/yr 158 221 168 104 50 40 Insurance US$m/yr 19 27 23 14 6 6 Decomm’g US$m 500 575 500 500 250 250 fund target

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend